Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,600/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $270K/room 2%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $472K/room 18%CPW $355K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,313/sf 24%Flatiron $1,769/sf 3%
Full index →
Condominium · 2006
Schaefer Landing North
440 Kent Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11249
Buildings·Condominium

Schaefer Landing North (440 Kent Avenue)

440 Kent Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11249

Williamsburg, Brooklyn

BBL 3021347503 · BIN 3387992

At a glance
Year built
2006
Type
Condominium
Units
134
Floors
24
Landmark
No
Pets
Pets have historically been accommodated; confirm current house rules with management at application
Board & building profile
Financing
Standard condominium; no financing contingency at initial offering
Subletting
Permitted (standard condo); right of first refusal rather than board approval; current house-rule minimum lease term not verified
Pied-à-terre
Permitted (condo)
Washer / dryer
Present or roughed in across most lines; specification varied — not verified unit by unit

Compiled by The Roebling Research Desk from the building’s offering plan, amendments, and related building documents (primary source dated 2006-08-15). Reported and subject to confirmation. Board policies can change by amendment — confirm at the offer stage.

The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2006–2026

Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.

Median $/sf
$1,014
Listing discount
0.0%
Recorded sales
289
On record
2006–2026
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at Schaefer Landing North would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.

Schaefer Landing was the first thing built on the South Williamsburg waterfront after the F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Company left it. Schaefer brewed on Kent Avenue for generations and shut the plant in 1976; the site then sat abandoned in City ownership for a quarter century, derelict riverfront directly across from the Lower East Side. Kent Waterfront Associates — a partnership of BFC Partners, L+M Equity Participants and Allstate Realty Associates — bought it at the end of 2001 for a reported $9 million, under an agreement that a substantial share of the housing built there would be permanently affordable. Construction ran from September 2003 to July 2006.

The project is worth understanding as a whole rather than as one address. Three buildings went up: the 24-story North tower at 440 Kent Avenue, the shorter South building at 446 Kent Avenue, and a 140-unit affordable rental building financed with the largest nine-percent Low-Income Housing Tax Credit allocation the State housing agency had made to that point. Contemporary coverage described the result as the largest project in the country combining deep-subsidy rental housing with market-rate condominiums on one site. That structure is why the building exists at all, and why the site carries a governance layer most Brooklyn condominiums do not.

Schaefer Landing also arrived four years before the neighborhood around it. When 440 Kent Avenue opened in 2006, the 2005 Greenpoint-Williamsburg rezoning — which converted roughly 175 blocks of East River waterfront from manufacturing to residential and mixed use, and which produced nearly every tower now standing north of the Williamsburg Bridge — had only just been adopted, and nothing had yet been built under it. Schaefer Landing had been assembled and approved on its own track, on a City-owned parcel, with its own affordability deal. It is the pre-rezoning building on a post-rezoning waterfront, and it still reads that way: lower, plainer, further south, and priced accordingly.

The development also had to solve a transit problem. The Southside blocks below the bridge are a long walk from the Bedford Avenue L and a moderate one from Marcy Avenue on the J, M and Z. The sponsor's answer was to build a landing at the shore, subsidize New York Water Taxi service from it — the first year underwritten by the developer, with a free annual commuter pass to every original unit owner — and run a contracted rush-hour van shuttle to both subway stations. The van service lapsed. The landing did not: scheduled East River ferry service later made Schaefer Landing a regular stop, and the seven-minute run to Lower Manhattan the sponsor advertised in 2006 is now an ordinary part of how residents commute. Confirm current NYC Ferry routing for any specific transaction. What remains is a full-service, doorman-attended, garage-and-courtyard condominium with genuine river frontage and Manhattan views, at a basis meaningfully below the Northside towers, in a location that trades convenience for quiet.

Architecture and unit composition

Gene Kaufman's design is a slab set perpendicular to the river, the right move for a site whose whole value is the water: it maximizes the number of apartments with direct East River and Manhattan exposure rather than distributing views around a bulky footprint. The tower sits on a podium containing the garage and the amenity floor, and the podium wraps a private landscaped courtyard shared with the rest of the Schaefer Landing site. The public esplanade — built by the development and maintained through the site associations — runs along the shore in front of it.

The unit plan is unusually legible for a building of this size, because Kaufman used a small number of repeating lines. The offering plan's Schedule A shows typical interior areas clustering at roughly 860, 1,175, 1,222, 1,246, 1,270 and 1,460 square feet across the tower floors, a band of larger 1,780- to 1,850-square-foot apartments below the penthouse levels, and penthouses running from roughly 1,690 to 1,995 square feet. The 860-square-foot line is the one-bedroom product; the 1,222 to 1,460 range covers two-bedroom configurations; three-bedroom layouts sit at the top of the stack. That consistency is why pricing here can be anchored tightly.

Interior specification is 2006 waterfront-condominium standard at a generous scale: nine- to ten-foot ceilings, floor-to-ceiling glass on the river elevations, hardwood or bamboo flooring, granite counters, and private terraces or balconies on a meaningful share of the stack. Twenty years on, renovated apartments read very differently from original ones, and that spread is a major source of price dispersion here. The amended Schedule A filed in August 2006 carried an aggregate offering of roughly $134.8 million — 860-square-foot units from about $485,000 to $720,000, the 1,270-square-foot line from about $765,000 to $1,280,000 depending on floor, penthouses from about $1,690,000 to $2,050,000 — and the sponsor declared the plan effective that month with purchase agreements on 105 of 134 units, fast absorption for a South Williamsburg waterfront building at that date.

Building operations

Schaefer Landing North runs as a staffed condominium: an attended lobby, a resident manager, and a concierge complement covering the building around the clock. The amenity program is split between the building and the shared site — fitness center, lounge, library, business center, playroom and roof deck belong to the residential program, while the courtyard, the driveway and gatehouse, and the waterfront landing are site elements.

That site structure is the operational feature buyers most often miss. Every unit's common charge carries an embedded assessment to two homeowners associations: The Schaefer Landing Homeowners Association, Inc., handling the immediate shared elements, and The Kent Waterfront Homeowners Association, Inc., handling the wider site including the gated common driveway off Kent Avenue and the waterfront landing. A recorded reciprocal easement and operation agreement dated February 2006 governs the shared driveway with the adjoining development parcel to the north, allocating maintenance costs and security staffing between the parties. None of this is unusual for a master-planned waterfront site, but it means the true monthly is the condominium charge plus two association assessments, and that some decisions about the grounds are not the condominium board's alone.

Two further notes belong in a diligence file. Recent operating budgets held in The Roebling Research Library show the condominium funding a capital assessment to retire a construction loan and complete an elevator capital project — normal work for a twenty-year-old tower, but a line item any buyer should price. And the building carries a bulk cable and internet arrangement billed through common charges, which should be netted out when comparing monthlies against buildings without one.

Policy framework

Pets: Historically accommodated. Confirm current restrictions with management at application.

Pied-à-terre, LLC purchases, trusts and foreign buyers: Permitted (standard NYC condominium).

Subletting: Permitted under standard condominium rules; the board's remedy is a right of first refusal rather than purchaser approval. Confirm any minimum lease term in the current house rules.

Financing: Standard condominium underwriting. Because part of the site is affordable rental housing under separate ownership and financing, some lenders ask additional questions about project composition; a lender familiar with the building shortens that conversation.

Flip tax / transfer fee: Not documented in the plan materials reviewed for this profile. Confirm with the managing agent before pricing a sale.

Property taxes: 421-a benefits were projected in the offering plan and produced nominal first-year unit taxes. Twenty years past completion, assume the benefit is substantially or wholly phased out and underwrite from the current bill.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟢
Strong — under cap in both periods
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
Per unit / month range

Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
Safe
What this means for you

The latest available FISP filing classified the facade as Safe — no repairs were required at that inspection. Facade inspections run on a fixed five-year cycle; future inspection, repair, and any assessment decisions remain building-specific.

Inspection history
2010–15
SWARMP
2015–20
SWARMP
2020–25
Safe
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2027
Assessed · 2010–15 to 2020–25
$2,250 in filing penalties
payment status not in the record
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs required before the next inspection cycle.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Penalties shown are amounts DOB assessed against filings on record across 2010–15 to 2020–25. The FISP dataset does not record whether they were paid, contested or remain open, so treat the figure as history rather than a current balance and confirm the building’s standing with the managing agent.

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See the full facade history →

421-a Tax Abatement

421-a exemption · full taxation begins FY2033
Long runway
~7 years of abatement remaining
Last year of benefit
FY2032
Years remaining
~7 yrs
Program
421-a (25-year)
What this means for you

A long-dated tax benefit still in place — a meaningful carrying-cost advantage today. Note the eventual step-up toward full taxes when the abatement ends.

Source: NYC Dept. of Finance property-tax exemption records (421-a), refreshed 2026-09-06 · The Roebling Research Library. Confirm the exact step-up schedule on the building’s DOF tax bill. Years shown are NYC tax years, which start July 1 — FY2033 runs July 1, 2032 to June 30, 2033.

Recent sales

Recent closings at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Apr 1, 202620C
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,175 sf
$1,335,000$1,136/sf-2.5%
Mar 20, 202617A
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,270 sf
$1,600,000$1,260/sf-4.5%
Nov 13, 2025E19
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,300 sf
$1,455,000$1,119/sf-2.7%
Oct 28, 2025F18
1 BR · 1.5 BA · 860 sf
$970,000$1,128/sf-9.8%
Jun 16, 20252E
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,246 sf
$1,320,500$1,060/sf-0.3%
Apr 30, 20258B
3 BR · 2 BA · 1,460 sf
$2,020,000$1,384/sf-8.2%
Mar 21, 20254B
3 BR · 2 BA · 1,460 sf
$2,330,300$1,596/sf-6.6%
Jun 26, 20244D
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,222 sf
$1,390,000$1,137/sf-2.5%

Market read. Most recent trades (2026) cleared a median $1,014/sf across 2 sales. Median listing discount 0.0% from the last ask.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

1C · 1,175 sf+147%
$646,588 ($550/sf) 2006$1,595,000 ($1,357/sf) 2021
2D · 1,650 sf+140%
$875,695 ($531/sf) 2006$2,100,000 ($1,273/sf) 2024
10D · 1,222 sf+134%
$682,227 ($558/sf) 2006$1,595,000 ($1,305/sf) 2023
9C · 1,175 sf+127%
$595,000 ($506/sf) 2011$1,350,000 ($1,149/sf) 2024
PH3D · 1,849 sf+127%
$1,300,000 ($681/sf) 2006$1,920,000 ($1,005/sf) 2006$1,400,000 ($733/sf) 2012$2,949,000 ($1,595/sf) 2022
View all 289 recorded sales, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 3-02134-7503) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.

What to know if you’re buying

Model the taxes from the current bill, not the plan. The offering plan's 421-a projections show unit taxes in the double and low triple digits per year. That was 2006. Pull the Department of Finance bill for the exact unit and run True Monthly Carrying Cost against it.

Understand the two homeowners associations. Your monthly carries assessments to both site associations in addition to the condominium's own charge. Ask for the current budgets of all three.

The location trades convenience for river frontage. Marcy Avenue on the J, M and Z and Bedford Avenue on the L are both real walks. The ferry landing at the foot of the site is why many residents choose the building; verify current NYC Ferry routing and hours against your commute.

Line and condition drive value more than floor. With a small number of repeating lines and twenty years of divergent renovation histories, the right comparable is a recent sale in the same line and similar condition.

Ask about the capital cycle. A twenty-year-old tower is inside its elevator, façade and mechanical replacement window. Get the current reserve position, assessment history and Local Law 11 status before you sign.

What to know if you’re selling

Lead with the water and the square footage. The advantage over newer Northside inventory is direct river frontage and interior area per dollar. Photograph the view and the floor plan, in that order.

Disclose the tax position early. Buyers will pull the bill themselves. Presenting it up front, with carrying cost calculated, removes the most common source of late-stage renegotiation here.

Explain the site structure before it becomes an objection. The two homeowners associations and the shared esplanade read as complexity if a buyer finds them in the by-laws and as amenity if the listing explains them first.

Price against your line. Same-line comparables are unusually reliable in a building of repeating lines; building averages understate a renovated river-facing apartment and overstate an original-condition interior one.

Condominium mechanics are fast. Right of first refusal rather than board approval; 30 to 45 days is a normal closing pace.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering Schaefer Landing North, also evaluate:

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.

Considering a move at Schaefer Landing North?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com