Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,600/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $270K/room 2%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $472K/room 18%CPW $355K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,313/sf 24%Flatiron $1,769/sf 3%
Full index →
Cooperative · 1929
35 Prospect Park West
35 Prospect Park West, Brooklyn, NY 11215
Buildings·Cooperative

35 Prospect Park West

35 Prospect Park West, Brooklyn, NY 11215

Park Slope, Brooklyn

BBL 3010730041 · BIN 3025018

ArchitectEmery Roth
At a glance
Year built
1929
Type
Cooperative
Units
70
Floors
18
Landmark
No
Board & building profile
Flip tax
2% of gross sales price (in certain cases appraised value), paid by the seller; treated as paid-in capital, segregated in a reserve account, released only by majority board vote. Produced $309,400 (FY2020) and $227,500 (FY2019)
Financing
75% of purchase price maximum, per the corporation's Application for Residence
Pets
No dog or cat kept or harbored without the Board of Directors' express written permission; no animal in public portions unless carried or leashed (house rules booklet)

Compiled by The Roebling Research Desk from the building’s offering plan, amendments, and related building documents (primary source dated 2020-09 (financials); house rules booklet undated). Reported and subject to confirmation. Board policies can change by amendment — confirm at the offer stage.

The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2004–2026

Bedroom-by-bedroom medians, the full transfer record, and how units trade against ask.

3BR median
$2.9M
Recent range
$2M – $4.3M
Listing discount
0.0%
Recorded transfers
67
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at 35 Prospect Park West would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.

35 Prospect Park West was born a cooperative. That distinguishes it from almost every other pre-1970s apartment building in Brooklyn, nearly all of which reached shareholder ownership through a 1980s conversion plan negotiated against a regulated tenancy. Here there was no conversion, no sponsor holding unsold shares, no non-purchasing tenants and no eviction plan. Garfield-Park Corporation put up the building in 1929 under a Plan of Organization dated April 1 of that year, conveyed it to 35 Park West Corporation at completion, and the corporation has run it ever since. The register's digitized records, which reach back to 1966, show no transfer of the fee.

The 1929 scheme was what the period called a limited cooperative. Roughly seventy percent of the building's rental value was to be owned by cooperators; the remaining thirty percent stayed rented, with the rent applied against operating expense, mortgage interest, amortization and taxes. Realty Associates, Inc. — the Remsen Street firm that built a great deal of southern Brooklyn — supervised construction, guaranteed completion, and guaranteed that maintenance would not exceed $9.95 per share for the first two years. Shareholders paid in six construction draws, the last ten percent due when the certificate of occupancy issued. The whole apparatus was designed to make a cooperative purchase feel as safe as a bond, in the spring of 1929.

What Emery Roth designed for that program is the reason to buy here. The apartment schedule attached to the plan is startling by any Brooklyn standard: simplex apartments of five, six, seven and eight rooms with three baths; duplexes of eleven, twelve and thirteen rooms with five and six baths; a penthouse simplex of eleven rooms and four baths; a penthouse duplex of eight rooms; and two maisonettes with their own street doors at 33 Prospect Park West and 225 Garfield Place. The largest duplexes put entertaining rooms downstairs and three en-suite bedrooms upstairs, with servants' rooms and servants' baths detailed separately in the specification. Against roughly 190,000 square feet of residential area across 70 recorded units, the arithmetic works out near 2,700 square feet per apartment — a figure with no real peer in the borough's cooperative stock.

The original specification is worth reading because so much of it survives as the thing a renovated apartment is renovated around. White oak floors laid in French herringbone with borders in the living rooms, dining rooms, galleries and libraries. Wood-burning fireplaces where the plans located them, left in rough masonry for owners to face themselves. Recessed Murray copper radiators on a two-pipe low-pressure vacuum system. Master baths tiled to seven feet five inches in colored matte glaze with faience floors. A cedar closet and a locked wine closet in every apartment. A lobby floored in twelve-inch black-and-white Vermont marble squares with a green marble base and panelling copied from an old English house. Eight elevator men on the 1929 payroll, plus a superintendent, an assistant superintendent, two doormen, three porters and two seasonal firemen.

Then there is the boundary. When the Landmarks Preservation Commission designated the Park Slope Historic District in 1973, it took in the entire block — every brownstone on Garfield Place and Montgomery Place, the whole Eighth Avenue frontage — and went around this building. So did the 2012 Extension and the 2016 Extension II. The result is a two-sided fact that a buyer should hear plainly. On one side, the co-op controls its own envelope: windows, façade work and rooftop projects need a DOB permit and a board vote, not a Landmarks certificate, which is why the corporation could run a $1.2 million façade contract in 2019–2020 without an approvals cycle in front of it. On the other side, the protection that keeps the block's context fixed does not attach to this address, and the building's own future alterations are governed by nothing stricter than zoning and the board's taste.

Architecture and unit composition

The building occupies the full 100-foot Prospect Park West frontage north of Garfield Place and runs 165 feet back, on a 16,500-square-foot lot. Built floor area is roughly 191,650 square feet — a built FAR near 11.6 against 6.02 permitted under today's R8X zoning. The Department of Finance counts eighteen stories; the 1929 plan describes fifteen stories plus two penthouses, and the two accounts are best read as describing the same massing from different conventions.

The main entrance is on Garfield Place, not the avenue — a Roth planning decision that keeps the park frontage entirely residential and gives the corner apartments uninterrupted exposure. A separate service entrance handles deliveries through the basement. As built the building ran two passenger cabs finished in wood and two metal service cabs; the specification is explicit that Roth arranged apartments so that residents would not walk long corridors and would not face each other's doors across a landing.

Because the apartment mix runs from five rooms to thirteen, the intra-building price spread here is wider than in almost any comparable Brooklyn cooperative, and floor is not the dominant variable — line and configuration are. A park-front simplex, a Garfield Place line, a maisonette with a private entrance and a penthouse duplex are four different products in one building, and they should be comped as such. Renovation state matters more than usual as well: apartments of this size carry renovation budgets that can rival the purchase price of a two-bedroom elsewhere in the district.

Building operations

35 Park West Corporation operates on a fiscal year ending September 30 and runs a genuinely large budget for a 70-unit building — total cost of operations above $2.7 million in recent audited years. Two lines dominate. New York City real estate taxes ran roughly $900,000 in fiscal 2020, against a building that is fully depreciated for accounting purposes. Payroll, payroll taxes and union benefits together exceeded $1.1 million. Substantially all employees are covered by an SEIU Local 32BJ collective bargaining agreement, and the corporation contributes to the Building Service 32BJ multiemployer pension fund, which its auditors disclose as having been certified in "red" — critical — status for the plan year ended June 30, 2020, with a rehabilitation plan in place. That disclosure is standard across union-staffed New York buildings and is not specific to this address, but it belongs in a buyer's file.

Capital spending has been heavy and recent. The corporation signed a $1,211,005 façade contract with Skyline Restoration Inc. plus engineering oversight, and had paid roughly $1.09 million of it by September 30, 2020. Property and equipment additions ran $1.11 million in fiscal 2020 alone. Funding came from the capital assessment in force since 2016 — $3.07 per share monthly in 2016, stepping down through $2.46, $1.50, $1.5345 and $1.5575 to roughly $1.58 per share for the year ending September 2021 — together with the 2 percent transfer fee, both of which flow to the reserve rather than to operations. Between them they produced more than $600,000 in fiscal 2020.

The consequence is visible on the balance sheet: the reserve fund fell from about $922,000 to about $359,000 over fiscal 2020 as the façade money went out the door. The corporation refinanced on June 5, 2018 with a $1,300,000 fifteen-year self-amortizing mortgage at 4.107 percent maturing July 1, 2033, and holds an undrawn $500,000 line of credit alongside it. Maintenance rose 5.0 percent effective October 2019 and 4.1 percent effective October 2020. No reserve study has been performed and the auditors note the omission. Ask for the current reserve balance, the status of the façade program, and whether the capital assessment is still running.

Two small revenue lines are worth knowing because they are unusual: the corporation licenses rooftop antenna space for $12,000 a year, and it bills storage separately from maintenance.

Policy framework

Purchaser review: Applicants are reviewed by two shareholder committees — a Finance Committee and a Screening Committee — which recommend to the Board of Directors. The package runs to three years of tax returns, statements of net worth with support for cash and securities, a statement of current annual income, salary confirmation where the employer has changed, the contract of sale, the lender's recognition agreement, a bank or brokerage reference letter sent directly to the committee, three business references and three personal references, all of whom are contacted, plus a signed acknowledgment that the applicant has read the house rules. Plan for a long timeline; the corporation's own guidance warns that reference confirmation is the bottleneck.

Financing: The application for residence states a limit of 75 percent of the purchase price.

Flip tax / transfer fee: 2 percent of the gross sales price, charged to the seller, or in certain cases measured against appraised value. It is treated as paid-in capital for tax purposes, segregated in a reserve account and released only by majority vote of the board. Transfer fees produced $309,400 in fiscal 2020 and $227,500 in fiscal 2019.

Capital assessment: In force continuously since 2016 at a per-share monthly rate revised annually. Confirm the current rate and the projected end date.

Pets: No dog or cat without the board's express written permission; animals must be carried or leashed in public portions.

Alterations: Governed by the corporation's Construction and Renovation Guidelines, available from the building manager, which shareholders are responsible for enforcing on their contractors.

Marketing and access: The building manager must be told in advance of any broker or prospective-buyer visit; the seller must notify the board in writing before listing; the corporation's attorney must be retained by the seller for the stock transfer; and the rules as written state that the building's address may not be used in public advertising. Establish the board's current position on that last point before you build a marketing plan.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟢
Strong — under cap in both periods
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
Per unit / month range

Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
SWARMP
What this means for you

The latest available filing classified the facade as SWARMP — Safe With A Repair and Maintenance Program: the engineer identified conditions requiring monitoring or repair before the next inspection cycle. The scope, timeline, and how the building funds the work are building-specific — we review the filings and board materials for you.

Inspection history
2005–10
Safe
2010–15
Safe
2015–20
SWARMP
2020–25
SWARMP
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2029
Assessed · 2005–10 to 2020–25
$4,000 in filing penalties
payment status not in the record
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs required before the next inspection cycle.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Penalties shown are amounts DOB assessed against filings on record across 2005–10 to 2020–25. The FISP dataset does not record whether they were paid, contested or remain open, so treat the figure as history rather than a current balance and confirm the building’s standing with the managing agent.

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

Recent transfers at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Jul 13, 20263B
4 BR · 3.5 BA
$4,325,000+8.1%
Apr 15, 202611B
3 BR · 4 BA
$3,207,000-8.4%
Dec 9, 20257E
2 BR · 2 BA
$2,250,000-9.8%
Aug 28, 20256A
3 BR · 3 BA
$2,575,000-6.4%
Jun 9, 202514C
3 BR · 3 BA · 2,830 sf
$3,400,000$1,201/sf+4.6%
Feb 18, 20259A
3 BR · 3 BA · 2,126 sf
$2,875,000$1,352/sf+0.0%
Feb 5, 202510B
3 BR · 2.5 BA
$3,400,000+13.5%
Jul 31, 20245E
3 BR · 2.5 BA · 1,436 sf
$1,995,000$1,389/sf+0.0%

Market read. $/sf is measured on the latest sales with reliable square footage (2025): a median $1,176/sf across 2 sales. The building has traded as recently as 2026. Median listing discount 1.6% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

14C · 2,830 sf+15%
$2,950,000 ($1,042/sf) 2021$3,400,000 ($1,201/sf) 2025
12C+1%
$3,375,000 2020$3,400,000 2021
7D · 2,200 sf-30%
$3,500,000 2017$2,450,000 ($1,114/sf) 2019
View all 67 recorded transfers, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 3-01073-0041) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.

What to know if you’re buying

You are buying square footage that does not exist elsewhere in the borough. Simplexes of five to eight rooms, duplexes of eleven to thirteen, two maisonettes with private street entrances. Decide which product you are actually shopping for before you compare prices.

Model the carrying cost honestly. A union staff, a fully attended building and a nine-hundred-thousand-dollar tax bill produce maintenance figures that shock buyers coming from smaller Park Slope co-ops. Run the True Monthly Carrying Cost against the specific apartment's share count.

Ask where the capital program stands. A $1.2 million façade contract, a reserve drawn down from roughly $922,000 to $359,000 in one year, and a capital assessment running since 2016. Get the current reserve balance and the board's forward plan.

The 2 percent transfer fee is the seller's, but price it anyway. It shapes what sellers will accept and it shows up in every negotiation in the building.

Understand what the historic district exclusion means. No Landmarks review on windows or façade work — faster and cheaper capital projects, and no LPC protection attaching to this building either way.

Budget the board package time. Two shareholder committees, three years of returns, six references contacted individually, and a 75 percent financing ceiling.

What to know if you’re selling

Lead with the plan and the provenance. An Emery Roth commission, built as a cooperative in 1929 and never converted, with room counts no competing building can match. That is a short, checkable story and it is the whole listing.

Comp your line, not the building. Averaging across a five-room simplex and a thirteen-room duplex produces a number that helps nobody. Use same-line and same-configuration sales.

Disclose the transfer fee and the assessment early. A 2 percent seller-paid fee and an ongoing capital assessment are both better handled in the first conversation than in the third.

Confirm the advertising rule before you plan marketing. The corporation's written rules restrict use of the building address in public advertising and require advance notice of broker visits. Get the board's current position in writing.

Have the corporation's financial record ready. Audited statements running back decades, a documented façade program and a self-amortizing mortgage maturing in 2033 are underwriting assets with both the board and the buyer's lender.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 35 Prospect Park West, also evaluate:

Preparing a board package for this building?

The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.

Considering a move at 35 Prospect Park West?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com