- Year built
- 1859
- Type
- Cooperative
- Floors
- 9
- Landmark status
- Not an individual landmark; in the SoHo-Cast Iron Historic District
- NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission records, updated February 2026
- Subletting by shareholders
- Permitted with conditions
- Maximum financing
- 80% of the purchase price
- Flip tax
- None
- Doorman
- No doorman
Every recorded sale at this building, 2004–2024
Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.
- Median $/sf, 2021
- $692
- 1 sale
- Listing discount
- 8.3%
- Recorded sales
- 16
- On record
- 2004–2024
Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.
A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at 565 Broadway would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.
John Kellum built this corner in 1859 and 1860 for a developer named John May, and it went up as a marble palazzo at a moment when Broadway above Houston was the most fashionable retail street in the country. Its tenant was Ball, Black & Co., the leading American jeweler of the mid-nineteenth century and Tiffany & Co.'s principal rival — Tiffany's own store stood across Broadway. Historical accounts credit the building with two firsts: New York's first genuinely fire-proof construction, and the first safe-deposit vaults in the United States, installed in its basement for the jeweler's stock. Kellum is the same architect who would go on to design the A. T. Stewart cast-iron store and the Tweed Courthouse, and this is early, confident work in that line.
The building's second life is the one that shaped it physically. In 1893 four stories in cream-colored brick were added above Kellum's five, chosen to answer the marble rather than to imitate it, and the nine-story massing that resulted is what stands today. The tenancy fell down the commercial ladder — jewelers to garment and hat manufacturers, a period as a bank — and then in the 1960s and 1970s working artists took the upper floors for the reason artists always took SoHo: cheap rent and enormous north and east light off a corner. In 1979 the preservation architect Joseph Pell Lombardi was commissioned to restore the building and convert it to a cooperative, and the loft tenants became shareholders.
The building’s reported artist-occupancy and conversion history makes legal occupancy a separate diligence question. The SoHo/NoHo Neighborhood Plan adopted December 15, 2021 created a voluntary route from JLWQA to unrestricted residential use. Its Arts Fund contribution began at $100 per square foot of converted floor space, with annual inflation adjustments; verify the applicable rate and area before calculating a unit’s cost. The January 2026 Court of Appeals decision upheld the fee against the takings challenge. Occupant-specific statutory protections and a unit’s actual Loft Law status require separate review; the rezoning did not automatically remove JLWQA restrictions.
Check the apartment’s Loft Law record. DOB guidance says an IMD unit that entered Loft Board jurisdiction is outside this JLWQA conversion process, and former IMD units with a final certificate of occupancy may continue residential occupancy without artist certification. The building’s DOB filings frequently carry a Loft Board flag, but that flag alone does not establish coverage or completed legalization for a specific apartment. Have counsel obtain the Loft Board registration, unit coverage and certificate of occupancy before relying on an exemption.
The last structural fact is the retail. Roughly 5,000 square feet on the corner of Broadway and Prince — one of the strongest retail corners in Manhattan — sits under ten or eleven apartments. Commercial rent of that quality carried by that few shareholders is the reason maintenance in a building like this behaves differently from maintenance in a residential-only cooperative of the same size. It is also a concentration: one space, one tenant, one lease, and a vacancy is felt immediately by every shareholder. Reading that lease — its term, its escalations, its expiry — is the second thing a buyer's attorney should do.
Architecture and unit composition
The Broadway and Prince elevations are the original Kellum work: an East Chester marble front over a cast-iron ground-floor storefront with Corinthian columns, arranged in the Renaissance-palazzo rhythm that Broadway's mid-century commercial architecture made standard. LPC's building database records stone as the primary material and brick as the secondary, which is the record's way of describing the marble base and the 1893 brick attic above. Despite the district's name, this is not a cast-iron-fronted building — the cast iron is at street level, the marble carries the composition, and buyers who have been told they are buying "a cast-iron loft" are buying something rarer and older than that.
The apartments are what nineteenth-century commercial construction produces when it is left alone: roughly 46,180 square feet of reported residential area across ten or eleven units; this gross-area allocation does not establish measured living area or full-floor layouts. Column-free spans are not on offer — cast-iron Corinthian columns run through the interiors and are part of the architecture rather than an obstacle to be removed. Ceilings are tall, windows are oversized on both the Broadway and Prince exposures, and the elevators are keyed to open directly into the lofts. The building appeared as the setting for the first season of The Real World: New York in 1992, which is the most widely circulated image of what a loft in this building looks like.
Buyers should expect wide variation in condition. A cooperative that converted in 1979 with its loft tenants in place has apartments that were renovated across four decades and apartments that were not, and condition is one factor to compare alongside floor, exposure, layout, ownership terms and monthly costs.
Building operations
This is a small, self-contained building rather than a serviced one. There is no doorman and no amenity program; the elevators are key-locked, which is the security model. Department of Buildings filings across the past twenty-five years read as ordinary stewardship of an old masonry building — boiler and oil-burner replacements in 2001 and 2004–2005, façade work with sidewalk sheds and scaffold in 2005 and 2007, water-tank and standpipe modernization with new sprinkler and domestic services in 2011, window replacement at the east and north elevations filed in 2012, and repeated interior alteration filings on individual floors. Exterior alterations generally require LPC permits; determine the applicable approval path, schedule and cost from the actual façade or window scope, with eligible staff permits and maintenance exemptions considered.
Because no financial statements for this cooperative are on file with us, we make no representation about reserves, the underlying mortgage, assessments or capital planning. Those are the documents to request first.
Policy framework
Financing is capped at 80 percent — a 20 percent minimum down payment — per the management-sourced policy record. That is at the permissive end for a Manhattan cooperative and a meaningful advantage over the 50 and 65 percent ceilings common in prewar houses uptown.
Subletting is permitted with board approval and appears to be renewable. The published fee schedule carries a subtenant application processing fee of $600, a $20 credit-check fee for each additional adult, refundable move-in and move-out deposits of $1,000 each, and — the telling item — a separate $300 sublet renewal fee. Buildings that permit only a single fixed sublet term do not publish renewal fees.
Purchase mechanics are a board package and interview, on published fees. A $650 non-refundable application fee, $150 per adult for credit reporting, and refundable $1,000 move-in and move-out deposits. The schedule also now carries a $40 registered-mail fee. That is management's charge, not one the law imposes: New York City's 2026 cooperative application law (Local Law 58 of 2026), for applications made on or after July 28, 2026, requires a co-op to acknowledge each submission by email and registered mail within fifteen days, stating whether the application is complete, and to decide within forty-five days of acknowledging a complete application. That law materially shortens what used to be an open-ended timeline, and buyers should hold the building to it.
Post-closing liquidity, the flip tax, pied-à-terre use, and trust and LLC ownership are not documented in any source available to us. No offering plan, proprietary lease or house rules for this building exist in either library. What the public record shows is only this: every one of the twelve recorded share transfers since 2006 ran to named individuals, and no entity or trust appears as a purchaser. That is consistent with a restriction, and it is not proof of one. All four of these terms must be obtained from the managing agent before an offer is priced, and none of them should be assumed from the norms of neighboring buildings.
Application and transaction fees
Fees below are from building management's published schedule, as of July 2026. They are shown as published, item by item; no total is added because the total depends on the transaction. Deposits are listed apart from nonrefundable charges.
- Terms
- No flip tax appears on the management-sourced fee schedule on file. That is not the same as there being none — transfer fees are frequently set in the proprietary lease rather than the application schedule. Confirm with the managing agent before pricing a sale
Source: The Roebling Team's building profile
Purchase
4 items
Fees and charges
| Item | Paid by | When | Amount | Refundable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Fee | Paid by Buyer | When With the application | Amount $650 | Refundable Non-refundable |
| Credit Check FeePer applicantRequired | Paid by Buyer | When With the application | Amount $150 per adult applicant/occupant. International credit checks may cost more. Please contact the Property Management for information in the name or price of the fee. | Refundable Non-refundable |
Deposits
| Item | Paid by | When | Amount | Refundable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Move In Deposit | Paid by Buyer | When With the application | Amount $1,000 | Refundable Refundable |
| Move Out Deposit | Paid by Shareholder | When With the application | Amount $1,000 | Refundable Refundable |
Sublet
5 items
Fees and charges
| Item | Paid by | When | Amount | Refundable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Processing FeeIncludes one free credit check | Paid by Subtenant | When With the application | Amount $600 | Refundable Non-refundable |
| Credit Check FeePer applicant | Paid by Subtenant | When With the application | Amount $20 per additional applicant after applicant one (1) and any adult occupant. International credit checks may cost more. Please contact the Property Management for information. | Refundable Non-refundable |
Deposits
| Item | Paid by | When | Amount | Refundable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Move Out Deposit | Paid by Shareholder | When With the application | Amount $1,000 | Refundable Refundable |
| Move In Deposit | Paid by Subtenant | When With the application | Amount $1,000 | Refundable Refundable |
Sublet renewal
Fees and charges
| Item | Paid by | When | Amount | Refundable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Fee | Paid by Shareholder | When With the application | Amount $300 | Refundable Non-refundable |
Refinance
2 items
Fees and charges
| Item | Paid by | When | Amount | Refundable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Fee | Paid by Shareholder | When With the application | Amount $500 | Refundable Non-refundable |
| Credit Check FeePer applicantRequired | Paid by Shareholder | When With the application | Amount $150 per applicant | Refundable Non-refundable |
Management updates its schedule without a public filing. The date is when management last updated the page, not when a rule changed. Confirm the current schedule with management before you apply.
Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to discuss the building's costs and purchase requirements.
Own an apartment here? Request an apartment-specific pricing review.
Financing and purchase requirements
- Maximum financing
- 80% of the purchase priceSource: building management's published schedule, as of July 2026
Sublet and pied-à-terre policy
A condominium owner leasing a unit and a co-op shareholder subletting are different rules, and a building-wide rule is different from a restriction on one apartment. This is the building's rule; confirm it for the specific apartment.
- Subletting by shareholders
- Permitted with conditionsBoard approvalSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
- Pied-à-terre ownership
- Not verified
Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to discuss the sublet and pied-à-terre rules for that apartment.
Building staffing and amenities
- Doorman
- No doormanSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
- Elevator
- YesSource: NYC Department of City Planning records (PLUTO)
Staffing and amenities as our building profile and recent listing records describe them. A feature not listed is not confirmed absent. Outdoor space, parking and some facilities can belong to particular apartments or to a separate owner; confirm access for the specific apartment.
Local Law 97
- 2024–2029 annual penalty
- $0 (under cap)
- 2030–2034 annual penalty
- $774/yr
- Per unit / month range
- $0 – $6
- Modeled exposure split equally across 11 units (the residential count on the city's lot record). Not an assessed amount; co-op shareholders are typically charged by share allocation.
Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.
See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →Facade safety — Local Law 11
The latest available filing classified the facade as SWARMP — Safe With A Repair and Maintenance Program: the inspector (QEWI) identified conditions requiring monitoring or repair, with repairs due by the deadline stated in the filing. The scope, timeline, and how the building funds the work are building-specific — we review the filings and board materials for you.
How to read this, and where it comes from
QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — a licensed professional engineer or registered architect who meets DOB’s FISP qualifications and signs the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).
Penalties shown are amounts DOB assessed against filings on record across 2005–10 to 2020–25. The FISP dataset does not record whether they were paid, contested or remain open, so treat the figure as history rather than a current balance and confirm the building’s standing with the managing agent.
Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.
Recent sales
Compare 565 Broadway with relevant SoHo loft sales, including newer condominiums and smaller cooperatives where differences in ownership, layout, condition and costs can be accounted for. Compare measured area, ceiling height, exposure and actual renovation condition using dated transactions; neither a neighborhood-wide ranking of condition nor a widening price gap is established here.
Two structural factors sit on the value here in ways buyers should price explicitly. The first is the retail income, which supports maintenance and is a genuine advantage as long as the space is let. The second is the JLWQA and Loft Law question, which is either a resolved non-issue or a six-figure contingent cost depending on a record that can be confirmed in a phone call. Anyone valuing this building without settling that question is guessing. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.
Recent transfers at this building, from The Roebling Research Library. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.
| Date | Unit | Apartment | Price | PPSF | vs. Ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2021 | 5E | 1 BR · 2 BA | $2,350,000 | -9.6% | |
| Apr 20, 2021 | 2 | 5 BR · 5 BA · 6,500 sf | $4,500,000 | $692/sf | -33.8% |
| Aug 28, 2018 | 5E | 1 BR · 2 BA · 1,850 sf | $2,600,000 | $1,405/sf | -7.0% |
| Mar 8, 2017 | 5W | 2 BR · 3 BA · 2,600 sf | $3,750,000 | $1,442/sf | -3.8% |
| May 28, 2014 | 5W | 3 BR · 3 BA · 2,740 sf | $4,200,000 | $1,533/sf | +7.7% |
| Jan 26, 2012 | 3 | 3 BR · 5,000 sf | $3,600,000 | $720/sf | -9.9% |
| Sep 5, 2010 | 7 | 3 BR · 5,000 sf | $4,500,000 | $900/sf | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | 7 | 3 BR · 5,000 sf | $4,995,000 | $999/sf | +0.0% |
Market read. $/sf is measured on the latest sales with reliable square footage (2021): a median $692/sf (recorded) across 1 sale. The building has traded as recently as 2024. Median listing discount 8.3% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.
The retrade record
Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.
Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.
Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-00498-0005). Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified in The Roebling Research Library. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.
What would your apartment rent for?
Enter your apartment and I'll send you what it would rent for, from comparable closed leases at 565 Broadway and nearby.
Buying here? Co-op closing costs typically run 2 to 3% of the price. See NYC co-op and condo closing costs, line by line.
Keep up with 565 Broadway and its market
The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings like 565 Broadway. Unsubscribe anytime.
We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.
What to know if you’re buying
Confirm the unit’s IMD status and lawful occupancy. Ask counsel to reconcile the Loft Board registration and coverage orders with the certificate of occupancy and proposed occupant’s legal basis. A DOB Loft Board flag alone does not establish exemption from JLWQA conversion or the Arts Fund contribution; if conversion is required, confirm the current indexed rate, qualifying area and approval process.
Read the retail lease. One ground-floor tenant on a prime Broadway corner underwrites a meaningful share of the building's income across ten or eleven shareholders. Term, escalations, expiry, renewal options and the tenant's credit are all material to your maintenance five years from now.
Get the documents, because we don't have them. No offering plan, proprietary lease, house rules or financial statements for this cooperative are held in either library. The flip tax, post-closing liquidity requirement, pied-à-terre policy and position on trusts and LLCs are all unknown to us and must come from the managing agent. Treat any figure quoted from memory or from a listing as unverified.
Budget for Landmarks on anything exterior. Windows, façade repointing, storefront changes and rooftop equipment all require a Landmarks permit in the SoHo–Cast Iron Historic District. That is a schedule cost as much as a dollar cost.
Underwrite the renovation, not the asking price. Confirm the apartment's measured interior area and estimate the actual systems, kitchen, bath and egress work alongside the other acquisition costs. Run the Renovation Cost Calculator before you decide what the apartment is worth, and remember that column placement and Landmarks review both constrain what is possible.
The financing ceiling is friendly; the board package is still a board package. Eighty percent financing is generous by Manhattan cooperative standards, but approval remains discretionary and requires a full package and an interview. Run the Co-op Board Qualification Calculator before offering.
What to know if you’re selling
Lead with the building, then the loft. Kellum, 1859, Ball, Black & Co., the marble front, the 1893 addition — this is one of the oldest and best-documented commercial buildings in SoHo, and the history is a genuine differentiator against the converted stock around it. Say plainly that it is marble rather than cast iron; the distinction is a point of interest, not a deficiency.
Neutralize the JLWQA question in advance. If the building's IMD record supports the exemption, get that documented before going to market. Left unaddressed it becomes a buyer's negotiating lever worth six figures; addressed up front it disappears.
Assemble the paper. Because no plan or financials for this building were located in the libraries searched, a seller who arrives with the proprietary lease, the current financial statements, the retail lease summary and a written statement of the flip tax and sublet policy gives buyers material needed for review without establishing a faster closing or stronger price.
Price against condition, not against averages. Confirm actual layouts and measured areas across the ten or eleven reported residences, and evaluate the available comparison sample. Run the Renovation Cost Calculator against the buyer's likely scope and set the ask from that math.
Comparable buildings
If you're considering 565 Broadway, also evaluate:
- 92 Greene Street — SoHo–Cast Iron Historic District loft building with a Joseph Pell Lombardi association; a conversion-history comparison to assess alongside apartment characteristics
- 115 Mercer Street — boutique SoHo loft cooperative one block west
- 10 Greene Street — cast-iron loft building in the same district; the true cast-iron-front comparison
- 101 Wooster Street — SoHo loft cooperative of similar scale and vintage of conversion
- 105 Wooster Street — full-floor loft alternative a few blocks west
- 139 Wooster Street — SoHo loft building with comparable floor plates
- 15 Mercer Street — small loft cooperative on the same street grid
- 16 Crosby Street — boutique loft alternative on the district's eastern edge
- 113 Prince Street — the Prince Street comparison a block west
- 169 Spring Street — SoHo loft building one block south; similar scale, different exposure
The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.
How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.
Considering a move at 565 Broadway?
Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com