Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,632/sf ▴3%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $271K/room ▴4%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $465K/room ▴3%CPW $355K/roomFifth Ave $501K/roomBillionaires' Row $4,313/sfMidtown East $1,279/sf ▾9%
Full index →
Condominium · 1885
The Randolph
12 West 18th Street, New York, NY 10011
Buildings·Flatiron·Condominium

12 West 18th Street (The Randolph)

12 West 18th Street, New York, NY 10011

Flatiron

BBL 1008197501 · BIN 1015429

At a glance
Year built
1885
Type
Condominium
Units
14
Floors
9
Landmark status
Not an individual landmark; in the Ladies' Mile Historic District
NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission records, updated February 2026
Doorman
No doorman

The Randolph sales history: 27 recorded sales

Own an apartment at The Randolph?
Enter your apartment to see its recorded sale history and today’s estimate.
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2004–2025

Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.

Median $/sf, 2025
$1,480
floor-adjusted, 2 sales
Listing discount
3.6%
Recorded sales
27
On record
2004–2025
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at The Randolph would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.

As cited in The Wall Street Journal★ 92 reviews on Google

Almost every loft building in the Ladies' Mile Historic District tells the same story in the same order: built as a store-and-loft for the dry-goods trade, worked hard for eighty years, emptied out, and converted to apartments in the 1980s. 12 West 18th Street tells it backwards. LPC's own building database records the original use as residential, multi-family, the original building type as an apartment building, and the original owner-developer as The Randolph Company — the source of the name it carries today. It was built in 1885 by F. M. Clark as an apartment house on a block that was about to become the northern edge of New York's department-store district, and it lost that use rather than acquiring it.

The physical record of what happened next is preserved in LPC's notes and in the shape of the building. A full ninth story was added between 1889 and 1891 — LPC lists Henry J. Hardenbergh, whose Dakota was seven years old and whose Plaza was still ahead of him, as an alteration architect of that period. Then, in 1911–12, the front wall was taken off entirely and a new façade rebuilt on steel columns, an alteration LPC attributes to Gronenberg & Leuchtag. Removing and rebuilding a street wall is not a cosmetic job; it is what you do when you are converting a residential building to commercial loft space and need column-free floors and large windows. From that point the building worked as stores and lofts for seventy years.

The tax record gives the conversion back to apartments its earliest dated public milestone. The Department of Finance's J-51 roll shows a rehabilitation grant with an initial year of 1984 running against fourteen unit lots — 1005 through 1018, which are the residential floors from the third story up. That grant is the tax-side record of the alteration that created the residential use; the alteration and certificate-of-occupancy records, not the benefit year, would date the legal conversion itself. The benefit was a J-51 exemption and abatement in exchange for the rehabilitation work, twelve years at 50 percent, extended to fourteen, expiring after tax year 1997. The four lower lots, commercial today, were not in the grant. The condominium apportionment on the tax roll follows in 1988.

There is a small forensic detail in that same record worth mentioning, because it explains the building's present unit count. Lot 1006 — the third-floor west unit — dropped off the J-51 roll after tax year 1987 while its thirteen neighbours ran on to 1997; the roll does not say why. By 2014 the space was an office: in April 2014 the condominium filed job 121944646 to "convert one existing office at the third floor to one apartment (Apt 3W)" and amend the certificate of occupancy, carrying the building from thirteen dwelling units to fourteen; the certificate was amended through a series of issuances between 2016 and 2019. The fourteen residential units PLUTO carries today are the thirteen on the 2014 application's existing count plus 3W.

Finally, a note on the block, because a sibling building here is easily confused with this one. 15 West 17th Street sits on lot 7504 of this same tax block, backing onto the same interior. It is a genuinely different building and a different proposition: 1906–07 rather than 1885, by William G. Pigueron, Beaux-Arts rather than neo-Renaissance, built as store-and-lofts rather than as apartments, eleven stories rather than nine, ten full-floor units rather than fourteen east/west pairs, converted in 2007 rather than 1984, with Loft Board indicators on its early filings and no J-51 at all. This building has the opposite profile on every one of those points. They share a block and nothing else.

Architecture and unit composition

Nine stories of limestone with cast iron, brick and a metal cornice, fifty-three feet wide, on a ninety-two-foot lot — LPC classes the style as neo-Renaissance and dates the fabric to three campaigns: the 1885 original, the ninth story of 1889–91, and the 1911–12 street wall on steel columns. The 1911 rebuild is why the façade reads more openly than most 1880s buildings on the block, and it is the reason the apartments behind it have the window line they do.

Above the commercial floors, the residential units are arranged in east/west pairs — 3E and 3W, 4E and 4W, and so on to 9E and 9W. Each apartment occupies roughly half of a fifty-three-foot floorplate; the E/W labels alone do not show whether a home faces the street, the rear of the block, or both, so check the floor plan and window locations for the specific apartment. It is a different product from the full-floor loft: smaller, more conventionally laid out, and generally easier to furnish. The ninth-floor units sit under the 1889–91 addition and have historically carried roof access; DOB filings from 2000 and 2002 cover a glass-and-metal roof bulkhead and convenience stairs to the roof at units 9E and 9W, together with roof railings and fencing.

The four non-residential lots occupy the ground and second floors — PLUTO splits the commercial area into 2,675 square feet of retail and 3,500 of office. The ground-floor retail has been a food use in recent years; a 2018 DOB filing legalized an existing pizza oven and walk-in cooler in response to an environmental control board violation. Two of the lower lots traded in 2024 and 2025 at prices consistent with residential rather than commercial pricing, which suggests some of that lower space has been put to residential-style use. The records reviewed for this profile do not establish the current classification and permitted use of each of the four lower lots; obtain the operative certificate of occupancy and approved plans for counsel’s review — it matters for anyone buying on the lower floors and for anyone underwriting the building's commercial income.

Building operations

This is a small, low-overhead condominium: fourteen residential units, one elevator, no doorman and no amenity program. Publicly documented capital work over the past fifteen years reads as steady rather than dramatic — a boiler and burner conversion from oil to gas in 2003, sidewalk vault repair and sidewalk replacement in 2011, chimney repair in 2012, façade repairs in 2014, and a full roofing system and parapet wall replacement in 2019. The building carries the ordinary obligations of a landmarked nine-story building on a Ladies' Mile block: Local Law 11 façade cycles, LPC review for any exterior work, and the maintenance burden of an 1885 structure with a 1911 street wall.

No offering plan for this condominium was located in either the Compass Offering Plan Library or The Roebling Research Library. That is a real gap and it is worth stating plainly: the plan is the document that would settle the common-charge allocation between the residential and commercial units, the by-laws, the right-of-first-refusal procedure, and whatever the sponsor reserved in 1984–88. We source it on request during diligence, and a buyer's attorney should insist on it along with the two most recent audited financial statements and the current budget.

Policy framework

Beyond transfer subject to the Board of Managers' right of first refusal, the records reviewed here do not establish the building’s current policy terms. Ownership by trusts, corporations and LLCs, pets, sublet notice and approval procedure, alteration agreement terms, move-in fees, storage, bicycle room and any resale capital contribution are all set by the governing documents and board and change over time. Obtain the current house rules, the by-laws and the alteration agreement from the managing agent before you write an offer, and confirm the common-charge split between the residential and commercial units, which is the single most consequential number in a mixed condominium of this size.

Application and transaction fees

Fees below are from building management's published schedule, as of September 2026. They are shown as published, item by item; no total is added because the total depends on the transaction. Deposits are listed apart from nonrefundable charges.

Purchase

5 items

Fees and charges

ItemPaid byWhenAmountRefundable
Application Processing FeePaid by BuyerWhen With the applicationAmount $750Refundable Non-refundable
QuestionnairePaid by BuyerWhen With the applicationAmount $350Refundable Not stated
Transfer FeePaid by SellerWhen At closingAmount $600Refundable Not stated

Deposits

ItemPaid byWhenAmountRefundable
Move In DepositPaid by BuyerWhen With the applicationAmount $1,000Refundable Refundable
Move Out DepositPaid by SellerWhen With the applicationAmount $1,000Refundable Refundable

Rental or lease

6 items

Fees and charges

ItemPaid byWhenAmountRefundable
Application Processing FeePaid by LandlordWhen With the applicationAmount $450Refundable Non-refundable
Move Out FeePaid by LandlordWhen With the applicationAmount $500Refundable Non-refundable
Move In FeePaid by TenantWhen With the applicationAmount $500Refundable Non-refundable

Deposits

ItemPaid byWhenAmountRefundable
Lease Escrow DepositPaid by LandlordWhen With the applicationAmount $1,000Refundable Not stated
Move Out DepositPaid by LandlordWhen With the applicationAmount $500Refundable Refundable
Move In DepositPaid by TenantWhen With the applicationAmount $500Refundable Refundable

Management updates its schedule without a public filing. The date is when management last updated the page, not when a rule changed. Confirm the current schedule with management before you apply.

Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to discuss the building's costs and purchase requirements.

Own an apartment here? Request an apartment-specific pricing review.

The Roebling Team at Compass is a brokerage. We are not the building’s management or its application office.

Monthly carrying charges in recent sales

Common charges + taxes, per room
$864 per room a monthMedian of 4 recorded sales since October 2023Source: recorded sales, refreshed October 2026
Common charges + taxes, per square foot
$2.10 per square foot a monthMedian of 4 recorded sales since October 2023Source: recorded sales, refreshed October 2026
Common charges alone, per square foot
$0.75 per square foot a monthMedian of 3 listings since October 2023 that give the annual taxSource: listing records, refreshed October 2026
Real estate taxes alone, per square foot
$1.33 per square foot a monthMedian of 3 listings since October 2023 that give the annual taxSource: listing records, refreshed October 2026

Common charges plus real estate taxes, combined into one monthly figure the way New York condominium listings show them. Add a mortgage payment for the monthly outlay. The split into common charges and taxes comes from the listings that also give the annual tax, a different sample, so the two lines need not add up exactly to the combined median; a tax abatement can hold taxes below the full amount until it expires. A summary of recorded sales and listings, not a current bill; charges change.

Building staffing and amenities

Doorman
No doormanSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Elevator
YesSource: NYC Department of Buildings elevator records
Amenities noted
Bike storageSource: The Roebling Team's building profile

Staffing and amenities as our building profile and recent listing records describe them. A feature not listed is not confirmed absent. Outdoor space, parking and some facilities can belong to particular apartments or to a separate owner; confirm access for the specific apartment.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟢
Strong — under cap in both periods
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
Per unit / month range
—

Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.

See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
Safe
What this means for you

The latest available FISP filing classified the facade as Safe — no repairs were required at that inspection. A filed Safe grade is not a guarantee of current condition: owners still maintain the facade and, where required, observe parapets each year. Future inspection timing (Local Law 49 of 2025 changed the cycle framework from October 1, 2026), repair and any assessment decisions remain building-specific.

Inspection history
2005–10
SWARMP
2010–15
Safe
2015–20
Safe
2020–25
Safe
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2027
Assessed · 2005–10 to 2020–25
$24,250 in filing penalties
payment status not in the record
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs are due by the deadline stated in the filing.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — a licensed professional engineer or registered architect who meets DOB’s FISP qualifications and signs the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Penalties shown are amounts DOB assessed against filings on record across 2005–10 to 2020–25. The FISP dataset does not record whether they were paid, contested or remain open, so treat the figure as history rather than a current balance and confirm the building’s standing with the managing agent.

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

12 West 18th Street trades as a Ladies' Mile loft condominium at boutique scale. The residential units have changed hands repeatedly since the conversion, in arm's-length resales to separate, unrelated purchasers running from the mid-2000s through 2025, with several units trading two and three times over that span. Both the residential and the commercial lots are held individually rather than in a single ownership, and the residential lots are assessed as condominium units rather than as class RR rentals — this is a genuine for-sale condominium, not a rental in a condominium wrapper.

Pricing here should be read in dollars per square foot against the Flatiron and Ladies' Mile loft conversion stock rather than against new development, and the E and W lines should be compared separately. Compare the specific unit’s taxes, common charges and assessments with those of alternatives, adjusting for services, reserve needs and any remaining tax benefits; the absence of an abatement does not eliminate other cost differences. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.

Recent closings at this building, from The Roebling Research Library. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Mar 14, 20259W
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,750 sf
$2,700,000$1,543/sf-1.8%
Jan 31, 20256E
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,750 sf
$2,500,000$1,429/sf-9.1%
Dec 10, 20248W
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,750 sf
$2,229,000$1,274/sf-0.9%
Oct 24, 2023PHE
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,800 sf
$3,400,000$1,889/sf-2.7%
Apr 20, 20216E
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,750 sf
$2,425,000$1,386/sf-5.8%
Feb 24, 2020PH9E
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,800 sf
$2,999,999$1,667/sf+0.2%
Jun 26, 20187E
2 BR · 1,750 sf
$2,825,000$1,614/sf-19.2%
Jun 22, 20184W
2 BR · 1,750 sf
$2,825,000$1,614/sf-4.2%

Market read. Most recent trades (2025) cleared a median $1,480/sf (floor-adjusted) across 2 sales. Floor-adjusted means each sale is restated to a constant mix of floors, so the figure can differ from the plain median of the sales listed above. Median listing discount 3.6% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

8E · 1,750 sf+78%
$1,125,000 ($625/sf) 2004 → $2,000,000 ($1,143/sf) 2011
7E · 1,750 sf+77%
$1,600,000 ($914/sf) 2014 → $2,825,000 ($1,614/sf) 2018
8W · 1,750 sf+65%
$1,355,000 ($774/sf) 2004 → $2,229,000 ($1,274/sf) 2024
4W · 1,750 sf+54%
$1,835,000 ($1,049/sf) 2006 → $1,415,000 ($809/sf) 2010 → $2,825,000 ($1,614/sf) 2018
6E · 1,750 sf+43%
$1,750,000 ($1,000/sf) 2008 → $1,985,000 ($1,134/sf) 2010 → $2,425,000 ($1,386/sf) 2021 → $2,500,000 ($1,429/sf) 2025
View all 27 recorded sales, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-00819-7501; each condominium apartment is its own tax lot). Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified in The Roebling Research Library. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.

For owners

What would your apartment rent for?

Enter your apartment and I'll send you what it would rent for, from comparable closed leases at The Randolph and nearby.

What would buying here cost?

At the recent median sale of $2.5M (3 sales in the past 24 months, since October 22, 2024), a buyer putting 25% down would pay about $103,144 to close, or 4.1% of the price.

  • Mansion tax: $31,250
  • Mortgage recording tax: $36,094
  • Title insurance: $11,250
  • Attorneys, lender, building fees, reserves and filings: $24,550

Assumes a resale (the seller pays transfer taxes), a $4,500 attorney fee and a mortgage on the rest.

The Roebling Report

Keep up with The Randolph and its market

The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings like The Randolph. Unsubscribe anytime.

We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.

What to know if you’re buying

The J-51 is long gone, which is good news. Loft conversions of this generation frequently still carry buyers into a tax step-up. This one does not — the benefit expired after tax year 1997. What you see on the current bill is the mature number.

Get the offering plan and the commercial allocation. Fourteen residential units share a building with four commercial lots. How common charges and real estate taxes are allocated between them, and what the commercial units are permitted to do, is the difference between a quiet building and a difficult one. This is the first question, not the last.

Understand which unit line you are buying. The E/W labels alone do not establish whether a home faces West 18th Street, the rear of the block, or both; compare each apartment's floor plan, window orientation and any roof or outdoor rights. Neither line is inherently better, but they are different apartments and they should not be priced as interchangeable.

Landmark review governs anything exterior. Windows, storefronts, rooftop additions and even railings on a Ladies' Mile building require LPC review. If your renovation plan touches the envelope, price the approval time as well as the work. Run the Renovation Cost Calculator with that in mind.

Confirm 3W's paperwork if you are buying it. The third-floor west unit was converted from office back to residential use between 2014 and 2019 under an amended certificate of occupancy. That work is signed off, but a purchaser should have counsel confirm the certificate reflects it.

What to know if you’re selling

Lead with the history, because it is genuinely unusual. An 1885 apartment house on Ladies' Mile, a ninth story attributed to Hardenbergh, a 1911 street wall on steel columns, and a return to residential use a century later. That is a better story than "loft conversion," and it is documented in LPC's own database rather than in marketing copy.

Have the building's documents assembled before you list. The offering plan was not located in the libraries searched for this profile. Assemble the plan, by-laws, house rules and two years of financials for buyer’s counsel; this can assist diligence without guaranteeing the closing schedule.

Price against the pair layout, not the full-floor stock. Buyers comparing this building against full-floor Ladies' Mile conversions are comparing different products. Position it on its own terms — scale, ceiling height, light, condition — and against the east/west loft stock that actually competes with it.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 12 West 18th Street, also evaluate:

More Flatiron buildings

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, transit, and pricing across Flatiron — read The Roebling Team Guide to Flatiron.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.

Considering a move at The Randolph?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Licensed Associate Real Estate Broker · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com