- Year built
- 1857
- Type
- Condominium
- Units
- 7
- Floors
- 7
- Pets
- Not documented in public records — confirm the house rules with the managing agent
- Landmark status
- Not an individual landmark; in the Tribeca East Historic District
- NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission records, updated February 2026
- Doorman
- No doorman
Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.
A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at The Tribeca Heritage Condominium would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.
White Street between Broadway and Church is one of the densest concentrations of mid-nineteenth-century store-and-loft architecture left in Manhattan, and almost every building on it has been through some version of the same century-long cycle: built for the dry-goods trade, stripped and fireproofed in the twentieth century, and recovered — or not — in the last thirty years. 53 White is the block's most complete recovery. The Landmarks Preservation Commission dates it to 1857–1858 and credits D. & A. C. Kingsland as the developer; it records no architect, which is ordinary for a speculative loft of that decade. The façade is Italianate, faced in white Tuckahoe marble over a cast-iron storefront with dark columns.
By the 1920s the marble had been coated in fire-retardant cement, fire escapes had been bolted across it, and the cast-iron columns had been encased in concrete block. That is the condition the building sat in for most of a century. DAB Investments bought it in 2016 and spent six years reversing all of it — removing the fire escapes, repairing the underlying stone, and uncovering the columns and window openings — while simultaneously converting a commercial and old-code residential building into seven condominium lofts.
The addition is the part buyers should understand, because it is the reason the building is seven stories today and five stories in older records. The Department of Buildings alteration application, filed in October 2016 and signed off in August 2022, took the building from five stories and 75 feet to seven stories and 93 feet, inserting a mezzanine between the first and second floors and building two entirely new floors above the original roof. That work required a Certificate of Appropriateness from LPC, which was applied for in May 2017 alongside a modification of use. The addition is set back so that it is not visible from the street — the standard LPC condition for rooftop work in a historic district, and the reason it was approved at all. Trade coverage reports the developer also went through a multi-year land-use review before construction and committed to maintaining the restored façade indefinitely as part of the approval.
The result is a small, unusual building: seven residential lofts with restored cast iron, wood beams and radiant floors, a multi-level penthouse with terraces at the top, and a wellness amenity suite — fitness room, infrared sauna, steam room, massage room — that is larger than a seven-unit building would normally support. The economics of that ratio are the first thing to check in the building's budget.
Architecture and unit composition
The lot is 39 feet wide and 100 feet deep, and the building fills nearly all of it. The original structure ran roughly 24,000 square feet over five floors; after the conversion it stands at about 31,300 square feet over seven stories, with a 2,700-square-foot mezzanine and a 5,000-square-foot two-floor addition on top. PLUTO reports 21,681 square feet of building area for this lot, differing from the approximately 31,300-square-foot post-conversion figure. Reconcile each source's measurement basis, date and approved scope before selecting an area for analysis.
Light is the design problem here and the design solution is worth reading carefully. The building is mid-block with a party wall on each side. The conversion added seven new window openings at the rear and — this is the material fact — 24 new lot-line windows on the western façade, which sits behind 49 White Street. Lot-line windows are an amenity that can be lost: if the adjoining owner builds, they can be required to be sealed, at the affected unit owner's expense. In a building where a full floor is a single residence, losing an entire flank of glass is not a cosmetic outcome. Any buyer here should identify exactly which windows in the specific unit are lot-line windows and what the adjoining property could legally build.
Residences have exposed brick, restored cast-iron columns, exposed wood beams and radiant heated floors. The top of the building is a multi-level penthouse with setback terraces. The final apartment schedule — which homes are full-floor, the bedroom counts and how the mezzanine and penthouse levels are allocated — should be read from the declaration and floor plans rather than assumed. There is one commercial unit at the base, recorded as unit lot 1601.
Building operations
This is a seven-residence condominium with a wellness amenity program and no documented doorman. The operating structure follows: a small denominator carrying a fitness center, steam room, infrared sauna and massage room, plus a passenger elevator serving seven residences. Common charges per square foot should be read against the current budget and reserve position rather than against the amenity list. The condominium is new — the declaration was recorded in January 2022 and the first closings followed within weeks — so the building's expense baseline and reserve history are still short. Ask for the current budget, the reserve balance, the Local Law 11 façade cycle status, and the sponsor's remaining unsold inventory before contract.
The façade obligation is a real operating item and specific to this building. A restored marble and cast-iron elevation inside a historic district is a maintenance liability in perpetuity, and exterior alterations require the applicable LPC review, while ordinary maintenance may be exempt. The board should have a plan and a reserve line for it.
Policy framework
Ownership form: Condominium. Transfers close through a right of first refusal rather than a board approval.
Pied-à-terre, subletting, LLC, trust and foreign ownership: Not documented; confirm in the declaration, bylaws and house rules. The recorded deed record includes both individual purchasers and single-purpose LLCs.
Pets, house rules, sublet minimums and flip tax: Not documented in public records for this building. Confirm all four with the managing agent before pricing an offer or a sale.
Real estate taxes: No exemption of any kind appears on the lot. Underwrite full unabated taxes on the specific unit from day one.
Building staffing and amenities
- Doorman
- No doormanSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
- Elevator
- YesSource: NYC Department of Buildings elevator records
- Amenities noted
- Fitness room, spa, storageSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Staffing and amenities as our building profile and recent listing records describe them. A feature not listed is not confirmed absent. Outdoor space, parking and some facilities can belong to particular apartments or to a separate owner; confirm access for the specific apartment.
Local Law 97
- 2024–2029 annual penalty
- $0 (under cap)
- 2030–2034 annual penalty
- $2,221/yr
- Per unit / month range
- $0 – $26
- Modeled exposure split equally across 7 units (the residential count on the city's lot record). Not an assessed amount; condominium owners are typically charged by each unit's common-interest percentage.
Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.
See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →Recent sales
The Tribeca Heritage sold as a sponsor offering beginning in early 2022. Recorded deeds show individual residences transferring to separately named purchasers — individuals, married couples and single-purpose LLCs — with purchase-money mortgages from four different institutional lenders. Those deeds document individual conveyances but do not establish unrelated beneficial ownership or current sponsor sellout; reconcile all seven unit interests and retained rights against current records.
Six of the seven residential unit lots have traded individually; the remaining residence and the ground-floor commercial unit have no recorded third-party transfer. The building prices as boutique Tribeca loft product in a landmark shell with new mechanical systems — a different comparable set from both the pre-conversion loft co-ops on the block and the new-development towers a few streets west. On a per-square-foot basis it sits in the upper band for boutique Tribeca conversions, and the absence of any tax abatement is the largest gap between headline price and true monthly cost. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.
Recent closings at this building, from The Roebling Research Library. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.
| Date | Unit | Apartment | Price | PPSF | vs. Ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2022 | 5 | 3 BR · 3.5 BA · 3,315 sf | $7,504,500 | $2,264/sf | -1.9% |
| Mar 11, 2022 | 6 | 3 BR · 3.5 BA · 3,315 sf | $7,550,000 | $2,278/sf | -1.3% |
| Feb 15, 2022 | 4 | 3 BR · 3.5 BA · 3,315 sf | $7,604,500 | $2,294/sf | +0.1% |
Market read. $/sf is measured on the latest sales with reliable square footage (2022): a median $2,278/sf (recorded) across 3 sales. The building has traded as recently as 2023. Median listing discount 0.7% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.
Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-00175-7507; each condominium apartment is its own tax lot). Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified in The Roebling Research Library. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.
What would your apartment rent for?
Enter your apartment and I'll send you what it would rent for, from comparable closed leases at The Tribeca Heritage Condominium and nearby.
Buying here? Condo closing costs with a mortgage typically run 3 to 6% of the price. See NYC co-op and condo closing costs, line by line.
Keep up with The Tribeca Heritage Condominium and its market
The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings like The Tribeca Heritage Condominium. Unsubscribe anytime.
We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.
What to know if you’re buying
Get the address right in every search. City data files this building under 51 White Street. LPC files it as 51–53 White Street. Title, tax bills and violation searches run on BIN 1001934 and BBL 1-00175-7507. A search run only on "53 White Street" will miss the Department of Buildings history.
Reconcile the source dates and areas. The building is an 1857–1858 structure per LPC, and its completed area is roughly 31,300 square feet, not the 21,681 in the city's file. The date and area discrepancies require the original construction and alteration records; no source is conclusive solely by category.
Map the lot-line windows. Twenty-four of them face west onto the rear of 49 White Street. Understand which belong to your floor and what the neighbor can build.
Confirm the LPC permit path. Window replacement, storefront alterations, terrace railings and mechanical equipment need the applicable LPC permission; eligible work can receive staff approval and ordinary maintenance may be exempt. Interior work requiring a DOB permit also needs LPC permission. Budget time as well as money.
Check the tax bill. The roll shows no exemption; confirm on the apartment's current bill that no abatement applies.
Read the budget against the amenity load. Four wellness rooms and an elevator across seven residences is a favorable ratio to use and an expensive one to fund.
What to know if you’re selling
Lead with the restoration and the approval record. The LPC Certificate of Appropriateness, the removal of the 1920s cement and fire escapes, and the recovered Tuckahoe marble are documented facts that survive a buyer's attorney's diligence. They are also unrepeatable — no competing building can add this story.
Be direct about taxes. Buyers comparing this to abated new construction downtown will find the difference themselves. Presenting the full unabated number up front, paired with a True Monthly Carrying Cost analysis, produces better outcomes than letting it surface late.
Same-building comparables are thin by design. With seven residences and a 2022–2026 sellout, pricing is a floor-by-floor argument rather than a building average. Terraces, ceiling height and window exposure move the number more than square footage does.
Comparable buildings
If you're considering 53 White Street, also evaluate:
- 55 White Street — the cast-iron landmark immediately next door, converted to loft condominiums; the closest possible comparable in address, block and building type
- 81 White Street — landmark Tribeca loft conversion farther east on White Street; similar scale, different vintage of conversion
- 91 Leonard Street — nearby Tribeca condominium to the south
- 66 Leonard Street — the Textile Building; the larger prewar loft conversion alternative
- 155 Franklin Street — boutique Tribeca loft building with full-floor residences
- 60 Collister Street — the American Express Carriage House; a comparable small landmark conversion
- The Sterling Mason (71 Laight Street) — landmark warehouse conversion with a contemporary addition; the same architectural argument at larger scale
- 443 Greenwich Street — the full-service Tribeca landmark conversion; the amenity-heavy alternative
- 108 Leonard Street — landmark conversion with a full amenity program; the institutional-scale alternative
More Tribeca buildings
- 52 Lispenard Street — 1867 condominium
- 52 Thomas Street — 1928 condominium
- 53 Warren Street — 1854 condominium
- The North Moore (53 North Moore Street) — 1910 condominium
- 55 Hudson Street — 1891 co-op
- 55 Leonard Street — 1915 condominium
The neighborhood
For the full corridor — architecture, transit, and pricing across Tribeca — read The Roebling Team Guide to Tribeca.
How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.
Considering a move at The Tribeca Heritage Condominium?
Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com