Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,600/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $270K/room 2%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $472K/room 18%CPW $355K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,313/sf 24%Greenwich Village $2,455/sf 10%
Full index →
Condop · 1903
The Walton
104 West 70th Street, New York, NY 10023

104 West 70th Street (The Walton)

104 West 70th Street, New York, NY 10023

Lincoln Square, Upper West Side

BBL 1011417501 · BIN 1029665

At a glance
Year built
1903
Type
Condop
Units
84
Floors
11
Landmark
No
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2003–2026

Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.

Median $/sf
$1,284
Listing discount
0.0%
Recorded sales
79
On record
2003–2026

The Walton is a 1903 apartment hotel that became one of Manhattan's earliest residential condominiums, and both halves of that sentence are load-bearing.

The building went up in the last great wave of Upper West Side apartment-hotel construction, when the Columbus Avenue elevated and the new IRT subway made the corner of 70th and Columbus a plausible address for people who wanted a serviced apartment rather than a house. Israels & Harder filed for a twelve-story apartment hotel at a cost of $600,000 — something over $17 million in today's terms — for a developer, Elizabeth A. Wilcox, whose name survives in LPC's record and almost nowhere else. What they built was unusually plain for its moment: a two-story stone base, then eleven bays of red brick with the Beaux-Arts detailing rationed rather than lavished. That restraint is why the building still looks coherent a century later, and it is also why the loss of the cornice hurts.

The second half is the tenure. The Department of Finance carries this as Manhattan condominium number 31. Manhattan's condominium numbers run sequentially from the statute's early years, and a number that low places The Walton among the first few dozen condominiums ever recorded in the borough — at a time when essentially every conversion in the city was going cooperative. Practically, that means a buyer here gets condominium ownership — a deed, a unit tax lot, an individual tax bill, no board interview of the cooperative kind — in a prewar Lincoln Square building where nearly every neighbouring conversion of the same vintage went the other way. Within a two-block radius, the comparable prewar stock is cooperative almost without exception. That is the building's structural advantage, and it is why it attracts buyers who want prewar scale with condominium liquidity: foreign purchasers, buyers taking title in a trust or an entity, and buyers who intend to rent the apartment out.

Third: the conversion is old enough that the tax benefits are long gone. The J-51 benefits that financed the 1980 gut renovation, and the second grant that financed the work of the early 1990s, both ran their course; the last benefit year on file is 2000. Twenty-six years of full taxation later, there is no abatement cliff ahead. What you see on the tax bill is what the apartment costs.


Architecture and unit composition

LPC records the style as Beaux-Arts and the materials as brick, stone and pressed metal. The elevation is organised in the classic apartment-hotel manner: a rusticated two-story stone base carrying the retail and the entrance, a long brick shaft, and — originally — a heavy metal cornice, since removed. The corner siting gives the building two long frontages, on Columbus Avenue and West 70th Street, and correspondingly good light on the upper floors.

The plan is the product of the 1980 conversion. Architectural records describe that renovation as producing eight apartments per floor and adding a penthouse level. The apartment lettering in ACRIS is consistent with that: units run 2B through 11-something across letters A to H, with the higher letters appearing on most floors. The typical apartment is a one- or two-bedroom of modest prewar hotel proportions; the exceptions are the combinations, and there are a number of them on the record.

Department of Buildings filings show combinations executed at a steady rate: 3A with 3B in 2004, a pair of apartments on the eleventh floor in 2005, apartments G and H in 2005, 9F with 9G in 2008, 10H with 11A in 2008 — a duplex, with a new convenience stair — and 10D, 10E and 10F in 2019. A 2008 major alteration took the dwelling-unit count from 84 to 85 and changed the occupancy classification from J-0 to R-2; filings from the same period describe a penthouse addition. Whether that 2008 work created the penthouse level or extended the one added in 1980 is not resolved on the face of the record.

Because the building is inside the Upper West Side / Central Park West Historic District, window replacement, air-conditioning sleeves and any storefront work at the base require LPC approval before DOB will permit them. DOB records exactly that sequence more than once, including a 2008 filing to construct a mock-up for LPC review — the tell of a building that has been through a serious window or façade approval.


Building operations

The Walton is a mixed-use condominium: a residential regime of 84 apartments above a separately owned retail condominium unit on Columbus Avenue, assessed as tax class 4 and carrying its own tax bill. Retail at this corner has turned over repeatedly — DOB filings record successive national tenants fitting out the space between 2010 and 2018, with partition work, accessibility modifications, sprinkler and awning filings each time. For a residential buyer the practical implications are ordinary: construction noise during fit-outs, and a commercial neighbour whose common charge contribution is fixed by the declaration rather than negotiable.

The capital record is that of a well-maintained prewar building carrying the ordinary exterior obligations of one:

  • Façade. A 240-foot heavy-duty sidewalk shed went up in 2002 during remedial repairs. Further exterior repair followed in 2007, masonry façade repairs in 2011, and then the major cycle: façade repairs filed in 2013 at an estimated $856,199, with pipe scaffold and a debris chute following in 2015. A building of this size and age can expect the cycle to repeat; ask for the current Local Law 11 filing status and the engineer's most recent report.
  • Sidewalk vault. Repaired in 2006 at roughly $85,000 — a Columbus Avenue corner obligation that catches owners by surprise when it recurs.
  • Mechanical. A new boiler and oil burner in 2005; a metal chimney replaced in 2004 and extended in 2014; air-handler work in 2009; sprinkler and standpipe modifications through 2010 and 2011.
  • Windows and sleeves. Window and A/C-sleeve installation filed in 2010 and again in 2014, both under landmark review.

The building is not documented as having a doorman, and the public record does not establish the staffing level. Confirm services, the superintendent arrangement and the current common charge structure with the managing agent.


Policy framework

There is very little here that we can state with confidence, and we would rather say so than guess.

No offering plan, declaration, by-laws or set of house rules for The Walton Condominium was located in either the Compass Offering Plan Library or The Roebling Research Library at the time of writing. That means the specifics of the policy stack — pets, subletting and any minimum lease term, the board of managers' right of first refusal and how the waiver process runs, application fees, move-in deposits, alteration agreement terms, and whether the sponsor or any successor retains rights over unsold units — are undocumented for our purposes.

What is structurally true, because it follows from the tenure rather than from any policy document, is the shape of the transaction. This is a condominium: a purchaser takes a deed to a unit tax lot, receives an individual tax bill, and is subject to a board of managers whose ordinary power over a resale is a right of first refusal rather than a right of rejection. There is no cooperative board interview, no financing ceiling imposed by a proprietary lease, no post-closing liquidity test, and no cooperative flip tax. Financing terms are set by the lender, not the building. Trusts, limited liability companies and non-resident purchasers are ordinarily accommodated in a condominium; whether this condominium's declaration says anything unusual on that point should be confirmed from the declaration itself.

Obtain the declaration, by-laws, house rules, most recent financial statements and the current common charge and assessment schedule from the managing agent before you make an offer.


Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟡
Moderate — under today's cap; material modeled 2030 exposure
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$45,135/yr
Per unit / month range
$0 – $45

Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
Safe
What this means for you

The latest available FISP filing classified the facade as Safe — no repairs were required at that inspection. Facade inspections run on a fixed five-year cycle; future inspection, repair, and any assessment decisions remain building-specific.

Inspection history
2005–10
Safe
2010–15
SWARMP
2015–20
SWARMP
2020–25
Safe
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2029
Assessed · 2005–10 to 2020–25
$150 in filing penalties
payment status not in the record
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs required before the next inspection cycle.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Penalties shown are amounts DOB assessed against filings on record across 2005–10 to 2020–25. The FISP dataset does not record whether they were paid, contested or remain open, so treat the figure as history rather than a current balance and confirm the building’s standing with the managing agent.

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

Recent closings at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Apr 24, 20264G
1 BR · 1 BA · 726 sf
$1,175,000$1,618/sfoff-mkt
Feb 20, 20262B
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,149 sf
$1,300,000$1,131/sf-7.1%
Oct 3, 2025PHB
488 sf
$775,000$1,588/sfoff-mkt
May 30, 202510DE
3 BR · 2.5 BA · 1,318 sf
$2,750,000$2,086/sf-8.2%
Jan 30, 20257D
2 BR · 2 BA · 909 sf
$1,725,000$1,898/sf-1.4%
Aug 14, 20243D
2 BR · 1,050 sf
$1,545,000$1,471/sf-2.2%
Jul 27, 202211F
1 BA · 451 sf
$795,000$1,763/sf-0.5%
Jul 7, 20225E
1 BA · 424 sf
$720,000$1,698/sf-4.0%

Market read. Most recent trades (2026) cleared a median $1,284/sf across 2 sales. Median listing discount 0.0% from the last ask.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

4C · 993 sf+110%
$699,000 ($704/sf) 2004$1,465,000 ($1,475/sf) 2021
2D · 909 sf+78%
$940,000 ($940/sf) 2005$1,675,000 ($1,843/sf) 2022
5E · 424 sf+71%
$421,500 ($994/sf) 2011$720,000 ($1,698/sf) 2022
10F · 364 sf+47%
$545,000 ($1,497/sf) 2016$800,000 ($2,198/sf) 2019
9A · 730 sf+44%
$625,000 ($856/sf) 2003$888,889 ($1,218/sf) 2008$899,000 ($1,232/sf) 2012
View all 79 recorded sales, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01141-7501) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.

What to know if you’re buying

The tenure is the product. Prewar Lincoln Square, condominium ownership. The nearby prewar stock of comparable vintage is overwhelmingly cooperative, and even the large postwar tower across the block line at 2025 Broadway is a condop whose apartments transfer as shares. If you need a deed — for a trust, an entity, a non-resident buyer, or a rental strategy — the alternatives on this block are few.

Underwrite full taxes and check the unit's own bill. The J-51 benefits burned off in 2000. Because this is a condominium, each apartment carries its own tax lot and its own assessment; do not extrapolate from another unit. Run the True Monthly Carrying Cost Calculator on the specific unit's actual tax bill and common charge.

Ask for the façade file. The 2013 cycle was substantial, and the building's exterior obligations on two frontages plus a sidewalk vault are not trivial. Ask for the current Local Law 11 status, the engineer's report, and any assessment history or planned assessment.

Verify the apartment against the tax lot. Combinations have been executed on at least six occasions since 2004, some of them across floors. Confirm that the unit lot, the certificate of occupancy and the declaration's schedule of units all describe the apartment you are actually buying.

Expect the landmark review on any renovation. Windows, sleeves and anything visible from Columbus Avenue or West 70th Street go through LPC first. Build the time into your schedule and the cost into the Renovation Cost Calculator.

Do not rely on PLUTO for this building. Its building area, building count and total unit count all conflict with the Department of Finance record. Where they differ, DOF and ACRIS win.

What to know if you’re selling

Market the tenure, not just the apartment. Condominium ownership in a 1903 building two blocks from Lincoln Center is the scarce attribute. It widens the buyer pool to entities, trusts, non-resident purchasers and investors — none of whom can transact in most of the surrounding prewar inventory.

Assemble the diligence package early. No offering plan is in general circulation for this building, which means every buyer's attorney starts from scratch. A seller who arrives with the declaration, by-laws, house rules, current financials and the unit's tax bill removes two weeks from the timeline.

Be direct about the taxes. They are full and they are not going up because of an expiring benefit. That is a genuinely favourable story against comparable inventory still carrying a benefit with years left to run, and it should be told that way rather than avoided.

Price the line, not the building. Corner apartments on the Columbus frontage, combined units, and the penthouse level price on a different basis from the interior lines. Anchor to comparables on the specific line and exposure.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering The Walton, also evaluate:

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across Upper West Side — read The Roebling Team Guide to Upper West Side.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent.

Considering a move at The Walton?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at The Walton would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.