Cooperative · 1963
Tracy Towers
421 Second Avenue, New York, NY 10010
Buildings·Gramercy·Cooperative

421 Second Avenue (Tracy Towers)

421 Second Avenue, New York, NY 10010

CorridorGramercy
At a glance
Year built
1963
Type
Cooperative
Units
162
Floors
16
Landmark
No
Pets
Permitted with board approval
Subletting
Permitted after two years of owner-occupancy, subject to board approval
Pied-à-terre
Allowed
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2004–2026

Bedroom-by-bedroom medians, the full transfer record, and how units trade against ask.

Studio median
$520K
Recent range
$500K – $763K
Listing discount
5.3%
Recorded transfers
58

421 Second Avenue — marketed as Tracy Towers — is one of the defining postwar cooperatives of the Kips Bay stretch of the Gramercy corridor. Completed in 1963 by architect Lawrence Rothman, the sixteen-story white-brick tower occupies a full Second Avenue blockfront and carries a set of alternate addresses (421, 423, 425, and 427 Second Avenue, plus 243 and 245 East 24th Street) that reflect its scale along the avenue. Where the surrounding blocks mix prewar walk-ups, rental product, and a scattering of newer glass, Tracy Towers reads as a purpose-built cooperative: a doorman building with a live-in manager, a full amenity package, and a shareholder base that has held the building as an owner-occupied community for six decades.

The building's significance is practical rather than architectural. It is a large, well-run, mid-century co-op that supplies exactly the inventory the eastern Gramercy and Kips Bay market has always been short on — studios and one-bedrooms with real doorman service, real amenities, and a maintenance structure that keeps monthly carry within reach of first-time buyers, pied-à-terre purchasers, and downsizers. In a corridor anchored at the top by the 1883 cooperative pedigree of 34 Gramercy Park East, Tracy Towers plays the opposite and equally important role: accessible, liquid, entry-point ownership.

It is a genuine cooperative — Tracy Tenants Corp — not a Mitchell-Lama, HDFC, or restricted-income project, and not a rental. Shareholders own their apartments outright and resell them on the open market through a standard board-approval process. That distinction matters, because much of the postwar white-brick stock nearby carries restrictions that Tracy Towers does not.

Architecture and unit composition

The 162 cooperative apartments are distributed across sixteen floors, with a unit mix weighted toward studios and one-bedrooms and a smaller complement of larger layouts, including penthouse apartments at the top of the tower. Rothman's plan is efficient rather than grand: functional room proportions, generous window lines for the era, and a compact core that supports the building's high unit count.

The mid-century white-brick facade is the corridor's period vernacular — the same postwar apartment-house language found across Second and Third Avenues in Kips Bay and lower Gramercy. Higher floors benefit from open exposures and skyline views; the landscaped rooftop terrace captures Empire State Building and open-sky sight lines that are a genuine amenity for a building at this price point.

View permanence is reasonable for the location. The surrounding blocks are substantially built out with mid-rise and tower product, and the building's height relative to its immediate neighbors preserves light and air on the upper floors better than the lower ones. As with any co-op of this vintage, apartment condition varies widely — renovated units and original-condition units trade at meaningfully different prices per room.

Building operations

421 Second Avenue operates as a full-service cooperative with a 24-hour doorman, a live-in resident manager, central laundry, bike and private storage, on-site parking, and the broader amenity package noted above — rooftop terrace, fitness center, residents' lounge, and children's playroom. For a building of its size and era, the service level is strong.

Carrying cost is the story shareholders should understand first. As a co-op, the monthly maintenance charge bundles the building's underlying operating costs, property taxes, staff, and any underlying mortgage into a single figure, a portion of which is tax-deductible (the building's deductibility figure has historically run in the range of half of maintenance — confirm the current percentage during due diligence). Maintenance on a studio or one-bedroom has historically run in the low four figures per month, which is the building's core value proposition: full doorman service and amenities at a monthly carry well below comparable condominium alternatives.

Buyers should review the building's most recent financial statements, reserve levels, board minutes, and any assessment history during due diligence. The 1982 renovation and the age of the building mean capital planning — facade, elevators, mechanicals, and roof — is an ongoing reality; a healthy reserve and a disciplined board are what separate a well-run mid-century co-op from a problem one.

Recent sales

Sales at 421 Second Avenue are best understood in cooperative terms — priced per room and per unit rather than per square foot, and governed by maintenance, board approval, financing limits, and any transfer fee (flip tax) rather than by condo mechanics. The building trades as an accessible-entry co-op: recent studio (alcove and full) inventory has clustered roughly in the high-$400,000s to mid-$500,000s, with one-bedrooms reaching into the high-$500,000s. Those are entry-point Manhattan price points for a full-service doorman building, and they are the reason the building maintains steady turnover and a deep buyer pool.

Pricing within the building is driven by the co-op fundamentals: floor and view (upper-floor and skyline-facing units command a premium), renovation condition, room count and layout efficiency, and the relationship between asking price and monthly maintenance. Because the buyer pool is dominated by first-time purchasers, pied-à-terre buyers, and downsizers — many of them financing to the building's permitted maximum — maintenance level and financing policy weigh heavily on what a given apartment will actually clear at.

Recent transfers at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Apartment-level facts are independently verified before publishing; sale prices reflect the recorded transfer amount at the NYC Department of Finance.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Apr 29, 20262C
5 BR · 1 BA · 520 sf
$670,000$1,288/sf-6.9%
Aug 6, 202514C
5 BR · 1 BA
$515,000-4.5%
Jan 28, 20255E
1 BA · 517 sf
$515,000$996/sfoff-mkt
Nov 1, 20249C
1 BA
$535,000-2.6%
Jul 8, 20248K
5 BR · 1 BA
$500,000-5.7%
May 15, 20249G
2 BR · 1 BA
$762,500-2.1%
Feb 8, 20242C
1 BA · 550 sf
$660,000$1,200/sf-5.6%
Jan 25, 20243G
2 BR · 1 BA · 800 sf
$680,000$850/sf-9.2%

Market read. Most recent trades (2026) cleared a median $1,291/sf across 1 sale. Median listing discount 2.9% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

6G · 850 sf+46%
$525,000 ($618/sf) 2004$765,000 ($900/sf) 2014
2G · 870 sf+37%
$565,000 ($665/sf) 2011$775,000 ($891/sf) 2022
5D · 700 sf+34%
$505,000 ($721/sf) 2012$675,000 ($964/sf) 2023
11D · 700 sf+17%
$545,000 2008$632,500 ($843/sf) 2015$640,000 ($914/sf) 2021
2A+16%
$620,000 2018$720,000 2022

Other recent transfers

DateUnitPrice
Apr 25, 202217A$565,000
Mar 21, 201814K$550,000
Dec 20, 201715H$549,000
Jan 31, 20132EF$725,000
View all 58 recorded transfers, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-00905-0026) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.

What to know if you’re buying

This is a true cooperative — plan for the board process. An accepted offer begins a full board-package application: financial disclosure, references, and a board interview. Underwriting focuses on whether a purchaser can comfortably carry and maintain the apartment. Guarantors, co-purchasing, and parents purchasing for children are permitted with board approval — flexibility that widens the buyer pool relative to stricter Gramercy co-ops.

Model the maintenance, not just the price. In a co-op, monthly maintenance — not price per square foot — is the number that governs affordability and resale. A portion is tax-deductible; confirm the current deductibility percentage, the maintenance level, and any recent or pending assessment during due diligence.

Understand the financing and down-payment limits. The building permits financing to a defined maximum, with a minimum down payment in the range typical of mid-market Manhattan co-ops (historically around 25% — confirm the current requirement). Buyers financing to the maximum should confirm both the building's ceiling and their lender's co-op approval before signing.

Confirm the flip tax and closing math. The cooperative carries a transfer fee (flip tax); the structure and who pays it affect both buyer and seller math. Run your numbers through the Buyer Closing Cost Calculator, and note that a co-op purchase is not subject to title insurance the way a condo is, which changes the closing-cost profile.

Mansion tax rarely applies here. At the building's typical price points, purchases fall well below the $1,000,000 mansion-tax threshold — but if you are buying a larger or combined unit, run the price through the Mansion Tax Calculator to confirm.

Pied-à-terre and sublet flexibility is real but conditional. Pieds-à-terre are permitted with board approval, and subletting is allowed after two years of owner-occupancy subject to board sign-off. Investment-oriented buyers should confirm the current sublet policy and any sublet fees in writing before relying on rental income.

What to know if you’re selling

Price to the room and to the maintenance. Buyers at this price point are comparing monthly carry as much as sticker price. Positioning your apartment against the building's studio and one-bedroom comps — adjusted for floor, view, condition, and maintenance — is what drives a clean sale.

Condition sells the premium. Renovated, turn-key apartments clear at a clear premium over original-condition units. If your apartment is renovated, the marketing should make that the headline; if it is original, price should reflect the buyer's renovation budget.

Prepare the buyer for the board. The deepest buyer pool for this building is first-time purchasers who may not know the co-op process. A well-prepared board package and realistic expectation-setting on the interview timeline reduce fall-through risk.

Closing timelines run on co-op time. Board application, review, and interview add weeks that a condo sale does not carry. Build that into your timeline and your buyer's expectations from the start.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 421 Second Avenue, also evaluate:

The Roebling Team at Tracy Towers

The Roebling Team at Compass specializes in the Gramercy corridor and the broader Park-facing and eastside Manhattan co-op market. We publish this building profile because cooperative buyers and sellers deserve building-specific intelligence — board policy, maintenance reality, transactional mechanics, and the realities of pricing per room at the apartment level — not generic market commentary.

If you're considering a purchase or sale at 421 Second Avenue, a 30-minute consultation is the right starting point. We'll bring the full context this page provides plus the transactional specifics your situation requires — board-package strategy, financing and maintenance analysis, comparable analysis at the apartment level, and the pacing strategy that fits your timeline.

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across Gramercy — read The Roebling Team Guide to Gramercy.

Considering a move at Tracy Towers?

Get the full picture on this building.

The full comp set, a private valuation of your line, or current and off-market availability — sent to you directly.

Or schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com