Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,600/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $270K/room 2%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $472K/room 18%CPW $355K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,313/sf 24%Greenwich Village $2,455/sf 10%
Full index →
Cooperative · 1929
410 Central Park West
410 Central Park West, New York, NY 10025

410 Central Park West

410 Central Park West, New York, NY 10025

Manhattan Valley, Upper West Side

BBL 1018360036 · BIN 1055302

At a glance
Year built
1929
Type
Cooperative
Units
97
Floors
16
Landmark
No
Financing
Not published by the cooperative. Listing records report a 20 percent minimum down payment; management-sourced records do not carry a financing cap. Confirm in writing before offering
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2003–2026

Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.

Median $/sf
$907
Listing discount
1.5%
Recorded sales
98
On record
2003–2026

Central Park West is a continuous parkfront corridor from 59th Street to 110th, and its economics change sharply north of 96th. 410 Central Park West sits at 101st Street, in Manhattan Valley, four blocks past the point where the historic district ends and roughly eight blocks past the point where trophy-tier pricing does. What a buyer gets for that geography is a 1929 corner building with direct park frontage, protected eastern outlooks over the reservoir end of the park, and a co-op structure with a modest flip tax — at a price that is not competing with the twin-towered Deco buildings in the seventies and eighties.

The architecture is credible rather than famous. Margon & Holder were prolific west-side apartment architects in the late 1920s and early 1930s, with work in the Riverside–West End historic districts and on West 86th, West 90th and West 72nd Streets, and they were architects of record on the building that replaced the original El Dorado. 410 Central Park West is a 1929 corner design from the same practice and the same moment, filed on a 1928 new-building application. It is not landmarked, which is genuinely useful: façade, window and mechanical work here proceeds without Landmarks review, at a lower cost and on a shorter schedule than the same work six blocks south.

The corporation is small and old-fashioned in a way that matters. Catcendix Corp. has 6,407 shares outstanding across 97 original apartments, which makes per-share arithmetic legible in a way it is not in a thousand-share-per-apartment building. The flip tax is 1 percent, at the low end for a prewar co-op. The board takes July and August off. The building is fully depreciated on the corporation's books and carries a persistent accumulated deficit alongside a healthy reserve position — the normal accounting picture for a co-op that has held its land and building since 1982 and funded capital work from cash rather than debt.

The one thing that has changed since our most recent statements is the biggest thing on this page, and it is in the next section.

Architecture and unit composition

Sixteen floors of prewar masonry on a 7,567-square-foot corner lot, roughly 100,500 square feet of building — a compact footprint carried tall, at more than twice today's permitted bulk. Two elevators serve 97 original apartments, which is a low unit count for the floor area and implies generous prewar plans rather than a studio-heavy stack.

The corporation's own financial statements record that several apartments have since been combined, and Department of Buildings filings at this address confirm the pattern, including a documented merge of two lettered apartments on the top floor. As in most prewar buildings with a combination history, the practical consequence is that "a two-bedroom at 410" describes at least two different products — an original line and an assembled one — and the two do not price alike.

Eastern and southeastern exposures above the treeline carry the park view that is the building's principal asset. West 101st Street lines look out over Manhattan Valley's lower-rise blocks.

Building operations

Tax history. The Department of Finance J-51 record shows three grants at this lot: a token benefit initiated in 1979 against $2,600 of qualifying cost, a substantial one initiated in 1985 against roughly $205,700, and a third initiated in 2004 against roughly $68,600 — each a 90 percent abatement running twelve years, extended to fourteen for the later grants. The 1979 grant expired in 1990 and the 1985 grant in 1996; the 2004 grant ran through tax year 2015 and the record ends there. There is no J-51 benefit today and no building-wide exemption on the lot. The only exemptions on the assessment roll are individual shareholder benefits, which the corporation receives and passes through to eligible shareholders.

There is a wrinkle here worth knowing. The audited financial statements record that in recent years the corporation levied operating assessments in amounts approximately equal to the real estate tax abatements it distributes to eligible shareholders. In other words, the abatement is credited to those who qualify and an offsetting assessment is billed across the building. A buyer comparing a maintenance figure against a building that does not do this is not comparing like with like. The corporation also protests its assessed valuation annually and has instituted tax certiorari proceedings against the City.

Management-sourced records carry a further, specific warning: transferring an apartment into a trust can suspend or forfeit eligibility for the co-op and condominium property tax abatement unless the trust and its beneficiaries are properly registered with the Department of Finance. Anyone contemplating trust ownership here should have counsel address it before closing, not after.

Debt — the open question. The corporation refinanced in 2016 into a first mortgage of $5,600,000, interest only at 3.65 percent, with monthly payments of $17,033 and a stated maturity of April 1, 2026, secured by the land and building, alongside a $1,000,000 revolving line of credit co-terminus with the note and undrawn at the most recent year-end on file. That mortgage matured in April 2026. The audited financial statements in The Roebling Research Library run only through 2020, so we do not hold the refinancing terms. This is the first question a buyer should ask and the first document a buyer's attorney should request: what replaced a $5.6 million interest-only note at 3.65 percent, at what rate, on what amortization, and with what effect on maintenance. Because the prior note was interest-only, no principal was retired against it — the full $5.6 million came due.

Reserves and capital work. Designated reserve cash and certificates of deposit together exceeded $1.6 million at the most recent year-end on file, against a building carried at cost and fully depreciated. The corporation has no reserve study; the board reviews building systems periodically and repairs as needed, which the auditors flag.

Recent capital work on file includes a roof water tank replacement, a service-entrance elevator lift, entrance and vestibule restoration, valve replacement, elevator door-lock monitoring, and roof section replacement following leak investigation. The one assessment on record was levied July 1, 2018 in the amount of $250,000 to part-fund a gas riser replacement, billed over thirty months and completed at the end of 2020, with the balance of that project funded from cash reserves. On the record we hold, this building funds capital work from reserves and short assessments rather than from debt — but that record ends in 2020.

Building staff are covered by a Building Service 32BJ collective bargaining agreement.

Policy framework

Ownership form: Cooperative. Full board package and interview; board discretion is not reviewable. Allow for the July–August board recess — a June contract can easily become a September closing. NYC Local Law 58 of 2026 now imposes acknowledgment and decision deadlines on co-op boards, but the recess period may toll them.

Financing: Not published by the cooperative. Listing records report 20 percent minimum down. Confirm the actual cap with the managing agent before you write an offer, because the gap between a 20 percent and a 25 percent requirement decides deals.

Post-closing liquidity: Not published. Boards at this tier commonly want liquid assets after closing equal to one to two years of maintenance and mortgage payments. Ask before offering.

Subletting: Permitted with board approval. The sublet fee is $1 per share on approval and on each renewal, and a refundable escrow of two months' maintenance is required at submission. On 6,407 shares across 97 apartments the per-share fee is a modest number — but the seasoning requirement and any term cap are unpublished, and a permissive fee schedule is not the same as a permissive board.

Pied-à-terre: Reported permitted in market records; undocumented in anything on file. Verify.

Trusts and LLCs: Trust transfers are plainly contemplated — the management fee schedule carries an explicit transfer-into-trust fee — and ACRIS shows completed conveyances at this lot involving multiple related and unrelated parties. The abatement consequence described above is the reason to involve counsel early. LLC purchase is a separate question and is not addressed anywhere on file.

Flip tax: 1 percent of the sale price, seller-paid. Confirmed in the corporation's audited financial statements and in the management-sourced fee schedule.

Alterations: An alteration agreement is on file in The Roebling Research Library, with refundable security deposits scaled by project type. Decorative work carries the smallest deposit; standard and major alterations carry more.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟡
Moderate — under today's cap; material modeled 2030 exposure
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$9,156/yr
Per unit / month range
$0 – $8

Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2025–30
SWARMP
What this means for you

The latest available filing classified the facade as SWARMP — Safe With A Repair and Maintenance Program: the engineer identified conditions requiring monitoring or repair before the next inspection cycle. The scope, timeline, and how the building funds the work are building-specific — we review the filings and board materials for you.

Inspection history
2010–15
SWARMP
2015–20
Safe
2020–25
Safe
2025–30
SWARMP
2030–35
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2032
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs required before the next inspection cycle.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

The comparable set for 410 Central Park West is the parkfront co-op stock between 96th and 110th Streets — 400, 415, 420 and 441 Central Park West — and secondarily the prewar co-ops a block or two west in Manhattan Valley. It is not the Deco trophy inventory of the seventies and eighties; that market has a different buyer and a different carrying-cost structure.

Within the building, the spread that matters is park-facing versus street-facing, and original versus combined. Above the treeline on the east side, the outlook cannot be built out — that is the durable asset. On the West 101st Street elevation, the argument is space and light rather than view, and pricing should reflect that plainly. The 1 percent flip tax and the permitted in-unit washer/dryer both work in a seller's favour relative to stricter buildings nearby. The unresolved mortgage refinancing is the item most likely to move a monthly figure between now and the next set of audited statements. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.

Recent transfers at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Apr 20, 20263C
1 BR · 1 BA · 689 sf
$630,000$914/sf-2.9%
Feb 20, 20261E
1 BR · 1 BA · 750 sf
$675,000$900/sf-3.4%
May 2, 20251D2D
3 BR · 2 BA · 1,700 sf
$1,775,000$1,044/sf-1.1%
Feb 19, 20257D
1 BR · 1 BA · 800 sf
$715,000$894/sf-2.7%
May 29, 20249B
2 BR · 1.5 BA
$1,440,000-0.7%
Feb 20, 20245EF
3 BR · 1,350 sf
$1,315,000$974/sf-6.0%
Dec 18, 202315C
1 BR · 1 BA
$650,000+0.0%
Oct 25, 202316D
1 BR · 750 sf
$770,000$1,027/sf-3.6%

Market read. Most recent trades (2026) cleared a median $907/sf across 2 sales. Median listing discount 1.5% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

14A · 1,200 sf+91%
$849,000 2003$1,625,000 ($1,354/sf) 2018
12B · 1,100 sf+71%
$850,000 ($708/sf) 2004$1,455,000 ($1,323/sf) 2023
6B · 1,065 sf+62%
$955,000 ($897/sf) 2012$1,550,000 ($1,455/sf) 2017
8C · 700 sf+61%
$359,000 ($513/sf) 2004$525,000 ($750/sf) 2006$579,500 ($828/sf) 2014
4C+24%
$507,000 2012$630,000 2022

Other recent transfers

DateUnitPrice
Nov 14, 200314A$849,000
View all 98 recorded transfers, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01836-0036) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.

What to know if you’re buying

Ask about the mortgage first. A $5.6 million interest-only note at 3.65 percent matured in April 2026. Nothing else on this page will affect your monthly as much as what replaced it. Request the current mortgage documents and the most recent audited financial statements through your attorney.

Understand the abatement-and-assessment mechanic. The corporation distributes tax abatements to eligible shareholders and levies an offsetting operating assessment. Compare maintenance figures between buildings only after you understand how each one handles this.

Raise the trust question before closing, not after. Management's own guidance is that a transfer into trust can suspend or forfeit the co-op and condominium tax abatement unless the trust is properly registered with the Department of Finance.

Plan around the summer recess. No board decisions in July or August. A contract signed in late spring should assume a September board date.

There is no abatement left on the building. The last J-51 grant was consumed in tax year 2015. The tax line is the tax line.

Confirm the financing cap in writing. The building does not publish one. Listing records say 20 percent down; that has not been confirmed by the managing agent in anything we hold. Run the Co-op Board Qualification Calculator before you offer.

Check whether the line is original or combined. Several apartments have been merged, including on the top floor. That governs circulation, kitchen placement and whether there are two entry doors.

What to know if you’re selling

Lead with the park frontage and the corner. Protected eastern outlook, 1929 corner architecture, a low flip tax and permitted in-unit laundry. That package is not common at this end of the corridor.

Get ahead of the refinancing. Whatever the board did in April 2026, a diligent buyer's attorney will find it. Presenting the current mortgage terms, the reserve position and the capital record proactively is the difference between a clean deal and a renegotiation.

Present the reserve and capital history. Over $1.6 million in reserves and certificates on the most recent statements on file, a completed gas riser replacement funded largely from cash, and a run of roof, elevator and entrance work. That is a well-run small co-op and it should be sold as one.

Price condition honestly. Original prewar apartments and gut-renovated combinations are two products here. Run the Renovation Cost Calculator against your asking strategy.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 410 Central Park West, also evaluate:

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across Central Park West — read The Roebling Team Guide to Central Park West.

Preparing a board package for this building?

The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent.

Considering a move at 410 Central Park West?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at 410 Central Park West would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.