Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,600/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $270K/room 2%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $472K/room 18%CPW $355K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,313/sf 24%Greenwich Village $2,455/sf 10%
Full index →
Cooperative · 1885
The Dundonald Flats, its original name
71 West 83rd Street, New York, NY 10024

71 West 83rd Street (Dundonald Flats)

71 West 83rd Street, New York, NY 10024

Upper West Side

BBL 1011970005 · BIN 1031217

At a glance
Year built
1885
Type
Cooperative
Units
12
Floors
5
Landmark
No
Amenities
Central laundry and a bicycle room in the basement, and video intercom security, per management-sourced and listing records. The Department of Finance classifies the building as a walk-up (class C6); some listing records reference elevator service. These cannot both be right — confirm on inspection and with the managing agent
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2004–2024

Bedroom-by-bedroom medians, the full transfer record, and how units trade against ask.

2BR median
$1.7M
Recent range
$840K – $1.8M
Listing discount
0.6%
Recorded transfers
22

This is a twelve-apartment cooperative in a five-story building from 1885, one block off Central Park, and the reason to know it is that almost nothing about the exterior has been erased. D. & J. Jardine built the Dundonald Flats for Thomas Cochrane in the first wave of Upper West Side development, designing for a specific product: one eight-room apartment with a bath per floor, aimed at professional households who wanted a full apartment rather than a rowhouse. The detailing — pressed-metal floral tympana instead of stained glass, terra-cotta panels stacking the second and third floors into what read as two-story arches, carved half-bowl balconettes at the fifth floor, a chamfered corner cut to catch light past the neighboring stoops — is the kind of work that usually gets stripped in a century and a half. Most of it is still there.

The interior changed twice, and both changes are legible in the public record. In 1946 the building was cut into nine single-room-occupancy rooms per floor and the entrance was shifted east to what had been the easternmost window; the original stoop survived as a flower bed. In 1982 the process reversed — a gut renovation returned the building to apartments at two or three per floor, and the Department of Finance's J-51 file confirms the scale of that work at roughly $230,400 of alteration cost on an 11,000-square-foot building. The cooperative corporation took title the same year, on a deed recorded July 28, 1982. The renovation and the conversion were one project.

The buyer's thesis should not be oversold. Twelve apartments in a landmarked five-story building means very low density, a small and personal board, and a location between Central Park West and Columbus that is among the best on the Upper West Side for the price of a walk-up co-op. It also means thin liquidity, limited amenities, and capital exposure that concentrates rather than spreads.

Architecture and unit composition

Five stories of brick over a roughly 40-foot frontage and a 2,850-square-foot lot, with about 11,000 square feet of building. Ornament is concentrated at the entrance arch, the terra-cotta banding and the fifth-floor balconettes; the wall between is plain brick. The chamfered eastern corner is worth noticing from the street — a deliberate move to buy light for the front rooms on a block where the neighbors sat hard against the property line.

Because the original plan was one eight-room apartment per floor and the current configuration is two or three, today's apartments are subdivisions of a much larger original layout. That produces variety rather than a standard line: plans differ landing to landing, some units carry the original front rooms with the chamfered corner and arched openings, others face rear over the mid-block. Studios and one-bedrooms sit at the entry tier; the upper front units are the building's best product. There is no standard plan and no meaningful per-square-foot average — each apartment has to be underwritten on its own.

A 2002 application to add a floor was disapproved at plan examination and never built. Anyone told the building has expansion potential should read the job status.

Building operations

Twelve apartments will not support staff. Expect a superintendent or a managed service arrangement rather than a resident staff, laundry and a bicycle room in the basement, and video intercom security at the entrance. The Department of Finance carries the building as a walk-up; some listing records reference elevator service, and that discrepancy needs to be resolved on inspection — in a five-story building it changes both the daily experience and the resale pool materially.

The capital picture is what matters at this scale. The building is landmarked, so facade and window work goes through LPC before DOB, which lengthens and prices up every exterior cycle. The 1982 gut renovation is now more than four decades old — the point where risers, wiring, roof and boiler from that generation come due — and there are twelve apartments to fund it. A capital project that disappears into a hundred-unit budget divides twelve ways here. On the other side of the ledger, ACRIS shows the underlying mortgage satisfied at the end of 2018 with nothing recorded since, so the cooperative appears to carry little or no underlying debt and would have borrowing capacity if it needed it. Confirm all of it against the current audited financial statements and board minutes.

Policy framework

Ownership form: Cooperative. You are buying shares in 71 W. 83 St. Corporation and a proprietary lease. The board approves every purchaser and does not have to give a reason.

None of this building's policy stack is published, and the reason matters. A twelve-unit cooperative has no listing-portal profile worth trusting, no published house rules, and no policy record in ACRIS, DOF, DOB or LPC. Everything below has to come from the managing agent, and in a building this small the answers are sometimes practice rather than written policy. Get them in writing anyway.

Board package and interview: Expect a full package — two to three years of returns, a complete financial statement, asset and employment verification, and reference letters — followed by an interview. With twelve shareholders the board is two or three people, and the process moves on their meeting schedule rather than yours. Build that into the contract timeline.

Financing ceiling and post-closing liquidity: Neither is published. Small prewar walk-up cooperatives run the full range from 80 percent financing down to all-cash, and some cap more tightly than larger buildings because a single default is a twelfth of the budget. Get both numbers from the managing agent before you make an offer — they determine your maximum price more directly than anything else in the file.

Subletting: Not documented. Ask for the seasoning requirement, the maximum term, the fee, and — critically here — how many apartments are sublet right now. Lenders apply owner-occupancy tests to cooperatives this small, and two sublets out of twelve is a different lending picture than none.

Pied-à-terre, trusts and LLCs: Not documented. Assume LLC ownership is declined and that pied-à-terre use and trust ownership are discretionary until the managing agent says otherwise.

Flip tax and pets: Not documented. Ask whether a flip tax exists, on what basis it is charged and who pays it, and ask for the house rules.

Real estate taxes: No abatement. The 1982 J-51 benefit expired in 1996 and the lot carries no exemption today.

Local Law 97

Compliance status
Not subject to Local Law 97

This building is below the 25,000 sq ft threshold at which LL97 emissions caps apply. No regulatory capital pressure from this law specifically, current or 2030.

See full Local Law 97 analysis →

Recent sales

This is a thin-trading building by design rather than accident. Twelve apartments produce roughly one recorded share transfer a year across the digital record, so the same-building comparable set is small enough that a single sale sets the reference point for a year or more. Pricing has to be built from the surrounding block — the small prewar cooperatives between Central Park West and Columbus in the 80s — and then adjusted for the specific apartment, because the subdivided plans differ so much floor to floor. Values on this stretch read per room rather than per square foot. The premium is location and building character; the discount is the absence of staff, amenities and elevator certainty. Indexed to the last complete year, buyers in this segment have paid up for renovated apartments with original detail intact and pressed hard on estate condition. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.

Recent transfers at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Aug 8, 20241R
1 BR · 2 BA
$1,130,000-1.3%
Jul 10, 20244F
2 BR · 1.5 BA
$1,765,000+0.0%
Mar 14, 20242F
2 BR · 2 BA
$1,700,000+6.6%
Oct 18, 20233F
2 BR · 2 BA
$1,419,000-2.1%
May 8, 20231M
1 BR · 1.5 BA
$840,000-0.6%
Mar 24, 20225F
2 BR · 2 BA
$1,655,000+4.8%
Oct 23, 20203F
2 BR · 1.5 BA · 900 sf
$1,100,000$1,222/sf-4.3%
Aug 8, 20195R
1 BR · 2 BA
$960,000-14.7%

Market read. $/sf is measured on the latest sales with reliable square footage (2020): a median $1,222/sf across 1 sale. The building has traded as recently as 2024. Median listing discount 0.0% from the last ask.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

4F+77%
$995,000 ($948/sf) 2008$1,150,000 ($1,095/sf) 2013$1,765,000 2024
3F+67%
$850,000 2006$1,100,000 ($1,222/sf) 2020$1,419,000 2023
5F+66%
$998,000 2008$1,145,000 2012$1,500,000 2017$1,655,000 2022
1M+53%
$550,000 2006$645,000 ($1,075/sf) 2014$840,000 2023
2F+33%
$1,275,000 2014$1,700,000 2024
View all 22 recorded transfers, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01197-0005) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.

What to know if you’re buying

Resolve the elevator question first. City records classify the building as a walk-up; some listing records say otherwise. In a five-story building this is not a detail — it sets your buyer pool at resale.

Get the whole policy stack in writing. Financing ceiling, liquidity requirement, sublet policy, pied-à-terre, trusts, flip tax. None of it is public, and an offer made on assumptions in a twelve-unit co-op is an offer made blind. Run the Co-op Board Qualification Calculator once you have the real numbers.

Read the financials with capital concentration in mind. Twelve apartments funding a landmarked 1885 facade and a 1982 renovation now over forty years old is the central financial fact. Ask for the reserve balance, the assessment history, the Local Law 11 cycle status, and the board's plan for the next major system. The apparent absence of underlying debt since the 2018 satisfaction is a positive — verify it against the audited statements and ask whether a credit line exists.

Underwrite the specific apartment, not the building. The plans are subdivisions of an 1885 eight-room layout and no two floors are alike. Walk it, and price the layout you are actually buying.

What to know if you’re selling

Sell the history, because it is documented. The Dundonald Flats name, the 1885 D. & J. Jardine commission, the surviving pressed-metal tympana and terra-cotta detail — this is a genuinely intact early Upper West Side flats building, and that is a defensible story rather than a marketing line. Correct the architect attribution while you are at it: some market records credit George W. Da Cunha, whose work is next door, and LPC's own database credits the Jardines.

Assemble the policy answers before you list. In a twelve-unit building a buyer's first five questions all have no public answer. Having the managing agent's written responses ready shortens marketing time more than anything else you can do.

Present the whole carry picture. No abatement, no staff, no elevator certainty — and correspondingly low maintenance against full-service buildings a block away. The True Monthly Carrying Cost Calculator makes that comparison work for you.

Condition drives the number. Original detail plus a current renovation is the top of this market. Run the Renovation Cost Calculator before deciding whether to sell as-is.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 71 West 83rd Street, also evaluate:

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across Upper West Side — read The Roebling Team Guide to Upper West Side.

Preparing a board package for this building?

The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent.

Considering a move at The Dundonald Flats, its original name?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at The Dundonald Flats, its original name would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.