Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,600/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $270K/room 2%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $472K/room 18%CPW $355K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,313/sf 24%Greenwich Village $2,455/sf 10%
Full index →
Condominium · 1922
595 West End Avenue
595 West End Avenue, New York, NY 10024

595 West End Avenue

595 West End Avenue, New York, NY 10024

Upper West Side

BBL 1012507504 · BIN 1087679

At a glance
Year built
1922
Type
Condominium
Units
54
Floors
15
Landmark
Designated
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2007–2026

Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.

Median $/sf
$1,765
Listing discount
0.0%
Recorded sales
54
On record
2007–2026

West End Avenue between 88th and 89th is one of the most intact prewar blockfronts in Manhattan, and 595 is one of the very few buildings on it that is a condominium. The corridor is cooperative territory almost without exception — 599 West End, 601, 607, 617, 160 and 173 Riverside Drive, 320 and 345 on the side streets — so a buyer who wants prewar West End Avenue with condominium liquidity, condominium financing rules and no board interview has an extremely short list, and this building is the largest name on it. That structural scarcity, more than anything about the apartments, is what sets pricing here.

The building itself is a good one. Sugarman, Hess & Berger designed it in 1922 for the 595 West End Avenue Corporation, replacing four rowhouses from the late 1880s, and it is a textbook Neo-Renaissance avenue apartment house: rusticated limestone base, scored brown brick shaft, terra-cotta spandrels and a big arched crown with a cartouche at the parapet. When the Landmarks Preservation Commission designated the Riverside–West End Historic District in 1989, its surveyors recorded that all of the original windows were still in place. The facade is protected twice over — by the historic district, and by a private facade conservation easement the sponsor granted to a preservation trust in December 2005.

The conversion is where a buyer's attention should go. The sponsor bought and converted the building as a rental with regulated tenants in place, closed the first residential unit on September 6, 2007, and ran an apartment-combination program through the same period — Department of Buildings filings from 2006 and 2007 record combinations of 2A with 2B, 4A with 4B, 9A with 9B, 12A with 12B, 14A with 14B and 14C with 14D, a single residence assembled from five apartments across the fourth and fifth floors, and a large combination joining 9A, 9B, 9C, 9D, 10C and 10D. The unit count in the filings moves from 61 to 44 to 54 as that work proceeded. The result is a building whose apartment mix is genuinely heterogeneous: original prewar layouts alongside combined residences that occupy half and full floors.

The most important fact in this building is not in any listing. According to the condominium's audited financial statements for both 2024 and 2025, the sponsor still owned 29.87 percent of the common elements, appurtenant to 16 of the 54 units. Eighteen years after the first closing, roughly three units in ten remain in sponsor hands — the residue of a conversion that took a building with rent-regulated tenancies and never fully sold out. That concentration is material in three directions at once: it shapes governance, it shapes the condominium's revenue risk, and it is the single most likely reason a conventional lender declines to warrant a mortgage in this building. Any buyer should establish with their lender, early, whether the building is currently warrantable.

Architecture and unit composition

Fifteen stories over roughly 78 feet of West End Avenue frontage, on a 6,230-square-foot lot with about 52,500 square feet of residential area. The elevation reads in three parts. The two-story base is rusticated limestone at the ground with limestone window surrounds and patterned brickwork above; the main entrance carries a stone surround with carved floral detail, a marble-paneled transom over wood-and-glass doors, and flanking light fixtures. Above the entry, the four central windows of the second and third stories sit in double-height limestone surrounds with pilasters carrying molded arches, and bowed metal balconies on scrolled brackets project at the third story.

The eleven-story midsection is scored brown brick with a bandcourse and inset balustrades at the sixth-story sill line and classically detailed balconies at two tenth-story windows. Six bays of windows articulate the facade — the two middle and two end bays paired with six-over-one sash, the remaining two single with eight-over-one. The two-story top section sits above a wide balconied bandcourse; its paired windows are joined vertically by terra-cotta spandrel panels and topped by large arches with decorative tympanums, and the arched center of the parapet carries a cartouche.

Apartment composition reflects the combination program more than the original plan. Alongside surviving prewar one- and two-bedroom layouts, the building holds half-floor and full-floor combined residences on the fourth, fifth, ninth, tenth, twelfth and fourteenth floors and a penthouse level that was substantially renovated in 2016. There is no reliable per-square-foot average in a building with this much internal variation, and comparables must be drawn line by line.

Building operations

Full staff under a 32BJ collective bargaining agreement, with a resident manager occupying Unit 1C — a unit the condominium purchased from the sponsor on March 6, 2008 and carries on its balance sheet. Central laundry and rentable storage generate modest ancillary income. Labor is the dominant expense: wages, union benefits, payroll taxes and insurance run to roughly 80 percent of operating cost, which is typical of a prewar building with real staff and no amenity program.

Capital posture, from the audited statements on file, deserves a careful read.

The condominium has run two concurrent assessments. A recurring $100,000 annual assessment to replenish reserves was billed across twelve monthly installments in 2024 and 2025, and the board has approved its continuation for 2026. Separately, on September 1, 2023 the condominium imposed a $1,300,000 assessment, allocated by common interest and billed over twelve months, to fund an exterior project and future work. Through December 31, 2025 the exterior program had consumed $886,894 and an elevator modernization consultant $19,750, with $315,074 of the assessment deferred for future major repairs. Exterior spending in the two years was roughly $886,000 combined.

The reserve fund closed 2025 at $655,014, down from $1,192,313 a year earlier — the exterior work is what drew it down. Operations run at a deficiency before assessments in both years: total revenue of about $1.26 million against operating cost of about $1.38 million. The auditors also noted that management has omitted the required supplementary information on future major repairs and replacements, and that the condominium has not commissioned a study of the remaining useful lives of the building's components. In practice that means there is no reserve study to underwrite against, and the elevator modernization now in the consultant stage is the next material capital item.

One further item belongs in any buyer's diligence file. The mortgage on the resident manager's unit, originally $600,000, reset on February 1, 2024 to a rate of 7.75 percent and matures on January 1, 2027 with a balloon of roughly $500,000. The condominium will need to extend, refinance or retire it, and it should be able to explain how.

Policy framework

Ownership form: Condominium. Purchases close through a right-of-first-refusal waiver rather than board approval — no package, no interview, no financing ceiling. On a corridor that is otherwise almost entirely cooperative, that is the building's principal competitive advantage.

Pied-à-terre, subletting, LLC, trust and foreign ownership: All permitted under the standard condominium framework. Confirm any minimum lease term and the waiver-request timeline with the managing agent.

Pets: Permitted under the standard framework; confirm weight and breed rules in the house rules.

Working capital contributions: Purchaser contributes one month's common charges, seller contributes three months' common charges. Model the seller-side contribution into net proceeds.

Sponsor concentration: The sponsor held 16 units and 29.87 percent of common interest at the two most recent year-ends on file. This is the item to raise with your lender before you sign a contract.

Real estate taxes: No abatement of any kind. Underwrite the full unabated bill on the specific unit.

Landmarks and the facade easement: The building is inside the Riverside–West End Historic District, and a private facade conservation easement also encumbers the property. Any exterior alteration — windows in particular, since LPC recorded the originals as intact at designation — is a Landmarks matter and potentially an easement matter as well. Verify what approvals a planned window replacement or through-wall installation requires before you buy on the assumption of doing it.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟡
Moderate — under today's cap; material modeled 2030 exposure
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$13,564/yr
Per unit / month range
$0 – $21

Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
Safe
What this means for you

The latest available FISP filing classified the facade as Safe — no repairs were required at that inspection. Facade inspections run on a fixed five-year cycle; future inspection, repair, and any assessment decisions remain building-specific.

Inspection history
2005–10
Safe
2010–15
Safe
2015–20
Safe
2020–25
Safe
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2028
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs required before the next inspection cycle.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

595 West End Avenue prices as prewar Upper West Side condominium product with a scarcity premium for tenure and a discount for the building's capital and sponsor position. On a dollars-per-square-foot basis it sits above the West End Avenue cooperative set, whose apartments are comparable in vintage and often larger, and below full-service new-construction condominium inventory further south on the avenue and on Broadway. The premium for condominium ownership on a cooperative corridor is real and observable; so is the offset from full unabated taxes, a live assessment and the sponsor's unsold position.

Indexed to the last complete year, the building's recorded resale activity spans a wide range because the units do — original prewar apartments at one end and large combined residences at the other, with the top of the range set by full-floor and upper-floor product. Combination units and renovated apartments clear at premiums; original-condition apartments clear when priced to the renovation math and to the Landmarks constraint on exterior work. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.

Recent closings at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Aug 10, 20267C
3 BR · 2 BA · 1,404 sf
$2,350,000$1,674/sf+0.0%
Jul 10, 202614
5 BR · 4 BA · 3,550 sf
$6,000,000$1,690/sf-4.0%
Mar 19, 20243D
1 BR · 1 BA · 702 sf
$810,000$1,154/sf+1.3%
Aug 30, 2022PH
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,437 sf
$3,625,000$2,523/sf-4.5%
Jan 14, 202212A
4 BR · 2.5 BA · 2,010 sf
$3,675,000$1,828/sf+8.9%
Aug 25, 20204
7 BR · 7.5 BA · 6,115 sf
$8,000,000$1,308/sf-15.8%
Jan 17, 2019PH
2 BR · 1,437 sf
$2,861,282$1,991/sfoff-mkt
Jul 18, 201712A
4 BR · 2,010 sf
$2,850,000$1,418/sf-10.9%

Market read. Most recent trades (2026) cleared a median $1,765/sf across 1 sale. Median listing discount 0.0% from the last ask.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

14 · 3,550 sf+36%
$4,425,000 ($1,246/sf) 2007$6,000,000 ($1,690/sf) 2026
7CD · 1,404 sf+29%
$1,547,740 ($1,102/sf) 2007$1,990,000 ($1,417/sf) 2013
PH · 1,437 sf+27%
$2,861,282 ($1,991/sf) 2019$3,625,000 ($2,523/sf) 2022
12A · 2,010 sf+23%
$2,978,381 ($1,482/sf) 2007$2,670,500 ($1,317/sf) 2011$2,850,000 ($1,418/sf) 2017$3,675,000 ($1,828/sf) 2022
16D · 702 sf+19%
$860,421 ($1,226/sf) 2008$1,025,000 ($1,460/sf) 2014
View all 54 recorded sales, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01250-7504) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.

What to know if you’re buying

Start with the lender, not the apartment. Sponsor ownership of 16 of 54 units and nearly 30 percent of common interest is above the concentration thresholds most agency and portfolio lenders apply. Get a written read on warrantability before you spend money on diligence.

Read both assessments and the exterior scope. A $1.3 million assessment from September 2023 plus a rolling $100,000 reserve assessment is a real monthly number on top of common charges. Ask what remains of the $315,074 deferred balance, what the elevator modernization is scoped and budgeted at, and whether a further assessment is contemplated.

There is no reserve study. The auditors say so explicitly. In a 1923 building with a fifteen-story facade, that is the gap you are underwriting.

Landmarks plus a private facade easement is a double constraint. Confirm the approval path for anything you plan to do to the exterior envelope, including windows, before contract.

The apartment mix is uneven by design. Combined residences and original prewar layouts trade on different math. Do not price off a building average, and walk the specific floor.

The corridor is the other half of the value. West End Avenue between 88th and 89th is quiet, landmarked and almost entirely prewar; Riverside Park is two blocks west and the 1 at 86th Street is three blocks east. Buyers trading from Central Park West or Broadway should spend an evening on the block.

What to know if you’re selling

Lead with the structure, not the finishes. Prewar West End Avenue in a condominium is close to unrepeatable on this corridor. That is the argument no cooperative neighbor can answer, and it is worth stating in the first line.

Address the sponsor position before a buyer's lender does. It will surface. Presenting the current sponsor percentage, the condominium's financials and any recent warrantability determination up front converts a deal-killer into a diligence item.

Be precise about assessments. Quote the current common charge, the current assessment installments and their expected end date together. Buyers comparing this building against cooperative maintenance figures need the whole number.

Document the exterior work. The 2024–25 facade program is completed capital spending that a buyer's attorney will credit. Have the scope, the cost and the Landmarks sign-offs ready.

Price the line. Combined half- and full-floor residences here are a different product from the original prewar layouts. Run the Renovation Cost Calculator against your apartment's condition before setting an ask.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 595 West End Avenue, also evaluate:

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across West End Avenue — read The Roebling Team Guide to West End Avenue.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent.

Considering a move at 595 West End Avenue?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at 595 West End Avenue would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.