150 West 82nd Street (The Marlow)
150 West 82nd Street, New York, NY 10024
BBL 1012127503 · BIN 1032037
- Year built
- 1926
- Type
- Condominium
- Floors
- 10
- Amenities
- Residents' lounge with kitchenette; children's playroom; fitness center; laundry room; landscaped interior courtyard; landscaped common roof terrace with grilling area; private storage lockers (sold as limited common elements); bike storage
- Financing
- Standard condominium financing; no cooperative-style financing ceiling
- Flip tax
- No traditional flip tax. The offering plan on file instead requires a non-refundable working capital contribution equal to two months' common charges, payable at the initial closing and again at each resale closing — a recurring transaction cost to include explicitly in the closing estimate
- Landmark status
- Not an individual landmark; in the Upper West Side / Central Park West Historic District
- NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission records, updated February 2026
- Leasing by owners
- Permitted with conditions
- Pets
- Pets permitted with conditions; species not stated
- Washer/dryer
- Permitted
- Doorman
- Requires confirmation
Every recorded sale at this building, 2022–2025
Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.
- Median $/sf, 2025
- $2,185
- floor-adjusted, 2 sales
- Listing discount
- 0.9%
- Recorded sales
- 28
- On record
- 2022–2025
Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.
A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at The Marlow would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.
The Marlow is the small, disciplined version of a thesis the Upper West Side has only been able to execute a handful of times: take a solid, unremarkable prewar rental apartment house, gut and recombine the plan into apartments people actually want in 2026, restore the façade under Landmarks review, add a rooftop level, and deliver it as condominium. George F. Pelham's 1926 building on West 82nd between Columbus and Amsterdam was never architecturally famous. It was a competent Neo-Georgian elevator apartment house on a quiet block, one of dozens the Pelham office produced. What makes it consequential now is what BKSK Architects did with it, and the ownership structure the conversion produced.
The offering plan on file is dated February 19, 2020, and it is a non-eviction plan — meaning no sitting tenant could be displaced by the conversion. The date on that plan does not establish its original submission date. Confirm the Attorney General filing history before describing which conversion-law provisions applied to this offering. The sponsor was 150 West 82nd Street Owner LLC, operating out of the offices of BentallGreenOak, a global real estate management and advisory firm; sponsor obligations under the plan were backed by an agreement procured from Apollo Global Management and its affiliates. That is an unusually institutional sponsorship for a forty-unit prewar conversion, and the plan set a reserve fund of roughly $2.69 million at conversion against a $89.9 million offering. An opening reserve does not establish current adequacy; review the current audited statements.
The architectural work was real, not cosmetic. The sponsor's scope in the plan on file includes new amenity space at the cellar level and in the rear yard, extension of the existing egress stairs, and — the piece that changed the building's silhouette — enlargement and reconfiguration of the tenth floor to construct the upper level of two duplex penthouses, PHN and PHS, connected by internal stairs to their lower levels on the ninth floor. The building went into the conversion as a nine-story structure and came out as a ten-story one with two duplex penthouses at the top. City records reflect exactly that change.
Inside, BKSK's approach was to keep what a 1926 Pelham plan does well and discard what it does badly. Retained: the over-scaled base moldings, the picture rails, nine-foot ceilings, the fenestration rhythm, the masonry envelope. Rebuilt: the floor plates themselves. The pre-conversion building was configured at a much finer grain than the delivered condominium; city building records show 60 dwelling units at the property in 2012, and 54 and 58 in filings from the mid-2000s. The conversion recombined that stock into 40 residences as offered — from studios up through a four-bedroom penthouse duplex — around a new plan built on great rooms, open kitchens, and full baths at contemporary scale.
That is the reconciliation any buyer or seller here needs. Sixty is the rental-era apartment count, not the condominium. The offering plan offered forty residential units. City assessment records carry thirty-eight residential units on the condominium billing lot, and the City Register shows thirty-nine recorded condominium unit lots at the address, running from 1201 through 1239 with designations from 1A through 9H plus PHN and PHS. Some published building profiles cite twenty-seven residences, which appears to be a partial count taken during the sellout rather than the declared roster. Forty as offered, thirty-nine as recorded, thirty-eight in city assessment records — the small differences are ordinary conversion drift between the plan, the declaration and the assessor's file, and none of them supports the figure of sixty.
Architecture and unit composition
The elevation is a restrained Neo-Georgian composition in limestone and brick, restored during the conversion under Landmarks Preservation Commission jurisdiction. The building reads as a mid-block prewar apartment house of its period — no courtyard, no monumental entrance, a straightforward masonry mass — which is precisely the character of the block. The visible change from the conversion is at the roofline, where the new tenth-floor level was set back and detailed to sit quietly against the restored cornice line.
Residences run from studios through a four-bedroom penthouse duplex. The interior specification is consistent across the inventory: airy great rooms, nine-foot ceilings, white oak herringbone floors, open kitchens with Miele appliances, spa-scaled baths, multi-zone heating and air conditioning, and stacked Miele washer and dryer in-unit.
Two details from the plan on file are worth carrying into a floor-plan review. First, certain residences include accessory storage rooms labeled "Pantry" — these are not habitable space, may not be used for sleeping, cooking or living, and may not be rented separately. Read them as closets, not as rooms, when comparing square footage between units. Second, the storage lockers are separately offered limited common elements rather than deeded space, they range from roughly 15 to 25 square feet, and they are not served by the building's emergency generator.
The recorded unit roster shows lines running A through K but not continuously floor to floor — a signature of a recombined prewar plan. As at any conversion of this type, the correct pricing anchor is the specific line and floor, not a building average across a forty-unit roster with that much layout variance.
Building operations
The staffing model is the most important operating fact at The Marlow, and it is the one most often misread. The first-year budget in the offering plan on file projects a superintendent at approximately fifteen hours per week, a single doorman working forty hours per week Monday through Friday, one full-time maintenance worker and one part-time weekend maintenance worker — all engaged through a staffing agency under contract to the condominium board rather than employed directly. The plan describes a part-time lobby attendant in its amenity summary. This is a boutique building, not a 24-hour full-service one, and the common charges should be read against that service level rather than against the larger doorman buildings nearby. Confirm current staffing with the managing agent, as the board has had years to adjust it.
The amenity package is compact and family-oriented: a residents' lounge with a kitchenette, a children's playroom, a fitness center, a laundry room, the landscaped interior courtyard, and the landscaped common roof terrace with a grilling area and open city views. Use of the roof terrace is subject to board regulation on occupancy limits and noise, as set out in the plan.
Two structural items belong in any diligence file here. First, the building sits within a designated historic district, so every façade alteration requires Landmarks approval — the plan discloses this explicitly. Combined with Local Law 11's periodic façade examination requirement, this means the exterior maintenance cycle is both mandatory and slower than in an unregulated building. The conversion-era restoration means near-term exposure is low, but the obligation is permanent.
Second — and this is the item a buyer is least likely to think to ask about — the offering plan disclosed that rent-regulation status at this building was determined unit by unit, turning in part on the expiration of tax-exemption benefits, and that twenty-seven of the offered units were not subject to any rent laws at the time of filing. The plan also carried the standard non-eviction-conversion special risk that the sponsor retained the unconditional right to rent rather than sell units, meaning purchasers could find themselves living alongside non-purchasing occupants indefinitely. Recorded transfers now show deeds across effectively the entire unit roster, so the sellout did complete. But the unit-level regulatory history is documented in the plan, and for any specific apartment it is worth confirming.
Policy framework
Pets: Permitted. Confirm size and breed conditions against the current house rules.
Pied-à-terre: Permitted.
Subletting: Permitted with conditions. Confirm the conditions, any right of first refusal on leases and any minimum lease term with the managing agent.
LLC, trust and foreign ownership: Permitted.
Financing: Not documented; confirm in the declaration, bylaws and house rules.
Flip tax: No traditional flip tax. The plan on file instead imposes a non-refundable working capital contribution equal to two months' common charges at the initial closing and at each resale closing. Include this contribution explicitly in each closing estimate and confirm the responsible party from the current documents; do not assume that both buyer and seller pay it.
Storage: Nine storage lockers were offered under the plan, priced at roughly $15,000 to $17,000 each and structured as limited common elements rather than deeded units. Availability today should be confirmed with the managing agent.
Property tax abatement: As at every New York condominium, the NYC Co-op/Condo Property Tax Abatement requires primary residence. LLC purchases and pied-à-terre use forfeit it — model the difference on the specific unit before offer.
Application and transaction fees
Fees below are from building management's published schedule, as of August 2026. They are shown as published, item by item; no total is added because the total depends on the transaction. Deposits are listed apart from nonrefundable charges.
Purchase
8 items
Fees and charges
| Item | Paid by | When | Amount | Refundable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Processing Fee | Paid by Buyer | When With the application | Amount $600 | Refundable Non-refundable |
| Consumer Credit Report FeePer applicantRequired | Paid by Buyer | When With the application | Amount $125 per person | Refundable Non-refundable |
| Move-In Fee | Paid by Buyer | When With the application | Amount $500 | Refundable Non-refundable |
| Working Capital Contribution | Paid by Buyer | When With the application | Amount Two (2) months common charges | Refundable Non-refundable |
| Move-Out Fee | Paid by Seller | When With the application | Amount $500 | Refundable Non-refundable |
| Closing Fee | Paid by Seller | When At closing | Amount $750 | Refundable Non-refundable |
Deposits
| Item | Paid by | When | Amount | Refundable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Move-in Deposit | Paid by Buyer | When With the application | Amount $1,000 | Refundable Refundable |
| Move Out Deposit | Paid by Seller | When With the application | Amount $1,000 | Refundable Refundable |
Rental or lease
7 items
Fees and charges
| Item | Paid by | When | Amount | Refundable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leasing Fee to condo | Paid by Landlord | When With the application | Amount One (1) month's common charges | Refundable Non-refundable |
| Move-Out Fee | Paid by Landlord | When With the application | Amount $500 | Refundable Non-refundable |
| Consumer Credit Report FeePer applicant | Paid by Tenant | When With the application | Amount $125 per person | Refundable Non-refundable |
| Lease Processing Fee | Paid by Tenant | When With the application | Amount $500 | Refundable Non-refundable |
| Move-In Fee | Paid by Tenant | When With the application | Amount $500 | Refundable Non-refundable |
Deposits
| Item | Paid by | When | Amount | Refundable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Move Out Deposit | Paid by Landlord | When With the application | Amount $1,000 | Refundable Refundable |
| Move-in Deposit | Paid by Tenant | When With the application | Amount $1,000 | Refundable Refundable |
Management updates its schedule without a public filing. The date is when management last updated the page, not when a rule changed. Confirm the current schedule with management before you apply.
Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to discuss the building's costs and purchase requirements.
Own an apartment here? Request an apartment-specific pricing review.
Financing and purchase requirements
- Purchase or lease by a corporation
- Permitted with conditionsSubject to condo attorney review of LLC documents. Note: The parties will be fully responsible for all legal fees in connection to his preparation of all relevant materials.Source: building management's published schedule, as of August 2026
Sublet and pied-à-terre policy
A condominium owner leasing a unit and a co-op shareholder subletting are different rules, and a building-wide rule is different from a restriction on one apartment. This is the building's rule; confirm it for the specific apartment.
- Leasing by owners
- Permitted with conditionsOne (1) year minimum term.Source: building management's published schedule, as of August 2026
- Short-term rentals
- Not permittedSource: building management's published schedule, as of August 2026
- Pied-à-terre ownership
- Not verified
Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to discuss the sublet and pied-à-terre rules for that apartment.
Pets and in-unit washer/dryer
- Pets
- Pets permitted with conditions; species not statedSubject to board approval. Please refer to the House RulesSource: building management's published schedule, as of August 2026
- In-unit washer/dryer
- PermittedSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to confirm the pet and washer/dryer rules for that apartment.
Monthly carrying charges in recent sales
- Common charges + taxes, per room
- $706 per room a monthMedian of 4 recorded sales since October 2023Source: recorded sales, refreshed October 2026
- Common charges + taxes, per square foot
- $2.45 per square foot a monthMedian of 4 recorded sales since October 2023Source: recorded sales, refreshed October 2026
Common charges plus real estate taxes, combined into one monthly figure the way New York condominium listings show them. Add a mortgage payment for the monthly outlay. A summary of recorded sales, not a current bill; charges change.
Building staffing and amenities
- Doorman
- Requires confirmationSources differ. Confirm with building management.
- Attended lobby
- YesSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
- Elevator
- YesSource: NYC Department of City Planning records (PLUTO)
- Amenities noted
- Fitness room, residents' lounge, playroom, roof deck, garden, bike storage, storage, laundry roomSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Staffing and amenities as our building profile and recent listing records describe them. A feature not listed is not confirmed absent. Outdoor space, parking and some facilities can belong to particular apartments or to a separate owner; confirm access for the specific apartment.
Local Law 97
- 2024–2029 annual penalty
- $0 (under cap)
- 2030–2034 annual penalty
- $8,026/yr
- Per unit / month range
- $0 – $18
- Modeled exposure split equally across 38 units (the residential count on the city's lot record). Not an assessed amount; condominium owners are typically charged by each unit's common-interest percentage.
Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.
See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →Facade safety — Local Law 11
The latest available filing classified the facade as SWARMP — Safe With A Repair and Maintenance Program: the inspector (QEWI) identified conditions requiring monitoring or repair, with repairs due by the deadline stated in the filing. The scope, timeline, and how the building funds the work are building-specific — we review the filings and board materials for you.
How to read this, and where it comes from
QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — a licensed professional engineer or registered architect who meets DOB’s FISP qualifications and signs the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).
Penalties shown are amounts DOB assessed against filings on record across 2005–10 to 2025–30. The FISP dataset does not record whether they were paid, contested or remain open, so treat the figure as history rather than a current balance and confirm the building’s standing with the managing agent.
Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.
Recent sales
Recent closings at this building, from The Roebling Research Library. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.
| Date | Unit | Apartment | Price | PPSF | vs. Ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2025 | 8J | 3 BR · 2.5 BA · 1,546 sf | $3,400,000 | $2,199/sf | -5.4% |
| Jan 27, 2025 | 2B | 1,389 sf | $2,952,251 | $2,125/sf | — |
| Jun 20, 2024 | 6J | 3 BR · 2.5 BA · 1,586 sf | $3,400,000 | $2,144/sf | -12.3% |
| Apr 15, 2024 | 7K | 3 BR · 2.5 BA · 1,907 sf | $4,050,000 | $2,124/sf | -12.9% |
| Dec 20, 2023 | 1AE | 2 BR · 2.5 BA · 1,270 sf | $2,014,793 | $1,586/sf | -6.3% |
| Jun 20, 2023 | 2C | 2 BR · 2 BA · 1,084 sf | $1,970,000 | $1,817/sf | -14.3% |
| Apr 7, 2023 | 3K | 3 BR · 2.5 BA · 1,905 sf | $3,900,000 | $2,047/sf | -6.0% |
| Dec 30, 2022 | PHN | 3 BR · 3.5 BA · 2,442 sf | $6,900,000 | $2,826/sf | -0.7% |
Market read. Most recent trades (2025) cleared a median $2,185/sf (floor-adjusted) across 2 sales. Floor-adjusted means each sale is restated to a constant mix of floors, so the figure can differ from the plain median of the sales listed above. Median listing discount 0.9% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.
Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.
Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01212-7503; each condominium apartment is its own tax lot). Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified in The Roebling Research Library. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.
What would your apartment rent for?
Enter your apartment and I'll send you what it would rent for, from comparable closed leases at The Marlow and nearby.
Buying here? Condo closing costs with a mortgage typically run 3 to 6% of the price. See NYC co-op and condo closing costs, line by line.
Keep up with The Marlow and its market
The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings like The Marlow. Unsubscribe anytime.
We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.
What to know if you’re buying
Buy the plan, not the vintage. The value here is that a 1926 shell was gutted and re-planned in 2020 — nine-foot ceilings and prewar moldings on top of a contemporary layout with in-unit laundry and open kitchens. Compare specific surrounding cooperatives for retained prewar layouts and dated sale prices; ownership form alone does not establish a lower price.
Know the service level before you compare common charges. A part-time-attended lobby with weekday doorman coverage is not the same product as a 24-hour building, and the charges reflect that. Compare like with like.
Add the two-month working capital contribution to your closing costs. It applies at resale closings as well as first sale; confirm the amount and payment responsibility.
Pull the plan and the financials. The offering plan, the reserve position since conversion, the current budget, the completed sponsor scope, and the unit-level rent-regulation history for the specific apartment are all documented. All of them are worth reading before contract.
Model the abatement. LLC and pied-à-terre purchases lose the Co-op/Condo Property Tax Abatement. On a three-million-dollar apartment that is a material monthly difference.
What to know if you’re selling
The conversion story is the selling story. BKSK Architects, a full gut and re-plan, a restored landmarked façade, a new rooftop level with two duplex penthouses — this is a documented, high-quality conversion, and buyers who have looked at unrenovated prewar cooperatives all week will recognize the difference immediately.
Market the documented terms. Leasing is permitted with conditions and in-unit laundry is permitted; confirm pied-à-terre, LLC, trust and foreign-purchase rules in the declaration, bylaws and house rules before marketing them.
Be candid about staffing. Buyers coming from full-service buildings will notice. Positioning it honestly — a boutique building with proportionate common charges — converts better than letting it surface at diligence.
Comparables have to be built by hand. With this few trades, an appraiser or a buyer's agent will reach for the surrounding market. Assemble the line-specific and boutique-conversion comparables yourself and put them in front of the buyer rather than letting them be assembled against you.
Comparable buildings
If you're considering The Marlow, also evaluate:
- 393 West End Avenue — Goldner & Goldner 1927, converted 2022 with CetraRuddy Architects; the larger, full-service version of the same prewar-conversion thesis
- 219 West 81st Street (The Avonova) — Gaetano Ajello prewar building converted to condominium; the closest direct peer two blocks south
- 134 West 82nd Street — prewar low-rise elevator cooperative on the same block; the co-op comparison at identical location
- 139 West 82nd Street — Gronenberg & Leuchtag Renaissance-inspired cooperative, also on the block
- The Rousseau (2280 Broadway / 221 West 82nd Street) — Emery Roth condop around the corner on Broadway; condominium-style rules in a cooperative wrapper
- The Belnord (225 West 86th Street) — 1908 courtyard building converted to condominium; the trophy-scale version of the conversion category
- 215 West 84th Street (The Henry) — Robert A.M. Stern Architects new-construction condominium; the ground-up alternative two blocks north
- 100 West 80th Street (The Orleans) — former hotel converted to condominium; boutique scale, similar buyer profile
- 101 West 87th Street (Park Columbus) — 1980s masonry mid-rise repositioned in a 2013 condominium conversion
- 252 West 85th Street — Schwartz & Gross prewar cooperative; the classic Upper West Side co-op benchmark
More Upper West Side buildings
- 145 West 86th Street — 1925 co-op by Emery Roth
- 146 West 74th Street — co-op
- 150 West 79th Street (The Dorset) — 1911 co-op by Schwartz & Gross
- 150 West 87th Street — 1914 co-op
- 150 West 95th Street — 1925 co-op
- 151 West 74th Street — 1923 co-op
The neighborhood
For the full corridor — architecture, transit, and pricing across Upper West Side — read The Roebling Team Guide to Upper West Side.
How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.
Considering a move at The Marlow?
Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com