The Mill Building (85 North 3rd Street)
85 North 3rd Street, Brooklyn, NY 11249
Williamsburg, Brooklyn
BBL 3023507501 · BIN 3392272
- Year built
- 1910
- Type
- Condominium
- Units
- 63
- Floors
- 6
- Landmark status
- Not an individual landmark; not in a historic district
- NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission and City Planning records, updated February 2026
- Leasing by owners
- Permitted with conditions
- Pied-à-terre
- Permitted with conditions
- Pets
- Pets permitted; species and limits not stated
- Washer/dryer
- Requires confirmation
- Maximum financing
- 90% of the purchase price
- Flip tax
- None
- Doorman
- Full-time doorman
Every recorded sale at this building, 2007–2026
Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.
- Median $/sf, 2026 to date
- $1,658
- 4 sales
- Listing discount
- 2.2%
- Recorded sales
- 175
- On record
- 2007–2026
Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.
A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at The Mill Building would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.
The Mill Building is a genuine loft conversion in North Williamsburg that became residential through a Board of Standards and Appeals variance rather than the 2005 rezoning. That distinction is the whole history of the building.
The structure dates to about 1910 and spent its working life as loft space for commercial and manufacturing use. Historical records identify the original occupant as the Hinds & Ketcham lithographing company; the offering plan, which is the more conservative source, declines to name a builder or an architect at all and notes that there was no certificate of occupancy on file at the Department of Buildings — the ordinary condition of a pre-1938 Brooklyn loft. What matters commercially is what the building is: heavy masonry, deep floor plates, wide window bays, wood columns and beams, and high ceilings to measure and compare with specific new-construction alternatives.
By the end of the twentieth century the building had filled with artists and light industry, and enough of them were living there that it fell under Article 7-C of the Multiple Dwelling Law — the Loft Law — as an Interim Multiple Dwelling. That status is the reason the conversion took the shape it did. The property sits in an M1-2 manufacturing district, where residential use is not permitted as of right. Rather than wait for a rezoning, the ownership went to the Board of Standards and Appeals and obtained a use variance under Zoning Resolution §72-21, granted January 7, 2003 (BSA Cal. No. 263-01-BZ) after the Department of Buildings objected to residential use on July 27, 2001. A further BSA letter of February 22, 2005 cleared three changes as substantially compliant: raising the residential count to 63 units, permitting the cellar commercial space to be used for parking for 29 cars, and permitting balconies along the building's north face. Every apartment in this building exists because of those two BSA actions.
The conversion itself was designed by Fifield Piaker Elman Architects, whose principal signs the alteration filings through 2004 and 2005, and carried out by Northside Development LLC and its affiliate D&A Equities, LLC, from whom the sponsor took title under a contract dated January 10, 2005. The plan budgeted roughly $10,000,000 for the proposed alterations. The condominium declaration was recorded June 18, 2007, and the first unit closed the following month.
Because the building was an IMD, the plan is a non-eviction plan with a Loft Law overlay rather than the ordinary rental-to-condominium structure. The plan provided that the building would remain under Loft Board jurisdiction until the Loft Board issued a final rent order, that on that order the remaining IMD tenants would become rent-stabilized, and that no eviction proceedings would be commenced against non-purchasing tenants for failure to purchase. It also warned, in the standard language, that because the sponsor could declare the plan effective at fifteen percent, owner-occupants might not gain control of the condominium for some time. The plan’s schedules distinguish specific electrical and laundry-hookup work, but do not by themselves establish the full delivery condition or present condition of each apartment.
Architecture and unit composition
Sixty-three residences run from the second floor to the penthouse; the first floor and cellar are commercial. The unit roster on the current Department of Finance roll gives the clearest picture of the inventory: fourteen units on the second floor, fourteen on the third, thirteen on the fourth, fifteen on the fifth, six on the sixth, and a penthouse. Recorded floor areas run from roughly 707 square feet to about 2,727 square feet, with the bulk of the building between 1,200 and 2,100 — a wide spread in recorded areas; verify interior measurements and the actual sales sample before deciding whether an average is informative.
Review each apartment’s layout and condition within the conversion’s existing structural grid and tenancy history. The plan's own disclosure makes the split explicit: approximately 39 of the 63 residences were electrically rewired for modern use and furnished with washer/dryer hook-ups, and the plan names 23 units — on every floor from the second to the sixth — that were not. The absence of those two upgrades does not establish the rest of the delivery condition or exclude other sponsor work; review the unit-specific scope and later renovation records. Confirm the specific apartment’s scope; the approximate 39 upgraded and 23 named non-upgraded units do not constitute a complete, exact schedule of all 63 residences.
Seven storage units are separately assessed on the current tax roll, out of ten created under the plan, and terraces appurtenant to certain apartments are limited common elements rather than separate lots. The roof carries a common deck available to all residential owners.
The commercial condominium beneath the residences has changed character completely. The plan describes Commercial Unit 1 as twenty-seven artist studios on the cellar and first floors, leased by the sponsor, with an express warning that the sponsor made no guarantee the studios would continue. They did not: the first floor has been rebuilt over the last fifteen years into a run of large ground-floor retail tenancies, and the commercial condominium is under separate institutional ownership. The 29-space garage in the cellar was likewise offered as a transient facility with no representation that residents would have access to it.
Building operations
The Mill Building operates as an attended, full-floor-plate loft condominium with a compact amenity set — lobby attendance, roof deck, building laundry, storage — rather than the amenity program of the waterfront towers. Two utility structures shape the common charge, and both come straight from the plan: gas for heat, hot water, cooking and laundry is not separately metered and is carried in residential common charges, while electricity within each apartment is separately metered and paid by the owner, including the electricity consumed by the unit's own heat pump. In a building with fifteen-foot ceilings and very large window walls, that division is worth understanding before you underwrite a monthly.
The conversion carried the standard conversion-statute funding: a Reserve Fund under Local Law 70, estimated in the plan at $452,894.88 before sponsor credits, and a Working Capital Fund funded by a one month's common charges contribution from each purchaser at closing, with no sponsor contribution.
The tax position is the single most important operating fact in this building, and it has changed. The sponsor applied for a partial exemption under Section 11-243 of the Administrative Code — the J-51 program — and, in the plan's standard language, gave no guarantee it would be granted. It was. Department of Finance exemption records show a J-51 exemption with a fourteen-year term and benefits commencing in 2012 running on the residential unit lots. That benefit has now expired: the exemption value on the residential units fell to zero on the fiscal 2026 roll, and the fiscal 2027 roll carries no J-51 exemption on any residential unit in the building. Confirm on each apartment's tax bill that no other benefit applies.
That transition is not a footnote. It is the difference between the carrying cost a buyer would have modeled from a 2018 listing and the carrying cost that applies today, and it is why a comparable from more than about two years back needs its tax component checked against the current bill. Pull the current bill on the specific unit; the roll no longer shows the J-51 exemption, and the bill shows whether any other benefit applies.
Policy framework
Board approval: None. The Residential Board holds a right of first refusal on any sale or lease of a residential unit. Beyond that right, the plan states the board has no power to approve or disapprove purchasers, and the By-Laws impose no owner-occupancy requirement.
Subletting, pied-à-terre, LLC and trust purchases: Subletting permitted with conditions; pied-à-terre, LLC and trust purchases not documented — confirm in the declaration, bylaws and house rules. Confirm the current lease-registration procedure and any fee with the managing agent.
Pets: Not addressed in the offering plan materials reviewed. Confirm current house rules before writing an offer.
Flip tax / transfer fee: No flip tax is described in the offering plan. Each purchaser contributes one month's common charges to the Working Capital Fund at closing. The plan also provided for a sponsor's-attorney fee of $700 on closings outside Manhattan — a sponsor-era term, not a resale term.
Washer/dryer: No unit was delivered with machines. Roughly 39 units were furnished with hook-ups; the plan names 23 that were not. Verify the specific apartment against the plan schedule and the current certificate of occupancy.
Loft Law: The building entered the condominium as an Interim Multiple Dwelling under Loft Board jurisdiction, with the plan providing that IMD tenants would become rent-stabilized on the Loft Board's final rent order and would not be evicted for failure to purchase. Ask whether a final rent order has issued and whether any regulated tenancy remains in the building.
Property taxes: J-51, fourteen-year term, benefits commencing 2012, now expired. The fiscal 2027 roll shows a zero exemption on the residential units.
Application and transaction fees
Fees below are from building management's published schedule, as of August 2026. They are shown as published, item by item; no total is added because the total depends on the transaction. Deposits are listed apart from nonrefundable charges.
- Terms
- No flip tax is described in the offering plan. Each purchaser contributes one month's common charges to the Working Capital Fund at closing; the sponsor contributed nothing to that fund
Source: The Roebling Team's building profile
Purchase
11 items
Fees and charges
| Item | Paid by | When | Amount | Refundable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Processing Fee | Paid by Buyer | When With the application | Amount $550 | Refundable Not stated |
| Credit Reports FeePer applicantRequired | Paid by Buyer | When With the application | Amount $200 Per applicant named on the lease - plus any additional occupants | Refundable Not stated |
| Package Reproduction and Messenger Fee | Paid by Buyer | When With the application | Amount $125 | Refundable Not stated |
| Waiver of Right of First Refusal | Paid by Seller | When With the application | Amount $350 | Refundable Not stated |
| Closing Administrative Fee | Paid by Buyer | When At closing | Amount $225 | Refundable Not stated |
| Expedited Closing FeeConditionalConditions: Less than 48 hr notice | Paid by Buyer | When At closing | Amount $400 | Refundable Not stated |
| Move In Fee | Paid by Buyer | When At closing | Amount $250 | Refundable Not stated |
| Postponement Fee | Paid by Buyer | When At closing | Amount $400 | Refundable Not stated |
| Purchaser's Working Capital ContributionRequired | Paid by Buyer | When At closing | Amount Equal to 1.5% of the purchase price | Refundable Not stated |
| Closing Administrative Fee | Paid by Seller | When At closing | Amount $225 | Refundable Not stated |
| Move Out Fee | Paid by Seller | When At closing | Amount $250 | Refundable Not stated |
Rental or lease
7 items
Fees and charges
| Item | Paid by | When | Amount | Refundable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leasing FeeRequired | Paid by Landlord | When With the application | Amount Equal to one month's rent | Refundable Not stated |
| Waiver of Right of First Refusal | Paid by Landlord | When With the application | Amount $350 | Refundable Not stated |
| Application Processing Fee | Paid by Tenant | When With the application | Amount $450 | Refundable Not stated |
| Credit Reports FeePer applicantRequired | Paid by Tenant | When With the application | Amount $200 Per applicant named on the lease - plus any additional occupants | Refundable Not stated |
| Move In Fee | Paid by Tenant | When With the application | Amount $250 | Refundable Not stated |
| Move Out Fee | Paid by Tenant | When With the application | Amount $250 | Refundable Not stated |
Lease renewal
Fees and charges
| Item | Paid by | When | Amount | Refundable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lease Renewal Fee | Paid by Landlord | When With the application | Amount One month's rent | Refundable Not stated |
Management updates its schedule without a public filing. The date is when management last updated the page, not when a rule changed. Confirm the current schedule with management before you apply.
Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to discuss the building's costs and purchase requirements.
Own an apartment here? Request an apartment-specific pricing review.
Financing and purchase requirements
- Maximum financing
- 90% of the purchase priceSource: building management's published schedule, as of August 2026
- Guarantors
- PermittedSource: building management's published schedule, as of August 2026
- Parent buying for an employed child
- PermittedSource: building management's published schedule, as of August 2026
- Parent buying for a student child
- PermittedSource: building management's published schedule, as of August 2026
Sublet and pied-à-terre policy
A condominium owner leasing a unit and a co-op shareholder subletting are different rules, and a building-wide rule is different from a restriction on one apartment. This is the building's rule; confirm it for the specific apartment.
- Leasing by owners
- Permitted with conditionsUnit owners may sublet immediatelySource: building management's published schedule, as of August 2026
- Pied-à-terre ownership
- Permitted with conditionsCase by case, board discretionSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to discuss the sublet and pied-à-terre rules for that apartment.
Pets and in-unit washer/dryer
- Pets
- Pets permitted; species and limits not statedSource: building management's published schedule, as of August 2026
- In-unit washer/dryer
- Requires confirmationSources differ. Confirm with building management.
Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to confirm the pet and washer/dryer rules for that apartment.
Monthly carrying charges in recent sales
- Common charges + taxes, per room
- $587 per room a monthMedian of 8 recorded sales since October 2023Source: recorded sales, refreshed October 2026
- Common charges + taxes, per square foot
- $1.41 per square foot a monthMedian of 9 recorded sales since October 2023Source: recorded sales, refreshed October 2026
Common charges plus real estate taxes, combined into one monthly figure the way New York condominium listings show them. Add a mortgage payment for the monthly outlay. A summary of recorded sales, not a current bill; charges change.
Building staffing and amenities
- Doorman
- Full-time doormanSource: recent listing records
- Attended lobby
- YesSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
- Elevator
- YesSource: NYC Department of Buildings elevator records
- Amenities noted
- Playroom, roof deck, garage, storage, laundry roomSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Staffing and amenities as our building profile and recent listing records describe them. A feature not listed is not confirmed absent. Outdoor space, parking and some facilities can belong to particular apartments or to a separate owner; confirm access for the specific apartment.
Local Law 97
- 2024–2029 annual penalty
- $0 (under cap)
- 2030–2034 annual penalty
- $57,943/yr
- Per unit / month range
- $0 – $77
- Modeled exposure split equally across 63 units (the residential count on the city's lot record). Not an assessed amount; condominium owners are typically charged by each unit's common-interest percentage.
Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.
See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →Recent sales
The Mill Building offers real loft volume, real industrial fenestration, and a masonry building with a hundred-and-fifteen-year history, three blocks from the Bedford Avenue L. Compare matched sales with glass condominiums of the 2006–2012 cycle before assigning a loft premium. Buyers who want a thirty-fourth-floor river view and a lap pool should be steered to the waterfront rather than argued with.
Compare renovation condition and documented work, floor-plate size and shape, floor, exposure and outdoor space without assuming their relative price effects. Recorded areas range from under 800 square feet to well over 2,500; verify interior measurements. Terraces are appurtenant to only some apartments, and the penthouse has a distinct configuration to assess.
For a 2025 comparison, use matched closed sales and reliable interior measurements to assess prices against interior-block new construction and waterfront towers; loft tenure and amenities do not establish a predetermined hierarchy. The one structural distortion in any historical comparison is the tax line: closings from the J-51 era carried a materially lower monthly than the same apartment carries today.
Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.
Recent closings at this building, from The Roebling Research Library. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.
| Date | Unit | Apartment | Price | PPSF | vs. Ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2026 | 312 | 1 BR · 1 BA · 1,200 sf | $1,995,000 | $1,663/sf | +0.0% |
| Aug 14, 2026 | 204 | 3 BR · 2 BA · 2,430 sf | $4,850,000 | $1,996/sf | -11.7% |
| Jun 17, 2026 | 214 | 1 BR · 1 BA · 1,203 sf | $1,850,000 | $1,538/sf | +0.0% |
| Mar 20, 2026 | 309 | 2 BR · 2 BA · 1,800 sf | $2,975,000 | $1,653/sf | -0.7% |
| Nov 7, 2024 | 404 | 3 BR · 2 BA · 1,884 sf | $2,725,000 | $1,446/sf | — |
| Jul 9, 2024 | 408 | 3 BR · 2 BA · 1,972 sf | $2,500,000 | $1,268/sf | -3.8% |
| May 16, 2024 | 308 | 2 BR · 2 BA · 1,750 sf | $2,100,000 | $1,200/sf | -2.3% |
| Mar 29, 2024 | 504 | 1 BA · 897 sf | $1,091,750 | $1,217/sf | +4.1% |
Market read. Most recent trades (2026 to date) cleared a median $1,658/sf (recorded) across 4 sales. Median listing discount 2.2% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.
The retrade record
Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.
Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.
Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 3-02350-7501; each condominium apartment is its own tax lot). Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified in The Roebling Research Library. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.
Closed rents at The Mill Building, last 36 months
| Size | Leases | Median / month |
|---|---|---|
| 1 bedroom | 3 | $8,300 |
| 2 bedroom | 8 | $12,750 |
11 closed leases, October 2023 to September 2026. Most recent lease September 2026. Sizes with fewer than 2 leases are not shown. Compiled by The Roebling Team at Compass from closed leases.
What would your apartment rent for?
The figures above are the building's closed leases. Enter your apartment and I'll send you what yours would rent for, from comparable leases at The Mill Building and nearby.
At the recent median sale of $2.73M (5 sales in the past 24 months, since October 22, 2024), a buyer putting 25% down would pay about $111,027 to close, or 4.1% of the price.
- Mansion tax: $34,063
- Mortgage recording tax: $39,342
- Title insurance: $12,262
- Attorneys, lender, building fees, reserves and filings: $25,360
Assumes a resale (the seller pays transfer taxes), a $4,500 attorney fee and a mortgage on the rest.
Keep up with The Mill Building and its market
The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings like The Mill Building. Unsubscribe anytime.
We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.
What to know if you’re buying
Model the tax at the current, un-abated bill. The J-51 exemption is gone as of the fiscal 2027 roll. Any monthly figure derived from a listing or a comparable more than two years old is wrong in the same direction.
Find out which apartment you are buying. The plan divides the building into roughly 39 units the sponsor rewired and fitted with laundry hook-ups and 23 it did not. That historical split establishes two specific upgrades, not the principal current renovation need; assess condition and subsequent work apartment by apartment.
Ask about Loft Law residue. The building converted out of Interim Multiple Dwelling status under Loft Board jurisdiction. Confirm that a final rent order has issued and whether any rent-stabilized tenancy survives anywhere in the building.
The retail and the garage are neighbors, not amenities. Commercial Unit 1 and the Parking Unit were retained by the sponsor and are separately owned. The plan expressly disclaims any guarantee that garage spaces would be available to residents, and the ground floor has already changed use once.
Expect gas in the common charge. Heat, hot water, cooking and laundry gas are master-metered and carried in common charges; only apartment electricity is yours. In a loft with fifteen-foot ceilings, that matters.
Condominium mechanics are simple. Right of first refusal, no board approval, no owner-occupancy requirement, no flip tax in the plan, one month's common charges into the working capital fund at closing.
What to know if you’re selling
Lead with what the building is. A 1910 lithography loft that became residential by BSA variance in a manufacturing district, with fifteen-foot ceilings, wood columns and factory windows. Compare those features with specific alternatives without claiming a market-wide count or an automatic price premium.
Prepare the tax conversation before the first showing. J-51 has expired. A seller who presents the current bill and a modeled carrying cost controls that conversation; a seller who lets the buyer's attorney discover it does not.
Document the renovation. The plan distinguishes electrical and laundry-hookup work in different apartments; provide scope, permits and sign-offs for the specific home without treating that distinction as proof of two general grades of delivery.
Price on the line and the condition, not the building average. The recorded areas run from under 800 to over 2,700 square feet; verify interior measurements and assess relevant sales with size and condition adjustments rather than requiring identical homes.
Comparable buildings
If you're considering The Mill Building, also evaluate:
- Austin Nichols House (184 Kent Avenue) — the Cass Gilbert warehouse conversion on the waterfront; Williamsburg's other great loft building, at far greater scale
- The Gretsch (60 Broadway) — the Southside guitar-factory conversion; the closest peer in provenance and volume
- Warehouse 11 (214 North 11th Street) — loft-referential new construction on the Northside; the reference against the thing itself
- 125 North 10th Street — the Northside low-rise condominium alternative, with parking
- 127 Kent Avenue (The Sixth) — the newest brick-and-factory-window building on the Northside, three blocks north
- The Edge — South Tower (22 North 6th Street) — the amenity-tower alternative; service depth against loft volume
- Two Northside Piers (2 Northside Piers) — the other early waterfront tower, with esplanade access
- The Clock Tower (1 Main Street) — the trophy loft conversion in DUMBO; the borough's benchmark for converted volume
- 70 Washington Street — DUMBO's largest loft conversion, and the standard reference for warehouse-scale living in Brooklyn
More Williamsburg buildings
- The Grand Manhattan, 390 Manhattan Avenue — condominium
- The Gretsch (60 Broadway) — 1916 condominium
- The Lynch Park V, 24 Lynch Street · Williamsburg — 2006 condominium
- The Oosten (429 Kent Avenue) — 2016 condominium
- The Pad, 196–200 South 2nd Street — condominium
- The Umbrella Factory (710 Metropolitan Avenue) — 1930 condominium
The neighborhood
For the full neighborhood — its buildings, character, and market — read The Roebling Team Guide to Williamsburg.
How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.
Considering a move at The Mill Building?
Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com