509 Pacific Street (The Hendrik)
509 Pacific Street, Brooklyn, NY 11217
Boerum Hill, Brooklyn
BBL 3001867502 · BIN 3425041
- Year built
- 2016
- Type
- Condominium
- Units
- 38
- Floors
- 80
- Landmark
- No
- Pets
- Not documented in the plan text reviewed; confirm the current house rules
- Financing
- no board approval or down-payment minimum; lender requirements govern
- Subletting
- permitted under the standard condominium framework; board right of first refusal is the standard mechanism in a plan of this vintage but was not verified against this building's by-laws in the text reviewed - flagged on page
- Pied-à-terre
- permitted (standard condominium)
Compiled by The Roebling Research Desk from the building’s offering plan, amendments, and related building documents (primary source dated 2019). Reported and subject to confirmation. Board policies can change by amendment — confirm at the offer stage.
Thirty-eight apartments with a 24-hour concierge is not a normal Brooklyn ratio. The Hendrik's first-year budget staffs a full-time superintendent and 4.2 doorman/concierge positions around the clock, which means roughly one service position for every seven residences — a Manhattan full-service ratio applied to a six-story building on a Boerum Hill side street. That decision, more than the architecture or the location, is what this building sells and what it costs to run.
The design is by Beyer Blinder Belle, a firm better known in New York for preservation and civic work than for boutique condominiums, and the brief the developer described was Danish Modern: restraint, craft, warm materials, an absence of gesture. Six stories, eighty feet, masonry, terraces cut into the upper levels. On a block where the alternative is either a nineteenth-century row house or a much larger contemporary building, the Hendrik's argument is finish quality at small scale.
The third fact is structural and easy to miss: the retail unit carries 30.8835 percent of the condominium's common interest. A single 25,696-square-foot commercial unit at cellar and ground level holds nearly a third of the building's voting and expense weight, and the plan offered it at $44,000,000. As of the seventeenth amendment it was unsold, held by the sponsor, and producing no rent. The budget carefully allocates expenses between the residential and retail components — the retail unit shares payroll only in proportion to the superintendent, and is excluded from electricity, cooking gas and water charges — but a buyer should read that allocation directly rather than assume the headline common-charge figure describes a purely residential base.
The fourth fact is the tax fact, and it runs the other way from what Brooklyn buyers usually expect. The plan's Schedule A shows residential taxes identical with and without ICAP while the retail unit's projection falls by roughly forty percent with it. The benefit here attaches to the commercial component; the residences carry full assessment. Buyers arriving from abated new-development product elsewhere in Brooklyn need to reset their carrying-cost model at the door.
The fifth is a numbering quirk that costs people money. The certificate of occupancy states explicitly that marketing floor designations run one level above construction designations — the second construction floor is marketed as the third floor, and so on up. Two apartments described as being on the same floor in different documents may not be.
Architecture and unit composition
The building occupies an 18,000-square-foot lot with 100 feet of frontage and 189 feet of depth, and carries roughly 81,197 square feet of building area — of which about 25,638 square feet is the commercial component. Construction classification is 1-B, occupancy group R-2, height 80 feet over six stories.
The vertical stack is unusually legible from the certificate of occupancy. The cellar holds mechanical space, retail, and the accessory fitness room. The ground floor holds retail, the residential lobby and 15 attendant parking spaces. The second, third and fourth construction levels carry ten, ten and eight residences respectively. The fifth and sixth levels each carry four full residences plus the lower and upper halves of two duplexes that span them — which is to say the top of the building is a genuinely different product from the middle, and the duplexes are the building's signature apartments.
Residences run one- to four-bedroom, with the amendments recording four-bedroom layouts near 1,890 square feet and penthouse three-bedrooms around 1,700 square feet with terraces. Terraces, balconies and cabanas are appurtenant to specific units and cannot lawfully be used as bedrooms or living rooms — a restriction the plan flags and one that occasionally surprises buyers who have seen a terrace furnished as a room.
Because the building sits outside the Boerum Hill Historic District, window replacement, terrace work and façade projects run through the Department of Buildings and the board rather than through the Landmarks Preservation Commission. In a masonry building of this vintage that removes a meaningful layer of cost and delay from any exterior project.
Building operations
The Hendrik's operating story is service depth against a small unit count. The plan's first-year budget totals $814,319, of which payroll and related expenses are $354,416 — a little over forty percent — supporting a full-time superintendent and 4.2 concierge positions covering 24 hours a day, seven days a week, on a non-union Class "A" wage scale. Water and sewer at $60,942, service contracts at $76,200 and electricity at $70,455 make up most of the remainder. The replacement reserve line was budgeted at $29,834, and the working capital account stood at roughly $95,025 as of December 2018.
Two disclosure items from the amendment record deserve attention. First, the permanent certificate of occupancy: as of the seventeenth amendment the building was operating on a renewed temporary certificate with the sponsor's architect projecting a permanent certificate within roughly twelve months of the opinion letter and the sponsor depositing an escrowed PCO amount. Ask for the current status in writing rather than assuming it resolved. Second, sponsor control: the amendment records all three board members as sponsor affiliates, with relinquishment set at the earlier of the fifth anniversary of the first closing (June 13, 2018), closing of title to all units including the retail unit, or the sponsor's voluntary election. Those dates have run; confirm the current composition and the date of transition from the minutes.
The retail unit is the third operating variable and the one most worth understanding. It holds 30.8835 percent of common interest, was unsold and unleased at the seventeenth amendment, and the sponsor was funding its common charges of roughly $7,220 a month and taxes of roughly $11,667 a month out of pocket. Whether it has since been sold or leased, to whom, and on what terms, is a question with direct consequences for the residential owners' budget and for the building's ground-floor character. Management history and current agent details are maintained in The Roebling Research Library and confirmed with clients during diligence.
Recent sales
The retrade record
Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.
Recent closings at this building, sourced from NYC Department of Finance records. Apartment-level detail (line, condition, asking-price context) verified upon consultation request.
| Date | Unit | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2025 | PH1A | $2,960,000 |
| Jan 30, 2025 | 3C | $1,695,000 |
| Sep 27, 2024 | 3E | $2,010,000 |
| Aug 26, 2024 | 5B | $3,050,000 |
| Sep 5, 2023 | 4A | $1,975,000 |
| May 12, 2023 | 5F | $1,605,000 |
Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.
Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 3-00186-7502) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price.
What to know if you’re buying
Understand what you are paying for in the common charge. Twenty-four-hour concierge coverage across 38 apartments is the building's defining feature and the reason payroll is over forty percent of the budget. That is a legitimate value proposition — but it is a fixed cost spread across a very small denominator.
Read the retail unit's position. A single commercial unit holds 30.8835 percent of common interest and was sponsor-held and unleased at the seventeenth amendment. Confirm its current ownership, tenancy and payment status; it is the biggest single variable in this budget.
There is no residential abatement. The plan's own schedule shows residential taxes unchanged with and without ICAP. Model the full bill for your unit.
Match the floor designation. Marketing floors run one above construction floors, and the certificate of occupancy says so. Confirm which convention any comparable is using.
Parking is a license with a labor cost. Fifteen attended spaces, $195,000 initial license price, $195 monthly fee, and attendants required whenever the spaces are in use. Confirm availability, cost and transfer mechanics before assigning it value.
What to know if you’re selling
Lead with service and craft. Beyer Blinder Belle, a 24-hour concierge, and a 38-unit building are a combination almost nothing else in Boerum Hill offers. Say it plainly.
Photograph the terrace and the material detail. The Danish Modern brief shows in finishes and in the terraces cut into the upper floors. Those are the differentiators against larger, glossier competitors.
Be direct about taxes. Buyers arriving from abated product will find the absence of a residential benefit immediately. Present the actual bill early.
Anchor to the right level. The top two floors and the duplexes are their own tier. Do not price them off the ten-unit floors below.
Package the license. If the apartment carries a parking license, document the license, the monthly fee and the assignment mechanics up front.
Comparable buildings
If you're considering The Hendrik, also evaluate:
- 561 Pacific Street — the nearest condominium peer, on the same street, with licensed parking and a larger unit count
- 323 Bergen Street — the newest large condominium on the same eastern Boerum Hill blocks
- 556 State Street (Boerum Heights) — earlier-generation new construction nearby, with deeded parking and a much leaner staff
- 71 Smith Street (The Boerum) — condominium over a hotel base at the Smith Street spine; the closest service comparison to the west
- 10 Nevins Street (The Brooklyn Grove) — larger Boerum Hill condominium toward Downtown
- 76 Schermerhorn Street (The Symon) — boutique condominium of comparable scale a few blocks west
- 550 Vanderbilt Avenue — Pacific Park condominium across Atlantic Avenue, with a documented abatement history that contrasts sharply
- 199 State Street (The Lookout Hill Condominium) — small condominium on the Boerum Hill–Brooklyn Heights line
- 423 Atlantic Avenue — the loft cooperative alternative one block north
Considering a move at The Hendrik?
Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.
Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.
A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at The Hendrik would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.