Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,600/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $270K/room 2%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $472K/room 18%CPW $355K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,313/sf 24%Greenwich Village $2,455/sf 10%
Full index →
Cooperative · 1859
565 Broadway
565 Broadway, New York, NY 10012

565 Broadway

565 Broadway, New York, NY 10012

SoHo

BBL 1004980005 · BIN 1007573

At a glance
Year built
1859
Type
Cooperative
Units
11
Floors
9
Landmark
Designated
Financing
80 percent maximum financing (20 percent minimum down) per the management-sourced policy record
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2004–2024

Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.

Median $/sf
$692
Listing discount
8.3%
Recorded sales
16
On record
2004–2024

John Kellum built this corner in 1859 and 1860 for a developer named John May, and it went up as a marble palazzo at a moment when Broadway above Houston was the most fashionable retail street in the country. Its tenant was Ball, Black & Co., the leading American jeweler of the mid-nineteenth century and Tiffany & Co.'s principal rival — Tiffany's own store stood across Broadway. Historical accounts credit the building with two firsts: New York's first genuinely fire-proof construction, and the first safe-deposit vaults in the United States, installed in its basement for the jeweler's stock. Kellum is the same architect who would go on to design the A. T. Stewart cast-iron store and the Tweed Courthouse, and this is early, confident work in that line.

The building's second life is the one that shaped it physically. In 1893 four stories in cream-colored brick were added above Kellum's five, chosen to answer the marble rather than to imitate it, and the nine-story massing that resulted is what stands today. The tenancy fell down the commercial ladder — jewelers to garment and hat manufacturers, a period as a bank — and then in the 1960s and 1970s working artists took the upper floors for the reason artists always took SoHo: cheap rent and enormous north and east light off a corner. In 1979 the preservation architect Joseph Pell Lombardi was commissioned to restore the building and convert it to a cooperative, and the loft tenants became shareholders.

That sequence — artist occupancy in a manufacturing district, then conversion — is the source of the single most consequential fact about buying here, and it is a regulatory fact rather than an architectural one. The building sat for decades in M1-5B zoning, where residential occupancy was legal only as Joint Living-Work Quarters for Artists and required certification by the Department of Cultural Affairs. Buildings in that condition carried a persistent underwriting problem: a non-artist purchaser was, on paper, an uncertified occupant of a JLWQA unit. The SoHo/NoHo Neighborhood Plan adopted on December 15, 2021 rezoned the neighborhood to M1-5/R9X inside the new Special SoHo-NoHo Mixed Use District, allowed JLWQA to continue as a legal non-conforming use, and created a voluntary path to convert a unit to Use Group 2 residential — at a one-time Arts Fund contribution of $100 per square foot. On a 5,000-square-foot full-floor loft that is a $500,000 line item, which is why the question is not academic here.

The Loft Law is what may take that line item off the table. In June 2023 the City settled that current and former Interim Multiple Dwellings are exempt from the artist-certification requirement, from the conversion to Use Group 2, and from the Arts Fund contribution — free to be occupied residentially and sold or transferred to anyone regardless of certification. Department of Buildings job filings for this building are flagged as falling under Loft Board jurisdiction on the large majority of records, which is what one would expect of a building with IMD history. If that record holds on inspection, the exemption applies and the largest contingent cost in a SoHo loft purchase disappears. We flag this as the first thing a buyer's counsel should confirm with the Loft Board, and we do not treat the DOB flag as a substitute for that confirmation.

The last structural fact is the retail. Roughly 5,000 square feet on the corner of Broadway and Prince — one of the strongest retail corners in Manhattan — sits under ten or eleven apartments. Commercial rent of that quality carried by that few shareholders is the reason maintenance in a building like this behaves differently from maintenance in a residential-only cooperative of the same size. It is also a concentration: one space, one tenant, one lease, and a vacancy is felt immediately by every shareholder. Reading that lease — its term, its escalations, its expiry — is the second thing a buyer's attorney should do.

Architecture and unit composition

The Broadway and Prince elevations are the original Kellum work: an East Chester marble front over a cast-iron ground-floor storefront with Corinthian columns, arranged in the Renaissance-palazzo rhythm that Broadway's mid-century commercial architecture made standard. LPC's building database records stone as the primary material and brick as the secondary, which is the record's way of describing the marble base and the 1893 brick attic above. Despite the district's name, this is not a cast-iron-fronted building — the cast iron is at street level, the marble carries the composition, and buyers who have been told they are buying "a cast-iron loft" are buying something rarer and older than that.

The apartments are what nineteenth-century commercial construction produces when it is left alone: roughly 46,180 square feet of residential area divided among ten or eleven units, which puts most of them at or near a full floor of about 4,600 to 5,000 square feet. Column-free spans are not on offer — cast-iron Corinthian columns run through the interiors and are part of the architecture rather than an obstacle to be removed. Ceilings are tall, windows are oversized on both the Broadway and Prince exposures, and the elevators are keyed to open directly into the lofts. The building appeared as the setting for the first season of The Real World: New York in 1992, which is the most widely circulated image of what a loft in this building looks like.

Buyers should expect wide variation in condition. A cooperative that converted in 1979 with its loft tenants in place has apartments that were renovated across four decades and apartments that were not, and the spread between them at this scale is the largest single driver of price.

Building operations

This is a small, self-contained building rather than a serviced one. There is no doorman and no amenity program; the elevators are key-locked, which is the security model. Department of Buildings filings across the past twenty-five years read as ordinary stewardship of an old masonry building — boiler and oil-burner replacements in 2001 and 2004–2005, façade work with sidewalk sheds and scaffold in 2005 and 2007, water-tank and standpipe modernization with new sprinkler and domestic services in 2011, window replacement at the east and north elevations filed in 2012, and repeated interior alteration filings on individual floors. Exterior work requires Landmarks approval, which lengthens timelines and raises unit costs on any façade or window cycle.

Because no financial statements for this cooperative are on file with us, we make no representation about reserves, the underlying mortgage, assessments or capital planning. Those are the documents to request first.

Policy framework

Financing is capped at 80 percent — a 20 percent minimum down payment — per the management-sourced policy record. That is at the permissive end for a Manhattan cooperative and a meaningful advantage over the 50 and 65 percent ceilings common in prewar houses uptown.

Subletting is permitted with board approval and appears to be renewable. The published fee schedule carries a subtenant application processing fee of $600, a $20 credit-check fee for each additional adult, refundable move-in and move-out deposits of $1,000 each, and — the telling item — a separate $300 sublet renewal fee. Buildings that permit only a single fixed sublet term do not publish renewal fees.

Purchase mechanics are a board package and interview, on published fees. A $650 non-refundable application fee, $150 per adult for credit reporting, and refundable $1,000 move-in and move-out deposits. The schedule also now carries a $40 registered-mail fee, which exists because New York City's 2026 cooperative application law requires a co-op to acknowledge a completed application in writing within fifteen days and to decide within forty-five days of that acknowledgment. That law materially shortens what used to be an open-ended timeline, and buyers should hold the building to it.

Post-closing liquidity, the flip tax, pied-à-terre use, and trust and LLC ownership are not documented in any source available to us. No offering plan, proprietary lease or house rules for this building exist in either library. What the public record shows is only this: every one of the twelve recorded share transfers since 2006 ran to named individuals, and no entity or trust appears as a purchaser. That is consistent with a restriction, and it is not proof of one. All four of these terms must be obtained from the managing agent before an offer is priced, and none of them should be assumed from the norms of neighboring buildings.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟢
Strong — under cap in both periods
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
Per unit / month range

Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
SWARMP
What this means for you

The latest available filing classified the facade as SWARMP — Safe With A Repair and Maintenance Program: the engineer identified conditions requiring monitoring or repair before the next inspection cycle. The scope, timeline, and how the building funds the work are building-specific — we review the filings and board materials for you.

Inspection history
2005–10
Safe
2010–15
Safe
2015–20
SWARMP
2020–25
SWARMP
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2028
Assessed · 2005–10 to 2020–25
$151,300 in filing penalties
payment status not in the record
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs required before the next inspection cycle.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Penalties shown are amounts DOB assessed against filings on record across 2005–10 to 2020–25. The FISP dataset does not record whether they were paid, contested or remain open, so treat the figure as history rather than a current balance and confirm the building’s standing with the managing agent.

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

565 Broadway trades as SoHo full-floor loft product, which is a market of its own and does not track either the neighborhood's new-development condominiums or its smaller converted co-ops. Pricing at this size is driven by square footage, ceiling height, exposure and — more than anywhere else in Manhattan — condition, because a raw or lightly renovated 5,000-square-foot loft and a finished one are effectively different assets. Indexed to the last complete year, the SoHo loft cooperative market has continued to reward turnkey space and to discount volume that requires a full build-out, and the gap between the two has widened rather than narrowed.

Two structural factors sit on the value here in ways buyers should price explicitly. The first is the retail income, which supports maintenance and is a genuine advantage as long as the space is let. The second is the JLWQA and Loft Law question, which is either a resolved non-issue or a six-figure contingent cost depending on a record that can be confirmed in a phone call. Anyone valuing this building without settling that question is guessing. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.

Recent transfers at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Jul 8, 20215E
1 BR · 2 BA
$2,350,000-9.6%
Apr 20, 20212
5 BR · 5 BA · 6,500 sf
$4,500,000$692/sf-33.8%
Aug 28, 20185E
1 BR · 2 BA · 1,850 sf
$2,600,000$1,405/sf-7.0%
Mar 8, 20175W
2 BR · 3 BA · 2,600 sf
$3,750,000$1,442/sf-3.8%
May 28, 20145W
3 BR · 3 BA · 2,740 sf
$4,200,000$1,533/sf+7.7%
Jan 26, 20123
3 BR · 5,000 sf
$3,600,000$720/sf-9.9%
Sep 5, 20107
3 BR · 5,000 sf
$4,500,000$900/sfoff-mkt
Jun 21, 20107
3 BR · 5,000 sf
$4,995,000$999/sf+0.0%

Market read. $/sf is measured on the latest sales with reliable square footage (2021): a median $692/sf across 1 sale. The building has traded as recently as 2024. Median listing discount 8.3% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

7 · 5,000 sf+0%
$4,500,000 ($900/sf) 2006$4,995,000 ($999/sf) 2010$4,500,000 ($900/sf) 2010
View all 16 recorded transfers, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-00498-0005) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.

What to know if you’re buying

Settle the IMD question before anything else. The Department of Buildings record flags this building under Loft Board jurisdiction, and the June 2023 City settlement exempts current and former IMDs from artist certification, from converting JLWQA to Use Group 2, and from the $100-per-square-foot Arts Fund contribution. On a full-floor loft that exemption is worth roughly half a million dollars. Have counsel confirm the building's and the specific unit's status with the Loft Board — not with the seller, and not with the listing.

Read the retail lease. One ground-floor tenant on a prime Broadway corner underwrites a meaningful share of the building's income across ten or eleven shareholders. Term, escalations, expiry, renewal options and the tenant's credit are all material to your maintenance five years from now.

Get the documents, because we don't have them. No offering plan, proprietary lease, house rules or financial statements for this cooperative are held in either library. The flip tax, post-closing liquidity requirement, pied-à-terre policy and position on trusts and LLCs are all unknown to us and must come from the managing agent. Treat any figure quoted from memory or from a listing as unverified.

Budget for Landmarks on anything exterior. Windows, façade repointing, storefront changes and rooftop equipment all require a Landmarks permit in the SoHo–Cast Iron Historic District. That is a schedule cost as much as a dollar cost.

Underwrite the renovation, not the asking price. At 4,600 to 5,000 square feet, the difference between a finished loft and one that needs systems, kitchens, baths and egress work is the largest number in the transaction. Run the Renovation Cost Calculator before you decide what the apartment is worth, and remember that column placement and Landmarks review both constrain what is possible.

The financing ceiling is friendly; the board package is still a board package. Eighty percent financing is generous by Manhattan cooperative standards, but approval remains discretionary and requires a full package and an interview. Run the Co-op Board Qualification Calculator before offering.

What to know if you’re selling

Lead with the building, then the loft. Kellum, 1859, Ball, Black & Co., the marble front, the 1893 addition — this is one of the oldest and best-documented commercial buildings in SoHo, and the history is a genuine differentiator against the converted stock around it. Say plainly that it is marble rather than cast iron; the distinction is a point of interest, not a deficiency.

Neutralize the JLWQA question in advance. If the building's IMD record supports the exemption, get that documented before going to market. Left unaddressed it becomes a buyer's negotiating lever worth six figures; addressed up front it disappears.

Assemble the paper. Because no plan or financials for this building circulate in the usual libraries, a seller who arrives with the proprietary lease, the current financial statements, the retail lease summary and a written statement of the flip tax and sublet policy moves faster and holds price better than one who does not.

Price against condition, not against averages. In a market of ten or eleven full-floor lofts, comparables are thin and each one is idiosyncratic. Run the Renovation Cost Calculator against the buyer's likely scope and set the ask from that math.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 565 Broadway, also evaluate:

  • 92 Greene Street — SoHo–Cast Iron Historic District loft building with a Joseph Pell Lombardi association; the closest peer by conversion lineage
  • 115 Mercer Street — boutique SoHo loft cooperative one block east
  • 10 Greene Street — cast-iron loft building in the same district; the true cast-iron-front comparison
  • 101 Wooster Street — SoHo loft cooperative of similar scale and vintage of conversion
  • 105 Wooster Street — full-floor loft alternative a few blocks west
  • 139 Wooster Street — SoHo loft building with comparable floor plates
  • 15 Mercer Street — small loft cooperative on the same street grid
  • 16 Crosby Street — boutique loft alternative on the district's eastern edge
  • 113 Prince Street — the Prince Street comparison a block west
  • 169 Spring Street — SoHo loft building one block south; similar scale, different exposure

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across Greenwich Village — read The Roebling Team Guide to Greenwich Village.

Preparing a board package for this building?

The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent.

Considering a move at 565 Broadway?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at 565 Broadway would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.