- Year built
- 1856
- Type
- Condominium
- Units
- 11
- Floors
- 6
- Landmark status
- Individual landmark; in the Tribeca South Historic District
- NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission records, updated February 2026
- Doorman
- No doorman
Every recorded sale at this building, 2004–2022
Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.
- Median $/sf, 2022
- $1,357
- 3 sales
- Recorded sales
- 9
- On record
- 2004–2022
Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.
A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at The Cary Building would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.
The Cary Building is one of the two or three most important cast-iron commercial buildings left in Lower Manhattan, and one of a very small number of individually designated New York City Landmarks that anyone can actually buy an apartment in. It was built in 1856–1857 to the designs of King & Kellum for the dry-goods firm of Cary, Howard & Sanger, and it does something almost no other building of its date does: it presents two full cast-iron fronts, on Chambers and on Reade, marching the same Italianate arcade around a through-block site. Designation came on August 24, 1982 under LP-01224, a decade before the Tribeca South Historic District was drawn around it in December 1992. The lot therefore carries both designations: individual landmark and historic district.
What that means in practice is worth stating plainly, because it is the building's dominant physical fact. Every element of the exterior — the ironwork, the storefronts, the window sash, the cornice, anything visible on the roof — is subject to Landmarks Preservation Commission review. LPC runs one permit process for individual landmarks and historic-district buildings; whether a job can be approved by staff or needs a Commission hearing depends on the work and the LPC rules that apply to it, not on the number of designations. A buyer who wants to change a window, install a through-wall unit, or build on the roof should assume a permit application, not a contractor.
The residential building is much younger than the shell, and it arrived in pieces. The condominium itself dates to a December 1982 declaration filed while the property was still an all-commercial building. Residential use began at the top: by the mid-2000s the fifth and sixth floors and the roof were a single duplex, and DOB filings from 2005 through 2007 show a residential fire alarm and sprinkler system serving those floors and structural work at the sixth-floor roof. The larger change came in June 2012, when an ALT-1 filed by Nobutaka Ashihara, RA, proposed converting floors two through four from commercial to residential use and raised the building's dwelling-unit count from two to eleven. The recorded subdivision followed: DOB subdivision applications filed in October and December 2018 divided the existing commercial condominium unit into residential unit lots, and the amended declaration and condominium map were recorded in December 2021. The first of the new residences closed in January 2022.
The result is a genuinely unusual ownership shape. Eleven residences sit above a single ground-floor retail unit inside a six-story landmark, with the residential floorplates running the full through-block depth of the site — roughly 150 feet from Chambers to Reade — on a 50-foot frontage. There is no doorman, no amenity program, and no meaningful common area beyond the lobby, the elevator and the roof. What there is, instead, is a landmark exterior, high ceilings, and the light that two street walls buy you on a corner site.
The thing a buyer should understand before making an offer is how thin the resale record is. Of the eleven residences, four — units 2A, 2B, 2C and 2D — traded to unaffiliated purchasers during 2022, at recorded prices roughly between $2.08 million and $2.66 million. The residences on the third and fourth floors and the two penthouses did not; they transferred at nominal consideration among entities and individuals affiliated with the ownership group that carried out the conversion, and they remain in those hands. That is not a defect, but it is a market fact: price discovery in this building rests on a very small number of arm's-length trades, and a seller here is competing against comparable Tribeca loft inventory rather than against a deep internal record.
Architecture and unit composition
The site is 50 feet wide and just over 151 feet deep, and the building covers essentially all of it across six stories. That geometry is what makes the residences work: each floor is a long, column-lined loft plate with light at both ends and no interior air shaft. The 2012 conversion divided floors two and three into four and three residences respectively and the fourth floor into two, with the fifth and sixth floors and roof retained as the two penthouse units, designated PHN and PHS.
The cast iron itself is the point of the exterior. King & Kellum's arcade runs in tiers of round-arched openings separated by engaged columns, an Italianate palazzo idiom executed in iron rather than stone — the technology that made Tribeca and SoHo possible. LPC records masonry as the primary material and cast iron as the secondary, which reflects the construction: iron fronts on load-bearing masonry side walls, not an iron frame.
Later work reshaped the interior more than the shell. A 2000 alteration inserted a new stair and elevator shaft through all floors and reworked the Chambers Street storefronts; a proposed seventh-story enlargement was filed in 2001 and withdrawn, with the scope revised to reframing the existing sixth floor where heavy timber had to be replaced. Sidewalk sheds and façade work appear in the record in 2001, 2014 and 2015. At six stories the building sits below the Local Law 11 façade-inspection threshold, which applies to buildings taller than six stories; confirm DOB's classification and ask for any façade repair records. Repair of a landmark cast-iron front is expensive regardless, and LPC controls the specification.
Building operations
This is a self-contained small building, not a serviced one. The residential common elements amount to the lobby, one elevator, the stair, and the roof terrace serving the upper duplex. There is no doorman and no staff of the kind a full-service condominium carries, which leaves a corresponding share of the maintenance burden with the board. Common charges are not assumed to be low or high here: compare the unit's actual charges, taxes and assessments with similar Tribeca units.
The commercial component is material here. The ground-floor retail unit is a separate condominium unit with its own ownership and its own history — it has traded, been financed, and been re-let independently of the residences — and the building has hosted commercial and institutional tenants on the lower floors within recent memory, including an educational use on the second floor approved in 2010 before that floor became residential. Any buyer should ask for the current declaration and by-laws to understand how common charges, roof and façade costs, and voting are allocated between the residential and commercial interests. In a mixed condominium, that allocation sets how costs are shared between the commercial and residential owners.
Policy framework
There is no offering plan for 105 Chambers Street in The Roebling Research Library at the time of writing, and the building publishes no policy stack. Rather than infer one, we state what is documented and what is not.
Ownership form: Condominium. Transfers proceed through the board's right of first refusal rather than a cooperative-style approval; confirm the application process and timing in the current declaration and bylaws.
Financing, pets, subletting, pied-à-terre and entity ownership: Not documented in public records. Request the declaration, by-laws, house rules and the current budget from the managing agent, and confirm any transfer fee or resale capital contribution in writing before contract.
Tax posture: The roll shows no exemption on any unit lot. Check the apartment's tax bill for any abatement before underwriting taxes.
Building staffing and amenities
- Doorman
- No doormanSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
- Elevator
- YesSource: NYC Department of Buildings elevator records
- Amenities noted
- Roof deckSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Staffing and amenities as our building profile and recent listing records describe them. A feature not listed is not confirmed absent. Outdoor space, parking and some facilities can belong to particular apartments or to a separate owner; confirm access for the specific apartment.
Local Law 97
- 2024–2029 annual penalty
- $0 (under cap)
- 2030–2034 annual penalty
- $38,761/yr
- Per unit / month range
- $0 – $294
- Modeled exposure split equally across 11 units (the residential count on the city's lot record). Not an assessed amount; condominium owners are typically charged by each unit's common-interest percentage.
Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.
See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →Recent sales
Tribeca loft condominiums price on ceiling height, light, floorplate geometry and the quality of the conversion, and the Cary Building's residences are long through-block plates in a designated landmark — a specific product that trades against converted loft stock rather than against tower inventory. Recorded activity here is limited: four residences traded to outside purchasers in 2022 in the low-to-mid two millions, and the balance of the building has not changed hands at arm's length since. Indexed to the last complete year, Tribeca loft pricing continues to reward renovated, high-ceilinged plates and to discount awkward interior layouts sharply; in a building with eleven residences and one recent sale cohort, condition and layout will do more work than any building-level premium.
Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.
Recent closings at this building, from The Roebling Research Library. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.
| Date | Unit | Apartment | Price | PPSF | vs. Ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2022 | PHN | 5,158 sf | $6,035,000 | $1,170/sf | — |
| May 20, 2022 | 2A | 1,620 sf | $2,197,801 | $1,357/sf | — |
| Mar 28, 2022 | 2C | 2 BR · 2 BA · 1,617 sf | $2,655,000 | $1,642/sf | -3.5% |
| May 10, 2006 | PHN | 5,158 sf | $4,174,825 | $809/sf | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | 2 | 1,620 sf | $9,200,000 | $5,679/sf | — |
Market read. Most recent trades (2022) cleared a median $1,357/sf (recorded) across 3 sales.
The retrade record
Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.
Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.
Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-00145-7501; each condominium apartment is its own tax lot). Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified in The Roebling Research Library. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.
What would your apartment rent for?
Enter your apartment and I'll send you what it would rent for, from comparable closed leases at The Cary Building and nearby.
Buying here? Condo closing costs with a mortgage typically run 3 to 6% of the price. See NYC co-op and condo closing costs, line by line.
Keep up with The Cary Building and its market
The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings like The Cary Building. Unsubscribe anytime.
We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.
What to know if you’re buying
Landmark review is the headline. As an individual landmark inside a historic district, the building needs LPC permits for exterior work, windows, storefronts and anything visible from the street or roof; the scope decides whether staff can approve it or it goes to a Commission hearing. Budget time as well as money, and ask what the building has already been approved for.
Read the mixed-use documents before you read the floor plan. The retail unit is a separate owner with a separate agenda. How the declaration splits façade, roof and elevator costs between commercial and residential is the number that will show up in your carrying cost for the next twenty years.
The roll shows no exemption. Check the apartment's tax bill for any abatement. When comparing monthlies against abated Tribeca new-development inventory, compare each unit's charges, taxes, financing and assessments.
The comparable set is thin and partly internal. Four arm's-length trades in one year is not a price history. Have your broker underwrite against the wider Tribeca loft market, not against the building's own record.
What to know if you’re selling
Lead with the landmark and the plate. An individually designated 1857 cast-iron building with through-block floorplates is a short list in Manhattan. That story does real work with the Tribeca buyer pool.
Be ready for façade and LPC questions early. Buyers' counsel will ask about façade condition, past repair work and any open LPC applications. Local Law 11 inspection cycles apply only to buildings taller than six stories, so confirm DOB's classification before describing a filing cycle. Have the answers in the package rather than in a negotiation.
Expect the buyer to test the comparables. With so few arm's-length sales in the building, pricing has to be argued from the neighborhood set. Bring the loft comps, the ceiling heights, and the square footage math to the first conversation.
Comparable buildings
- 87 Chambers Street — a Chambers Street loft condominium on the same corridor, closest in scale and buyer profile.
- 91 Chambers Street — adjacent block, comparable boutique loft conversion.
- 100 Reade Street — the Reade Street side of the same Tribeca South fabric.
- 157 Chambers Street — a further-west Chambers Street conversion with a similar unit count.
- 165 Chambers Street — comparable small Tribeca loft condominium.
- 134 Duane Street — a Tribeca South loft building of similar date and scale, cooperative rather than condominium.
- 137 Duane Street — nearby loft condominium in a designated Tribeca block.
- 52 Thomas Street — small Tribeca loft conversion with landmark constraints.
- 30 Warren Street — the newer end of the Tribeca South buyer pool, useful as a pricing contrast.
- 166 Duane Street — boutique loft condominium in the historic district.
More Tribeca buildings
- 101 Franklin Street (250 Church Street) — condominium by Hill West Architects
- 101 Warren Street — 2008 condominium by Skidmore, Owings & Merrill
- 104–108 Reade Street — 1860 condominium
- 108 Duane Street — 1855 condominium
- 108 Leonard Street (The Clock Tower) — 1894 condominium
- 109 Reade Street — 1885 condominium
The neighborhood
For the full corridor — architecture, transit, and pricing across Tribeca — read The Roebling Team Guide to Tribeca.
How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.
Considering a move at The Cary Building?
Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com