Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,632/sf ▴3%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $271K/room ▴4%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $465K/room ▴3%CPW $355K/roomFifth Ave $501K/roomBillionaires' Row $4,313/sfHell's Kitchen $1,328/sf ▴0%
Full index →
Condominium · 1897
61 North Moore Street
61 North Moore Street, New York, NY 10013
Buildings·Tribeca·Condominium

61 North Moore Street

61 North Moore Street, New York, NY 10013

Tribeca

BBL 1001887504 · BIN 1002121

CorridorTribeca
At a glance
Year built
1897
Type
Condominium
Units
9
Floors
7
Landmark status
Not an individual landmark; in the Tribeca West Historic District
NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission records, updated February 2026
Doorman
Requires confirmation

61 North Moore Street sales history: 7 recorded sales

Own an apartment at 61 North Moore Street?
Enter your apartment to see its recorded sale history and today’s estimate.
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2004–2025

Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.

Median $/sf, 2025
$2,132
1 sale
Listing discount
0.0%
Recorded sales
7
On record
2004–2025
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at 61 North Moore Street would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.

As cited in The Wall Street Journal★ 92 reviews on Google

North Moore Street between Greenwich and Hudson is one of the few blocks in Tribeca where the nineteenth-century warehouse wall is still more or less intact, and 61 North Moore is a piece of it: an 1897 commercial warehouse built for the Protestant Episcopal Society to the design of Buchman & Deisler, in iron and orange iron-spot brick with a metal cornice, altered by James Gavigan in 1907, and designated within the Tribeca West Historic District.

The conversion is well documented in city records, which is not always true of Tribeca lofts of this vintage. Tribeach Holdings acquired the building in 2000 through 59-63 N. Moore Associates LLC. William Fegan filed an Alteration Type 1 in March 2000 to change the occupancy from commercial to residential, reapportion floor area and reach seven stories; the application was approved that September, permitted immediately after, and signed off in July 2003. A condominium subdivision was filed and approved with DOB in August 2001, and the first unit deeds were recorded between October 2001 and May 2002. The sequence is clean, complete and closed.

The recorded condominium schedule has nine residential unit lots in a landmarked warehouse, with no doorman or amenity program described in the reviewed materials. The ratio of building gross area to recorded lots is not measured apartment area. Compare current common charges, reserves and planned work; façade and elevator costs follow the governing allocation provisions. Recorded lots do not establish the number of owners or low charges. Check the apartment’s current tax bill; absence of a recorded abatement does not prevent future assessment or rate changes.

Built floor-area ratio is 4.80 against 6.02 permitted residential in the C6-2A district, a gap of roughly 5,900 square feet on a 4,850-square-foot lot; that simple comparison does not establish legal zoning floor area or permitted future work. In the Tribeca West Historic District any such work is also constrained in practice — exterior alterations generally require an LPC permit; eligible work may receive staff approval and ordinary maintenance may be exempt — and any rights should be confirmed in the condominium's documents.

Architecture and unit composition

The building is a seven-story late-nineteenth-century warehouse: iron and cast iron at the base, orange iron-spot brick above, capped with a metal cornice. It occupies a 4,850-square-foot lot with roughly 56 feet of frontage on North Moore Street and 88 feet of depth, and it holds 23,266 gross square feet. The 1907 alteration by James Gavigan is part of the fabric LPC designated, and the whole elevation is regulated.

Residences are identified by floor and orientation — east and west halves on the lower and middle floors, with a top-floor residence whose area should be verified from its plans. Recorded transfers over the last two decades cover apartments 1E, 1W, 2W, 3E, 5E and 5W among the nine unit lots. Layouts are loft-derived: the conversion reapportioned floor area rather than dividing the plates into conventional apartments, and the residences carry fireplaces, central air conditioning and in-unit laundry, with private storage in the building.

The 12-versus-10-versus-9 unit question deserves one more sentence, because it recurs in every data source touching this address. The DOB application proposed twelve dwelling units for zoning and egress purposes. The market record from the conversion period describes ten. The recorded condominium created nine residential unit lots, and nine is what the Department of Finance assesses and what ACRIS transfers. Those records describe different dates and potentially different populations; reconcile the current approved dwelling schedule, occupancy records and amendments before choosing a physical or legal apartment count.

Building operations

The recorded schedule contains nine residential unit lots. Reviewed materials describe an elevator without doorman coverage or an amenity program, but recent listing tags indicate part-time door coverage. Confirm the current staffing schedule. A smoke and sprinkler alarm system was filed in 2002, immediately after the first closings, and DOB records show façade repair with a heavy-duty sidewalk shed in 2000 and scaffolding with rigging in 2001 during the conversion, and interior partition work on the third and fourth floors in 2012 and in apartment 3E in 2019. The reviewed filing record since conversion is limited; that does not establish current work practices or unpermitted activity. Request actual project records and signoffs.

The operating question a buyer should press is reserves. Review the governing allocations for the landmarked masonry façade, applicable façade inspections, elevator and roof; nine recorded residential lots do not establish nine owners or equal cost shares. Ask for the current budget, the reserve balance, the assessment history and the most recent façade filing status before contract. Ask as well how the condominium treats its unused development rights, whether they have ever been the subject of a proposal, and whether the bylaws say anything about their disposition.

The conversion record

Original use and date: commercial warehouse, 1897, altered 1907, per LPC.

The alteration that created residential use: DOB Alteration Type 1, job 102647067, filed 2 March 2000 by William Fegan, RA, for 59-63 N. Moore Associates LLC. Existing occupancy commercial, proposed occupancy residential; twelve dwelling units proposed at seven stories; filed for zoning and egress. Approved 8 September 2000, fully permitted 12 September 2000, signed off 24 July 2003.

Condominium creation: DOB condominium subdivision job 102962206, filed and approved in August 2001. First unit deeds recorded October 2001 through May 2002 as condominium number 1206, unit lots 1401–1409.

Zoning, BSA and JLWQA: the lot is C6-2A within the Special Tribeca Mixed Use District, a commercial district in which residential use is permitted. No Board of Standards and Appeals application for this block appears in the BSA's published applications record, and the change of use was filed with DOB as an Alteration Type 1 for zoning and egress. The zoning in force when that job was filed in 2000 has not been confirmed here; the C6-2A mapping is the current one. The Joint Live-Work Quarters for Artists framework does not apply here. JLWQA is a SoHo and NoHo manufacturing-district regime conditioning residential occupancy on artist certification; it has never governed this Tribeca lot.

Loft Law / IMD: no Loft Board Interim Multiple Dwelling registration for this lot is identifiable in published city records, but the reviewed register, the stated commercial occupancy through 2000 and a permitted conversion do not by themselves exclude historical IMD coverage. Obtain the complete Loft Board and occupancy history before reaching that conclusion.

J-51: none. The Department of Finance's J-51 file contains no entry for this block and lot in any year, and the nine unit lots carry no exemption on the assessment roll. Underwrite full unabated taxes.

Policy framework

Ownership form: condominium. There is no co-op board admission; purchases run through the condominium's application and right-of-first-refusal process. No offering plan for this building was located in The Roebling Research Library or the Compass Offering Plan Library at the time of writing, so the bylaws and house rules should be read directly.

Pets, pied-à-terre, subletting, LLC and trust purchase: the reviewed material does not establish these permissions. Obtain the declaration, bylaws, house rules and current application requirements for the proposed ownership and use.

Financing: no cooperative financing ceiling applies. In a nine-unit condominium, however, lender review turns on the condominium questionnaire — single-owner concentration, commercial square footage, reserve funding, insurance and litigation (Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac retired their established-project owner-occupancy test in March 2026, though some lenders still ask). Get the questionnaire completed early; allow time for the lender's review without assuming a ranked cause of delays.

Resale capital contribution: not documented in public records. Confirm with the managing agent whether the bylaws impose one.

Real estate taxes: the assessment roll shows no exemption and full assessment since 2001; check the apartment's tax bill for any abatement. Future bills still change with assessments and rates.

Building staffing and amenities

Doorman
Requires confirmationSources differ. Confirm with building management.
Elevator
YesSource: NYC Department of Buildings elevator records

Staffing and amenities as our building profile and recent listing records describe them. A feature not listed is not confirmed absent. Outdoor space, parking and some facilities can belong to particular apartments or to a separate owner; confirm access for the specific apartment.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟡
Moderate — under today's cap; material modeled 2030 exposure
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$8,735/yr
Per unit / month range
$0 – $81
Modeled exposure split equally across 9 units (the residential count on the city's lot record). Not an assessed amount; condominium owners are typically charged by each unit's common-interest percentage.

Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.

See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
Safe
What this means for you

The latest available FISP filing classified the facade as Safe — no repairs were required at that inspection. A filed Safe grade is not a guarantee of current condition: owners still maintain the facade and, where required, observe parapets each year. Future inspection timing (Local Law 49 of 2025 changed the cycle framework from October 1, 2026), repair and any assessment decisions remain building-specific.

Inspection history
2005–10
Safe
2010–15
Safe
2015–20
SWARMP
2020–25
Safe
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2028
Assessed · 2005–10 to 2020–25
$23,000 in filing penalties
payment status not in the record
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs are due by the deadline stated in the filing.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — a licensed professional engineer or registered architect who meets DOB’s FISP qualifications and signs the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Penalties shown are amounts DOB assessed against filings on record across 2005–10 to 2020–25. The FISP dataset does not record whether they were paid, contested or remain open, so treat the figure as history rather than a current balance and confirm the building’s standing with the managing agent.

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

61 North Moore prices as a Tribeca loft condominium, and comparisons can include small converted loft condominiums and relevant full-service Greenwich and Hudson Street towers with adjustments for services, age, layout and costs. Verify current staffing and amenities: the authored materials and recent listing tags differ on doorman coverage. Assess the landmarked nineteenth-century envelope, actual apartment dimensions and current costs. The ratio near 2,585 gross square feet per residence is not measured living area, and neither this building’s nor larger buildings’ liquidity follows from unit count.

Compare floor, orientation, measured interior area, layout and condition using dated transactions. Verify the top-floor plan rather than inferring its size from tax assessments. Review the actual transfer history to establish available comparables; nine recorded residential lots do not establish turnover or typical holding periods. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.

Recent closings at this building, from The Roebling Research Library. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Aug 13, 20255E
4 BR · 3 BA · 2,674 sf
$5,700,000$2,132/sf+0.4%
Jul 12, 20231E
3 BR · 3 BA · 2,123 sf
$3,495,000$1,646/sf+0.0%
Jun 20, 20235W
2,823 sf
$5,100,000$1,807/sf—
Feb 28, 20183E
3 BR · 2.5 BA · 2,660 sf
$5,250,000$1,974/sf+6.1%
Apr 25, 20161E
3 BR · 2,123 sf
$4,075,000$1,919/sf-5.1%
Dec 20, 20131E
2 BR · 2,123 sf
$3,795,000$1,788/sf+0.0%
Oct 14, 20041W
2,487 sf
$2,300,000$925/sf—

Market read. Most recent trades (2025) cleared a median $2,132/sf (recorded) across 1 sale. Median listing discount 0.0% from the last ask.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-00188-7504; each condominium apartment is its own tax lot). Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified in The Roebling Research Library. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.

For owners

What would your apartment rent for?

Enter your apartment and I'll send you what it would rent for, from comparable closed leases at 61 North Moore Street and nearby.

Buying here? Condo closing costs with a mortgage typically run 3 to 6% of the price. See NYC co-op and condo closing costs, line by line.

The Roebling Report

Keep up with 61 North Moore Street and its market

The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings like 61 North Moore Street. Unsubscribe anytime.

We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.

What to know if you’re buying

Distinguish nine recorded interests from the differing dwelling counts. The DOB application said twelve, the conversion-era market record said ten, the recorded condominium has nine, and the Department of Finance assesses nine. Confirm the relevant current unit schedule and actual allocation rules for each calculation; the discrepancy alone does not establish how a valuation model treats the property.

Do not confuse this building with its neighbours. 53 North Moore Street is a separate and much larger condominium on the same block, and 39 North Moore Street is a different building on block 190. The controlling identifiers here are BBL 1-00188-7504 and BIN 1002121.

Underwrite full taxes and a thin denominator. The records show no J-51 or other exemption on this lot; confirm on the apartment's tax bill. For the condominium’s landmarked façade and elevator, review the reserve balance alongside debt, operating cash flow, assessments and the actual capital plan before ranking financial exposure.

Confirm the certificate of occupancy against the apartment as built. The Alt-1 was signed off in July 2003 after a three-year conversion; make sure the C of O reflects the configuration you are buying.

Test the lender early. Small condominiums can fail financing on questionnaire items — single-owner concentration, reserve funding, insurance — rather than on the borrower. Request lender review early and address outstanding items within the contract's actual deadlines; clearance is not guaranteed.

Ask about the development rights. A simple lot-area comparison suggests roughly 5,900 square feet of unused residential floor area, though that does not establish legal zoning floor area or what could be built. Any use is constrained by the Tribeca West Historic District, and a buyer should know what the board thinks about it.

What to know if you’re selling

Lead with the documentation. An 1897 warehouse by Buchman & Deisler, designated in the Tribeca West Historic District, converted under a fully signed-off Alteration Type 1 and a recorded condominium subdivision. Provide the underlying records for counsel’s review of the specific apartment.

Document the current tax posture. Provide the apartment’s current tax bill and exemption or abatement record. The reported absence of a J-51 benefit does not fix future assessments, rates or bills.

Have the condominium package ready before you list. Assemble the questionnaire, budget, reserve statement, governing allocations and façade status for review. Complete records support diligence but do not guarantee the closing schedule.

Price the residence, not the building. Verify floor, orientation, measured interior area and layout for each apartment. A ratio based on building gross area and recorded lots is not an apartment price-per-square-foot measure.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 61 North Moore Street, also evaluate:

More Tribeca buildings

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, transit, and pricing across Tribeca — read The Roebling Team Guide to Tribeca.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.

Considering a move at 61 North Moore Street?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Licensed Associate Real Estate Broker · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com