Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,600/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $270K/room 2%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $472K/room 18%CPW $355K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,313/sf 24%Flatiron $1,769/sf 3%
Full index →
Condominium · 1916
The Gretsch, or The Gretsch Building
60 Broadway, Brooklyn, NY 11249
Buildings·Condominium

The Gretsch (60 Broadway)

60 Broadway, Brooklyn, NY 11249

Williamsburg, Brooklyn

BBL 3021307501 · BIN 3059506

At a glance
Year built
1916
Type
Condominium
Units
130
Floors
12
Landmark
No
Pets
Not documented in the plan materials reviewed here; confirm with management
Board & building profile
Flip tax
None documented in the plan; purchaser contributes two months' common charges to the Working Capital Fund at closing (offering plan)
Financing
Standard condominium; by-laws require first/second mortgages to be with an institutional lender, the sponsor, a family member, business associate, employer or selling unit owner (offering plan)
Subletting
Permitted (standard condo); current house-rule terms not verified
Pied-à-terre
Permitted (condo)
Washer / dryer
Hook-ups only in the original specification — sponsor provided connections, not machines (offering plan, Special Risk 16)

Compiled by The Roebling Research Desk from the building’s offering plan, amendments, and related building documents (primary source dated 2003-07-22). Reported and subject to confirmation. Board policies can change by amendment — confirm at the offer stage.

The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2005–2026

Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.

Median $/sf
$1,263
Listing discount
1.9%
Recorded sales
333
On record
2005–2026
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at The Gretsch, or The Gretsch Building would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.

The Gretsch is Williamsburg's real loft building. Almost everything else on the condominium map here was built new after the 2005 Greenpoint-Williamsburg rezoning — glass and brick towers on former manufacturing land, designed to look industrial. The Gretsch is the factory itself: ten stories of heavy masonry raised in 1916 for the Fred. Gretsch Manufacturing Company, with the company's name still carried at the parapet and two vintage Gretsch guitars displayed in the lobby.

The company behind it is one of the more consequential names in American music manufacturing. Friedrich Gretsch, an immigrant from Mannheim, opened a small instrument shop in Brooklyn in 1883; the business passed to his son and grew until, by 1916, it needed the ten-story plant at 60 Broadway — Gretsch Building No. 4, the largest of the family's Williamsburg facilities. Drums and guitars were made here for roughly fifty years. By the mid-1960s drum production was moved out to make room for the guitar lines, which the Beatles-era boom had pushed past what the floors could absorb. Gretsch sold to the Baldwin Piano Company in 1967, manufacturing left for Arkansas in 1969, and the family sold the building at the end of the 1990s.

The conversion that followed was early and consequential. Claridge Properties acquired the roughly 210,000-square-foot building in 2002 and, with Classon Realty and Lehman Brothers Real Estate Funds, put approximately $75 million into it. The offering plan was accepted for filing in July 2003, the converted building was delivered in 2004, and the result was — by the developer's own description and the general reckoning of the period — the first full-service, doorman-attended residential condominium in Williamsburg. It landed south of the bridge in a neighborhood still principally Hasidic and industrial, at a moment when the fight over what the waterfront would become was at its sharpest. The building was a lightning rod in that argument, and it drew the first significant cohort of Manhattan buyers across the river to South Williamsburg.

Karl Fischer's job was restraint plus addition. The factory's own structure — deep floor plates, pier-and-spandrel masonry, enormous window openings, the ceiling heights industrial machinery required — is the product. The conversion updated plumbing, heating and windows, inserted a double-height lobby with black granite, glass elevators and bookshelves flanking a fireplace by Andres Escobar & Associates, and added two contemporary penthouse floors above the original cornice line. Ceiling heights in the apartments run to twelve and thirteen feet.

In market terms that produces a building that does not price like the rest of Williamsburg. Volume, light and column-and-beam character are scarce here in a way they are not in DUMBO or Tribeca, and the Gretsch has effectively no local competition for them south of the bridge. The trade-off is the age of the conversion: systems, finish specification and amenity program are all 2003-vintage, and buyers cross-shopping newer waterfront product are weighing character against infrastructure.

Architecture and unit composition

The offering plan describes the work precisely: rehabilitate the existing ten-story building and construct two additional penthouse floors, producing a twelve-story building plus cellar containing 130 residential units, three commercial units and one storage unit. Residential floors begin at the second story — fifteen units on the second, nineteen on the third, sixteen each on the fourth and fifth, thirteen on the sixth, twelve each on the seventh through tenth, two on the eleventh and one on the twelfth.

The mix reflects loft ambition rather than a maximised count: 21 studios, 6 duplex loft-style apartments, 35 one-bedrooms, 5 one-bedrooms with a home office, 44 two-bedrooms, 8 two-bedrooms with a home office and 11 three-bedrooms. Apartments in the A, M, O and R lines and at the penthouse levels carry adjacent private balconies or roof terraces designated as limited common elements; the plan names them individually, so establishing whether a given apartment has deeded outdoor space is straightforward.

Interiors are the reason the building trades the way it does. Ceilings run twelve to thirteen feet across much of the inventory, with loft-scaled open living areas, oversized industrial window bays, free-standing fireplaces in a number of units, and — in the original specification — Sub-Zero, Wolf and Asko appliances with granite counters. Corner apartments look toward the Williamsburg Bridge and the Manhattan skyline. Twenty years of individual renovation has produced a wide condition spread, and where the underlying volume is the asset, the gap between a thoughtfully renovated loft and an untouched 2004 unit is substantial.

Two structural details belong in any diligence file. The plan discloses lot-line windows on certain apartments: if an adjoining owner builds, those windows must be sealed at the affected owner's expense, estimated at roughly $1,000 per window. Legal light and air come from the north and south facades, so sealing would not threaten the certificate of occupancy — but it would change an apartment. Separately, the sponsor reserved an adjoining parcel with the stated intention of subdividing it and building a five-story structure containing accessory parking, on which a limited number of spaces might be offered to Gretsch owners. The plan made no guarantee, and any representation about parking today should be verified.

Building operations

The Gretsch was built to operate as a full-service building, which in 2004 Williamsburg was itself the innovation. The superintendent's residence, Unit 2Q on the second floor, was sold to the Board of Managers on behalf of all residential owners — a structure that keeps a resident superintendent permanently housed in the building rather than dependent on a lease.

The common-element program in the plan is loft-appropriate rather than tower-appropriate: a library and media room at the ground and second floors, a residents' lounge across parts of the fifth and sixth floors, a raised garden terrace behind the building at ground level, and a common roof at the eleventh floor. The plan stated there were no parking facilities at the property and no recreation facilities beyond those listed. Later public descriptions refer to a health club and garage parking; those may reflect programming added after the sponsor period or arrangements on the adjoining parcel. Ask the managing agent what is actually in place before relying on it.

Two ownership-structure points matter on resale. The ground-floor and cellar commercial units were retained by the sponsor and not offered under the plan, with the right reserved to subdivide and re-let them, and the plan warned purchasers to expect higher pedestrian traffic and noise as a consequence — the retail neighbours below can change. And the sponsor reserved the unconditional right to rent rather than sell units, a standard-form special risk of the era; two decades of resale activity has resolved the practical question, but it is why the plan's cover language reads the way it does.

Policy framework

Pets: Not documented in the plan materials reviewed here. Confirm current house rules with management.

Pied-à-terre, LLC purchases, trusts and foreign buyers: Permitted (standard NYC condominium).

Subletting: Permitted under standard condominium rules; the board's remedy is a right of first refusal rather than purchaser approval.

Washer/dryer: Hook-ups were provided; machines were not. Most apartments now have them, but confirm at the unit.

Working capital: Two months' common charges due at closing per the offering plan.

Property taxes: J-51 exemption and abatement benefits, applied for under Administrative Code §11-243 with an anticipated start on or after July 1, 2005. The plan projected aggregate first-year residential taxes with J-51 of roughly $138,879 across the building. Assume the benefit is at or near exhaustion today and underwrite from the current bill.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟡
Moderate — under today's cap; material modeled 2030 exposure
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$26,474/yr
Per unit / month range
$0 – $17

Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
Safe
What this means for you

The latest available FISP filing classified the facade as Safe — no repairs were required at that inspection. Facade inspections run on a fixed five-year cycle; future inspection, repair, and any assessment decisions remain building-specific.

Inspection history
2005–10
SWARMP
2010–15
Safe
2015–20
Safe
2020–25
Safe
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2028
Assessed · 2005–10 to 2020–25
$10,150 in filing penalties
payment status not in the record
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs required before the next inspection cycle.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Penalties shown are amounts DOB assessed against filings on record across 2005–10 to 2020–25. The FISP dataset does not record whether they were paid, contested or remain open, so treat the figure as history rather than a current balance and confirm the building’s standing with the managing agent.

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

Recent closings at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Apr 6, 20264Q
1 BR · 1 BA · 1,059 sf
$1,245,000$1,176/sf-4.2%
Oct 8, 20256G
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,231 sf
$1,547,000$1,257/sf-3.3%
Jul 31, 20253H
1 BA · 668 sf
$895,000$1,340/sf+0.0%
May 15, 20256H
1 BR · 1.5 BA · 1,153 sf
$1,495,000$1,297/sf+0.0%
Apr 29, 20252K
1 BA · 682 sf
$840,000$1,232/sf-0.6%
Jan 7, 20253U
2 BR · 1.5 BA · 1,170 sf
$1,455,000$1,244/sf-2.7%
Oct 15, 20249J
3 BR · 2.5 BA · 1,691 sf
$2,840,000$1,679/sfoff-mkt
Oct 11, 20246L
605 sf
$830,000$1,372/sfoff-mkt

Market read. Most recent trades (2026) cleared a median $1,263/sf across 1 sale. Median listing discount 1.9% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

View all 333 recorded sales, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 3-02130-7501) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.

What to know if you’re buying

You are buying the building, not the finish. The twelve-to-thirteen-foot ceilings, the window bays and the floor plates are irreplaceable in this neighbourhood. Kitchens and baths can be redone. Price the volume and budget the renovation separately.

Get the tax program right. This is a J-51 building, not a 421-a building — a distinction that trips up buyers arriving from the waterfront towers. Pull the current tax bill for the unit and run True Monthly Carrying Cost against it.

Check the lot-line windows. The plan identifies apartments whose supplementary light comes from lot-line windows that must be sealed at the owner's cost if an adjoining site is developed. Ask whether your unit is affected.

Verify the amenities and parking that marketing describes. The plan provided a lounge, library, roof and garden, and expressly no parking on the property. Confirm anything beyond that with management.

Understand the retail below. The commercial units were sponsor-retained and can be subdivided and re-let. Lower-floor buyers should look at what is downstairs today and consider what could be there tomorrow.

What to know if you’re selling

Tell the factory story properly. Gretsch Building No. 4, 1916, half a century of drums and guitars, the name still on the parapet. It is genuine provenance and the most differentiating thing about the apartment.

Photograph the ceiling height and the windows. Buyers cross-shopping newer product will not otherwise register how different the volume is. Wide shots, natural light, and a floor plan showing the depth of the plate.

Be direct about the conversion's age. A 2003-vintage conversion has 2003-vintage systems and a modest amenity program. Sellers who acknowledge that and price to it transact faster.

Choose comparables by layout, not floor. Exposure, corner position and ceiling height matter more here than the number on the door.

Condominium mechanics are fast. Right of first refusal rather than board approval; 30 to 45 days is a normal closing pace.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering The Gretsch, also evaluate:

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.

Considering a move at The Gretsch, or The Gretsch Building?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com