- Year built
- 1872
- Type
- Condominium
- Units
- 5
- Floors
- 6
- Pets
- Not documented in public records — confirm the house rules with the managing agent
- Landmark status
- Not an individual landmark; in the SoHo-Cast Iron Historic District
- NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission records, updated February 2026
- Leasing by owners
- Permitted with conditions
- Washer/dryer
- Permitted
Every recorded sale at this building, 2003–2024
Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.
- Median $/sf, 2024
- $2,875
- 1 sale
- Listing discount
- 8.8%
- Recorded sales
- 8
- On record
- 2003–2024
Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.
A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at The Grand Mercer would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.
Alexander Roux ran one of the great American furniture houses of the mid-19th century, and in 1872 he put up a cast-iron store building on Mercer Street to house it. Joseph M. Dunn drew it; W. B. Pettit laid the masonry. The Landmarks Preservation Commission's own building database records all of that by tax lot, and the district designation that came a century later froze the elevation in place.
The conversion created five apartments. Three are full floors of roughly 4,000 square feet; two are penthouse floors with private roof terraces above them. The elevator opens into the residences. There is no lobby staff, no amenity program, and no shared corridor. For a certain buyer that is the entire proposition: a floor of a landmarked cast-iron building, entered directly from a lift, in a five-residence association whose actual operating and capital costs require review.
The historical budget is worth distinguishing from current costs. The offering plan's first-year budget for the entire building — residential and commercial common charges combined — came to well under six figures. That first-year projection does not establish current operating costs. The plan separately disclosed no reserve fund for major capital repairs or replacements; the budget alone does not explain that reserve policy. Three decades on, the reserve position and the capital plan are the first two documents any buyer here should ask for, because spreading a façade or roof project across five residences and one commercial unit — in the proportions the declaration sets — turns it into a large per-unit number very quickly.
The second thing to understand is the occupancy designation, and it is genuinely consequential.
Architecture and unit composition
The building sits on a lot roughly 50 feet wide and 100 feet deep, with a building footprint about 50 by 85 feet. That produces floor plates of approximately 4,000 square feet — a genuine full-floor loft rather than a subdivided one. Ceiling heights run high in the manner of a 19th-century store building, and the original cast-iron front carries the street elevation.
The residential stack is simple. Floors two, three and four are single full-floor lofts. PH-A occupies the fifth floor with roughly 1,000 square feet of private roof terrace; PH-B occupies the sixth with roughly 2,500 square feet. Both terrace allocations are limited common elements under the declaration. The commercial unit takes the ground floor and cellar at roughly 7,500 square feet and has been separately owned since 2017.
Because the building is Class III non-fireproof construction and sits in a designated historic district, two categories of work behave differently here than in a modern condominium. Exterior alterations, including non-visible work, and DOB-permitted interiors require LPC review, subject to specified maintenance exemptions; staff approval or a Certificate of Appropriateness depends on scope and LPC rules. Anything touching structure or egress runs into the code posture of a 19th-century timber-and-masonry building. Confirm the proposed work, approvals and schedule with the project professionals.
Building operations
47 Mercer Street operates as a small self-directed condominium with no attended lobby and no on-site staff. Department of Buildings records over the past two decades show the ordinary maintenance arc of a landmarked cast-iron building: cooling-tower replacement in 2010, masonry reconstruction in 2011, sidewalk shed and scaffolding filings in 2011 and 2014 tied to remedial façade work, and a steady run of unit-level interior alterations.
The building is six stories, which places it outside the Facade Inspection and Safety Program's coverage of buildings greater than six stories, and no FISP filings appear in city records. That does not mean the façade is unmonitored — the masonry and shed filings show otherwise — but it does mean the periodic reporting discipline that governs taller buildings does not apply here. In a landmarked cast-iron building, the exterior is the largest capital item on the horizon and it is not on a mandated clock.
Audited financial statements for the mid-2000s are on file in The Roebling Research Library. They are dated, and no substitute for the current year's audit, the current budget, and a direct conversation with the managing agent about reserves, any live or contemplated assessment, and the status of the exterior.
Joint Live-Work Quarters for Artists — what it means here
SoHo's residential population exists because of a zoning workaround. For decades the neighborhood's M1-5A and M1-5B manufacturing districts permitted residential occupancy only as Joint Live-Work Quarters for Artists — live-work space for occupants certified as artists under the Multiple Dwelling Law's Article 7-B framework. The apartments were legal; the occupancy was conditioned.
The offering plan for 47 Mercer Street, filed in the mid-1990s, is explicit: the five residential units were offered as "joint living-working quarters for artists," and occupancy of a residential unit was restricted to residential (living-working quarters for artists) or home-occupational use as permitted by law. Department of Buildings alteration applications filed in 2004 and 2005 for the second and third floors describe the work as "renovation of an existing JLWQ." The architect's report in the plan records the site as M1-5B. The designation is documented from three independent directions.
Two things have changed since. In December 2021 the city adopted the SoHo/NoHo rezoning, which replaced M1-5A and M1-5B with new districts — this lot is now M1-5/R7X inside the Special SoHo-NoHo Mixed Use District — and created a voluntary path to convert an existing conforming JLWQA use to unrestricted Use Group 2 residential use, coupled with a required contribution to an arts fund. That path was litigated. On January 13, 2026 the New York Court of Appeals reversed the Appellate Division in the challenge to the rezoning, clearing the way for JLWQA-to-residential conversions to proceed.
For a buyer at 47 Mercer Street the practical questions are narrow and answerable: what does the building's current Certificate of Occupancy say, has the condominium taken any step toward converting the residential units to unrestricted residential use, and what would the arts-fund contribution be if it did. None of that is resolvable from public records alone. Ask the managing agent and have counsel pull the C of O. Buyers who skip this step in SoHo are the ones who discover the constraint at the closing table.
Policy framework
Ownership form: Condominium. Purchases close through the Board of Managers' right of first refusal rather than a cooperative board approval.
Right of first refusal: The by-laws on file give the Board of Managers a right of first refusal with respect to the sale or lease of any unit other than a sponsor-owned unit. Extending the right to leases is broader than the market standard and matters to anyone buying with an eye to renting.
Occupancy: Subject to the JLWQA designation discussed above. Confirm the current Certificate of Occupancy before contract.
Pied-à-terre, LLC, trust and foreign ownership: Not documented in the records we hold; confirm each in the current declaration, bylaws and house rules, subject to the same occupancy question.
Working capital: Collected at closing at two months' common charges under the original plan.
Reserves: The offering plan stated that there was no reserve fund for major capital repairs or replacements. Whether the board has built one in the decades since is a question for the current audit.
Flip tax: Not documented in public records.
Real estate taxes: No J-51 or other exemption appears on the residential unit lots; check the unit's tax bill for any abatement.
Sublet and pied-à-terre policy
A condominium owner leasing a unit and a co-op shareholder subletting are different rules, and a building-wide rule is different from a restriction on one apartment. This is the building's rule; confirm it for the specific apartment.
- Leasing by owners
- Permitted with conditionsBoard approvalSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
- Pied-à-terre ownership
- Not verified
Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to discuss the sublet and pied-à-terre rules for that apartment.
Own an apartment here? Request an apartment-specific pricing review.
Pets and in-unit washer/dryer
- Pets
- Not verified
- In-unit washer/dryer
- PermittedSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to confirm the pet and washer/dryer rules for that apartment.
Local Law 97
- 2024–2029 annual penalty
- $0 (under cap)
- 2030–2034 annual penalty
- $25,184/yr
- Per unit / month range
- $0 – $420
- Modeled exposure split equally across 5 units (the residential count on the city's lot record). Not an assessed amount; condominium owners are typically charged by each unit's common-interest percentage.
Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.
See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →Recent sales
Evaluate the dated transfers for this five-residence building without inferring a neighborhood liquidity ranking from its unit count. The condominium was declared in 1997; the sponsor held several units for years afterward, and the full-floor lofts and the two penthouse floors have each changed hands only a small number of times since. Every recorded residential transfer since the declaration has been to a separate, unrelated purchaser — individuals, trusts and single-purpose entities — with no bulk transaction and no single owner controlling the building.
Pricing here is a per-square-foot conversation about full-floor cast-iron lofts, and the relevant comparable set is the small population of SoHo buildings that deliver an entire floor behind a landmarked front. New construction in the neighborhood, and subdivided conversions with corridors and multiple homes per floor, are different products with different buyers. The two penthouse floors carry private roof terraces of a size that is close to unrepeatable in the district, and they should be analyzed separately from the three full floors below. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.
Recent closings at this building, from The Roebling Research Library. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.
| Date | Unit | Apartment | Price | PPSF | vs. Ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2024 | 2 | 3 BR · 2.5 BA · 4,000 sf | $11,500,000 | $2,875/sf | -8.0% |
| Apr 26, 2023 | PH | 3 BR · 3 BA · 4,300 sf | $9,995,000 | $2,324/sf | -8.8% |
| Apr 16, 2021 | PHB | 6,500 sf | $8,500,000 | $1,308/sf | — |
| May 3, 2016 | 3 | 4 BR · 2 BA · 4,000 sf | $7,500,000 | $1,875/sf | -12.8% |
| Nov 25, 2008 | 2 | 3 BR · 4,000 sf | $6,000,000 | $1,500/sf | -20.0% |
| Jun 3, 2008 | 3 | 4 BR · 4,000 sf | $6,350,000 | $1,588/sf | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | 4 | 4,000 sf | $4,200,000 | $1,050/sf | — |
Market read. Most recent trades (2024) cleared a median $2,875/sf (recorded) across 1 sale. Median listing discount 8.8% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.
The retrade record
Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.
Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.
Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-00474-7503; each condominium apartment is its own tax lot). Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified in The Roebling Research Library. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.
What would your apartment rent for?
Enter your apartment and I'll send you what it would rent for, from comparable closed leases at The Grand Mercer and nearby.
Buying here? Condo closing costs with a mortgage typically run 3 to 6% of the price. See NYC co-op and condo closing costs, line by line.
Keep up with The Grand Mercer and its market
The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings like The Grand Mercer. Unsubscribe anytime.
We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.
What to know if you’re buying
Resolve the JLWQA question before you sign. Pull the Certificate of Occupancy, ask the managing agent what the building's designation is today, and ask whether the condominium has considered converting to unrestricted residential use under the 2021 rezoning framework now that the litigation has concluded.
Confirm the LPC permit route. Exterior alterations, including non-visible work, and DOB-permitted interiors require review, subject to specified maintenance exemptions; a Certificate of Appropriateness is not automatic. Budget time as well as money.
Five residences is the whole risk profile. The original plan disclosed no reserve fund, there is no mandated façade inspection cycle at this height, and no staff to spread costs across. A single exterior project is a large per-unit number. Read the reserve provisions in the declaration and bylaws, and the current audit, budget and capital plan.
The right of first refusal covers leases. If your plan includes renting the unit, understand that the board's right reaches that.
Neighboring buildings on this block are not this condominium. 473 Broadway and 475 Broadway sit on the same tax block (lots 7504 and 7505) and are entirely separate condominiums with their own boards, budgets and policies. ACRIS and the Landmarks building database confirm three distinct properties.
What to know if you’re selling
Lead with the floor plate and the direct elevator entry. Four thousand square feet on a single landmarked floor with a keyed lift is the argument, and very little inventory in SoHo answers it.
Have the C of O and the occupancy answer ready. A well-informed seller who addresses the JLWQA designation up front, with documentation, removes the single largest source of diligence friction in a SoHo loft sale.
Present the capital picture proactively. Small buildings invite questions about reserves and assessments. Answering them with the current audit in hand is a pricing advantage.
Choose comparables by actual plan and sale date. The five-residence count does not establish scarcity or make every average unusable; compare the penthouse floors and full floors below with adjustments for their actual layouts and outdoor rights.
Comparable buildings
If you're considering 47 Mercer Street, also evaluate:
- 475 Broadway — 14 residences plus a commercial unit in an 1894–95 store-and-loft building on the same tax block; a separate condominium, and the direct comparison for landmarked SoHo conversion at larger scale
- 77 Mercer Street — 10 residences in an 1875–76 cast-iron store building; the closest peer in vintage, material and format
- 30 Crosby Street — 13 residences in an 1878 building in the same district; boutique landmarked conversion
- 105 Wooster Street — 15 residences in a late-19th-century SoHo loft building; larger denominator, similar product
- 139 Wooster Street — 16 residences, 2006; the new-construction alternative inside the district
- 27 Wooster Street — 15 residences delivered in the mid-2010s; contemporary SoHo condominium with an amenity program
- 107 Greene Street — 15 lofts in a cast-iron-era building substantially rebuilt in the mid-2000s
- 22 Mercer Street — 16 residences, adaptive reuse of a 19th-century loft building with a penthouse addition
- 40 Mercer Street — 2007 ground-up condominium on the same street; the full-service alternative
How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.
Considering a move at The Grand Mercer?
Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com