Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,600/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $270K/room 2%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $472K/room 18%CPW $355K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,313/sf 24%Greenwich Village $2,455/sf 10%
Full index →
Condop · 1929
Marketed in listing records as The Warner
467 Central Park West, New York, NY 10025

467 Central Park West

467 Central Park West, New York, NY 10025

Manhattan Valley, Upper West Side

BBL 1018427501 · BIN 1075198

At a glance
Year built
1929
Type
Condop
Units
99
Floors
16
Landmark
No
Amenities
Full-time doorman and live-in superintendent per listing records; a common landscaped garden appears on essentially every unit record for the building; bicycle storage and private storage. A cellar laundry room was built out under DOB filings in April and May 2019 — washers, dryers and the required sprinkler protection "for tenants use"
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2003–2026

Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.

Median $/sf
$939
Listing discount
2.1%
Recorded sales
71
On record
2003–2026

Central Park West does not end at 96th Street, but the market's mental map mostly does. Above the historic district boundary the avenue keeps its address, its park frontage and its 1920s bones, and sheds a large fraction of its price. 467 Central Park West is the clearest example of that arbitrage at the north end: a 1929 prewar apartment house with a columned entrance, pediment and terra-cotta trim, sixteen stories of park-facing lines, and pricing that has nothing to do with the buildings twenty blocks south.

It is also, unlike most of the avenue, a condominium. That is a consequence of when it converted. The recorded evidence is unambiguous: 49 unit deeds landed in 1987 to 63 separate grantees, another 17 the following year. This was one of the mid-1980s prewar rental-to-condominium conversions, done at the moment when Manhattan Valley was still a difficult sell and the sponsor needed the wider buyer pool that condominium ownership opens up. Secondary records that put the conversion in 1993 are describing something else — most likely the J-51 filings that followed the sponsor's rehabilitation work.

Those J-51 benefits are the part of the building's history most likely to be mispriced today. Abatements initiated in 1990 and 1992 carried through fiscal 2001 and fiscal 2003; a smaller one initiated in 1999 runs out of the record after fiscal 2010. DOF's historical file goes to fiscal 2018 and shows nothing here afterward. Every one of the building's tax bills has been unabated for roughly fifteen years, which means, unusually, there is no burn-off cliff ahead — the taxes a buyer sees are the taxes they get. Buyers coming from newer condominiums with live 421-a or J-51 schedules should register that as a positive, not a neutral.

The building's other structural distinction is that it is not landmarked. LPC's database records no designated building anywhere on Block 1842. Whatever the marketing says about the facade, no city agency reviews what happens to it — which is why the terra-cotta and brick replacement filed in 2018 and the earlier exterior restorations of 2001, 2005 and 2011 were the board's decisions alone. Read the capital history rather than the designation status.

Architecture and unit composition

The building presents a corner mass on a seventy-six-foot Central Park West frontage running about 125 feet deep, with roughly 92,500 square feet of residential space over sixteen floors. The detailing is characteristic 1920s apartment-house work: a columned entry, an ornamented window group above it, a pediment, rosettes, and terra-cotta trim carried across the elevations — the kind of ornament that generates maintenance obligations, and has, in the form of the terra-cotta replacement filed in 2018.

The unit mix runs from studios and alcove studios through one- and two-bedrooms, with a small number of larger lines and penthouse-level apartments carrying private terraces; a penthouse expansion was filed in 2002. The A and B lines are the building's larger park-side product; the C, D, E and F lines are the smaller and rear-facing stock. Combinations exist — a 2014 filing joined 11D and 11E — so the DOF count of 99 units runs slightly ahead of what the building actually contains today. Ceiling heights, plaster detail and casement or double-hung window openings vary by line and by how thoroughly a given apartment was renovated after 1987; the conversion did not deliver a uniform product, and condition variance inside the building is wide.

Building operations

Full-time door staff and a live-in superintendent per listing records, with a common landscaped garden that appears on virtually every unit record for the building and is the amenity residents actually use. Bicycle storage and private storage are available. The central laundry is comparatively new: DOB filings in April and May 2019 cover the installation of washers, dryers and sprinkler protection at the cellar level for residents' use, which suggests the building's laundry provision was upgraded rather than original.

The capital record visible in DOB filings is steady rather than dramatic — facade repairs in 2001, masonry and lintel work in 2005 and 2006, exterior restoration with a sidewalk shed in 2011, a lobby restoration with new entry doors and mailboxes in 2010, and the terra-cotta and brick replacement program filed in 2018 with an accompanying site-safety plan. That is a building that has been addressing its envelope on a roughly decadal cycle. A buyer should ask for the current facade cycle status and the most recent financial statements; neither the offering plan nor the condominium's financials are on file with us.

Policy framework

As a condominium, sales here do not require board approval — the board's remedy is a right of first refusal, and the practical consequence is a faster, more predictable closing than a co-op of comparable price. Beyond that, the building's own rules are not documented in The Roebling Research Library. Subletting policy, pet policy, pied-à-terre and investor tolerance, move-in rules and the schedule of transfer-related fees should all be requested from the managing agent before contract rather than assumed from condominium convention.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟢
Strong — under cap in both periods
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
Per unit / month range

Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
Safe
What this means for you

The latest available FISP filing classified the facade as Safe — no repairs were required at that inspection. Facade inspections run on a fixed five-year cycle; future inspection, repair, and any assessment decisions remain building-specific.

Inspection history
2005–10
Safe
2010–15
Safe
2015–20
SWARMP
2020–25
Safe
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2029
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs required before the next inspection cycle.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

467 Central Park West is the value entry to a park-front address. Pricing sits well below the prewar co-op stock on the park blocks south of 96th Street and below the Central Park West condominiums nearer the museum, and the discount is a function of location on the avenue rather than of the building's construction or condition. Within the building, the spread is driven by three things in order: whether a line faces the park, whether the apartment has private outdoor space, and how completely it has been renovated since the conversion. Studios and one-bedrooms in the rear lines set the floor; park-facing two- and three-bedrooms and the terraced penthouse-level apartments set the ceiling.

Two structural points matter to the underwriting. First, the absence of any live tax abatement means monthly carrying costs are already at their steady state — there is no scheduled step-up in taxes to model. Second, because the conversion is nearly forty years old, condition inside the building varies more than in a newer condominium, and per-square-foot comparisons across lines are only meaningful once renovation quality is held constant. Index any market read to the last complete year. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.

Recent closings at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Jan 28, 202611A
3 BR · 2 BA · 1,500 sf
$1,774,000$1,183/sf-1.4%
Apr 11, 202512C
1 BR · 1 BA · 764 sf
$850,000$1,113/sf+0.0%
Apr 10, 20243B
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,108 sf
$1,440,000$1,300/sf-3.7%
Feb 15, 202416A
3 BR · 2 BA · 1,499 sf
$1,980,000$1,321/sf-12.0%
Apr 18, 20232E
1 BR · 1 BA · 800 sf
$790,000$988/sf-4.2%
Mar 24, 20238F
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,152 sf
$1,150,000$998/sf-13.2%
Dec 20, 202214D
736 sf
$969,500$1,317/sfoff-mkt
Nov 12, 20219D
1 BR · 1 BA · 736 sf
$920,000$1,250/sf-5.6%

Market read. Most recent trades (2026) cleared a median $939/sf across 1 sale. Median listing discount 2.1% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

9D · 736 sf+92%
$480,000 ($623/sf) 2003$920,000 ($1,250/sf) 2021
2C · 764 sf+77%
$620,000 ($795/sf) 2005$1,100,000 ($1,440/sf) 2020
4F · 664 sf+61%
$450,000 ($643/sf) 2004$725,000 ($1,092/sf) 2021
1B · 796 sf+57%
$550,000 ($691/sf) 2009$650,000 ($817/sf) 2013$865,000 ($1,087/sf) 2017
4E · 793 sf+43%
$560,037 ($706/sf) 2006$560,038 ($706/sf) 2006$800,000 ($1,009/sf) 2015
View all 71 recorded sales, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01842-7501) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.

What to know if you’re buying

You are buying a condominium on Central Park West, which is rare. Almost the entire avenue is cooperative. If your purchase involves a trust, an LLC, foreign income, a non-traditional financing structure, or a plan to sublet, this building solves problems that the co-ops south of here will not.

The taxes are already unabated. Confirm it on the current tax bill, but the J-51 record shows the last benefit lapsing after fiscal 2010. Compare that honestly against a newer condominium whose abatement still has years to run.

Read the facade file. Terra-cotta and brick replacement was filed in 2018 on a building with substantial ornament and no landmark protection. Ask the managing agent for the current Local Law 11 cycle status, the reserve balance, and whether any assessment is live.

Price the block, not just the building. This is Manhattan Valley at 107th Street, not the museum blocks. The B and C at 103rd Street, the 1 at 110th, and the park itself define the daily experience. Walk it at night before you decide.

What to know if you’re selling

Correct the record in the listing. Public sources carry a 1993 conversion date; the recorded deeds show 1987. Getting the building's history right earns credibility with buyers' counsel, who will pull ACRIS.

Lead with condominium ownership. On this avenue it is close to unique, and it materially widens your buyer pool — investors, trusts, LLCs and buyers with complex income all clear here and cannot clear next door.

Sell the garden and the outlook. The common garden appears on nearly every unit record in the building and is what residents cite; park-facing lines and terraced apartments are the premium product and should be marketed as such.

Set expectations on condition. After forty years of independent renovations, the building has no uniform standard. Price to your actual finish level and run the Renovation Cost Calculator against the alternative before deciding whether to improve or discount.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 467 Central Park West, also evaluate:

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across Central Park West — read The Roebling Team Guide to Central Park West.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent.

Considering a move at Marketed in listing records as The Warner?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at Marketed in listing records as The Warner would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.