Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,632/sf ▴3%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $271K/room ▴4%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $465K/room ▴3%CPW $355K/roomRFifth Ave $501K/roomRBillionaires' Row $4,313/sfRHell's Kitchen $1,328/sf ▴0%
Full index →
39 Fifth Avenue, 39 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10003, Manhattan — Cooperative, 1922

39 Fifth Avenue

39 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10003

Greenwich Village

BBL 1005680004 · BIN 1009251

ArchitectEmery Roth
ManagementLovett Realty
At a glance
Year built
1922
Type
Cooperative
Units
58
Floors
17
Landmark
In a historic district

39 Fifth Avenue sales history: 89 recorded transfers

Own an apartment at 39 Fifth Avenue?
Enter your apartment to see its recorded sale history and today’s estimate.
Board & building profile
Flip tax
Transfer fee tiered by when the SELLING shareholder originally purchased: 1% of sale price if the apartment was originally purchased before June 12, 2013; 2% of sale price if originally purchased on/after June 12, 2013
Financing
Maximum financing allowed is 75%
Subletting
Permitted only with Board of Directors consent/approval
Washer / dryer
Not permitted by default
Pets
Pets allowed
Trust / LLC
Not explicitly stated as a board policy
Managing agent
The Lovett Company, LLC

Compiled by The Roebling Research Desk from the building’s offering plan, amendments, and related building documents (primary source dated 2018). Board policies can change by amendment — confirm at the offer stage.

The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2003–2026

Bedroom-by-bedroom medians, the full transfer record, and how units trade against ask.

1BR median
$1.8M
Recent range
$740K – $3.1M
Listing discount
1.4%
Recorded transfers
89
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at 39 Fifth Avenue would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.

As cited in The Wall Street Journal★ 92 reviews on Google

39 Fifth Avenue is the historical anchor of the Lower Fifth Avenue Gold Coast. Built in 1922 by Bing & Bing in collaboration with Emery Roth, the 17-story building was the first tall apartment building on Lower Fifth Avenue — the structural opening of the 1920s construction cycle that, over the following seven years, would replace the corridor's 19th-century mansion-and-rowhouse fabric with the prewar cooperative inventory that defines the corridor today.

Bing & Bing — the development partnership of Leo S. and Alexander S. Bing — was, alongside the Helmsleys, Tishmans, and a small handful of other 1920s Manhattan developers, among the most consequential builders of the city's luxury apartment-house tradition. The Bing & Bing partnership produced approximately a dozen apartment houses in collaboration with Emery Roth between roughly 1920 and 1931, including the buildings at 299 West 12th Street, 302 West 12th Street, 45 Christopher Street, and the broader West Village and Lower Fifth Avenue concentration that established the development team as the dominant builder of downtown luxury cooperative inventory in the 1920s. 39 Fifth Avenue sits at the front of that body of work — the first of the partnership's tall apartment-house commissions on Lower Fifth Avenue and the project that opened the corridor to the broader prewar cooperative cycle.

Roth's architectural register at 39 Fifth is Spanish Renaissance — dark brown brick with terracotta loggia detail at the third story, a configuration that produces one of the most architecturally distinguished facades on Lower Fifth Avenue. Roth's broader 1922 vocabulary, executed at 39 Fifth, would continue to evolve across the subsequent decade and would inform the architect's later, larger Park Avenue and Central Park West commissions. For Lower Fifth Avenue specifically, the Roth credential at 39 Fifth is a structural pedigree marker — and one that distinguishes the building from the Sugarman & Berger and Boak & Raad attributions that define much of the rest of the corridor.

The cooperative conversion in 1986 placed 39 Fifth in the middle of the broader Lower Fifth Avenue conversion cycle. The 58-apartment scale is materially smaller than the larger cooperatives on the corridor (One Fifth's ~180 units, the Brevoort's 296, 24 Fifth's 419) and meaningfully larger than the most boutique inventory (43 Fifth's 42, 45 Fifth's ~63). The mid-size scale produces a structurally distinct residential idiom — institutional enough to support a full-service amenity program, intimate enough to preserve a personal building culture.

For buyers, 39 Fifth represents the corridor's deepest architectural pedigree: Bing & Bing developer credential, Emery Roth architectural attribution, the historical anchor position as the first tall apartment building on Lower Fifth, and the mid-size 58-unit scale that supports a full-service operational program at intimate institutional culture.

Architecture and unit composition

The 58 cooperative apartments distribute across the building's 17 stories in configurations characteristic of Roth's 1922 vintage — substantial classic-six and classic-seven layouts, with apartment scale meaningfully larger than the one-bedroom-dominant boutique cooperatives on the corridor. Apartments retain the prewar signatures characteristic of Roth's 1922 vocabulary: substantial ceiling heights, formal entry galleries, library-living combinations, formal dining rooms, primary suites with closet infrastructure, and oak-strip flooring throughout.

The Spanish Renaissance facade — dark brown brick with the terracotta loggia detail at the third story — is the building's defining architectural feature and one of the most distinguished facade compositions on Lower Fifth Avenue.

Building operations

39 Fifth Avenue operates as a full-service cooperative with 24-hour doorman, live-in superintendent, fitness center, residents' lounge, bike storage, on-site laundry, and central storage. The amenity program is consistent with the building's mid-size cooperative scale and the corridor's broader prewar full-service tradition. Specific board policies on financing percentages, subletting frameworks, pied-à-terre permissions, pet rules, and flip-tax structure should be confirmed against the offering plan during due diligence.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟡
Moderate — under today's cap; material modeled 2030 exposure
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$5,095/yr
Per unit / month range
$0 – $7
Modeled exposure split equally across 58 units (the city tax-lot count). Not an assessed amount; co-op shareholders are typically charged by share allocation.

Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
SWARMP
What this means for you

The latest available filing classified the facade as SWARMP — Safe With A Repair and Maintenance Program: the engineer identified conditions requiring monitoring or repair, with repairs due by the deadline stated in the filing. The scope, timeline, and how the building funds the work are building-specific — we review the filings and board materials for you.

Inspection history
2005–10
SWARMP
2010–15
Safe
2015–20
Safe
2020–25
SWARMP
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2028
Assessed · 2005–10 to 2020–25
$23,000 in filing penalties
payment status not in the record
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs are due by the deadline stated in the filing.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Penalties shown are amounts DOB assessed against filings on record across 2005–10 to 2020–25. The FISP dataset does not record whether they were paid, contested or remain open, so treat the figure as history rather than a current balance and confirm the building’s standing with the managing agent.

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See the full facade history →

Management & transfer contacts

Managing agent
Flip tax
1% of sale price if purchased before 6/12/2013; 2% if after
Pied-à-terre
Allowed
Notable fees
Sublease fee 10% of monthly maintenance; license fee $17,500; max financing 75%
Transfer facts compiled by The Roebling Team · as of 2026-07. Confirm current policies and fees with the managing agent before contract.

Recent sales

Recent transfers at this building, from The Roebling Research Library. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Aug 31, 20269B
1 BR · 1 BA
$1,950,000+0.0%
Aug 26, 20268B
1 BR · 1 BA
$1,900,000-2.6%
Apr 21, 20268D
1 BR · 1 BA
$1,505,000+0.7%
Feb 24, 20262B
1 BR · 1 BA
$1,500,000-6.0%
Dec 11, 20251B
1 BR · 1 BA
$740,000-11.9%
Sep 3, 20256C
1 BR · 1 BA
$1,940,000+0.5%
Nov 1, 202413A
1 BR · 1 BA · 860 sf
$2,000,000$2,326/sf+0.0%
Mar 22, 20242A
1 BR · 1 BA
$1,500,000-3.2%

Market read. $/sf is measured on the latest sales with reliable square footage (2024): a median $1,856/sf (floor-adjusted) across 1 sale. The building has traded as recently as 2026. Median listing discount 1.4% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

6B · 850 sf+140%
$649,000 ($764/sf) 2003 → $1,557,000 ($1,832/sf) 2014
2C+138%
$599,000 ($666/sf) 2003 → $1,175,000 ($1,306/sf) 2012 → $1,425,000 2018
9B+117%
$900,000 ($1,059/sf) 2009 → $1,425,000 ($1,676/sf) 2012 → $1,950,000 2026
5D · 900 sf+80%
$695,000 ($772/sf) 2003 → $850,000 ($944/sf) 2005 → $1,250,000 ($1,389/sf) 2008
4C · 875 sf+63%
$999,000 ($1,142/sf) 2007 → $1,625,000 ($1,857/sf) 2015
View all 89 recorded transfers, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-00568-0004). Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified in The Roebling Research Library. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.

For owners

What would your apartment rent for?

Enter your apartment and I'll send you what it would rent for, from comparable closed leases at 39 Fifth Avenue and nearby.

What would buying here cost?

At the recent median sale of $1.9M (7 transfers since 2024), a buyer putting 25% down would pay about $33,550 to close, or 1.8% of the price.

  • Mansion tax: $19,000
  • No mortgage recording tax or title insurance on a co-op purchase
  • Attorneys, lender, building fees and filings: $14,550

Assumes a resale (the seller pays transfer taxes), a $4,500 attorney fee and a mortgage on the rest.

The Roebling Report

Keep up with 39 Fifth Avenue and its market

The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings like 39 Fifth Avenue. Unsubscribe anytime.

We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.

What to know if you’re buying

The architectural pedigree is the structural feature. The Bing & Bing / Emery Roth combination at the 1922-vintage opening of the Lower Fifth Avenue cycle is the deepest architectural-pedigree credential on the corridor.

The 58-unit mid-size scale produces a specific operational character. Substantially larger than the boutique cooperatives (43 Fifth, 45 Fifth) and meaningfully smaller than the institutional corridor peers (24 Fifth, the Brevoort). The cooperative culture is correspondingly calibrated to the mid-size scale.

The classic-six and classic-seven apartment idiom is structural. Roth's 1922 layouts are meaningfully larger than the one-bedroom-dominant inventory at 45 Fifth and the studio-and-junior-one-bedroom inventory at 24 Fifth. The right building for buyers seeking the larger prewar configurations.

Greenwich Village Historic District protection applies. The 1922 Roth facade, the Church of the Ascension's adjacent Gothic Revival presence, and the broader corridor are all subject to LPC review.

Confirm operational specifics directly. Board policies on financing, subletting, pied-à-terre use, pets, and flip tax should be confirmed during due diligence.

What to know if you’re selling

Marketing should lead with the architectural anchor positioning. "First tall apartment building on Lower Fifth Avenue, Bing & Bing / Emery Roth 1922" is the structural marketing argument.

Pricing should reference the corridor's full-service prewar tier. Comparable buildings: One Fifth Avenue (Corbett 1927), 24 Fifth (Roth 1926), the broader 1920s Lower Fifth cooperative cycle.

Closing timelines are cooperative-standard. Plan for 60–90 days from contract through approval to closing.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 39 Fifth Avenue, also evaluate:

More Greenwich Village buildings

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, transit, and pricing across Greenwich Village — read The Roebling Team Guide to Greenwich Village.

Preparing a board package for this building?

The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.

Considering a move at 39 Fifth Avenue?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com