Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,632/sf ▴3%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $271K/room ▴4%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $465K/room ▴3%CPW $355K/roomFifth Ave $501K/roomBillionaires' Row $4,313/sfHell's Kitchen $1,328/sf ▴0%
Full index →
Cooperative · 1922
Cathedral Parkway Apartments
535 West 110th Street, New York, NY 10025

535 West 110th Street

535 West 110th Street, New York, NY 10025

Morningside Heights

BBL 1018820008 · BIN 1056904

At a glance
Year built
1922
Type
Cooperative
Units
140
Floors
14
Amenities
24-hour doorman, live-in resident manager and full staff, two large roof decks, renovated fitness room (membership), central laundry, bicycle room, cold storage, private storage for a fee, and a landscaped, canopied entrance
Landmark status
Not an individual landmark; in the Morningside Heights Historic District
NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission records, updated February 2026
Pied-à-terre
Permitted with conditions
Pets
Pets permitted with conditions; species not stated
Washer/dryer
Permitted with conditions
Maximum financing
80% of the purchase price
Doorman
Full-time doorman

Cathedral Parkway Apartments sales history: 245 recorded sales

Own an apartment at Cathedral Parkway Apartments?
Enter your apartment to see its recorded sale history and today’s estimate.
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2004–2026

Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.

Median $/sf, 2026 to date
$972
floor-adjusted, 3 sales
Listing discount
2.0%
Recorded sales
245
On record
2004–2026
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at Cathedral Parkway Apartments would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.

As cited in The Wall Street Journal★ 92 reviews on Google

This is the largest and, in the Landmarks Preservation Commission's own assessment, one of the most prominent apartment houses on Cathedral Parkway — a 175-foot Renaissance Revival street wall by Robert T. Lyons, built in 1922–23 for Samuel Roseff as Morningside Heights filled in with middle-class apartment buildings around a university that had moved uptown a generation earlier. Lyons was a serious apartment architect; the St. Urban, the single-towered building on Central Park West, is his. Here he worked restrained: a limestone base, a carved arched entrance in a two-story classical surround, quoins and stringcourses, full window surrounds on four floors, and a metal cornice still in place. The LPC called the design a restrained interpretation of the style and the building prominent in its size and massing.

Two facts about the parcel do more to shape a transaction here than anything about the architecture, and they point in opposite directions.

The first is landmark status. On February 21, 2017 the Landmarks Preservation Commission designated the Morningside Heights Historic District, and this building, block 1882 lot 8, is a contributing building inside it. That is worth stating precisely because the district's boundary on this block is not intuitive: 545 West 110th Street, the 2000s condominium immediately to the west on the same block, lies outside the district. It was built in 2005, more than a decade before designation, so it was not shaped by the district rules — but today it sits outside LPC jurisdiction while 535 sits inside it. Designation is not a formality at 535. The LPC permit record shows a steady flow of applications for this address — through-window HVAC on secondary facades, air-conditioner louvers and grilles, interior alterations requiring a DOB permit — with Certificates of No Effect issued as recently as June 2026. Any buyer planning a renovation that touches a window, a wall sleeve, a louver or the exterior in any way is now in a two-agency process, and should budget time accordingly.

The second is the façade. The building's Local Law 11 record was clean for years — SAFE in the 2007 and 2012 cycles — then moved to SWARMP in February 2019 and to UNSAFE in the Cycle 9 report filed February 21, 2024. A full façade restoration had already been filed with the Department of Buildings in August 2023, with a sidewalk shed permitted that September and suspended-scaffold amendments running through January 2025. The subsequent Cycle 9 filing in November 2025 was still UNSAFE. An amended Cycle 9 report submitted August 29, 2026, following a field inspection on August 21, reports the façade SAFE, though the Department's current-status field had not yet caught up at the time of writing. In plain terms: this building has just come out the far side of a three-year, shed-and-scaffold façade program on a hundred-year-old masonry and limestone envelope. That is the single most important thing to underwrite here, and it is the reason to ask for the assessment history before you bid.

Architecture and unit composition

Fourteen stories and a penthouse across a 175-foot frontage produce large, conventionally planned pre-war apartments with real bones. The published layouts run from studios in the G line with an eight-foot entry foyer and a windowed kitchen, through one-bedrooms in the A line with twenty-foot living rooms, to two-bedrooms in the H line laid out the way 1920s buildings laid them out — a long entry foyer or gallery opening onto a nineteen-foot living room, a separate nineteen-foot dining room, and a nineteen-foot windowed kitchen beside it. Ceilings are high in parts of the building and eat-in kitchens are common. The penthouse level carries private terraces, including one of roughly 590 square feet.

The combination history in the Department of Buildings record is worth reading before you shop. Apartments 8B and 8D were combined in 2015, 11C and 11E in 2022, penthouses 1 and 2 in 2008, and 8C and 9C were joined vertically in 2005 with a new opening cut through the structural slab and a convenience stair. This is a building where the board approves ambitious alteration work, including structural work — which is both an opportunity and a reason to read the alteration agreement carefully. Note also that the two large roof decks are a common amenity, and that some apartments carry protruding through-wall air-conditioners that are now subject to LPC review when replaced.

Building operations

Full-service and traditional: an attended lobby around the clock, a live-in resident manager with a full staff, a central laundry, a bicycle room, cold storage, private storage available for a fee, and a fitness room that has been renovated and is offered on a membership basis. In-apartment washer-dryers are permitted with board approval, which is unusual for a building of this age and is documented in individual DOB filings rather than in any published policy.

On the tax side there is nothing to model and that itself is the finding. The building carries no J-51 exemption, no J-51 abatement, and no other property-tax benefit on the New York City Department of Finance exemption roll for fiscal years 2021 through 2027. Whatever J-51 benefit may have attached to the alteration work PLUTO records in 1986 and 2005 has fully expired; there is no burn-off ahead and no schedule to price. PLUTO shows a small residual exempt total on the lot with no corresponding record in the exemption detail, which is a reporting artifact rather than a benefit.

Underlying debt has been managed steadily rather than aggressively. The apartment corporation took an $8,000,000 mortgage at the 2004 conversion, refinanced and consolidated in November 2012 alongside a separate multi-million-dollar credit facility, and modified again in February 2019 with a further facility recorded that October — leaving underlying debt in the range of $8 million with a credit line behind it. Those are recorded instruments, not audited balances; the current outstanding principal, the rate and the maturity are in the building's financial statements and should be obtained from the managing agent.

The 2004 conversion — and why it still matters

The public record dates the cooperative conversion precisely. On October 4, 2004, a deed conveying the building to Cathedral Parkway Apartments Corp. was recorded in ACRIS, together with the corporation's original $8,000,000 mortgage and seventy-two individual share transfers closing the same day — the insider closings. Share transfers have continued in every year since, to separately named purchasers, but those names do not establish beneficial relationships or present common control.

It is a young conversion, and that has consequences a buyer should raise directly with the managing agent:

  • Sponsor concentration. Listing records describe the building as roughly 85 percent sold. If a sponsor or holder of unsold shares still owns a meaningful block, some lenders will treat that as an underwriting item, and in a small number of cases as a decline. Ask for the current sponsor-owned percentage in writing.
  • Non-purchasing tenants. A 2004 conversion can leave rent-regulated non-purchasing tenants in place for decades. The number, if any, is not in the public record. Ask.
  • Reserve depth. A twenty-two-year-old cooperative in a hundred-and-three-year-old building that has just completed a major façade program has a specific reserve question in front of it. The financial statements will answer it; nothing public will.

Policy framework

Board package and interview. Standard for a Manhattan cooperative: a full financial package, references, and an in-person interview. Run the Co-op Board Qualification Calculator before offering.

Financing. Up to 80 percent per listing records — permissive, and a real advantage over the neighborhood's older conversions, which commonly cap at 75 percent. Verify with the managing agent.

Post-closing liquidity. Not published. Obtain the board's current standard before you bid; in a building of this size it is the requirement most likely to decide a marginal file.

Subletting. Permitted after two years of residency with board approval. Maximum term, renewal policy and the sublet fee are not published — get all three from the managing agent.

Pied-à-terre. Permitted case-by-case with board approval, per listing records. Confirm; pied-à-terre postures shift with board composition.

Trusts, LLCs and guarantors. Not addressed in any public record. Assume board discretion and get the answer in writing before contract.

Flip tax. Not published. Assume one exists and confirm the amount and the payer.

Landmark compliance. Exterior work, window replacement, through-wall air-conditioner replacement and any interior work requiring a DOB permit runs through the Landmarks Preservation Commission as well as the Department of Buildings. Build the extra review time into any renovation schedule.

Financing and purchase requirements

Maximum financing
80% of the purchase priceSource: The Roebling Team's building profile

Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to discuss the building's costs and purchase requirements.

Own an apartment here? Request an apartment-specific pricing review.

The Roebling Team at Compass is a brokerage. We are not the building’s management or its application office.

Sublet and pied-à-terre policy

A condominium owner leasing a unit and a co-op shareholder subletting are different rules, and a building-wide rule is different from a restriction on one apartment. This is the building's rule; confirm it for the specific apartment.

Subletting by shareholders
Not verified
Pied-à-terre ownership
Permitted with conditionsCase by case, board discretionSource: The Roebling Team's building profile

Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to discuss the sublet and pied-à-terre rules for that apartment.

The Roebling Team at Compass is a brokerage. We are not the building’s management or its application office.

Pets and in-unit washer/dryer

Pets
Pets permitted with conditions; species not statedPermitted with board approval per listing recordsSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
In-unit washer/dryer
Permitted with conditionsBoard approvalSource: The Roebling Team's building profile

Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to confirm the pet and washer/dryer rules for that apartment.

The Roebling Team at Compass is a brokerage. We are not the building’s management or its application office.

Building staffing and amenities

Doorman
Full-time doormanSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Attended lobby
YesSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Live-in superintendent
YesSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Elevator
YesSource: NYC Department of City Planning records (PLUTO)
Amenities noted
Fitness room, roof deck, bike storage, storage, laundry room, cold storageSource: The Roebling Team's building profile

Staffing and amenities as our building profile and recent listing records describe them. A feature not listed is not confirmed absent. Outdoor space, parking and some facilities can belong to particular apartments or to a separate owner; confirm access for the specific apartment.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟡
Moderate — under today's cap; material modeled 2030 exposure
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$54,503/yr
Per unit / month range
$0 – $32
Modeled exposure split equally across 140 units (the residential count on the city's lot record). Not an assessed amount; co-op shareholders are typically charged by share allocation.

Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.

See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
Safe
What this means for you

The latest available FISP filing classified the facade as Safe — no repairs were required at that inspection. A filed Safe grade is not a guarantee of current condition: owners still maintain the facade and, where required, observe parapets each year. Future inspection timing (Local Law 49 of 2025 changed the cycle framework from October 1, 2026), repair and any assessment decisions remain building-specific.

Inspection history
2005–10
Safe
2010–15
Safe
2015–20
SWARMP
2020–25
Safe
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2029
Assessed · 2005–10 to 2020–25
$2,000 in filing penalties
payment status not in the record
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs are due by the deadline stated in the filing.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — a licensed professional engineer or registered architect who meets DOB’s FISP qualifications and signs the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Penalties shown are amounts DOB assessed against filings on record across 2005–10 to 2020–25. The FISP dataset does not record whether they were paid, contested or remain open, so treat the figure as history rather than a current balance and confirm the building’s standing with the managing agent.

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

The building is the largest full-service pre-war cooperative on Cathedral Parkway and prices as the neighborhood's mainstream option rather than its trophy. Pricing runs on a per-room basis, and the spread within the building is wide: pre-war two-bedrooms with an intact separate dining room and a windowed kitchen are the core product, the penthouse level with private terraces sits well above it, and the studio and one-bedroom lines anchor the bottom. Condition drives the rest — this is a 1923 building where a meaningful share of apartments have never been fully renovated, and where LPC review now sits between a buyer and any work touching the envelope.

Against its neighbors, the trade is legible. 545 West 110th Street, next door, is modern construction with in-unit laundry, high ceilings and a garage, outside the historic district, at condominium pricing and condominium flexibility. This building offers pre-war scale, a doorman, two roof decks, 80 percent financing and co-op per-room pricing, with landmark obligations and a just-completed façade program attached. Buyers should price both and decide which set of constraints they would rather own.

Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.

Recent transfers at this building, from The Roebling Research Library. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Aug 31, 202610J
1 BR · 1 BA · 475 sf
$525,000$1,105/sf-4.4%
Jul 21, 202615B
1 BR · 1 BA · 750 sf
$750,000$1,000/sf-16.2%
Jul 9, 20266I
2 BR · 1 BA · 1,000 sf
$925,000$925/sf-2.5%
Nov 14, 202512H
2 BR · 2 BA
$1,540,000-14.2%
Nov 3, 202511B
1 BR · 1 BA · 750 sf
$710,000$947/sf-6.0%
Aug 1, 202511G
1 BR · 1 BA · 750 sf
$750,000$1,000/sf-0.7%
Apr 11, 20243F
2 BR · 1 BA
$860,000-1.7%
Jul 26, 202312A
1 BR · 1 BA · 663 sf
$570,650$861/sf+1.0%

Market read. Most recent trades (2026 to date) cleared a median $972/sf (floor-adjusted) across 3 sales. Floor-adjusted means each sale is restated to a constant mix of floors, so the figure can differ from the plain median of the sales listed above. Median listing discount 2.0% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

6B · 750 sf+118%
$307,020 ($409/sf) 2004 → $670,000 ($893/sf) 2017
2GH · 2,300 sf+69%
$1,475,000 ($641/sf) 2004 → $2,400,000 ($1,043/sf) 2012 → $2,495,000 ($1,085/sf) 2022
3F+66%
$518,977 ($519/sf) 2004 → $759,000 ($759/sf) 2007 → $860,000 2024
12I · 1,000 sf+65%
$665,000 ($665/sf) 2005 → $665,000 ($665/sf) 2009 → $1,100,000 ($1,100/sf) 2017
7J · 500 sf+50%
$365,000 ($730/sf) 2008 → $405,000 ($810/sf) 2014 → $504,000 ($1,061/sf) 2018 → $549,000 ($1,098/sf) 2018
View all 245 recorded transfers, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01882-0008). Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified in The Roebling Research Library. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.

For owners

What would your apartment rent for?

Enter your apartment and I'll send you what it would rent for, from comparable closed leases at Cathedral Parkway Apartments and nearby.

What would buying here cost?

At the recent median sale of $750K (6 transfers in the past 24 months, since October 21, 2024), a buyer putting 25% down would pay about $11,363 to close, or 1.5% of the price.

  • Mansion tax: $0
  • No mortgage recording tax or title insurance on a co-op purchase
  • Attorneys, lender, building fees and filings: $11,363

Assumes a resale (the seller pays transfer taxes), a $4,500 attorney fee and a mortgage on the rest.

The Roebling Report

Keep up with Cathedral Parkway Apartments and its market

The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings like Cathedral Parkway Apartments. Unsubscribe anytime.

We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.

What to know if you’re buying

Underwrite the façade cycle first. The Cycle 9 record ran UNSAFE from February 2024 through at least November 2025, with an amended report reporting SAFE in August 2026. Ask your attorney for the last five years of board minutes, every assessment resolution, and the engineer's final report. A completed façade program is a good thing to buy into — but only once you know what it cost and whether it was funded from reserves, an assessment, or the credit line.

Confirm the landmark reality before you plan a renovation. You are inside the Morningside Heights Historic District. Your neighbor at 545 is not. Window replacement, louvers, wall sleeves and any permitted interior work require LPC sign-off in addition to DOB.

Ask three questions about the 2004 conversion. Current sponsor-owned share percentage; number of remaining non-purchasing tenants; reserve balance. All three affect financeability and none of them are public.

Test the 80 percent ceiling. If it holds, this building is materially more accessible than most pre-war co-ops in Morningside Heights. Get it confirmed in writing rather than from a listing.

Walk the block twice. Cathedral Parkway carries crosstown traffic and the 1 train is at the corner of Broadway. Rear and interior lines are quiet; front lines are not.

What to know if you’re selling

Lead with the finished façade, not around it. A completed Local Law 11 program with a SAFE report on file is a selling point. Buyers' attorneys will find the UNSAFE history regardless; you want to be the one who framed it.

Say "80 percent financing" early. State the documented limit and confirm its current application; it does not establish a measurable buyer-pool advantage over other listing decisions.

Document what LPC has already approved in your apartment. A Certificate of No Effect on file for work already done removes a category of buyer anxiety and is worth putting in the package.

Pre-war layout is the product. Separate dining rooms, windowed kitchens, long galleries and high ceilings are features to compare with the actual plans of neighboring alternatives. Market against the neighborhood's new construction on plan, not on finish.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 535 West 110th Street, also evaluate:

More Upper West Side buildings

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, transit, and pricing across Upper West Side — read The Roebling Team Guide to Upper West Side.

Preparing a board package for this building?

The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.

Considering a move at Cathedral Parkway Apartments?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Licensed Associate Real Estate Broker · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com