335 Greenwich Street (Hanover River House)
335 Greenwich Street, New York, NY 10013
Tribeca
BBL 1001430021 · BIN 1001553
- Year built
- 1930
- Type
- Cooperative
- Units
- 28
- Floors
- 13
- Landmark
- Designated
- Pets
- Permitted — dogs allowed per management-sourced records. Confirm current limits with the managing agent
Every recorded sale at this building, 2004–2026
Bedroom-by-bedroom medians, the full transfer record, and how units trade against ask.
- 3BR median
- $3M
- Recent range
- $2.2M – $7.9M
- Listing discount
- 1.0%
- Recorded transfers
- 28
Almost every residential building in Tribeca began as a warehouse. This one began as a bank.
In 1929 the Centrun Corporation — a subsidiary of the Central Hanover Bank & Trust Company — filed to replace a five-story brick building at the southeast corner of Greenwich and Jay Streets with a thirteen-story office tower. Cross & Cross, a firm known for its bank work, designed it; Marc Eidlitz built it; and it opened in 1931 as one of the last tall office buildings put up in what is now the Tribeca West Historic District. The bank occupied it, and after the bank became Manufacturers Hanover Trust the successor occupied it, for decades. In 1979 it was converted to a cooperative. The name it now carries preserves the tenant, and so does the building: the remnants of the original sign are still legible in the patterned brick frieze above the second story.
The structural consequence of that origin is the thing buyers should weigh first. This is a steel-frame, fireproof building, and it was designed as a set-back skyscraper rather than as a loft. It has a cast-stone base with bronze doors, a brick frieze at the tenth story with three floors recessed above it, and steel sash on the elevations that rise clear of the neighbors. Compared with the masonry loft conversions that make up most of Tribeca's cooperative stock, it carries different maintenance economics, different acoustics, different window details and a different profile against the sky. The setback also produces something the loft buildings mostly cannot: real private terraces on the upper floors, with greenhouse structures on at least one of them documented in the building's filing history.
Inside, the apartments are simplex and duplex lofts with beamed ceilings and large windows, and the stack has been combining for years — recorded share transfers and Department of Buildings filings show 7AB, 8/9C, 6/7C, 2/3C and a combined 3A/3B. The recorded count remains 28; the effective count is lower, and the apartments a buyer will actually see are larger than a per-unit average implies. Service is correspondingly lean: a full-time superintendent, a renovated lobby, a video intercom and a common roof deck, and no doorman. In a building of this size with three landmarked elevations, that posture is arithmetic rather than oversight, and the Department of Buildings history — a nearly unbroken sequence of façade cycles — is the core of diligence here.
Architecture and unit composition
The corner site runs approximately fifty feet on Greenwich Street and a hundred feet on Jay, on a lot of about 5,000 square feet carrying roughly 55,800 square feet of building. That produces a built floor area ratio near 11.1 against a current residential maximum around 6.0 — the building is substantially over-built by today's zoning and could not be reproduced at its present bulk. For shareholders that is a durable advantage; for anyone modelling development value on the lot, there is none.
The designation report describes the elevations closely. The one-story base is cast stone, with multi-pane kalamein windows mostly intact and, at the center bay of the Greenwich frontage, paired doors cast in a bronze alloy topped by screens of the same material and fronted by paired retractable sliding metal doors — an unusual survival. A second pair of bronze and glass doors sits near the eastern end of the Jay Street elevation, next to a garage door. Above the base both street façades are faced in white brick with decorative brickwork in some spandrel panels. The building sets back behind a decorative brick frieze at the tenth story and rises another three floors, with the same frieze motif repeated at the top in place of a cornice. The north and east elevations, visible above the neighbors on Greenwich and Jay, are brick with historic steel sash.
Apartment numbering runs to 14 in a thirteen-story building, so the floor a listing cites and the floor the Department of Finance records may not match. Read the tax record and the survey rather than the apartment letter.
Building operations
Service is limited by design: a full-time superintendent, a video intercom system, a renovated lobby, an elevator and a common roof deck. There is no doorman and no attended lobby. Roughly 1,000 square feet of commercial space occupies part of the ground floor.
The capital record is the useful part, and it is long. The Department of Buildings file shows façade repairs and remedial work in 2000, brickwork replacement at the northwest corner in 2003, sidewalk shed and scaffold cycles in 2003, 2005 and 2006, masonry reconstruction in 2006, brick removal and replacement for waterproofing in 2009, further shed work in 2010, a combined sprinkler and standpipe filing in 2012, a high-pressure gas service replacement in 2012, parapet replacement and general façade repairs in 2013, a lobby renovation in 2014, isolated window replacement at the eighth and tenth floors on the south wall in 2016, and a further round of façade repairs in 2018. The roof water tank was replaced with a fiberglass unit in 2019.
Read that sequence carefully. It describes a corner building with three exposed elevations that has been in more or less continuous envelope work for a quarter century. That is not a red flag on its own — a building that keeps filing is a building that keeps maintaining — but on 28 apartments it means assessments are a live possibility rather than a theoretical one. Ask for the assessment history, the reserve balance, the underlying mortgage and its maturity, and the status of the current Local Law 11 cycle before you go to contract.
Policy framework
Ownership form: Cooperative. Purchasers acquire shares in Hanover River House Inc. and a proprietary lease, not a deed. This is confirmed in the recorded transfer record: apartments here transfer through ACRIS as property type "SP" — share transfers — with real property transfer tax returns attached, rather than as deeds. Recent recorded share transfers include apartments 2A, 7AB, 8/9C and 14A.
What that means at the closing table: a full board package, a board interview, and a board approval that is discretionary and unappealable. Budget 60 to 90 days from contract to closing, not 30 to 45.
Pets: Permitted, including dogs, per management-sourced records. Confirm size and count limits with the managing agent.
Everything else is unpublished. The financing ceiling, the post-closing liquidity requirement, the sublet policy and its seasoning period, the pied-à-terre position, the treatment of trusts and guarantors, and the flip tax do not appear in any public record for this building. That is normal for a small cooperative and it is not a warning sign — but it does mean none of it can be assumed. Every one of those items has to come from the managing agent, in writing, before an offer is made. We will not publish a number we cannot source.
Real estate taxes: No abatement or exemption program applies. The small exemption value on the lot reflects individual shareholder exemptions passed through at the building level. Note that in a cooperative, real estate taxes are paid by the corporation and reach the shareholder inside the monthly maintenance rather than as a separate bill — compare maintenance here against a condominium's common charges plus taxes, not against common charges alone.
Landmark compliance: Any exterior alteration requires LPC review, and work affecting the protected features requires a Certificate of Appropriateness. Terrace enclosures, greenhouse replacements, window changes and rooftop additions on this building all fall inside the Commission's jurisdiction.
Local Law 97
- 2024–2029 annual penalty
- $0 (under cap)
- 2030–2034 annual penalty
- $7,191/yr
- Per unit / month range
- $0 – $21
Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.
See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →Facade safety — Local Law 11
The latest available filing classified the facade as SWARMP — Safe With A Repair and Maintenance Program: the engineer identified conditions requiring monitoring or repair before the next inspection cycle. The scope, timeline, and how the building funds the work are building-specific — we review the filings and board materials for you.
How to read this, and where it comes from
QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).
Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.
Recent sales
Hanover River House trades as prewar Tribeca cooperative loft product with real architecture behind it. Recent activity has centered around the low-to-mid three-million-dollar range, and the transaction count is thin by construction: fewer than thirty apartments, a share of them already combined, in a building where owners tend to stay.
On a per-room basis the building prices in the upper band for Tribeca cooperatives, with the premium attaching to the corner exposure, the setback terraces on the upper floors and the Art Deco pedigree. It prices below the neighborhood's full-service condominiums, and that gap is doing three jobs at once: the cooperative form, the absence of a doorman, and the capital exposure that comes with three landmarked elevations on a small denominator. Comparables should be drawn from Tribeca's converted cooperative loft buildings rather than from its condominium inventory, and combined apartments should be valued as the units they now are rather than as the two they once were. Index any market statement to the last complete year. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.
Recent transfers at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.
| Date | Unit | Apartment | Price | PPSF | vs. Ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2026 | 8 | 4 BR · 2.5 BA | $3,750,000 | -11.8% | |
| Aug 13, 2026 | 2 | 3 BR · 1.5 BA | $3,200,000 | +0.0% | |
| Sep 9, 2025 | PHA | 2 BR · 1 BA · 1,600 sf | $3,750,000 | $2,344/sf | +0.0% |
| Jan 22, 2025 | 7AB | 4 BR · 3.5 BA | $7,925,000 | -0.3% | |
| Aug 10, 2023 | 8 | 3 BR | $2,900,000 | -1.7% | |
| Mar 25, 2022 | PHA | 2 BR · 1 BA | $3,450,000 | -10.4% | |
| Jan 31, 2022 | 6 | 3 BR · 2.5 BA | $3,400,000 | +16.2% | |
| Oct 19, 2021 | 10A | 2 BR · 1 BA | $2,005,000 | +0.5% |
Market read. $/sf is measured on the latest sales with reliable square footage (2025): a median $2,344/sf across 1 sale. The building has traded as recently as 2026. Median listing discount 0.3% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.
The retrade record
Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.
Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.
Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-00143-0021) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.
What to know if you’re buying
You are buying shares, not real property. The recorded transfer record confirms it — apartments here move as share transfers, not deeds. Your lender will issue a co-op share loan, your attorney will review a proprietary lease and a recognition agreement rather than a condominium declaration, and your closing will be a UCC transaction. Price the difference in timeline and in flexibility before you fall in love with the terrace.
Get the financing ceiling in writing before you offer. No maximum-financing figure is published for this building. Small Tribeca cooperatives run anywhere from 50 to 80 percent, and the difference decides whether your deal exists. This is the first question to the managing agent, not the last.
Get the post-closing liquidity requirement too. Boards at this scale typically want to see a multiple of annual carry left over after closing. Find out the multiple before you assemble the package. Run the Co-op Board Qualification Calculator with real numbers, not assumed ones.
Ask what the flip tax is, and how it is calculated. None is documented publicly. A flip tax structured on gain and one structured on price produce very different outcomes on a resale, and the answer belongs in your model on the way in, not on the way out.
Ask about the sublet policy even if you plan to live there. The sublet rule sets your exit options if life changes, and it shapes the building's rental composition. Seasoning period, maximum term and sublet fee, all in writing.
Underwrite the façade. A corner building with three exposed elevations, inside a historic district, on 28 apartments, with continuous envelope filings since 2000. Read the assessment history and the reserve balance, ask what the current Local Law 11 cycle requires, and ask whether the board has a funded plan or intends to assess.
Ask about the underlying mortgage. A cooperative's underlying mortgage and its maturity date are the largest single item on the corporation's balance sheet and appear in no listing. Your attorney should pull the current financial statements. And confirm the floor while you are at it — apartment numbers run to 14 in a thirteen-story building.
What to know if you’re selling
Lead with the building, not the apartment. Cross & Cross, 1930–31, built for Central Hanover Bank & Trust, Art Deco, steel-frame, inside the Tribeca West Historic District, with the original bank sign still legible in the brick. Very few Tribeca cooperatives have a provenance that specific, and it is citable from the LPC designation report.
Assemble the policy stack before you list. Financing ceiling, post-closing liquidity, sublet terms, pet limits, flip tax — none of it is public, and every serious buyer's attorney will ask. Having it in hand on day one shortens your deal and widens your buyer pool.
Present the capital record affirmatively. Twenty-five years of façade cycles, a 2013 parapet replacement, a 2014 lobby renovation, a 2019 water tank. Buyers who see a shed history without context assume neglect; buyers who see a maintenance program assume stewardship. Give them the second version, with the filings behind it.
Comp against Tribeca cooperatives, not condominiums. The neighborhood's condominium pricing embeds a doorman, a deed and a faster closing. Comping against it invites a disappointing appraisal. Within the building, the setback terraces and three exposures are what separate the upper floors from the loft stock nearby.
If your apartment is a combination, document it. Several units here have been merged. Bring the alteration approvals and the amended certificate where they exist — a combined apartment without paper is a diligence problem.
Comparable buildings
If you're considering Hanover River House, also evaluate:
- 100 Hudson Street — 44-residence 1909–10 loft cooperative; the closest peer on tenure, scale and Tribeca conversion vintage
- 55 Hudson Street — 1891 building converted to cooperative in 1983; the same conversion generation with the same board-package framework
- 47 Hudson Street — late-nineteenth-century loft cooperative; smaller, leaner, and a useful check on how a low unit count carries capital cost
- 134 Duane Street — 12-unit loft cooperative in an 1859–60 building; the boutique co-op alternative
- 195 Hudson Street — 27-residence conversion of the 1929 U.S. Rubber Company Building; nearly identical unit count and vintage, structured as a condominium
- 145 Hudson Street — 21-residence 1928–29 Art Deco building converted in 2000; the closest architectural cousin in the neighborhood
- 311 Greenwich Street — Reade House, 1988 ground-up condominium two blocks south; the new-construction contrast on the same street
- 443 Greenwich Street — full-service Tribeca loft condominium; the opposite end of the amenity and privacy spectrum
- 155 Franklin Street — 10-residence conversion of an 1882 sugar warehouse; another small landmarked building where per-owner capital exposure drives the diligence
The neighborhood
For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across Tribeca — read The Roebling Team Guide to Tribeca.
The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.
How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent.
Considering a move at Hanover River House?
Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.
Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.
A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at Hanover River House would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.