182 West 82nd Street (The Pontiac)
182 West 82nd Street, New York, NY 10024
BBL 1012127502 · BIN 1032041
- Year built
- 1892
- Type
- Condominium
- Floors
- 7
- Landmark status
- Not an individual landmark; in the Upper West Side / Central Park West Historic District
- NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission records, updated February 2026
- Leasing by owners
- Permitted
- Pied-à-terre
- Permitted
- Pets
- Pets permitted; species and limits not stated
- Washer/dryer
- Permitted
- Maximum financing
- 100% of the purchase price
- Doorman
- Doorman (hours not stated)
Every recorded sale at this building, 2015–2024
Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.
- Median $/sf, 2024
- $3,212
- 1 sale
- Listing discount
- 8.3%
- Recorded sales
- 21
- On record
- 2015–2024
Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.
A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at The Pontiac would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.
Four brownstone flats buildings went up together on this stretch of West 82nd Street in 1892 and 1893, designed by Gilbert A. Schellenger for the Gordon Brothers and known collectively as The Pontiac. They were speculative middle-class housing of the kind that filled the side streets between Columbus and Amsterdam in the decade after the elevated railway arrived, and they spent the next century as walk-up rental buildings. By the time the assemblage traded in 2012 the four buildings held twenty apartments among them.
What Naftali Group did with them is structurally unusual. Rather than convert each building or gut-renovate the rentals, the developer merged all four into a single tax lot and a single condominium, added two floors above the original cornice, extended the envelope at the rear, and came out with eleven residences where there had been twenty. The alteration application on file records the trade precisely: twenty existing dwelling units to eleven proposed, five stories to seven, sixty feet to seventy-seven. The result is a building whose typical apartment is not a converted flat but a floor-through assembled across two or three of the original party-wall structures.
That is why the unit mix reads the way it does. Eleven homes of three to five bedrooms, sized from roughly 2,000 square feet to more than 5,000, including two triplexes at the base with their own street-level entrances and two penthouses under the new roof. On the Upper West Side, where much of the family-sized inventory is in prewar cooperatives, an eleven-unit condominium of this scale inside a historic district occupies a narrow market position.
The conversion happened under Landmarks jurisdiction. The tax lot is inside the Upper West Side / Central Park West Historic District, and LPC's building database carries all four addresses as contributing structures. The Department of Buildings file is flagged accordingly. The two-story addition and the rear enlargement therefore cleared an LPC review, and future window, façade or rooftop work should be checked against current LPC requirements. Some ordinary maintenance is exempt and eligible work may receive staff approval; estimate the cost and schedule for the particular scope.
The final structural fact concerns tax benefits. No 421-a, no J-51, no exemption of any kind appears on the assessment roll for the residential unit lots. Abatements are applied at the bill level, so check the specific apartment's tax bill.
Architecture and unit composition
The four original façades survive as the building's public face: Romanesque Revival brownstone, 1892–93, with the horizontal banding and arched openings typical of Schellenger's speculative Upper West Side work. Above the original cornice sits a contemporary two-story addition set back from the street wall, the standard LPC-acceptable solution for adding height inside a historic district — visible from a distance, largely invisible from the sidewalk directly below.
Behind the retained façades, the conversion reconfigured four buildings into eleven residences. The alteration record establishes the enlargement and unit-count change; approved plans and completion records are needed to establish which bearing walls, circulation elements and floor levels were retained or rebuilt. Review the approved floor plans and the apartment in person for width, depth, level changes and the relation of its layout to the original buildings; the assemblage alone does not establish those interior details.
The composition runs from two triplexes at the base — townhouse-scaled, with direct street entrances — through full-floor homes in the middle of the stack to two penthouses at the top. Ceiling heights and window sizes vary between the retained floors and the addition. As with any conversion of this type, the building has no representative apartment, and line-and-floor analysis matters more than a building average.
Building operations
The building runs as a small full-service condominium: an attended lobby with doorman coverage supplemented by virtual concierge service, a resident superintendent, a fitness center, bicycle storage and private storage. Eleven residences is a small denominator for staffed service, and common charges per square foot should be evaluated against the operating budget rather than the amenity roster.
Two diligence items are specific to this building. First, landmark status: check façade restoration, window replacement, roof or mechanical projects for applicable LPC permits and maintenance exemptions; review the proposed scope before estimating its effect on a Local Law 11 project. Ask for the current façade filing status and the reserve position together. Second, the building is a heavily reconfigured 1892 structure. Review mechanical and structural replacement records and current condition alongside the retained enclosure; a conversion at this level of complexity merits review of the board’s capital records.
Policy framework
Ownership form: Condominium. Purchases close through a board right of first refusal rather than a cooperative approval — a meaningful differentiator on the Upper West Side, where most comparable family-sized inventory is cooperative.
Pied-à-terre, subletting, LLC, trust and foreign ownership: All permitted under the standard condominium framework. Minimum sublet lease terms should be confirmed with the managing agent.
Pets: Not documented in the records reviewed here. Confirm weight and breed limits in the house rules.
Flip tax: Not documented in public records.
Real estate taxes: No exemption of any kind. Underwrite full unabated taxes on the specific unit and run the True Monthly Carrying Cost analysis against the current bill.
Application and transaction fees
Fees below are from building management's published schedule, as of September 2026. They are shown as published, item by item; no total is added because the total depends on the transaction. Deposits are listed apart from nonrefundable charges.
Purchase
7 items
Fees and charges
| Item | Paid by | When | Amount | Refundable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Processing Fee | Paid by Buyer | When With the application | Amount $700 | Refundable Non-refundable |
| Credit Check FeePer applicantRequired | Paid by Buyer | When With the application | Amount $100 per applicant | Refundable Non-refundable |
| Move In Fee | Paid by Buyer | When With the application | Amount $500 | Refundable Not stated |
| Working Capital Contribution | Paid by Buyer | When With the application | Amount Equal to three (3) month's common charges | Refundable Not stated |
| Move Out Fee | Paid by Seller | When With the application | Amount $500 | Refundable Not stated |
Deposits
| Item | Paid by | When | Amount | Refundable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Move In Deposit | Paid by Buyer | When At closing | Amount $2,500 | Refundable Refundable |
| Move Out Deposit | Paid by Seller | When At closing | Amount $2,500 | Refundable Refundable |
Rental or lease
6 items
Fees and charges
| Item | Paid by | When | Amount | Refundable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Move Out Fee | Paid by Landlord | When With the application | Amount $500 | Refundable Non-refundable |
| Application Processing Fee | Paid by Tenant | When With the application | Amount $700 | Refundable Non-refundable |
| Credit Check FeePer applicantRequired | Paid by Tenant | When With the application | Amount $100 per applicant | Refundable Non-refundable |
| Move In Fee | Paid by Tenant | When With the application | Amount $500 | Refundable Non-refundable |
Deposits
| Item | Paid by | When | Amount | Refundable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Move Out Deposit | Paid by Landlord | When At closing | Amount $2,500 | Refundable Refundable |
| Move In Deposit | Paid by Tenant | When At closing | Amount $2,500 | Refundable Refundable |
Management updates its schedule without a public filing. The date is when management last updated the page, not when a rule changed. Confirm the current schedule with management before you apply.
Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to discuss the building's costs and purchase requirements.
Own an apartment here? Request an apartment-specific pricing review.
Financing and purchase requirements
- Maximum financing
- 100% of the purchase priceSource: building management's published schedule, as of September 2026
- Co-purchasing
- PermittedSource: building management's published schedule, as of September 2026
- Parent buying for an employed child
- PermittedSource: building management's published schedule, as of September 2026
- Parent buying for a student child
- PermittedSource: building management's published schedule, as of September 2026
- Purchase or lease by a corporation
- PermittedSource: building management's published schedule, as of September 2026
Sublet and pied-à-terre policy
A condominium owner leasing a unit and a co-op shareholder subletting are different rules, and a building-wide rule is different from a restriction on one apartment. This is the building's rule; confirm it for the specific apartment.
- Leasing by owners
- PermittedSource: building management's published schedule, as of September 2026
- Pied-à-terre ownership
- PermittedSource: building management's published schedule, as of September 2026
- Short-term rentals
- Not permittedSource: building management's published schedule, as of September 2026
Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to discuss the sublet and pied-à-terre rules for that apartment.
Pets and in-unit washer/dryer
- Pets
- Pets permitted; species and limits not statedSource: building management's published schedule, as of September 2026
- In-unit washer/dryer
- PermittedSource: building management's published schedule, as of September 2026
Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to confirm the pet and washer/dryer rules for that apartment.
Building staffing and amenities
- Doorman
- Doorman (hours not stated)Source: The Roebling Team's building profile
- Concierge
- YesSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
- Attended lobby
- YesSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
- Live-in superintendent
- YesSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
- Elevator
- YesSource: NYC Department of City Planning records (PLUTO)
- Amenities noted
- Fitness room, bike storage, storageSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Staffing and amenities as our building profile and recent listing records describe them. A feature not listed is not confirmed absent. Outdoor space, parking and some facilities can belong to particular apartments or to a separate owner; confirm access for the specific apartment.
Local Law 97
- 2024–2029 annual penalty
- $0 (under cap)
- 2030–2034 annual penalty
- $0 (under cap)
- Per unit / month range
- —
Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.
See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →Facade safety — Local Law 11
The latest available filing classified the facade as SWARMP — Safe With A Repair and Maintenance Program: the inspector (QEWI) identified conditions requiring monitoring or repair, with repairs due by the deadline stated in the filing. The scope, timeline, and how the building funds the work are building-specific — we review the filings and board materials for you.
How to read this, and where it comes from
QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — a licensed professional engineer or registered architect who meets DOB’s FISP qualifications and signs the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).
Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.
Recent sales
The sponsor sellout ran quickly. All eleven residences were conveyed between May and August 2015, to separately named purchasers in individual transactions, with no same-name multiple holdings identified at those closings. Different deed names do not establish unrelated beneficial owners or current holdings. Resale activity has been steady since, with most of the stack trading at least once and several units trading twice.
Compare the building’s three- to five-bedroom layouts with relevant Upper West Side sales using reliable interior areas, condition, services and carrying costs; those features do not establish a fixed market tier. Buyers weighing it against the surrounding prewar cooperatives should understand that they are comparing two different asset classes — co-op policy, financing and resale rules vary building by building, while this condominium’s documented terms permit leasing and pied-à-terre use; test any price difference using comparable sales. The triplexes and penthouses trade on a different basis again from the full-floor homes. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.
Recent closings at this building, from The Roebling Research Library. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.
| Date | Unit | Apartment | Price | PPSF | vs. Ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2024 | PHESponsor Sale | 3 BR · 3.5 BA · 2,220 sf | $7,130,000 | $3,212/sf | — |
| Jun 22, 2023 | PHW | 3 BR · 3 BA · 2,049 sf | $5,500,000 | $2,684/sf | +4.8% |
| Mar 19, 2021 | 3WSponsor Sale | 4 BR · 3.5 BA · 2,752 sf | $4,900,000 | $1,781/sf | -13.7% |
| Mar 3, 2021 | 5W | 4 BR · 3.5 BA · 2,752 sf | $4,950,000 | $1,799/sf | -8.3% |
| Jan 2, 2020 | THW | 4 BR · 5.5 BA · 5,194 sf | $9,150,000 | $1,762/sf | -8.5% |
| Jun 24, 2019 | 2N | 3 BR · 3.5 BA · 2,280 sf | $4,350,000 | $1,908/sf | -23.3% |
| Jan 17, 2018 | 4WSponsor Sale | 4 BR · 3.5 BA · 2,752 sf | $5,800,000 | $2,108/sf | -0.9% |
| Dec 19, 2016 | 5WSponsor Sale | 4 BR · 2,752 sf | $5,800,000 | $2,108/sf | -9.7% |
Market read. Most recent trades (2024) cleared a median $3,212/sf (recorded) across 1 sale. Median listing discount 8.3% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.
The retrade record
Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.
Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.
Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01212-7502; each condominium apartment is its own tax lot). Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified in The Roebling Research Library. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.
What would your apartment rent for?
Enter your apartment and I'll send you what it would rent for, from comparable closed leases at The Pontiac and nearby.
Buying here? Condo closing costs with a mortgage typically run 3 to 6% of the price. See NYC co-op and condo closing costs, line by line.
Keep up with The Pontiac and its market
The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings like The Pontiac. Unsubscribe anytime.
We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.
What to know if you’re buying
Match the record, then use the right date. The condominium is marketed as 182 West 82nd Street; the assembled tax lot is labeled 176 West 82nd Street in city data. Both identify the same property. PLUTO lists the year built as 1900; LPC dates the original buildings to 1892–93. When comparing records or valuation output, match by tax lot and use the LPC construction date.
This is a landmarked building. Check the proposed exterior scope for LPC permits, exemptions and staff approval options. Obtain project-specific timing and cost estimates rather than assuming a fixed difference from non-designated buildings.
Four buildings, one condominium. Layouts follow the geometry of the original party walls. Some plans are excellent; all of them repay walking in person.
No abatement on the roll. Pull the actual tax bill on the specific unit. There is no scheduled step-up, but the bill still changes with assessments and rates.
Condominium in a co-op neighborhood. Confirm the specific ownership, leasing and financing requirements, then compare sale evidence rather than assigning an automatic flexibility premium.
What to know if you’re selling
Describe the building’s configuration. Eleven condominium residences of three to five bedrooms occupy an assemblage of four historic flats buildings; compare these layouts with current competing inventory.
Name the ownership form early. Buyers coming from the co-op inventory are frequently unaware how different the approval, sublet and financing rules are here. State the current documented requirements explicitly; any price effect needs comparable-sale support.
Explain the address and date crosswalk in your materials. Identify 182 West 82nd Street and the city’s 176 West 82nd Street parcel alias together, and distinguish LPC’s 1892–93 construction history from the administrative 1900 year.
Review the available comparables. The eleven residences vary by configuration. Use relevant in-building sales and other comparable properties, adjusting for layout, floor, condition and transaction date; unit count alone does not establish the sales sample.
Comparable buildings
If you're considering 182 West 82nd Street, also evaluate:
- 150 West 82nd Street (The Marlow) — George F. Pelham's 1926 building converted by BKSK Architects; the same block, a much larger condominium, and the closest direct alternative
- 134 West 82nd Street — prewar cooperative on the same block; the co-op comparison in its purest form
- 139 West 82nd Street — Gronenberg and Leuchtag cooperative on the same street, at different scale and economics
- 200 Amsterdam Avenue — the large full-amenity new-construction condominium tower nearby; the opposite structural argument at a higher price tier
- 380 Amsterdam Avenue — Amsterdam Avenue condominium; compare its unit mix, services and actual sale evidence
- 530 Amsterdam Avenue — Upper West Side building alternative; confirm ownership structure before comparing purchase requirements
- 402 Columbus Avenue — avenue-front condominium a short walk east
- 580 Columbus Avenue — Upper West Side condominium
- 100 West 80th Street — side-street building two blocks south, different vintage and policy stack
- 2138 Broadway — Broadway-front alternative with a very different exposure profile
More Upper West Side buildings
- 175 West 93rd Street (The Westwind) — 1929 co-op by Rosario Candela
- 176 West 87th Street — 1916 co-op by Schwartz & Gross
- The Packard, 176 West 86th Street — 1986 condominium
- The Chesterfield, 186 West 80th Street — condominium
- 200 Amsterdam Avenue — 2021 condominium
- 200 Riverside Boulevard — 1997 condominium by Philip Johnson and Costas Kondylis
The neighborhood
For the full corridor — architecture, transit, and pricing across Upper West Side — read The Roebling Team Guide to Upper West Side.
How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.
Considering a move at The Pontiac?
Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com