35 Prospect Park West
35 Prospect Park West, Brooklyn, NY 11215
Park Slope, Brooklyn
BBL 3010730041 · BIN 3025018
- Year built
- 1929
- Type
- Cooperative
- Units
- 70
- Floors
- 18
- Landmark status
- Requires confirmation
- City records and our profile differ. Confirm with building management.
- Subletting by shareholders
- Not permitted
- Dogs
- Requires confirmation
- Cats
- Requires confirmation
- Maximum financing
- 75% of the purchase price
- Flip tax
- 2% of the purchase price, paid by the seller
- Doorman
- Full-time doorman
- Flip tax
- 2% of gross sales price (in certain cases appraised value), paid by the seller; treated as paid-in capital, segregated in a reserve account, released only by majority board vote. Produced $309,400 (FY2020) and $227,500 (FY2019)
- Financing
- 75% of purchase price maximum, per the corporation's Application for Residence
- Pets
- Requires confirmation
Compiled by The Roebling Research Desk from the building’s offering plan, amendments, and related building documents (primary source dated 2020-09 (financials); house rules booklet undated). Reported and subject to confirmation. Board policies can change by amendment — confirm at the offer stage.
Every recorded sale at this building, 2004–2026
Bedroom-by-bedroom medians, the full transfer record, and how units trade against ask.
- 3BR median, 2023–2026
- $2.9M
- 7 qualifying sales
- Recent range
- $2M – $4.3M
- Listing discount
- 0.0%
- Recorded transfers
- 67
Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.
A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at 35 Prospect Park West would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.
35 Prospect Park West was born a cooperative. That distinguishes it from almost every other pre-1970s apartment building in Brooklyn, nearly all of which reached shareholder ownership through a 1980s conversion plan negotiated against a regulated tenancy. Here there was no conversion, no sponsor holding unsold shares, no non-purchasing tenants and no eviction plan. Garfield-Park Corporation put up the building in 1929 under a Plan of Organization dated April 1 of that year, conveyed it to 35 Park West Corporation at completion, and the corporation has run it ever since. The register's digitized records, which reach back to 1966, show no transfer of the fee.
The 1929 scheme was what the period called a limited cooperative. Roughly seventy percent of the building's rental value was to be owned by cooperators; the remaining thirty percent stayed rented, with the rent applied against operating expense, mortgage interest, amortization and taxes. Realty Associates, Inc. — the Remsen Street firm that built a great deal of southern Brooklyn — supervised construction, guaranteed completion, and guaranteed that maintenance would not exceed $9.95 per share for the first two years. Shareholders paid in six construction draws, the last ten percent due when the certificate of occupancy issued. The whole apparatus was designed to make a cooperative purchase feel as safe as a bond, in the spring of 1929.
The Emery Roth apartment schedule attached to the plan documents a wide range of configurations: simplex apartments of five, six, seven and eight rooms with three baths; duplexes of eleven, twelve and thirteen rooms with five and six baths; a penthouse simplex of eleven rooms and four baths; a penthouse duplex of eight rooms; and two maisonettes with their own street doors at 33 Prospect Park West and 225 Garfield Place. The largest duplexes put entertaining rooms downstairs and three en-suite bedrooms upstairs, with servants' rooms and servants' baths detailed separately in the specification. Roughly 190,000 square feet of recorded residential building area across 70 recorded units yields about 2,700 square feet of allocated gross area per unit. Common circulation, walls and other non-interior areas can be included; this quotient neither measures apartment interiors nor establishes a borough-wide size ranking.
The original specification is worth reading because so much of it survives as the thing a renovated apartment is renovated around. White oak floors laid in French herringbone with borders in the living rooms, dining rooms, galleries and libraries. Wood-burning fireplaces where the plans located them, left in rough masonry for owners to face themselves. Recessed Murray copper radiators on a two-pipe low-pressure vacuum system. Master baths tiled to seven feet five inches in colored matte glaze with faience floors. A cedar closet and a locked wine closet in every apartment. A lobby floored in twelve-inch black-and-white Vermont marble squares with a green marble base and panelling copied from an old English house. Eight elevator men on the 1929 payroll, plus a superintendent, an assistant superintendent, two doormen, three porters and two seasonal firemen.
Then there is the boundary. When the Landmarks Preservation Commission designated the Park Slope Historic District in 1973, it took in the entire block — every brownstone on Garfield Place and Montgomery Place, the whole Eighth Avenue frontage — and went around this building. So did the 2012 Extension and the 2016 Extension II. The result is a two-sided fact that a buyer should hear plainly. On one side, the co-op controls its own envelope: windows, façade work and rooftop projects need a board vote and any DOB permit the scope requires, not a Landmarks certificate, which is why the corporation could run a $1.2 million façade contract in 2019–2020 without an approvals cycle in front of it. On the other side, the Landmarks review that governs changes on the rest of the block does not attach to this address, and the building's own future alterations are governed by zoning, the building code and the board rather than by the Commission.
Architecture and unit composition
The building occupies the full 100-foot Prospect Park West frontage north of Garfield Place and runs 165 feet back, on a 16,500-square-foot lot. Built floor area is roughly 191,650 square feet — a built FAR near 11.6 against 6.02 permitted under today's R8X zoning. The Department of Finance counts eighteen stories; the 1929 plan describes fifteen stories plus two penthouses, and the two accounts are best read as describing the same massing from different conventions.
The main entrance is on Garfield Place, not the avenue — a Roth planning decision that keeps the park frontage entirely residential and gives the corner apartments uninterrupted exposure. A separate service entrance handles deliveries through the basement. As built the building ran two passenger cabs finished in wood and two metal service cabs; the specification is explicit that Roth arranged apartments so that residents would not walk long corridors and would not face each other's doors across a landing.
Because the apartment mix runs from five rooms to thirteen, the intra-building price spread here is wider than in almost any comparable Brooklyn cooperative, and floor is not the dominant variable — line and configuration are. A park-front simplex, a Garfield Place line, a maisonette with a private entrance and a penthouse duplex are four different products in one building, and they should be comped as such. Renovation state matters more than usual as well: apartments of this size carry renovation budgets that can rival the purchase price of a two-bedroom elsewhere in the district.
Building operations
35 Park West Corporation operates on a fiscal year ending September 30 and runs a genuinely large budget for a 70-unit building — total cost of operations above $2.7 million in recent audited years. Two lines dominate. New York City real estate taxes ran roughly $900,000 in fiscal 2020, against a building that is fully depreciated for accounting purposes. Payroll, payroll taxes and union benefits together exceeded $1.1 million. Substantially all employees are covered by an SEIU Local 32BJ collective bargaining agreement, and the corporation contributes to the Building Service 32BJ multiemployer pension fund, which its auditors disclose as having been certified in "red" — critical — status for the plan year ended June 30, 2020, with a rehabilitation plan in place. That disclosure is standard across union-staffed New York buildings and is not specific to this address, but it belongs in a buyer's file.
Capital spending has been heavy and recent. The corporation signed a $1,211,005 façade contract with Skyline Restoration Inc. plus engineering oversight, and had paid roughly $1.09 million of it by September 30, 2020. Property and equipment additions ran $1.11 million in fiscal 2020 alone. Funding came from the capital assessment in force since 2016 — $3.07 per share monthly in 2016, stepping down through $2.46, $1.50, $1.5345 and $1.5575 to roughly $1.58 per share for the year ending September 2021 — together with the 2 percent transfer fee, both of which flow to the reserve rather than to operations. Between them they produced more than $600,000 in fiscal 2020.
The consequence is visible on the balance sheet: the reserve fund fell from about $922,000 to about $359,000 over fiscal 2020 as the façade money went out the door. The corporation refinanced on June 5, 2018 with a $1,300,000 fifteen-year self-amortizing mortgage at 4.107 percent maturing July 1, 2033, and holds an undrawn $500,000 line of credit alongside it. Maintenance rose 5.0 percent effective October 2019 and 4.1 percent effective October 2020. No reserve study has been performed and the auditors note the omission. Ask for the current reserve balance, the status of the façade program, and whether the capital assessment is still running.
Two small revenue lines are worth knowing because they are unusual: the corporation licenses rooftop antenna space for $12,000 a year, and it bills storage separately from maintenance.
Policy framework
Purchaser review: Applicants are reviewed by two shareholder committees — a Finance Committee and a Screening Committee — which recommend to the Board of Directors. The package runs to three years of tax returns, statements of net worth with support for cash and securities, a statement of current annual income, salary confirmation where the employer has changed, the contract of sale, the lender's recognition agreement, a bank or brokerage reference letter sent directly to the committee, three business references and three personal references, all of whom are contacted, plus a signed acknowledgment that the applicant has read the house rules. Plan for a long timeline; the corporation's own guidance warns that reference confirmation is the bottleneck.
Financing: The application for residence states a limit of 75 percent of the purchase price.
Flip tax / transfer fee: 2 percent of the gross sales price, charged to the seller, or in certain cases measured against appraised value. It is treated as paid-in capital for tax purposes, segregated in a reserve account and released only by majority vote of the board. Transfer fees produced $309,400 in fiscal 2020 and $227,500 in fiscal 2019.
Capital assessment: In force continuously since 2016 at a per-share monthly rate revised annually. Confirm the current rate and the projected end date.
Pets: No dog or cat without the board's express written permission; animals must be carried or leashed in public portions.
Alterations: Governed by the corporation's Construction and Renovation Guidelines, available from the building manager, which shareholders are responsible for enforcing on their contractors.
Marketing and access: The building manager must be told in advance of any broker or prospective-buyer visit; the seller must notify the board in writing before listing; the corporation's attorney must be retained by the seller for the stock transfer; and the rules as written state that the building's address may not be used in public advertising. Establish the board's current position on that last point before you build a marketing plan.
Application and transaction fees
Fees below are from building management's published schedule, as of July 2026. They are shown as published, item by item; no total is added because the total depends on the transaction. Deposits are listed apart from nonrefundable charges.
- Terms
- 2% of the Purchase Price
- Rate
- 2% of the purchase price
- Paid by
- Seller
Source: building management's published schedule, as of July 2026
Purchase
8 items
Fees and charges
| Item | Paid by | When | Amount | Refundable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Processing Fee | Paid by Buyer | When With the application | Amount $500 | Refundable Non-refundable |
| Consumer Report FeePer applicantRequired | Paid by Buyer | When With the application | Amount $250 Per Applicant | Refundable Non-refundable |
| Move-In Fee | Paid by Buyer | When With the application | Amount $500 | Refundable Non-refundable |
| Move-Out Fee | Paid by Seller | When With the application | Amount $500 | Refundable Non-refundable |
| If Financing, Recognition Agreement FeeConditional | Paid by Buyer | When At closing | Amount $300 | Refundable Non-refundable |
| Closing Administrative Fee | Paid by Seller | When At closing | Amount $600 | Refundable Non-refundable |
Deposits
| Item | Paid by | When | Amount | Refundable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Move in Deposit | Paid by Buyer | When With the application | Amount $500 | Refundable Refundable |
| Move Out Deposit | Paid by Seller | When With the application | Amount $500 | Refundable Refundable |
Refinance
3 items
Management's “less refinance” schedule
Fees and charges
| Item | Paid by | When | Amount | Refundable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Processing Fee | Paid by Shareholder | When With the application | Amount $350 | Refundable Non-refundable |
Management's “more refinance” schedule
Fees and charges
| Item | Paid by | When | Amount | Refundable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Processing Fee | Paid by Shareholder | When With the application | Amount $350 | Refundable Non-refundable |
| If applicable, credit check feeConditional · Per applicant | Paid by Shareholder | When With the application | Amount $250.00/per applicant | Refundable Non-refundable |
Management updates its schedule without a public filing. The date is when management last updated the page, not when a rule changed. Confirm the current schedule with management before you apply.
Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to discuss the building's costs and purchase requirements.
Own an apartment here? Request an apartment-specific pricing review.
Financing and purchase requirements
- Maximum financing
- 75% of the purchase priceSource: building management's published schedule, as of July 2026
Sublet and pied-à-terre policy
A condominium owner leasing a unit and a co-op shareholder subletting are different rules, and a building-wide rule is different from a restriction on one apartment. This is the building's rule; confirm it for the specific apartment.
- Subletting by shareholders
- Not permittedSource: building management's published schedule, as of July 2026
- Pied-à-terre ownership
- Not verified
Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to discuss the sublet and pied-à-terre rules for that apartment.
Pets and in-unit washer/dryer
- Dogs
- Requires confirmationSources differ. Confirm with building management.
- Cats
- Requires confirmationSources differ. Confirm with building management.
- In-unit washer/dryer
- Not verified
Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to confirm the pet and washer/dryer rules for that apartment.
Monthly carrying charges in recent sales
- Maintenance, per room
- $639 per room a monthMedian of 8 recorded sales since October 2023Source: recorded sales, refreshed October 2026
- Maintenance, per square foot
- $1.73 per square foot a monthMedian of 4 recorded sales since October 2023Source: recorded sales, refreshed October 2026
Maintenance as recorded with each sale. A co-op's maintenance already covers the building's real estate taxes and the building's own mortgage, if it has one; add your own loan payment for the monthly outlay. A summary of recorded sales, not a current bill; charges change.
Building staffing and amenities
- Doorman
- Full-time doormanSource: recent listing records
- Attended lobby
- YesSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
- Elevator
- YesSource: NYC Department of City Planning records (PLUTO)
- Amenities noted
- Storage, laundry roomSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Staffing and amenities as our building profile and recent listing records describe them. A feature not listed is not confirmed absent. Outdoor space, parking and some facilities can belong to particular apartments or to a separate owner; confirm access for the specific apartment.
Local Law 97
- 2024–2029 annual penalty
- $0 (under cap)
- 2030–2034 annual penalty
- $9,379/yr
- Per unit / month range
- $0 – $11
- Modeled exposure split equally across 70 units (the residential count on the city's lot record). Not an assessed amount; co-op shareholders are typically charged by share allocation.
Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed October 2026.
See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →Facade safety — Local Law 11
The latest available filing classified the facade as SWARMP — Safe With A Repair and Maintenance Program: the inspector (QEWI) identified conditions requiring monitoring or repair, with repairs due by the deadline stated in the filing. The scope, timeline, and how the building funds the work are building-specific — we review the filings and board materials for you.
How to read this, and where it comes from
QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — a licensed professional engineer or registered architect who meets DOB’s FISP qualifications and signs the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).
Penalties shown are amounts DOB assessed against filings on record across 2005–10 to 2020–25. The FISP dataset does not record whether they were paid, contested or remain open, so treat the figure as history rather than a current balance and confirm the building’s standing with the managing agent.
Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed October 2026.
Recent sales
Recent transfers at this building, from The Roebling Research Library. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.
| Date | Unit | Apartment | Price | PPSF | vs. Ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2026 | 3B | 4 BR · 3.5 BA | $4,325,000 | +8.1% | |
| Apr 15, 2026 | 11B | 3 BR · 4 BA | $3,207,000 | -8.4% | |
| Dec 9, 2025 | 7E | 2 BR · 2 BA | $2,250,000 | -9.8% | |
| Aug 28, 2025 | 6A | 3 BR · 3 BA | $2,575,000 | -6.4% | |
| Jun 9, 2025 | 14C | 3 BR · 3 BA · 2,830 sf | $3,400,000 | $1,201/sf | +4.6% |
| Feb 18, 2025 | 9A | 3 BR · 3 BA · 2,126 sf | $2,875,000 | $1,352/sf | +0.0% |
| Feb 5, 2025 | 10B | 3 BR · 2.5 BA | $3,400,000 | +13.5% | |
| Jul 31, 2024 | 5E | 3 BR · 2.5 BA · 1,436 sf | $1,995,000 | $1,389/sf | +0.0% |
Market read. $/sf is measured on the latest sales with reliable square footage (2025): a median $1,176/sf (floor-adjusted) across 2 sales. The building has traded as recently as 2026. Median listing discount 1.6% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.
The retrade record
Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.
Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.
Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 3-01073-0041). Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified in The Roebling Research Library. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.
What would your apartment rent for?
Enter your apartment and I'll send you what it would rent for, from comparable closed leases at 35 Prospect Park West and nearby.
At the recent median sale of $3.21M (7 transfers in the past 24 months, since November 3, 2024), a buyer putting 25% down would pay about $62,655 to close, or 2.0% of the price.
- Mansion tax: $48,105
- No mortgage recording tax or title insurance on a co-op purchase
- Attorneys, lender, building fees and filings: $14,550
Assumes a resale (the seller pays transfer taxes), a $4,500 attorney fee and a mortgage on the rest.
Keep up with 35 Prospect Park West and its market
The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings like 35 Prospect Park West. Unsubscribe anytime.
We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.
What to know if you’re buying
Compare the documented apartment types. Simplexes of five to eight rooms, duplexes of eleven to thirteen, two maisonettes with private street entrances. Decide which product you are actually shopping for before you compare prices.
Model the carrying cost honestly. The fiscal 2020 statements reported roughly $900,000 in real estate taxes and over $1.1 million in payroll and related costs for the union staff. Obtain the current budget and actual maintenance and assessment charges; those historical expenses do not establish today's bill or a comparison with smaller co-ops. Run the True Monthly Carrying Cost against the specific apartment's share count.
Ask where the capital program stands. A $1.2 million façade contract, a reserve drawn down from roughly $922,000 to $359,000 in one year, and a capital assessment running since 2016. Get the current reserve balance and the board's forward plan.
The 2 percent transfer fee is the seller's, but price it anyway. It shapes what sellers will accept and it shows up in every negotiation in the building.
Understand what the historic district exclusion means. City landmark review does not apply to this undesignated building, but board approvals, DOB permits and other applicable requirements remain. Absence of LPC review alone does not guarantee faster or cheaper work.
Budget the board package time. Two shareholder committees, three years of returns, six references contacted individually, and a 75 percent financing ceiling.
What to know if you’re selling
Lead with the plan and the provenance. An Emery Roth commission, built as a cooperative in 1929 and never converted, with the five- to thirteen-room configurations described in the original plan. Document the specific apartment's current layout rather than claiming that no competing building offers similar space.
Comp your line, not the building. Averaging across a five-room simplex and a thirteen-room duplex produces a number that helps nobody. Use same-line and same-configuration sales.
Disclose the transfer fee and the assessment early. A 2 percent seller-paid fee and an ongoing capital assessment are both better handled in the first conversation than in the third.
Confirm the advertising rule before you plan marketing. The corporation's written rules restrict use of the building address in public advertising and require advance notice of broker visits. Get the board's current position in writing.
Have the corporation's financial record ready. Audited statements running back decades, a documented façade program and a self-amortizing mortgage maturing in 2033 are underwriting assets with both the board and the buyer's lender.
Comparable buildings
If you're considering 35 Prospect Park West, also evaluate:
- 40 Prospect Park West — the 1942 co-op directly across Garfield Place; also excluded from the historic district, and a very different apartment
- 39 Plaza Street West — Rosario Candela's 1926 tower on Grand Army Plaza; the other architect-signature prewar cooperative in the neighborhood
- 1 Prospect Park West — the 2019 condominium conversion at Grand Army Plaza; the condo-ownership alternative on the same avenue
- 10 Plaza Street East — the 1959 fifteen-story co-op on the Plaza; postwar full-service
- 20 Plaza Street East — 1940 co-op on Grand Army Plaza
- 135 Eastern Parkway (Turner Towers) — the large prewar Prospect Heights cooperative; the closest peer on scale
- 34 Plaza Street East — prewar co-op on the Plaza's Prospect Heights side
- 209 Lincoln Place — the ten-story 1928 co-op inside the historic district
- 1 Grand Army Plaza (Richard Meier on Prospect Park) — the park-front new-development condominium alternative
More Park Slope buildings
- 347 Sixth Avenue — 1920 condominium
- 349 16th Street — 1925 condominium
- 349 22nd Street — 1931 condominium
- 350 Butler Street — 2021 condominium
- 350 Sixth Avenue — 1920 condominium
- 352 Sixth Avenue — 1920 condominium
The neighborhood
For the full neighborhood — its buildings, character, and market — read The Roebling Team Guide to Park Slope.
The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.
How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.
Considering a move at 35 Prospect Park West?
Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com