Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,600/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $270K/room 2%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $472K/room 18%CPW $355K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,313/sf 24%Greenwich Village $2,455/sf 10%
Full index →
Condominium · 1887
The One40 Franklin Condominium. Department of Buildings filings also carry "140 Franklin Street Condominium" and "One 40 Franklin Condo"
140 Franklin Street, New York, NY 10013
Buildings·Tribeca·Condominium

140 Franklin Street (One40 Franklin)

140 Franklin Street, New York, NY 10013

Tribeca

BBL 1001897507 · BIN 1002128

CorridorTribeca
At a glance
Year built
1887
Type
Condominium
Units
13
Floors
6
Landmark
No
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2004–2026

Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.

Median $/sf
$3,377
Listing discount
2.9%
Recorded sales
18
On record
2004–2026

Albert Wagner built two great Romanesque Revival commercial blocks in lower Manhattan within three years of each other. The first, in 1885–1886, was the Puck Building on Lafayette Street. The second, in 1887–1888, is this one — a store-and-factory building for D. S. Walton & Company at the corner of Franklin and Varick, in cast iron with brick, brownstone and terra cotta. Both were built for printing and paper. Both are now residential. They are not commonly discussed together, and they should be.

What Wagner produced here is a corner building with a genuinely aggressive elevation: heavy rustication at the base, a rhythm of arched openings rising through the floors, and a top story that pushes forward at the corner. It reads as a factory that was designed to be looked at, which is exactly what the best Tribeca loft stock is.

The building stayed industrial through the twentieth century. The residential conversion came late in the 1990s: the condominium declaration for the property was mapped in January 1999, the full unit-lot map covering the residential floors was filed in October 2000, and the alteration that created the residential use was under permit through 2000 and 2001, filed by Franklin Equity Associates LLC. PLUTO records the alteration year as 1999. The first residential deeds recorded between October 2000 and April 2001.

The result is a small building of very large apartments. Thirteen residences across six floors and a mezzanine, above a ground-floor retail condominium unit, with the original cast-iron structure and the original window openings retained. The floor plates are deep — the lot runs roughly 123 feet along Franklin and 100 feet deep — which is why so many of the residences read as full-floor or near-full-floor lofts rather than as carved-up apartments.

There is no abatement here and there never was one on the record, which is unusual for a conversion of this vintage and, for a buyer, simplifying: the tax bill on the assessment roll is the tax bill.

Architecture and unit composition

The building is six stories and a mezzanine, 86 feet tall, on a corner lot of roughly 11,362 square feet with about 123 feet of Franklin Street frontage. LPC records the primary material as cast iron, with brick, brownstone and terra cotta — an unusual combination that accounts for the elevation's weight at the base and its openness above.

Inside, the conversion kept what mattered: the cast-iron column grid, the original window openings, and floor-to-floor heights that produce the tall ceilings this generation of Tribeca loft is bought for. Several of the residences are described in DOB filings as 1938-code residential units, which is a technical way of saying the conversion legalized existing space rather than rebuilding it, and which has practical consequences for how alterations are filed today.

Apartment lettering in the filings runs B and C on most floors, with combinations across letters — 2BC and 5B/C both appear — and a residence reaching the mezzanine by an internal stair from the sixth floor. Anyone underwriting a specific unit should confirm whether it is a single original lot or a combination, because the two behave differently in a resale and in an alteration filing.

The building has an active capital record: façade restoration in 2005 and again in 2012, roof and bulkhead restoration in 2008, sidewalk sheds for remedial work in 2005, 2009 and 2013, sidewalk-bulkhead alterations in 2018, and a full renovation of the residential lobby and hallways permitted in 2020. That is the ordinary maintenance rhythm of a 1888 masonry building in a historic district — Local Law 11 cycles land hard on a thirteen-unit denominator, and a buyer should ask for the current façade report and the reserve position.

The address, and why it is confusing

Four addresses attach to one tax lot.

PLUTO and the Department of Finance carry the lot's address as 132 Franklin Street. LPC's designation record calls the same building 1–9 Varick Street (aka 136–142 Franklin Street). The offering-plan folder in The Roebling Research Library is labeled 132–142 Franklin Street. And every one of the fourteen condominium unit lots on the assessment roll — the thirteen residences and the retail unit — is addressed 140 Franklin Street.

The resolution is straightforward once the building identification numbers are checked. Geocoding "132 Franklin Street" in Manhattan returns this tax lot but a null building identification number, meaning there is no addressable building at that point. Geocoding "140 Franklin Street" returns the same tax lot and BIN 1002128, which is the number carried on every Department of Buildings application for the property. 140 Franklin Street is the building. 132 Franklin, 136–142 Franklin and 1–9 Varick Street are aliases for the same corner parcel. A buyer or an appraiser pulling city data on "132 Franklin Street" will get the right lot with the wrong name; anyone searching "1 Varick Street" will get the right building under an address no resident uses.

The unit count, and how it moved

The current answer is thirteen residences plus one retail unit. Getting there took twenty-five years.

The condominium was mapped in two stages. A declaration covering the ground-floor commercial unit and the residential mass was filed in January 1999, and the residential unit lots — 1502 through 1514 — were mapped in October 2000. An amended declaration in January 2004 added lot 1515, bringing the residential count to fourteen. In 2002 the condominium filed with the Department of Buildings to combine apartments under the city's standard combination procedure. In August 2009 an amended declaration covering lots 1503 and 1504 was recorded, mapped in November 2010; lot 1504 dropped off the assessment roll after the 2011/12 year and has not appeared since, which is what a merger of two unit lots into one residence looks like in the tax record. The two lots have since been released and conveyed together.

Separately, an Alteration Type 1 approved in January 2009 proposed increasing the second floor from two apartments to three, which would have taken the building to fourteen residences. It does not appear to have been built: the count in every subsequent filing, and on every assessment roll since, is thirteen.

The retail condominium unit at the base has had its own history. In 2015 and 2016 its owner filed an Alteration Type 1 that reclassified the cellar and first-floor occupancy and added an internal stair and a limited-use elevator between cellar and first floor. The unit remains a retail condominium, classified RK in tax class 4 on the FY2027 roll, and is separately owned from the residences.

Landmark status and what it constrains

The lot sits inside the Tribeca West Historic District, LP-01713, designated May 7, 1991 — eight years before the residential conversion. LPC's own building database lists this building as a contributing structure in the district, with Albert Wagner as architect and 1887–1888 as the construction date. It is not an individual landmark; the historic-district designation is what governs.

A Certificate of Appropriateness is required for discretionary exterior work, and Department of Buildings applications for this property carry the landmark flag as "Y." In practice, windows, storefronts, awnings, signage, rooftop additions and anything visible from a public thoroughfare require Landmarks review before a DOB permit will issue. The building's own capital record shows this operating normally — the façade restorations of 2005 and 2012 and the 2018 sidewalk-bulkhead work all proceeded — but review adds time, and a buyer planning window replacement or a rooftop change should build that schedule in before contract rather than after.

Because the designation predates the conversion, it also explains what the conversion did not do: there is no vertical enlargement here and no visible rooftop addition. What the building looks like from Franklin Street is substantially what Wagner built.

Conversion history: what did and did not apply

Three questions come up on every Tribeca loft conversion, and this building answers all three cleanly.

Was there a use variance? No Board of Standards and Appeals variance appears in the record. The lot is zoned C6-2A within the Special Tribeca Mixed Use District, and residential use is permitted. The special district, created in 1976, is the mechanism that made residential conversion feasible across this part of Tribeca without case-by-case relief.

Was this a Loft Law building? No. Every Department of Buildings application reviewed for this property — including both Alteration Type 1 applications, in 2008 and 2015 — carries the Loft Board flag as "N," and no Interim Multiple Dwelling registration appears for the lot. This was a conventional conversion of a commercial building, not a legalization of interim residential occupancy under Article 7-C of the Multiple Dwelling Law. That is a meaningful difference: there is no residual population of protected occupants and no rent-regulated overhang from a legalization proceeding.

Was there a J-51? No J-51 record appears for this lot, or for the pre-condominium lot, in the Department of Finance's J-51 exemption and abatement history, and every unit lot shows a zero exemption in the FY2027 assessment roll. There is no burn-off to model. The taxes on the current bill are the taxes.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟡
Moderate — under today's cap; material modeled 2030 exposure
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$32,339/yr
Per unit / month range
$0 – $207

Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2025–30
Safe
What this means for you

The latest available FISP filing classified the facade as Safe — no repairs were required at that inspection. Facade inspections run on a fixed five-year cycle; future inspection, repair, and any assessment decisions remain building-specific.

Inspection history
2010–15
Safe
2015–20
Safe
2020–25
SWARMP
2025–30
Safe
2030–35
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2032
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs required before the next inspection cycle.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

Thirteen residences and a twenty-five-year ownership history produce a thin but genuinely long record. ACRIS shows individual arms-length deeds to separate, unrelated buyers running continuously from the first conversion sales in 2000 and 2001 through resales in every subsequent decade, with several units having changed hands three times. All thirteen residential lots are classified R4 in tax class 2 — residential condominium units in an elevator building — and none is classified as a condominium rental. This is an owner-occupied building.

Pricing here is set by the variables that govern authentic Tribeca loft stock: floor, exposure at the corner, ceiling height, whether the residence is a single original unit or a combination, and whether it reaches the mezzanine or the top floor. The relevant comparable set is the small group of pre-1900 Tribeca loft conversions inside the historic district — not new construction, whose measurement conventions, tax posture and floor plates are all different. The absence of any abatement means the sticker price and the carrying cost move together, which is not true of much of the competing downtown inventory. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.

Recent closings at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
May 29, 20264B
3 BR · 3 BA · 3,021 sf
$10,202,396$3,377/sf+2.5%
Mar 31, 2025PHC
3 BR · 4.5 BA · 4,100 sf
$12,600,000$3,073/sf-2.9%
Jan 21, 20252B
7 BR · 4.5 BA · 6,300 sf
$16,000,000$2,540/sf-5.6%
Aug 11, 2021PHA
4 BR · 4 BA · 5,019 sf
$14,500,000$2,889/sf-21.6%
May 9, 20185B
5 BR · 4.5 BA · 6,226 sf
$18,500,000$2,971/sf+0.0%
Mar 8, 2018PH6A
3 BR · 5,019 sf
$10,750,000$2,142/sf-22.7%
Mar 7, 2018PHA
4 BR · 5,019 sf
$10,750,000$2,142/sfoff-mkt
Aug 2, 20125BC
5 BR · 6,226 sf
$14,300,000$2,297/sf+5.9%

Market read. Most recent trades (2026) cleared a median $3,377/sf across 1 sale. Median listing discount 2.9% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

4B · 3,021 sf+85%
$5,500,000 ($1,821/sf) 2011$10,202,396 ($3,377/sf) 2026
3C · 3,159 sf+45%
$3,350,000 ($1,060/sf) 2006$4,500,000 ($1,425/sf) 2006$4,850,000 ($1,535/sf) 2011
PHA · 5,019 sf+35%
$10,750,000 ($2,142/sf) 2018$14,500,000 ($2,889/sf) 2021
View all 18 recorded sales, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-00189-7507) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.

What to know if you’re buying

Verify the tax lot, not the address. City data addresses this lot as 132 Franklin Street and LPC calls it 1–9 Varick Street. The condominium and every unit lot use 140 Franklin Street. Confirm BBL 1-00189-7507 and BIN 1002128 on the contract.

Ask whether your unit is a combination. Several residences here are combinations of originally separate condominium unit lots, and at least one pair of lots was merged in the tax record. Combinations affect alteration filings, financing and resale.

There is no abatement and never was one on record. Underwrite the current bill. This is one of the rare downtown conversions where the tax analysis is genuinely simple.

Budget for Landmarks and for Local Law 11. A contributing building in the Tribeca West Historic District, with a masonry-and-cast-iron elevation and an active façade-repair history, spreads its capital costs across thirteen residences. Read the reserve position and the most recent façade report.

Ask for the policy stack in writing. No offering plan for this building was located in either offering-plan library. Pets, subletting, minimum down payment and any resale transfer fee should come from the managing agent, not from assumption.

The ground floor is separately owned. The retail unit is a separate condominium unit with its own owner, and it has been altered twice in the past decade. Understand what is permitted there.

What to know if you’re selling

Lead with the architect and the fabric. Albert Wagner, 1888, Romanesque Revival, cast iron — verified against LPC's own building database, and the same hand that built the Puck Building. That is a provenance claim that survives scrutiny, and very few Tribeca conversions can make one.

Correct the address problem before it costs you. Buyers, appraisers and lenders pulling city data will surface "132 Franklin Street" with no building attached to it. Provide the BBL and BIN and the alias list up front.

Be explicit about what the unit is. Full floor or part floor, original lot or combination, ceiling height, mezzanine access. With thirteen residences there is no building average to price against.

Present the tax posture as an advantage. No abatement to expire, no J-51 burn-off, no step-up schedule. Against competing inventory with an abatement running out, that is a selling point rather than a concession.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 140 Franklin Street, also evaluate:

  • 155 Franklin Street — loft condominium on the same street inside the same historic district; the closest peer by fabric and address
  • 220 West Broadway — loft condominium on the same tax block; the nearest neighbor in the ownership record
  • 145 Hudson Street (Sky Lofts) — full-floor Tribeca loft condominium a block west; the classic full-floor comparison
  • 161 Hudson Street — Tribeca loft condominium of similar scale and vintage
  • 124 Hudson Street — small pre-1900 Tribeca loft conversion; the boutique alternative
  • 25 North Moore Street — Tribeca condominium in the historic district; different construction, same buyer pool
  • 108 Leonard Street — large landmark conversion nearby; the full-service alternative at much greater scale
  • 100 Hudson Street — Tribeca loft condominium; comparable floor plates in a different building type
  • 14 Leonard Street — small Tribeca loft condominium; the low-unit-count alternative

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across Tribeca — read The Roebling Team Guide to Tribeca.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent.

Considering a move at The One40 Franklin Condominium. Department of Buildings filings also carry "140 Franklin Street Condominium" and "One 40 Franklin Condo"?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at The One40 Franklin Condominium. Department of Buildings filings also carry "140 Franklin Street Condominium" and "One 40 Franklin Condo" would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.