Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,600/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $270K/room 2%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $472K/room 18%CPW $355K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,313/sf 24%Greenwich Village $2,455/sf 10%
Full index →
Cooperative · 1856
419 West 22nd Street
419 West 22nd Street, New York, NY 10011
Buildings·Chelsea·Cooperative

419 West 22nd Street

419 West 22nd Street, New York, NY 10011

Chelsea

BBL 1007200038 · BIN 1012692

CorridorChelsea
At a glance
Year built
1856
Type
Cooperative
Units
4
Landmark
No

Four apartments in a single Anglo-Italianate house built in 1856, on the north side of one of the best-preserved blocks in Chelsea. That is the entire building, and the honest version of this page is a short one.

What distinguishes it from its immediate neighbors is that it is genuinely a single house. This stretch of West 22nd Street holds three row-house cooperatives within a few doors of one another, and the other two are both pairs: 429 West 22nd carries two 1855 houses built on speculation by Morgan Pindar on one merged tax lot, and 461 West 22nd is likewise two 1854 houses on a single lot. Each of those cooperatives owns and maintains two roofs, two façades, two stoops and two sets of party walls, and splits the cost across eight or so shareholders. 419 owns one of everything and splits it across four. The per-shareholder exposure to a single capital event is therefore higher here than next door, and it is the first thing to understand about the building's finances.

LPC's building database also leaves this house's authorship blank where it names the builder of the pair down the street. That is a real difference in the record, not an oversight worth papering over: 429's Morgan Pindar attribution is documented, and 419's builder is not. The house is a year younger than the Pindar pair and two years younger than 461, which places it at the tail of the same speculative wave that filled in this block as the Chelsea grid pushed west of Ninth Avenue in the mid-1850s.

The third thing that matters is scale in the other direction. Sixteen and two-thirds feet of frontage on a lot nearly a hundred feet deep, with the house running about sixty-five feet back, leaves roughly thirty-four feet of rear yard — real garden depth for a Chelsea row house, and the reason the parlor and garden apartments in buildings of this type command what they do. Four apartments over about 4,284 square feet averages a little over a thousand square feet apiece, which in a four-story-plus-basement house means floor-through or near-floor-through living with windows front and back and no interior corridor.

Landmark designation has protected all of this since February 1981, when the Chelsea Historic District Extension was designated. That protection is the reason the block still looks the way it does and it is also a permanent operating cost: window replacement, stoop and ironwork repair, repointing and cornice work all require a Landmarks permit, and at four shareholders those approvals arrive on a small denominator.

Architecture and unit composition

An 1856 Anglo-Italianate row house on a narrow lot: four stories over a raised basement, a stoop to the parlor floor, and the shallow-arched openings and bracketed detail that distinguish the Anglo-Italianate from the full Italianate brownstones that followed a decade later. The Department of Finance records the building at 4.75 stories, its shorthand for four full floors plus a partial level below.

Four apartments across roughly 4,284 square feet puts the units at a little over a thousand square feet each, which on a sixteen-and-two-thirds-foot frontage means each apartment runs the full depth of the house — light and air front and rear, no interior corridor, and the deep rear yard behind. A house of this configuration typically produces a garden-level residence with direct yard access and floor-throughs above; the record does not identify which apartment is which, and floor plans should be obtained rather than assumed. Listing records confirm that washer-dryers are permitted in the apartments, which in a four-story walk-up with no basement laundry is not a small point.

Buyers should expect condition to vary widely and to matter more than in a larger building. In a four-unit cooperative there are no comparable sales inside the building to anchor a price, and the spread between a renovated floor-through and an unrenovated one is the dominant variable.

Building operations

There is no elevator, no doorman and no documented staff. Department of Buildings filings over the past decade read as ordinary maintenance of a small landmark house rather than as a capital program: a new gas meter and a boiler with tankless coil in 2014; interior renovation with the construction of a porch in 2016; a pipe scaffold and a heavy-duty sidewalk shed in March 2017 for remedial inspection and repairs; façade repairs at the north elevation filed in November 2017 by a preservation-specialist architect; and an interior renovation with exterior window work in 2020. That is a building that has attended to its envelope in the recent past, which is the right thing to have found.

Because no financial statements for this cooperative are on file with us, we make no representation about reserves, the underlying mortgage, assessments or capital planning. In a four-shareholder building those documents are the transaction.

Policy framework

Nothing is published, and nothing is on file. No offering plan, proprietary lease, house rules or financial statements for 419 West 22nd Street exist in either the Compass Offering Plan Library or The Roebling Research Library, and the cooperative maintains no management-sourced policy record of the kind larger buildings post. That is entirely normal for a four-unit house and it is not a defect. It does mean that every term a buyer needs must be obtained in writing from the managing agent, and none of it should be inferred from the neighbors.

Specifically, all of the following are undocumented and must be asked: the maximum permitted financing and minimum down payment; the post-closing liquidity requirement; whether there is a flip tax and how it is calculated; whether subletting is permitted and on what seasoning, term and fee; whether pied-à-terre use is allowed; whether purchase or ownership by an LLC or other entity is permitted; and what the board package and interview process actually consists of. In a four-apartment cooperative these terms are frequently set informally, and they change with the composition of a board that is, by definition, most of the building.

One item is documented, and it is worth having. A revocable trust took title on a recorded share transfer in 2022, which establishes that trust ownership has been accepted here at least once. That is meaningful for buyers whose estate planning requires it, and it is more than can be said for most small cooperatives — but a single precedent is not a policy, and it should still be confirmed.

Approvals now run on a statutory clock. New York City's 2026 cooperative application law requires a cooperative to acknowledge a completed board application in writing within fifteen days and to render a decision within forty-five days of that acknowledgment. Small self-administered boards are the ones most likely to drift past an informal timeline; the law applies to them regardless of size.

Local Law 97

Compliance status
Not subject to Local Law 97

This building is below the 25,000 sq ft threshold at which LL97 emissions caps apply. No regulatory capital pressure from this law specifically, current or 2030.

See full Local Law 97 analysis →

Recent sales

This is Chelsea row-house cooperative product: pre-Civil War houses, no services, no elevator, deep rear yards, and a landmark block. It prices against the other small houses on West 22nd and West 20th rather than against the elevator cooperatives on Ninth Avenue or the West Chelsea condominiums a few blocks west, and the pricing driver is condition and floor — a renovated parlor or garden floor-through with yard access sits at the top of the range, and an unrenovated upper floor in a walk-up sits at the bottom. Indexed to the last complete year, the Chelsea historic-district row-house market has been steady rather than dramatic, rewarding scarcity and block quality while discounting walk-up upper floors more sharply than it did before 2020.

Five recorded share transfers in eighteen years is the other fact that shapes the market here. Turnover this thin means there is almost never a comparable sale inside the building, and a buyer or seller is pricing off four or five houses on adjacent lots. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.

Recent transfers at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Jul 1, 20254
3 BR · 2 BA · 2,176 sf
$2,295,000$1,055/sf-8.2%
Jun 16, 20222
1 BR · 1 BA
$1,350,000+4.2%
Jun 23, 20211
3 BR · 2.5 BA
$3,710,000-2.2%
Sep 30, 20151
3 BR · 2,000 sf
$2,862,500$1,431/sf-3.0%
Mar 9, 20073
2 BR · 1,000 sf
$874,000$874/sf-5.0%

Market read. Most recent trades (2025) cleared a median $1,055/sf across 1 sale. Median listing discount 3.0% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

1+30%
$2,862,500 ($1,431/sf) 2015$3,710,000 2021

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-00720-0038) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.

What to know if you’re buying

Get the documents before you get attached. No offering plan, proprietary lease, house rules or financials for this building are in circulation. Financing ceiling, post-closing liquidity, flip tax, sublet policy, pied-à-terre rules and entity ownership are all unknown until the managing agent puts them in writing. Ask for all of them in one request, in writing, before you make an offer.

Underwrite the denominator. Four shareholders own one roof, one façade, one boiler and one landmark-regulated envelope. A Landmarks-compliant window or cornice project that would be a rounding error in a hundred-unit building is a materially sized assessment here. Ask for the last three years of financial statements, the reserve balance, and any assessment history — and ask what the board's plan is for the next façade cycle.

The 2017 façade work is a good sign — verify how far it went. A pipe scaffold, a heavy-duty sidewalk shed and a north-elevation repair filed by a preservation architect suggests the envelope was addressed within the past decade. Confirm the scope, the sign-off and what was deferred.

Confirm the conversion year and get the plan if it exists. Listing records say 1977; PLUTO logs 1979. The offering plan settles it and also settles the share allocation, which is how your maintenance is calculated.

Trusts have been permitted once; entities are unknown. If your purchase structure requires a trust or an LLC, raise it before you spend money on diligence rather than after.

Run the qualification math for a small board. Four-shareholder boards apply their own standards and are not bound by market convention on financing or liquidity. Run the Co-op Board Qualification Calculator before offering, and assume the requirement is conservative until you are told otherwise.

What to know if you’re selling

Assemble the paper first. Because nothing about this building circulates publicly, the seller who arrives with the proprietary lease, current financial statements, the share allocation and a written statement of the flip tax and sublet policy removes the buyer's largest source of hesitation. Sellers who cannot produce those documents lose weeks and, usually, price.

Sell the block and the house, precisely. One 1856 Anglo-Italianate house on its own lot, in the Chelsea Historic District Extension, with roughly thirty-four feet of rear yard. Distinguish it from the paired houses down the street — the single-house structure is a real difference and buyers who have looked at the block will not have been told about it.

Be explicit about the tax position. No J-51, no 421-a, full assessment. There is no benefit to lose and no phase-out to explain, which is a clean answer that many Chelsea conversions cannot give.

Price against condition and floor, not against averages. With five recorded transfers since 2007 there is no internal comparable set. Run the Renovation Cost Calculator against the likely buyer's scope and set the ask from that math, remembering that Landmarks review governs anything visible from the street.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 419 West 22nd Street, also evaluate:

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across Chelsea — read The Roebling Team Guide to Chelsea.

Preparing a board package for this building?

The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent.

Considering a move at 419 West 22nd Street?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at 419 West 22nd Street would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.