Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,632/sf ▴3%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $271K/room ▴4%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $465K/room ▴3%CPW $355K/roomFifth Ave $501K/roomBillionaires' Row $4,313/sfHell's Kitchen $1,328/sf ▴0%
Full index →
Cooperative · 1896
48 Great Jones Street
48 Great Jones Street, New York, NY 10012
Buildings·NoHo·Cooperative

48 Great Jones Street

48 Great Jones Street, New York, NY 10012

NoHo

BBL 1005310045 · BIN 1008524

CorridorNoHo
At a glance
Year built
1896
Type
Cooperative
Units
12
Floors
7
Amenities
Landscaped common roof terrace; drive-in delivery bay off the eastern storefront opening directly to the elevator, per listing records
Landmark status
Not an individual landmark; in the NoHo Historic District Extension
NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission records, updated February 2026

48 Great Jones Street sales history: 20 recorded sales

Own an apartment at 48 Great Jones Street?
Enter your apartment to see its recorded sale history and today’s estimate.
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2004–2026

Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.

Median $/sf, 2026 to date
$2,053
floor-adjusted, 1 sale
Listing discount
5.3%
Recorded sales
20
On record
2004–2026
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at 48 Great Jones Street would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.

As cited in The Wall Street Journal★ 92 reviews on Google

Great Jones Street is two blocks long and carries an outsized share of downtown's cultural record, and 48–52 Great Jones is the building the Landmarks Preservation Commission chose to put on the cover of its NoHo Historic District Extension report. That is not decoration. The building is a 68-foot-wide Renaissance Revival store-and-loft, built in 1896–97 by the architect A. V. Porter for Thomas W. Keogh, who was assembling and developing the north side of the street as the area turned commercial. Porter divided a wide front into three vertical bays so it would read like three narrow lofts — a two-story limestone base on cast-iron columns, beribboned cartouches in the spandrels, four-story brick piers with Corinthian capitals, and a galvanized-iron cornice with Greek key and egg-and-dart moldings, scrolled brackets and coffers. The LPC report calls it largely intact to its late-nineteenth-century appearance.

Its commercial history is the neighborhood's in miniature. In 1915 the building was leased to the New York Fur Auction Sales Corp., when NoHo was the center of the fur trade; from the 1920s until 1969 it belonged to the Whitaker Paper Company, a newsprint and business-paper dealer that occupied it as primary tenant for nearly half a century. Then the manufacturing base emptied, artists moved into the floors, and the building became something the city had not quite figured out how to regulate yet.

What happened next is why this building is genuinely unusual, and it is documented in the offering plan on file in The Roebling Research Library. An individual owner bought the property in October 1973 and began converting it; the tenants had already moved in and were performing work on their own lofts. A Board of Standards and Appeals variance was granted on October 8, 1974, zoning the building for joint living/working quarters and offices, subject to conditions — including a minimum loft size of 1,200 square feet, a tenant recreation space to be made available free of charge to residents, and substantial completion within one year. Work stalled in a dispute among the sponsors. On June 16, 1975, 48 Tenants Corp. took title, finished the conversion contemplated by the variance, obtained a new certificate of occupancy, and then filed the offering plan itself, in December 1977, expressly in lieu of a plan from the original sponsors, "who are either not available or who are unable to prepare and submit" one. This is a tenant-completed, self-sponsored cooperative — the shareholders finished their own building and wrote their own plan. Nearly fifty years later the same corporation still owns it.

Architecture and unit composition

The facade is the reason for the designation and the reason for the maintenance bill. Limestone piers with foliate capitals and a dentiled entablature carry the two-story base; the first floor keeps its decorated cast-iron columns, and the eastern bay retains a delivery bay with a diamond-plate ramp and a storefront the LPC report describes as historic and possibly original. Above, four-story brick piers with Corinthian capitals frame grouped windows, paneled cast-iron spandrels with floral decoration separate the floors, and the seventh floor turns to arched windows under radiating brick architraves. Historic wood sash survives at the second floor.

Inside, the offering plan describes a seven-story-and-basement non-fireproof building with a single fully automatic combination passenger/service elevator. The residences are floor-throughs and half-floors — recorded share transfers use front, rear and west designations across the second through seventh floors — sized against the variance's 1,200-square-foot floor. The practical result is twelve apartments in a building 68 feet wide by roughly 88 feet deep, which is a scale of loft that NoHo no longer produces. The delivery bay opening straight to an oversized elevator, described in listing records, is a genuine functional oddity worth seeing; so is the landscaped common roof terrace, which reads as the descendant of the variance's tenant recreation-space condition.

Building operations

The ground floor and cellar contain roughly 5,200 square feet of commercial space per city records. Their existence does not establish a current capital cushion or net contribution to the twelve-apartment cooperative's budget. The offering plan documents the origin of that arrangement: at conversion the commercial space was let to a prior owner of the building, which also held a second mortgage against the property. Request current ownership and lease records, term and expiration, collections, vacancy exposure and expenses; assess the net contribution to maintenance from the current budget rather than ranking it from unit count.

The DOB record shows recurring envelope filings: Local Law 11 facade repairs in 2009, an emergency facade shed in 2008, a new fire-alarm system and standpipe and fire-pump work in 2014 and 2017, boiler replacement in 2008, above-ground fuel storage decommissioned in 2016, and masonry, limestone and window restoration in 2018; the filings do not confirm completion or current condition. In a landmarked building, envelope work runs through the Landmarks Preservation Commission as well as the Department of Buildings, and that is a real line item and a real timeline for any shareholder alteration touching the exterior.

Policy framework

None of it is published. The financing ceiling, minimum down payment, post-closing liquidity expectation, flip tax structure and rate, sublet policy and surcharge, pied-à-terre posture, and the treatment of trusts and LLCs are all board-set and live only in the managing agent's file and the current proprietary lease.

Two things we can state from the documents on file. The proprietary lease requires the written consent of the corporation for any subletting, on such conditions as the board may prescribe, with consent not to be unreasonably withheld; an amendment on file authorizes a monthly sublet surcharge, capped in that amendment at $500 per month. And any assignment of the lease and transfer of shares requires board consent, with the board obligated to act on a written application within thirty days. Both provisions date to the conversion era and have almost certainly been amended since. Treat them as the shape of the framework, not as current terms, and get the current terms in writing.

Building staffing and amenities

Elevator
YesSource: NYC Department of City Planning records (PLUTO)
Amenities noted
Roof deckSource: The Roebling Team's building profile

Staffing and amenities as our building profile and recent listing records describe them. A feature not listed is not confirmed absent. Outdoor space, parking and some facilities can belong to particular apartments or to a separate owner; confirm access for the specific apartment.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟡
Moderate — under today's cap; material modeled 2030 exposure
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$18,684/yr
Per unit / month range
$0 – $130
Modeled exposure split equally across 12 units (the residential count on the city's lot record). Not an assessed amount; co-op shareholders are typically charged by share allocation.

Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.

See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
Safe
What this means for you

The latest available FISP filing classified the facade as Safe — no repairs were required at that inspection. A filed Safe grade is not a guarantee of current condition: owners still maintain the facade and, where required, observe parapets each year. Future inspection timing (Local Law 49 of 2025 changed the cycle framework from October 1, 2026), repair and any assessment decisions remain building-specific.

Inspection history
2005–10
Safe
2010–15
Safe
2015–20
SWARMP
2020–25
Safe
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2029
Assessed · 2005–10 to 2020–25
$6,000 in filing penalties
payment status not in the record
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs are due by the deadline stated in the filing.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — a licensed professional engineer or registered architect who meets DOB’s FISP qualifications and signs the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Penalties shown are amounts DOB assessed against filings on record across 2005–10 to 2020–25. The FISP dataset does not record whether they were paid, contested or remain open, so treat the figure as history rather than a current balance and confirm the building’s standing with the managing agent.

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

Shares have traded on the open market to unrelated individual and trust purchasers steadily since the mid-2000s, across the full range of lines — front and rear half-floors and full-floor units on the second through seventh floors. Volume is what twelve apartments produce: a closing or two in an active year, sometimes none. That makes pricing here a comparables problem rather than a statistics problem. Value tracks floor level, exposure, ceiling height and condition, and the building prices against NoHo's boutique loft condominium stock at a cooperative basis — with the artists' joint living-work framework and the board process as the offsetting cost. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.

Recent transfers at this building, from The Roebling Research Library. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Sep 25, 20267F
3 BR · 2 BA · 2,500 sf
$4,950,000$1,980/sf-0.9%
Oct 27, 20227F
3 BR · 2 BA · 2,500 sf
$4,600,000$1,840/sf-7.9%
Aug 26, 20225R
2 BR · 1 BA · 2,508 sf
$3,175,000$1,266/sf-6.5%
Aug 22, 20223F
2 BR · 2 BA · 2,500 sf
$4,250,000$1,700/sf+6.4%
Apr 2, 20196R
3 BR · 2 BA · 2,600 sf
$2,700,000$1,038/sf-32.5%
Apr 2, 20196W
1 BR · 1 BA · 1,400 sf
$1,635,000$1,168/sf+0.0%
Apr 5, 20123F
2 BR · 2,500 sf
$3,100,000$1,240/sf-7.5%
Apr 22, 20114F
3 BR · 2,500 sf
$3,240,000$1,296/sf-7.4%

Market read. Most recent trades (2026 to date) cleared a median $2,053/sf (floor-adjusted) across 1 sale. Floor-adjusted means each sale is restated to a constant mix of floors, so the figure can differ from the plain median of the sales listed above. Median listing discount 5.3% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

7F · 2,500 sf+116%
$2,295,000 2006 → $4,600,000 ($1,840/sf) 2022 → $4,950,000 ($1,980/sf) 2026
3F · 2,500 sf+77%
$2,400,000 ($960/sf) 2007 → $3,100,000 ($1,240/sf) 2012 → $4,250,000 ($1,700/sf) 2022
4F · 2,500 sf+51%
$2,146,500 ($859/sf) 2006 → $3,240,000 ($1,296/sf) 2011
View all 20 recorded transfers, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-00531-0045). Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified in The Roebling Research Library. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.

For owners

What would your apartment rent for?

Enter your apartment and I'll send you what it would rent for, from comparable closed leases at 48 Great Jones Street and nearby.

Buying here? Co-op closing costs typically run 2 to 3% of the price. See NYC co-op and condo closing costs, line by line.

The Roebling Report

Keep up with 48 Great Jones Street and its market

The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings like 48 Great Jones Street. Unsubscribe anytime.

We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.

What to know if you’re buying

Understand the joint living-work framework before you offer. This building's residential use exists because of a 1974 Board of Standards and Appeals variance zoning it for joint living/working quarters and offices. Your attorney should read the variance, the conditions attached to it, and the current certificate of occupancy, and should confirm with the managing agent how the building handles artist certification in practice for a purchaser who is not a certified artist. This is the single most consequential diligence item at this address.

Buy shares, and prepare for a share purchase. A full board package, a board interview, and a board with broad discretion, limited by federal, state and city law and its own authority. Assume a financing ceiling below condominium levels, a post-closing liquidity test measured in years of carrying cost, and real scrutiny of liquid reserves. Run the Co-op Board Qualification Calculator before you make an offer.

Get the policy stack in writing. Maximum financing; flip tax structure, rate and who pays; whether subletting is permitted and after what seasoning, and what the current surcharge is; whether pied-à-terre ownership is entertained at all; and whether the board will approve a trust or an LLC. None of this is public. All of it can end a deal at contract.

Twelve apartments means a small shareholder base — and a landmarked facade. Assessment appetite, reserve depth and the facade cycle all run through that base, with votes following the share allocation in the co-op's governing documents, and exterior work requires Landmarks approval on top of DOB permits. Have your attorney read the most recent financial statements and ask directly about the capital plan for the envelope and about any live assessment.

The commercial tenancy is a genuine variable. Verify the current net income, expenses and vacancy exposure of the roughly 5,200 square feet of ground-floor and cellar commercial space, then model any effect on maintenance.

The J-51 is long gone. The benefit initiated in 1978 and burned off around 1989–90, and the roll shows no live exemption on the lot. No phase-out remains, but taxes still change with assessments and rates; check the apartment's tax bill.

What to know if you’re selling

Lead with the building the LPC put on its cover. A. V. Porter, 1896–97, for Thomas W. Keogh; the fur auction house; Whitaker Paper for half a century; the cover photograph of the NoHo Historic District Extension designation report. Marketing that names the architecture precisely outperforms marketing that gestures at "prewar loft."

Tell the conversion story, because it is the differentiator. A 1974 BSA variance, a stalled sponsor, and a tenants' corporation that took title in 1975, finished the building and filed its own offering plan in 1977. Buyers cross-shopping developer conversions have never heard a story like it, and it is documented in the plan on file with us.

Front-load the artist-certification question. It will be asked, and a seller who answers it early with the variance and the certificate of occupancy in hand screens for the right buyer instead of losing the deal in diligence.

Assemble diligence materials at listing. With trades this infrequent, buyers' attorneys work the documents hard. We provide the offering plan, proprietary lease and amendments, and financial statements from The Roebling Research Library to serious buyers' counsel.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 48 Great Jones Street, also evaluate:

  • 43 Great Jones Street — 1892–93 Romanesque Revival loft co-op of full-floor residences directly across the street; the most direct like-for-like comp
  • 27 Great Jones Street — ten-residence loft condominium formed in 1998 from two nineteenth-century buildings; the condo alternative on the same street
  • 382 Lafayette Street — eight-residence 1896 warehouse loft condominium on the same tax block
  • 27 Bleecker Street — 1888 loft building converted in 1985 to a cooperative of artists' joint living-work quarters; the closest peer on conversion framework
  • 54 Bleecker Street — 1896 warehouse converted in 1985–86, with a comparable J-51 and joint living-work record
  • 10 Bleecker Street — 1890s Renaissance Revival loft converted to a boutique NoHo cooperative
  • 1 Bond Street — the landmarked 1880 Robbins & Appleton cast-iron loft condominium a block north
  • 40 Bond Street — Herzog & de Meuron's 2007 boutique condominium; the street's design benchmark
  • 25 Bond Street — boutique loft-style condominium at NoHo's top-end pricing

More NoHo buildings

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, transit, and pricing across NoHo — read The Roebling Team Guide to NoHo.

Preparing a board package for this building?

The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.

Considering a move at 48 Great Jones Street?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Licensed Associate Real Estate Broker · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com