160 West 77th Street
160 West 77th Street, New York, NY 10024
BBL 1011480056 · BIN 1030185
- Year built
- 1926
- Type
- Cooperative
- Floors
- 9
- Landmark status
- Not an individual landmark; in the Upper West Side / Central Park West Historic District
- NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission records, updated February 2026
- Subletting by shareholders
- Permitted with conditions
- Pets
- Pets permitted with conditions; species not stated
- Flip tax
- Tiered or formula; see fees
- Doorman
- No doorman
Every recorded sale at this building, 2003–2026
Bedroom-by-bedroom medians, the full transfer record, and how units trade against ask.
- 2BR median, 2024–2026
- $1.5M
- 3 qualifying sales
- Recent range
- $1.3M – $3.5M
- Listing discount
- 0.8%
- Recorded transfers
- 40
Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.
A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at 160 West 77th Street would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.
The blocks between Columbus and Amsterdam in the West Seventies are the Upper West Side's most consistent stretch of mid-1920s apartment houses: nine and ten stories, beige and buff brick, neo-Renaissance detail, several apartments to a floor, built as rental buildings for a professional class and converted to cooperatives in the early 1980s. 160 West 77th Street is a good, clean example of the type, and it was designed by one of the architects who defined it.
George F. Pelham was among the most prolific apartment architects of prewar Manhattan, and his work runs through the Upper West Side in quantity — including 125 West 76th Street, one block south on the same tax block, and 20 West 77th Street toward Central Park. The building he put up here in 1926 replaced four four-story stone-fronted rowhouses and reads as a designed street presence rather than a speculative box: a canopied entrance under a two-and-a-half-story surround, bandcourses above the second and seventh floors that break the elevation into a base, shaft and capital, and two-story window surrounds at the flanks of the top two floors. It was built steel-framed and fireproof — a fact that matters more than it sounds, because it is what made the apartment combinations that have reshaped the building's interior over forty years possible at all.
That combination history is the building's defining structural fact for a buyer today. The building has been consolidated over time: Department of Buildings filings record combinations on the third, fourth, eighth, ninth and tenth floors from 2002 through 2020 (among them 4A/4B/4E, 8C/8D and 9A with 10A). The apartment counts reported on those filings range from 49 down to 34 and back to 45 and 39, so they do not trace a clean decline, and PLUTO's 45 does not settle the current total; the original plan and the completed combinations need reconciling. The practical result is a building whose inventory ranges from original one- and two-bedroom lines to substantial combined homes, and where building averages provide context but require apartment-level adjustments for layout, floor, exposure and condition.
The third fact is landmark status, and it is unambiguous here. The lot sits inside the Upper West Side/Central Park West Historic District, confirmed in the Landmarks Preservation Commission's own building database rather than inferred from a city data field. Window replacement and façade alterations generally require LPC approval. Some work qualifies for staff permits, other proposals need Commission-reviewed Certificates of Appropriateness, and specified routine maintenance is exempt; visibility alone does not determine the route. For a shareholder this is mostly a cost-and-timeline question on building-wide projects; for a buyer planning to change windows it is a question to raise before contract.
Architecture and unit composition
Nine stories in beige brick over a masonry base, with the residential floors running two through nine and a commercial-free ground floor. DOB filings reference A through E lines, so confirm the original plan before assuming four apartments a floor; the lines have front and rear exposures and a light court that gives the interior lines their windows. Prewar proportions hold throughout: defined entry foyers, separate dining space in the larger lines, real closets, and beamed ceilings in the original apartments.
Because so many lines have been combined, the current inventory is uneven in a way that rewards floor-plan reading. The building has produced combined homes on multiple floors, and those apartments carry layouts that exist nowhere else in the building. Original apartments in the smaller lines remain the value entry. Upper floors gain light over the low-rise rowhouse stock across the street; lower floors trade that for scale and price.
Facade filings recur on a regular cycle — masonry reconstruction filings appear in 2005, 2010 and 2014, and an eighth-cycle facade program including lintel steel replacement on the north elevation was filed in 2019. The filings show regular Local Law 11 activity; completion and current condition need confirming from recent inspection reports and board materials.
Building operations
The building runs as a self-managed-scale prewar co-op with a live-in superintendent rather than a doorman staff. Management-sourced records describe a roof deck, a bicycle room, a windowed playroom, a central laundry, and full-height basement storage cages. There is one passenger elevator.
This is a mid-size cooperative, and its financial posture should be read directly rather than inferred. Ask the managing agent for the current audited financial statements, the underlying mortgage balance and maturity date, the reserve balance, and whether any assessment is running or contemplated. The 2019 facade filing and the active J-51 abatement both point to capital work, but its completion and financing need confirming; the question a buyer needs answered is what is next and how it will be paid for.
Application and transaction fees
- Terms
- 3 percent, per management-sourced records — confirm the base (price, gain, or per-share) with the managing agent
Source: The Roebling Team's building profile
Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to discuss the building's costs and purchase requirements.
Own an apartment here? Request an apartment-specific pricing review.
Sublet and pied-à-terre policy
A condominium owner leasing a unit and a co-op shareholder subletting are different rules, and a building-wide rule is different from a restriction on one apartment. This is the building's rule; confirm it for the specific apartment.
- Subletting by shareholders
- Permitted with conditionsBoard approvalSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
- Pied-à-terre ownership
- Not verified
Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to discuss the sublet and pied-à-terre rules for that apartment.
Pets and in-unit washer/dryer
- Pets
- Pets permitted with conditions; species not statedPermitted with board approval, per management-sourced recordsSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
- In-unit washer/dryer
- Not verified
Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to confirm the pet and washer/dryer rules for that apartment.
Monthly carrying charges in recent sales
- Maintenance, per room
- $529 per room a monthMedian of 6 recorded sales since October 2023Source: recorded sales, refreshed October 2026
Maintenance as recorded with each sale. A co-op's maintenance already covers the building's real estate taxes and the building's own mortgage, if it has one; add your own loan payment for the monthly outlay. A summary of recorded sales, not a current bill; charges change.
Building staffing and amenities
- Doorman
- No doormanSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
- Live-in superintendent
- YesSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
- Elevator
- YesSource: NYC Department of City Planning records (PLUTO)
- Amenities noted
- Playroom, roof deck, bike storage, storage, laundry roomSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Staffing and amenities as our building profile and recent listing records describe them. A feature not listed is not confirmed absent. Outdoor space, parking and some facilities can belong to particular apartments or to a separate owner; confirm access for the specific apartment.
Local Law 97
- 2024–2029 annual penalty
- $0 (under cap)
- 2030–2034 annual penalty
- $28,734/yr
- Per unit / month range
- $0 – $53
- Modeled exposure split equally across 45 units (the residential count on the city's lot record). Not an assessed amount; co-op shareholders are typically charged by share allocation.
Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.
See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →Facade safety — Local Law 11
The latest available filing classified the facade as SWARMP — Safe With A Repair and Maintenance Program: the inspector (QEWI) identified conditions requiring monitoring or repair, with repairs due by the deadline stated in the filing. The scope, timeline, and how the building funds the work are building-specific — we review the filings and board materials for you.
How to read this, and where it comes from
QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — a licensed professional engineer or registered architect who meets DOB’s FISP qualifications and signs the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).
Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.
Recent sales
The building trades as mid-tier prewar Upper West Side cooperative inventory: priced by room and by condition rather than by amenity, with combined apartments and high-floor lines carrying premiums over original small-line stock. Renovated apartments clear at a meaningful spread over estate condition here, because the buyer pool is largely end-users who are pricing a renovation they do not want to run. Maintenance should be compared against buildings with similar staffing — actual maintenance and assessments depend on the full budget, debt and capital needs; staffing differences alone do not establish which building costs less. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.
Recent transfers at this building, from The Roebling Research Library. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.
| Date | Unit | Apartment | Price | PPSF | vs. Ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2026 | 9C | 2 BR · 2 BA | $560,000 | +6.7% | |
| Jan 21, 2026 | 6A | 3 BR · 2 BA | $2,625,000 | -2.7% | |
| Nov 1, 2024 | 2 | 4 BR · 2,150 sf | $3,500,000 | $1,628/sf | +0.0% |
| Oct 29, 2024 | 2A3A | 4 BR · 3 BA · 2,150 sf | $3,235,000 | $1,505/sf | -7.6% |
| Jan 29, 2024 | 3D | 2 BR · 2 BA | $1,510,000 | -2.6% | |
| Jan 4, 2024 | 7D | 2 BR · 2 BA | $1,532,500 | -0.8% | |
| Aug 22, 2023 | 5B | 3 BR · 2 BA · 1,650 sf | $2,400,000 | $1,455/sf | +0.0% |
| Sep 29, 2022 | 5A | 3 BR · 2 BA | $2,341,500 | +11.5% |
Market read. $/sf is measured on the latest sales with reliable square footage (2024): a median $1,567/sf (recorded) across 2 sales. The building has traded as recently as 2026. Median listing discount 0.5% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.
The retrade record
Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.
Other recent transfers
| Date | Unit | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2026 | 9D | $1,299,000 |
Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.
Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01148-0056). Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified in The Roebling Research Library. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.
What would your apartment rent for?
Enter your apartment and I'll send you what it would rent for, from comparable closed leases at 160 West 77th Street and nearby.
At the recent median sale of $2.63M (5 transfers in the past 24 months, since October 21, 2024), a buyer putting 25% down would pay about $47,363 to close, or 1.8% of the price.
- Mansion tax: $32,813
- No mortgage recording tax or title insurance on a co-op purchase
- Attorneys, lender, building fees and filings: $14,550
Assumes a resale (the seller pays transfer taxes), a $4,500 attorney fee and a mortgage on the rest.
Keep up with 160 West 77th Street and its market
The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings like 160 West 77th Street. Unsubscribe anytime.
We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.
What to know if you’re selling
Sell the specific apartment, not the building. Documented combinations have changed some layouts, but compare current plans rather than assuming every line is unique. Floor plans, exposures and renovation scope carry the pricing argument.
Get the board package right before you accept an offer. Confirm financing and liquidity requirements early to assess buyer eligibility; no ranked history of failed-deal causes is established here. Have the managing agent's current requirements in hand and qualify buyers against them at the offer stage. Run the Co-op Board Qualification Calculator before accepting.
Have the building's paperwork ready. Current audited financials, the underlying mortgage terms, the reserve position, the facade and Local Law 11 status, and the J-51 schedule are all questions a good buyer's attorney will ask. Providing those records early supports buyer and lender review, without guaranteeing the sale price.
Comparable buildings
If you're considering 160 West 77th Street, also evaluate:
- 125 West 76th Street — George F. Pelham, 1922, cooperative since 1986; the same architect on the same tax block and the closest like-for-like
- 20 West 77th Street — George F. Pelham, 1925; the same hand, closer to Central Park and priced accordingly
- 170 West 76th Street — 1925–26 cooperative one block south; a comparable prewar mid-size co-op in the same historic district
- 219 West 77th Street — 2017 boutique condominium by Thomas Juul-Hansen; the new-construction alternative on the same street with an entirely different approval process
- 206 West 77th Street — 2017 Thomas Juul-Hansen condominium; the other new-build alternative on the block
- 101 West 78th Street — 1886 building converted to condominium; the prewar condominium option one block north
- 200 West 78th Street — c. 1920 prewar corner building converted to condominium; the small prewar condo alternative
- 145 West 79th Street — Emery Roth, 1928 cooperative; the larger prewar co-op comparison two blocks north
- 210 West 78th Street — prewar cooperative in the same corridor and price band
More Upper West Side buildings
- 155 West 70th Street — 1989 condominium by SLCE Architects
- 155 West 71st Street — 1940 condominium by Jacob M. Felson
- 157 West 74th Street — condominium
- 160 West 85th Street — 1950 co-op
- 160 West 87th Street — 1914 co-op
- 160 West 95th Street — 1914 co-op
The neighborhood
For the full corridor — architecture, transit, and pricing across Upper West Side — read The Roebling Team Guide to Upper West Side.
The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.
How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.
Considering a move at 160 West 77th Street?
Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com