995 Fifth Avenue (The Stanhope)Recorded sales & closing prices
995 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10028
73 recorded transfers, 2008–2026. Sortable and searchable below.
- Recorded transfers
- 73
- Date range
- 2008–2026
- Median $/sf
- $2,423
- Listing discount
- 7.5%
- Monthly carry/sf
- $5.30
- Price range
- $200K – $34.8M
Change in the building’s median $/sf over each window, adjusted to a constant-quality (average-floor) unit so it reflects price — not which floors happened to sell. (2022 marks the rate-shock inflection.) Like-for-like repeat-sale figures to follow.
The building trades in the trophy tier of Fifth Avenue conversions, with wide internal dispersion across three dimensions: floor, line, and unit type.
Vertical premium. Higher floors carry meaningfully higher pricing — the building's apartment records sit at the top of the tower, and the press-covered listings cluster in the upper half. Lower-floor units transact at materially lower $/sf than the same layout ten floors above; the premium is steep enough that an otherwise-identical apartment in the top third can clear at multiples of the same line on the lower floors.
Line premium. Park- and Met-facing west lines carry a clear premium over the east and side lines. The Fifth Avenue exposure — directly across from the Met and over Central Park — is the building's most valuable view and trades that way. East- and side-facing residences trade at a discount that reflects the exposure, not the apartment itself.
Unit type matters as much as floor. The studio band, mid-floor residences, and full-floor/penthouse tier are three different markets with different buyer pools and different $/sf. The studio band transacts at accessible Museum Mile pricing; the full-floor and penthouse inventory has produced eight-figure trades and press-covered listings — the $65 million penthouse ask of 2010 and the $30 million contract of 2012 reported by The Real Deal remain the building's most public price points.
The ground-lease structure is priced into the building relative to fee-simple neighbors, which creates the relative-value argument for buyers who underwrite it properly. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.
The complete recorded-sale history for The Stanhope, compiled from NYC Department of Finance transfer records and verified listing data, then enriched apartment-by-apartment by The Roebling Team research desk. Across sales with a public asking price, the building carries a median listing discount of 7.5% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy here.
Price per square foot over time
38 sales with a known square footage, by closing date.
Recent closings
The building’s 10 most recent market sales.
| Date | Unit | Apartment | Price | $/sf | vs. Ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2026 | 10S | 4 BR · 3.5 BA · 4,357 sf | $10,750,000 | $2,467 | -2.2% |
| Jul 24, 2025 | 16 | 8 BR · 9.5 BA · 8,360 sf | $22,000,000 | $2,632 | -9.3% |
| Apr 30, 2024 | 5S | 5 BR · 5.5 BA · 4,357 sf | $8,100,000 | $1,859 | -26.3% |
| Apr 30, 2024 | 1D | $8,100,000 | — | ||
| Mar 15, 2024 | 14A | $5,950,000 | — | ||
| Feb 13, 2024 | 7S | 4 BR · 4.5 BA · 4,357 sf | $11,300,000 | $2,594 | — |
| Sep 27, 2022 | 3N | 4 BR · 4.5 BA · 4,118 sf | $10,600,000 | $2,574 | -2.8% |
| Mar 28, 2022 | 11N | 2 BR · 2.5 BA · 2,596 sf | $5,750,000 | $2,215 | -2.5% |
| Mar 5, 2020 | 1E | 1 BR · 1 BA · 468 sf | $998,000 | $2,132 | — |
| Jun 27, 2019 | 7S | 4 BR · 4.5 BA · 4,357 sf | $10,600,000 | $2,433 | -13.8% |
The retrade record
Lines that have changed hands more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.
Every recorded sale
Sort any column; filter by unit or keyword. Prices are the recorded transfer amount at the NYC Department of Finance. Every sale sits in one of three states: counted in the building’s medians and trend; shown but excluded as a non-arms-length or nominal transfer; or shown and ⚑ flagged for review — a possible duplicate filing or an extreme $/sf outlier, held out of the statistics pending manual verification rather than allowed to move them.
| Apartment | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2026 | 10S | 4 BR · 3.5 BA | 4,357 | $10,750,000 | $2,467 | -2.2% |
| Jul 24, 2025 | 16 | 8 BR · 9.5 BA | 8,360 | $22,000,000 | $2,632 | -9.3% |
| Apr 30, 2024 | 5S | 5 BR · 5.5 BA | 4,357 | $8,100,000 | $1,859 | -26.3% |
| Apr 30, 2024 | 1D | — | $8,100,000 | — | — | |
| Mar 15, 2024 | 14A | — | $5,950,000 | — | — | |
| Feb 13, 2024 | 7S | 4 BR · 4.5 BA | 4,357 | $11,300,000 | $2,594 | — |
| Sep 27, 2022 | 3N | 4 BR · 4.5 BA | 4,118 | $10,600,000 | $2,574 | -2.8% |
| Mar 28, 2022 | 11N | 2 BR · 2.5 BA | 2,596 | $5,750,000 | $2,215 | -2.5% |
| Dec 28, 2020 | 6S | 4 BR · 3.5 BAnon-market transfer (excluded from $/sf & trends) | 4,357 | $7,900,000 | — | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | 1E | 1 BR · 1 BA | 468 | $998,000 | $2,132 | — |
| Jun 27, 2019 | 7S | 4 BR · 4.5 BA | 4,357 | $10,600,000 | $2,433 | -13.8% |
| Apr 6, 2018 | 11NCo-op Sponsor Transfer | 2 BR · 2.5 BA | 2,596 | $8,200,000 | $3,159 | -0.6% |
| Apr 6, 2018 | 11SCo-op Sponsor Transfer | 5 BR · 6 BA | 5,947 | $22,200,000 | $3,733 | +3.3% |
| Apr 6, 2018 | 1GCo-op Sponsor Transfer | — | $1,000,000 | — | — | |
| Apr 6, 2018 | 11SCo-op Sponsor Transfer | 5 BR · 6 BA | 5,947 | $21,500,000 | $3,615 | +0.0% |
| Apr 6, 2018 | 11SNCo-op Sponsor Transfer | 7 BR · 9.5 BA | 8,543 | $29,750,000 | $3,482 | +0.0% |
| Feb 22, 2018 | 15 | 7 BR · 8 BA | 8,350 | $35,000,000 | $4,192 | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | 4S | 5 BR · 4 BA | 4,357 | $9,999,999 | $2,295 | -16.6% |
| Aug 7, 2015 | 7N | 4 BRnon-market transfer (excluded from $/sf & trends) | — | $1,375,000 | — | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | 10S | 5 BR · 5 BA | 4,357 | $14,500,000 | $3,328 | -3.3% |
| Feb 28, 2014 | 5N | 4 BR | 4,118 | $12,372,500 | $3,004 | -1.0% |
| Feb 25, 2014 | 12S | 5 BR | 4,357 | $13,500,000 | $3,098 | -3.5% |
| Dec 9, 2013 | 6S | 4 BR | 4,357 | $12,250,000 | $2,812 | -7.5% |
| Oct 4, 2013 | 7S1E | 5 BR · 5.5 BA | 4,825 | $14,250,000 | $2,953 | — |
| Jun 16, 2013 | 10S | 4 BR | 4,357 | $12,500,000 | $2,869 | -16.7% |
| Nov 30, 2012 | 11N | 2 BR | 2,596 | $11,300,000 | $4,353 | -1.7% |
| Nov 30, 2012 | 1G | — | $200,000 | — | — | |
| Jul 30, 2012 | 1J | — | $1,127,703 | — | — | |
| Jul 24, 2012 | 1I | 1 BA | 461 | $999,667 | $2,168 | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | 1I | 1 BA | 461 | $999,666 | $2,168 | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | 16 | 7 BR | 8,360 | $27,376,940 | $3,275 | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | 9S | 3 BR | 3,092 | $6,500,000 | $2,102 | -18.7% |
| Mar 16, 2010 | 15 | 5 BR | 8,360 | $21,011,434 | $2,513 | -10.6% |
| Jul 20, 2009 | 2S | 5 BR | 4,357 | $7,783,759 | $1,786 | -20.2% |
| Feb 4, 2009 | 6S | 4 BR · 3.5 BA | 4,357 | $12,540,773 | $2,878 | -1.6% |
| Feb 4, 2009 | 6S | 4 BR · 3.5 BA | 4,357 | $12,540,774 | $2,878 | -1.6% |
| Dec 11, 2008 | 9S | 3 BR | 3,092 | $7,991,419 | $2,585 | -10.7% |
| Dec 11, 2008 | 9S | 3 BR | 3,092 | $7,991,418 | $2,585 | -10.7% |
| Nov 12, 2008 | 14 | 6 BR | 8,360 | $17,446,322 | $2,087 | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | 8N | 4 BR | 4,118 | $12,792,862 | $3,107 | -7.0% |
| Sep 18, 2008 | 2N | 4 BR | 4,118 | $10,243,526 | $2,488 | -14.6% |
| Sep 8, 2008 | PH | 6 BR · 8.5 BA | 7,067 | $34,758,839 | $4,918 | -26.8% |
| Aug 8, 2008 | 8S | 5 BR | 4,357 | $12,681,898 | $2,911 | -7.8% |
| Jul 18, 2008 | 11S | 5 BR | 4,357 | $14,427,835 | $3,311 | -6.9% |
| Jun 4, 2008 | 1A | — | $1,250,000 | — | — | |
| May 27, 2008 | 1H | — | $1,133,425 | — | — | |
| May 27, 2008 | 1H | — | $1,133,424 | — | — | |
| May 14, 2008 | 5N | 4 BR | — | $12,791,007 | — | -7.0% |
| May 2, 2008 | 7S | 5 BR | 4,357 | $12,175,979 | $2,795 | — |
| May 2, 2008 | 1E | 1 BR · 1 BA | 468 | $1,064,693 | $2,275 | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | 1G | — | $1,018,814 | — | — | |
| Apr 28, 2008 | 12S | 5 BR | 4,357 | $13,904,021 | $3,191 | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | 12S | 5 BR | 4,357 | $13,904,022 | $3,191 | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | 4N | 4 BR | 4,118 | $11,457,605 | $2,782 | -6.5% |
| Apr 23, 2008 | 11N | — | $11,734,719 | — | — | |
| Apr 23, 2008 | 11N | 2 BR | 2,596 | $11,734,720 | $4,520 | -15.9% |
| Apr 9, 2008 | 10S | 5 BR | 4,357 | $13,065,847 | $2,999 | -5.0% |
| Apr 4, 2008 | 3S | 4 BR | 4,357 | $11,230,261 | $2,578 | -10.2% |
| Apr 1, 2008 | 3N | 4 BR · 4.5 BA | 4,118 | $12,116,839 | $2,942 | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | 10N | 4 BR | 4,118 | $12,852,946 | $3,121 | -4.8% |
| Mar 31, 2008 | 6N | 4 BR | 4,118 | $12,007,573 | $2,916 | -6.6% |
| Mar 31, 2008 | 1B | — | $816,843 | — | — | |
| Mar 31, 2008 | 1B | — | $816,842 | — | — | |
| Mar 26, 2008 | 7N | 4 BR | 4,118 | $9,660,523 | $2,346 | -25.1% |
| Mar 3, 2008 | 4S | 5 BR | 4,357 | $11,000,000 | $2,525 | +0.0% |
| Feb 27, 2008 | 1A | — | $10,315,597 | — | — | |
| Jan 31, 2008 | 9N | 6 BR | 5,383 | $13,283,824 | $2,468 | -29.9% |
| Jan 31, 2008 | 9N | 6 BR | 5,383 | $13,283,825 | $2,468 | -29.9% |
| Jan 25, 2008 | 12N | 4 BR | 4,118 | $12,281,326 | $2,982 | -26.7% |
| Jan 25, 2008 | 1C | — | $864,399 | — | — | |
| Jan 14, 2008 | 1D | — | $961,076 | — | — | |
| Jan 14, 2008 | 5S | 5 BR | 4,357 | $12,187,727 | $2,797 | -8.0% |
| Jan 14, 2008 | 1D | — | $961,077 | — | — |
Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01492-0069) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate. Storage, parking, and commercial units are excluded from all figures. Floor- and line-level $/sf are time-controlled (each sale measured against the building’s going rate at the time of sale) and expressed at today’s pricing, so they isolate the floor or line premium rather than blend two decades of market movement.
Put this data to work.
Know what’s fair before you offer — we’ll show you where each line trades, the building’s discount-to-ask pattern, and where the value sits right now.
Price to the building’s real trajectory, not a guess — we’ll position your line against its true comps to maximize the outcome.