Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,600/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $270K/room 2%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $472K/room 18%CPW $355K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,313/sf 24%Greenwich Village $2,455/sf 10%
Full index →
Cooperative · 1921
The Brick House
136 West 75th Street, New York, NY 10023

136 West 75th Street (The Brick House)

136 West 75th Street, New York, NY 10023

Upper West Side

BBL 1011460049 · BIN 1030085

At a glance
Year built
1921
Type
Cooperative
Units
30
Floors
6
Landmark
Designated
Amenities
Bike storage, basement storage; no doorman
Pets
Recent listing records describe the building as not permitting pets — verify with the managing agent
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2004–2022

Bedroom-by-bedroom medians, the full transfer record, and how units trade against ask.

Listing discount
0.0%
Recorded transfers
35

The Brick House is what the Upper West Side's side streets do best and least often advertise: a six-story, 30-apartment pre-war cooperative on a tree-lined block between Columbus and Amsterdam, three blocks from Central Park and four from Lincoln Center, at a scale where the whole building fits in a lobby conversation. It was built in 1920–21 by Bethlehem Engineering Corporation for West 75th Street Corporation, in a restrained neo-Georgian brick-and-stone idiom that the Landmarks Preservation Commission catalogued when the Upper West Side / Central Park West Historic District was designated.

Its structure is unusually well documented, because the 1982 offering plan on file carries a full engineering report. Floors are concrete arches on a fireproofed steel frame; entrance, public and stair hall walls are eight- and twelve-inch brick. The single passenger elevator is not original — the plan records that the first car, by the Reedy Elevator Company, was replaced by Staley Elevator Company under a 1945 elevator application. That is the sort of detail that matters when a small building has one cab and no second means of vertical access.

The building converted late in the first great wave, under an eviction plan presented on June 1, 1982, with rent-controlled and rent-stabilized tenants in place; the cooperative corporation took title in May 1983. Four decades on, the sponsor position is long gone and the building trades as an owner-occupied house. Listing records describe it as self-managed and carrying no underlying mortgage — worth verifying at offer stage, because a co-op with no underlying debt has a materially different risk profile from its peers, and because self-management means the quality of the financials depends on the volunteers producing them.

The other structural fact to hold onto is the combination history. Thirty apartments were offered in 1982; DOB filings and recorded share transfers since show at least six combinations, several across floors. What is left is a building whose mix runs from genuinely small one-bedrooms to full-floor-scale family layouts, in a house with no doorman and a low fee base. That spread — modest carry, real apartment size, landmarked block — is the whole proposition.

Architecture and unit composition

Six floors of brick over a 63-foot frontage, 27,176 square feet in total, and no commercial space: the building is entirely residential, which keeps the corporation's income simple and its exposure to retail vacancy at zero. Average unit size in the original 30-apartment configuration is roughly 900 square feet, but the average is misleading. The combinations recorded since 2002 — 3D with 3E, 1E with 2E, 4A with 4B, 6D with 6E, 5C with 5D and later 5E, 2A with 2B — have produced a handful of substantially larger apartments, some duplexed across floors, alongside the surviving one- and two-bedroom lines. Pre-war proportions are intact, and rear-facing lines look onto mid-block gardens rather than an avenue.

Building operations

Staffing is a live-in superintendent, not a doorman — the appropriate model for a 30-apartment house and a principal reason the maintenance base stays low. Bike storage and basement storage are documented in listing records. Capital work in the DOB record is proportionate and steady rather than dramatic: a lintel and cornice/balustrade repair in 2005, a full facade restoration filed in January 2016 under a heavy-duty sidewalk shed, and structural joist repair between the second and third floors in 2015. Nothing in the open record suggests deferred-maintenance stress. Because the building is described as self-managed, the audited statements and any board communications are the documents to request; The Roebling Research Library holds the offering plan.

Policy framework

Very little of this building's policy stack is published, which is normal for a small self-managed co-op and is the single most important diligence point here.

Financing ceiling and post-closing liquidity. Neither is published. Small Upper West Side co-ops of this vintage commonly cap financing between 70 and 80 percent and expect liquid reserves after closing measured in years of maintenance and debt service, but nothing in the public record establishes this building's figures. Get them from the managing agent in writing before you write an offer, not after.

Board package and interview. Expect the standard Manhattan package — two years of returns, a full REBNY-style financial statement, personal and professional references, and an interview with the board. In a 30-apartment building the board is small and the interview is decisive.

Sublet policy. The proprietary lease on file gives the directors unrestricted discretion. Whatever the current house rule allows — seasoning period, term cap, sublet fee — it sits on top of a lease that permits the board to say no without explanation. Treat this as a primary-residence building unless management tells you otherwise in writing.

Flip tax. Listing records cite one percent, paid by the purchaser. Confirm the base (price, or gain, or per-share) and who bears it; this is a term boards revise.

Pied-à-terre, trusts and LLCs. Listing records describe pied-à-terre purchases as welcome. Trust and LLC ownership is not addressed anywhere in the public record. If you intend to buy through a trust, an LLC, or with a guarantor or co-purchaser, raise it before you make an offer.

Pets. Recent listing records describe the building as not allowing pets. That is a policy worth confirming directly, because it is also the sort of rule boards amend.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟡
Moderate — under today's cap; material modeled 2030 exposure
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$9,324/yr
Per unit / month range
$0 – $26

Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
Safe
What this means for you

The latest available FISP filing classified the facade as Safe — no repairs were required at that inspection. Facade inspections run on a fixed five-year cycle; future inspection, repair, and any assessment decisions remain building-specific.

Inspection history
2005–10
SWARMP
2010–15
SWARMP
2015–20
Safe
2020–25
Safe
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2027
Assessed · 2005–10 to 2020–25
$6,250 in filing penalties
payment status not in the record
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs required before the next inspection cycle.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Penalties shown are amounts DOB assessed against filings on record across 2005–10 to 2020–25. The FISP dataset does not record whether they were paid, contested or remain open, so treat the figure as history rather than a current balance and confirm the building’s standing with the managing agent.

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

The Brick House trades as a mid-market Upper West Side pre-war co-op: the small one-bedroom lines clear at the entry end of the corridor's co-op range, and the combined multi-bedroom apartments well above it, with the spread driven almost entirely by size and renovation condition rather than view or exposure. Pricing is best measured per room against the surrounding side-street co-ops between Columbus and Amsterdam rather than against Central Park West or the doorman buildings on Broadway, whose service model and fee base are different. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.

Recent transfers at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Feb 23, 2022PHA
2 BR · 2 BA
$2,050,000+2.8%
Jan 20, 20215CDE
4 BR · 3.5 BA
$2,950,000-8.5%
Aug 30, 20172B
2 BR · 1,010 sf
$1,260,000$1,248/sf-1.2%
Nov 29, 20162C
2 BR
$1,025,000+0.0%
Jan 9, 20153C
2 BR · 900 sf
$945,000$1,050/sf-0.4%
Sep 4, 20142A
2 BR · 1,200 sf
$1,375,000$1,146/sf+10.0%
Dec 27, 20133DE
2 BR · 1,050 sf
$1,286,000$1,225/sf+7.6%
Sep 26, 20134AB
4 BR · 2.5 BA · 2,210 sf
$2,950,000$1,335/sf+13.5%

Market read. $/sf is measured on the latest sales with reliable square footage (2017): a median $1,248/sf across 1 sale. The building has traded as recently as 2022. Median listing discount 0.0% from the last ask.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

1C+43%
$645,000 2005$925,000 2007
2C+31%
$780,000 2010$1,025,000 2016
2B · 1,010 sf+27%
$995,000 2005$1,260,000 ($1,248/sf) 2017
3C · 900 sf+15%
$825,000 2005$920,000 2007$768,000 2011$945,000 ($1,050/sf) 2015
6A+6%
$1,400,000 2008$1,480,000 2013
View all 35 recorded transfers, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01146-0049) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.

What to know if you’re buying

Underwrite the corporation before the apartment. No underlying mortgage, if confirmed, is a genuine asset — it means the maintenance is funding operations and reserves rather than debt service, and it removes refinancing risk. Ask for the last two audited statements and the current reserve balance.

Price the combination premium honestly. The combined lines are the building's scarce product and the reason large-apartment pricing here reaches well above the small-line pricing. They are also the units most likely to carry legacy renovation work of varying age. Run the Renovation Cost Calculator against what you see.

One elevator, six floors, no doorman. A modest service model. If package handling and a staffed lobby matter, price the difference against the doorman buildings on Central Park West and West End Avenue.

Landmark status is a cost, not just a credential. Exterior work — windows, facade, ironwork — needs LPC review. The 2016 facade restoration is behind the building; future cycles will follow the same path. And run the Co-op Board Qualification Calculator with the actual financing ceiling once management provides it, not with a market-standard assumption.

What to know if you’re selling

Lead with the corporation. In a market where buyers read co-op balance sheets carefully, an unencumbered, self-managed house with a documented capital record is the headline. Have the audited statements ready for buyers' counsel on day one.

Name the building. "The Brick House" is how this address is known in the neighborhood and in the offering plan itself. Use it.

Set expectations on the board package early. Small self-managed boards move at their own pace. A seller who briefs the buyer's team on the package and interview at contract, rather than at board submission, closes faster.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 136 West 75th Street, also evaluate:

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across Upper West Side — read The Roebling Team Guide to Upper West Side.

Preparing a board package for this building?

The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent.

Considering a move at The Brick House?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at The Brick House would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.