Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,600/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $270K/room 2%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $472K/room 18%CPW $355K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,313/sf 24%Greenwich Village $2,455/sf 10%
Full index →
Cooperative · 1926
160 West 77th Street
160 West 77th Street, New York, NY 10024

160 West 77th Street

160 West 77th Street, New York, NY 10024

Upper West Side

BBL 1011480056 · BIN 1030185

At a glance
Year built
1926
Type
Cooperative
Units
45
Floors
9
Landmark
Designated
Pets
Permitted with board approval, per management-sourced records
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2003–2026

Bedroom-by-bedroom medians, the full transfer record, and how units trade against ask.

2BR median
$1.5M
Recent range
$1.5M – $3.5M
Listing discount
0.8%
Recorded transfers
39

The blocks between Columbus and Amsterdam in the West Seventies are the Upper West Side's most consistent stretch of mid-1920s apartment houses: nine and ten stories, beige and buff brick, neo-Renaissance detail, four apartments to a floor, built as rental buildings for a professional class and converted to cooperatives in the early 1980s. 160 West 77th Street is a good, clean example of the type, and it was designed by one of the architects who defined it.

George F. Pelham was among the most prolific apartment architects of prewar Manhattan, and his work runs through the Upper West Side in quantity — including 125 West 76th Street, one block south on the same tax block, and 20 West 77th Street toward Central Park. The building he put up here in 1926 replaced four four-story stone-fronted rowhouses and reads as a designed street presence rather than a speculative box: a canopied entrance under a two-and-a-half-story surround, bandcourses above the second and seventh floors that break the elevation into a base, shaft and capital, and two-story window surrounds at the flanks of the top two floors. It is steel-framed and fireproof — a fact that matters more than it sounds, because it is why the apartment combinations that have reshaped the building's interior over forty years were possible at all.

That combination history is the building's defining structural fact for a buyer today. Laid out with four apartments per floor across eight residential floors, the building has been steadily consolidated: Department of Buildings filings record combinations on the third, fourth, eighth, ninth and tenth-line apartments across the 2000s and 2010s, and the apartment count reported on those filings falls from the high forties into the high thirties. PLUTO still carries 45. The practical result is a building whose inventory ranges from original one- and two-bedroom lines to substantial combined homes, and where a building-average price per room tells you almost nothing about a specific apartment.

The third fact is landmark status, and it is unambiguous here. The lot sits inside the Upper West Side/Central Park West Historic District, confirmed in the Landmarks Preservation Commission's own building database rather than inferred from a city data field. Window replacement, facade work and any visible exterior change require a Certificate of Appropriateness. For a shareholder this is mostly a cost-and-timeline question on building-wide projects; for a buyer planning to change windows it is a question to raise before contract.

Architecture and unit composition

Nine stories in beige brick over a masonry base, with the residential floors running two through nine and a commercial-free ground floor. The original plan put four apartments on each residential floor — a straightforward A, B, C, D arrangement with front and rear exposures and a light court that gives the interior lines their windows. Prewar proportions hold throughout: defined entry foyers, separate dining space in the larger lines, real closets, and beamed ceilings in the original apartments.

Because so many lines have been combined, the current inventory is uneven in a way that rewards floor-plan reading. The building has produced combined homes on multiple floors, and those apartments carry layouts that exist nowhere else in the building. Original apartments in the smaller lines remain the value entry. Upper floors gain light over the low-rise rowhouse stock across the street; lower floors trade that for scale and price.

The facade has been maintained on a regular cycle — masonry reconstruction filings appear in 2005, 2010 and 2014, and an eighth-cycle facade program including lintel steel replacement on the north elevation was filed in 2019. That is the profile of a building keeping up with its Local Law 11 obligations rather than deferring them, which for a 1926 masonry building is the right signal.

Building operations

The building runs as a self-managed-scale prewar co-op with a live-in superintendent rather than a doorman staff. Management-sourced records describe a roof deck, a bicycle room, a windowed playroom, a central laundry, and full-height basement storage cages. There is one passenger elevator.

This is a mid-size cooperative, and its financial posture should be read directly rather than inferred. Ask the managing agent for the current audited financial statements, the underlying mortgage balance and maturity date, the reserve balance, and whether any assessment is running or contemplated. The 2019 facade cycle and the active J-51 abatement both indicate capital work has been done and financed; the question a buyer needs answered is what is next and how it will be paid for.

Policy framework — buying and selling shares here

A cooperative apartment is not real property. You buy shares in 160 West 77th Street Owners Corp. and a proprietary lease to a specific apartment, and ACRIS confirms that apartments here transfer as property type SP — share transfers rather than as deeds. Everything below follows from that, and almost none of it is published anywhere. It comes from the managing agent, and it should be in hand before you make an offer.

Board package and interview. Expect a full financial disclosure package — tax returns, bank and brokerage statements, a REBNY-style financial statement, employment verification, and personal and professional reference letters — followed by an in-person or video board interview. Build four to eight weeks into the timeline between accepted offer and closing, and understand that the board is not obliged to give a reason for a rejection.

Financing ceiling. Not published. Prewar Upper West Side co-ops of this vintage commonly cap financing between 70 and 80 percent, and some are stricter. Get the actual number from the managing agent before you write an offer, because it sets your down payment and it is not negotiable.

Post-closing liquidity. Not published, and frequently the binding constraint rather than the down payment. Boards in this stratum typically want to see liquid assets remaining after closing measured in one to two years of combined maintenance and mortgage payments, sometimes more. Ask.

Sublet policy. Not published. Typical structures run to a seasoning period of one to three years of owner-occupancy before any sublet is permitted, a cap on cumulative sublet years, board approval of each tenant, and a sublet fee. If you are contemplating any period of non-occupancy, resolve this before contract.

Flip tax. Management-sourced records carry a 3 percent transfer fee. Confirm the base — 3 percent of price, of gain, or a per-share amount are materially different outcomes — and confirm who pays it, which is customarily the seller.

Pied-à-terre, trusts, LLCs, co-purchase, guarantors and gifting. Not published. Prewar co-ops in this corridor are generally restrictive on non-primary-residence purchases and on ownership through trusts or entities, and permissive positions are usually case-by-case rather than written. Purchases in a trust for estate-planning reasons are more often accommodated than pied-à-terre use. None of this can be assumed.

Pets. Permitted with board approval per management-sourced records; confirm limits in the house rules.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟡
Moderate — under today's cap; material modeled 2030 exposure
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$17,341/yr
Per unit / month range
$0 – $32

Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
SWARMP
What this means for you

The latest available filing classified the facade as SWARMP — Safe With A Repair and Maintenance Program: the engineer identified conditions requiring monitoring or repair before the next inspection cycle. The scope, timeline, and how the building funds the work are building-specific — we review the filings and board materials for you.

Inspection history
2005–10
SWARMP
2010–15
SWARMP
2015–20
SWARMP
2020–25
SWARMP
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2028
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs required before the next inspection cycle.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

The building trades as mid-tier prewar Upper West Side cooperative inventory: priced by room and by condition rather than by amenity, with combined apartments and high-floor lines carrying premiums over original small-line stock. Renovated apartments clear at a meaningful spread over estate condition here, because the buyer pool is largely end-users who are pricing a renovation they do not want to run. Maintenance should be compared against buildings with similar staffing — a live-in superintendent building will show a lower monthly than a full doorman co-op, and that difference is a service level, not a bargain. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.

Recent transfers at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Jun 25, 20269C
2 BR · 2 BA
$560,000+6.7%
Jan 21, 20266A
3 BR · 2 BA
$2,625,000-2.7%
Nov 1, 20242
4 BR · 2,150 sf
$3,500,000$1,628/sf+0.0%
Oct 29, 20242A3A
4 BR · 3 BA · 2,150 sf
$3,235,000$1,505/sf-7.6%
Jan 29, 20243D
2 BR · 2 BA
$1,510,000-2.6%
Jan 4, 20247D
2 BR · 2 BA
$1,532,500-0.8%
Aug 22, 20235B
3 BR · 2 BA · 1,650 sf
$2,400,000$1,455/sf+0.0%
Sep 29, 20225A
3 BR · 2 BA
$2,341,500+11.5%

Market read. $/sf is measured on the latest sales with reliable square footage (2024): a median $1,567/sf across 2 sales. The building has traded as recently as 2026. Median listing discount 0.5% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

4D+57%
$976,667 2011$1,535,000 2022
9A+51%
$1,395,000 ($845/sf) 2004$2,100,000 2014
3D+24%
$1,215,000 2019$1,510,000 2024
2 · 2,150 sf+22%
$2,880,000 ($1,340/sf) 2016$3,500,000 ($1,628/sf) 2024
6B+22%
$985,000 ($985/sf) 2017$1,200,000 2018
View all 39 recorded transfers, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01148-0056) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.

What to know if you’re selling

Sell the specific apartment, not the building. With combinations having reshaped the inventory over forty years, no two lines are alike. Floor plans, exposures and renovation scope carry the pricing argument.

Get the board package right before you accept an offer. The most common cause of a dead deal in a building like this is a buyer who cannot clear a financing ceiling or a liquidity expectation nobody told them about. Have the managing agent's current requirements in hand and qualify buyers against them at the offer stage. Run the Co-op Board Qualification Calculator before accepting.

Have the building's paperwork ready. Current audited financials, the underlying mortgage terms, the reserve position, the facade and Local Law 11 status, and the J-51 schedule are all questions a good buyer's attorney will ask. Answering them quickly protects the price.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 160 West 77th Street, also evaluate:

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across Upper West Side — read The Roebling Team Guide to Upper West Side.

Preparing a board package for this building?

The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent.

Considering a move at 160 West 77th Street?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at 160 West 77th Street would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.