- Year built
- 1866
- Type
- Condominium
- Units
- 9
- Floors
- 4
- Landmark
- No
- Pets
- Case by case, per listing records — confirm with the managing agent
Every recorded sale at this building, 2004–2025
Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.
- Median $/sf
- $1,592
- Listing discount
- 0.0%
- Recorded sales
- 16
- On record
- 2004–2025
Most Tribeca loft conversions are single buildings. This one is three, joined behind a single 77-foot elevation on a corner.
The Landmarks Preservation Commission designates the property as 363–367 Greenwich Street and gives it a single construction date of 1866, a single architect — Gage Inslee — and a single commissioning owner, William Kain. That is unusually early for the surrounding stock: the Tribeca West Historic District is dominated by the 1880s and 1890s, and the buildings on the rest of this tax block date from 1881 through 1930, by Thomas R. Jackson, Detlef Lienau, Napoleon Le Brun & Sons and others. The Mondo predates nearly all of them. LPC records the building as Italianate, faced in cast iron over brick, with a pressed-metal cornice, and built as commercial store and lofts.
Four stories is small for the district, and it produces the building's defining characteristic. Nine residences, three to a floor, on a corner lot 77 feet wide and 102 feet deep, means every apartment has genuine width and every apartment on the corner lines has two exposures. The elevator is key-locked and opens directly into each residence, so there are no interior corridors and no shared landings above the ground floor. Ceilings run roughly ten and a half to twelve feet. This is what a mid-nineteenth-century loft floor plate gives you when it is subdivided lightly rather than densely, and it is the reason the building trades where it does.
The conversion is old. The declaration was recorded May 1, 1984, and individual units were deeded out through 1984 and 1985, which places The Mondo among the first wave of Tribeca loft condominiums — a full seven years before the neighborhood was designated. That sequence matters: the building was converted when Tribeca was still a manufacturing district in transition, and the residential fabric was already in place when the Landmarks Preservation Commission arrived in 1991. Designation locked in the elevation the conversion had inherited.
The ground floor never went residential. Roughly 10,000 of the building's 29,000 square feet is commercial, held in three separate unit lots at the base — 1A, 1B and 1C — and in continuous use. Department of Buildings records show a run of restaurant filings on the first floor and cellar from 2010 forward: new eating-and-drinking establishment applications, kitchen exhaust and fire-suppression work, condenser relocations to the rear yard and inner court. A prospective purchaser should treat this as a defining feature rather than a footnote. Restaurant tenancy at the base of a nine-unit building means mechanical equipment, refuse handling, delivery traffic and late hours are shared conditions, and it also means the condominium's income and expense structure is materially affected by the commercial units' share.
Architecture and unit composition
The elevation is a cast-iron and brick store-and-loft front of 1866, running 77 feet along Greenwich Street and turning the corner at Harrison. Cast iron is LPC's recorded primary material, with brick secondary and a pressed-metal cornice above. The storefront openings at the base and the window rhythm above are the protected features; both are original to the store-and-loft program, and both are the elements a Certificate of Appropriateness application would turn on.
Above the ground floor the building holds nine residences on three floors — 2A, 2B, 2C; 3A, 3B, 3C; 4A, 4B, 4C. Residential area totals 19,244 square feet, which averages roughly 2,100 square feet per residence before accounting for the duplex condition at the top. Department of Buildings applications from 2000 and 2004 record a rooftop addition and the creation of a duplex apartment by adding penthouse space above a fourth-floor residence, along with roof decking adjacent to a second-floor unit — so the top of the building is not uniform and outdoor space is unevenly distributed. Any buyer should confirm exactly what is deeded to a particular unit, because at this building roof rights and terrace access are unit-specific rather than building-wide.
PLUTO's missing floor count for this lot is worth naming because it recurs on condominium billing lots and can send a buyer or an appraiser to the wrong conclusion. The Department of Finance assessment roll carries four stories for every residential unit lot in the building; the unit designations run only to the fourth floor; and Department of Buildings applications from 2000 forward consistently state nine dwelling units. The building is four stories with rooftop additions above, and PLUTO simply does not record the figure.
Building operations
There is no staff. Nine residential owners share an elevator, a lobby and a set of building systems with three commercial unit owners at the base. That produces low common charges by Tribeca standards and a correspondingly high per-unit exposure to any capital item, since a nine-way split absorbs almost nothing.
The capital record on file with the Department of Buildings is, for a building this size, reassuringly active. The condominium filed for façade repairs, repointing, masonry work and cornice repair in 2011; a full roof replacement and waterproofing in 2016; a lobby renovation with egress modifications in 2014; boiler and hot-water heater replacement in 2011; and rooftop air-conditioning equipment replacement in 2019. A sidewalk shed and scaffolding were erected in 2010 and again in 2011 for the façade and roof work. That is a condominium that has been maintaining a 160-year-old cast-iron building rather than deferring on it.
Two operating questions should still be put to the managing agent directly. The first is the residential–commercial allocation: with roughly a third of the building's area in commercial units at the base, how are common charges and capital assessments apportioned, and what governance rights do the commercial unit owners hold? The second is the Local Law 11 cycle. A cast-iron and brick façade of 1866 with a pressed-metal cornice, inside a historic district, is an expensive assembly to maintain: every exterior repair runs through LPC as well as DOB, and the permitting adds both cost and time. Ask for the current façade filing status, the reserve balance and the assessment history.
Because no offering plan for this building was located in either document library, the by-laws, house rules, allocation formula and any resale contribution must all come from the managing agent. Budget diligence time accordingly.
Policy framework
Pets are permitted case by case, per listing records — confirm the current rule with the managing agent. Pied-à-terre use, LLC and trust purchases, and subletting are permitted under the standard condominium framework, with the board's remedy on a proposed transfer being a right of first refusal rather than a cooperative-style approval. Residences have in-unit washers and dryers and central air conditioning. Financing terms, any minimum down-payment requirement, and any resale capital contribution are not documented in public records. There is no tax abatement on this building.
Recent sales
The Mondo sells as authentic Tribeca loft product: full-floor-third residences of roughly 2,100 square feet, direct elevator entry, ceilings above ten feet, two street exposures on the corner lines, and a landmarked 1866 cast-iron elevation. It competes with the small landmarked loft conversions scattered through the Tribeca West Historic District rather than with new construction, and the comparison a buyer should build is against other buildings of five to fifteen units in converted store-and-loft or warehouse stock.
Three variables move value here. The first is floor and line — the corner units with two exposures and the top-floor residences with rooftop additions are structurally different products from the interior second-floor units. The second is the commercial base: restaurant tenancy directly below a nine-unit building is priced differently by different buyers, and it is the single most polarizing feature of the property. The third is the absence of service. There is no doorman, and for a portion of the Tribeca buyer pool that is disqualifying regardless of the ceilings.
Against those, the building offers what newer Tribeca condominiums cannot manufacture: a genuine 1866 loft floor plate at a scale that has not been subdivided away, and a corner. Index any market read to the last complete year rather than to the partial current one.
Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.
Recent closings at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.
| Date | Unit | Apartment | Price | PPSF | vs. Ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2025 | 4B | 2,512 sf | $4,000,000 | $1,592/sf | off-mkt |
| Aug 8, 2023 | 2C | 3 BR · 2 BA · 2,000 sf | $2,495,000 | $1,248/sf | +0.0% |
| Sep 27, 2021 | 3B | 3 BR · 2 BA · 2,000 sf | $3,495,000 | $1,748/sf | +0.0% |
| Nov 3, 2020 | 3A | 3 BR · 2 BA · 2,010 sf | $3,050,000 | $1,517/sf | +0.0% |
| Jan 20, 2015 | 2A | 4 BR · 1,978 sf | $2,725,000 | $1,378/sf | +1.9% |
| Nov 21, 2013 | 2B | 2 BR · 2,010 sf | $2,995,000 | $1,490/sf | +0.0% |
| Jul 13, 2012 | 3A | 3 BR · 2,010 sf | $2,525,000 | $1,256/sf | -4.7% |
| Jun 14, 2010 | 3B | 2 BR · 2,000 sf | $2,600,000 | $1,300/sf | +4.0% |
Market read. Most recent trades (2025) cleared a median $1,592/sf across 1 sale. Median listing discount 0.0% from the last ask.
The retrade record
Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.
Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.
Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-00181-7502) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.
What to know if you’re buying
Confirm exactly what outdoor space is deeded to the unit. Rooftop additions and roof decking were added to specific residences in 2000, 2004 and later. Terrace and roof rights here are unit-specific. Get it in the deed and the declaration, not from a floor plan.
Underwrite the commercial base. Three commercial unit lots and roughly 10,000 square feet at the ground floor, in restaurant use. Ask about the allocation of common charges, the commercial units' governance rights, and how mechanical equipment, refuse and delivery logistics are managed.
Price the landmark permitting, not just the landmark status. Every exterior repair on a cast-iron 1866 façade runs through the Landmarks Preservation Commission as well as the Department of Buildings. Work touching the storefronts, window openings or cornice needs a Certificate of Appropriateness after a public hearing. On a nine-unit building that cost divides nine ways.
There is no offering plan on file in either library. By-laws, house rules and the policy stack must come from the managing agent.
Read the capital record as a positive. Façade and cornice work in 2011, roof replacement in 2016, boiler replacement in 2011, lobby work in 2014. A small condominium that files and does the work is a better risk than one that does not.
What to know if you’re selling
Lead with the floor plate and the corner. Roughly 2,100 square feet with direct elevator entry, ceilings above ten feet, and two exposures on the corner lines is what buyers cannot find in newer Tribeca inventory at this size.
Get the history right and use it. An 1866 Gage Inslee store-and-loft row in the Tribeca West Historic District, converted in 1984 — seven years before designation. The 1866 date is unusually early for the district and is verifiable in the Landmarks Preservation Commission's own record.
Have the capital answers ready. Buyers of a nine-unit 160-year-old building will ask about the façade and the roof. The 2011 façade and cornice work and the 2016 roof replacement are the answer; put them in front of the question.
Address the restaurant directly. It is the first thing every buyer raises. Have the allocation, the noise and mechanical arrangements, and the board's position documented rather than improvised.
Comparable buildings
- 7 Harrison Street — one block east on the same street; an 1894 store-and-loft warehouse converted to twelve residences inside the same historic district. The closest structural analogue in Tribeca
- 155 Franklin Street — small landmarked loft conversion at comparable unit scale and floor-plate character
- 60 Collister Street — boutique Tribeca loft ownership with a similar buyer pool
- 39 North Moore Street — full-floor loft residences in a converted Tribeca warehouse
- 27 North Moore Street — comparable small-building loft product inside the district
- 92 Laight Street — converted loft ownership at similar residence sizes
- 387 Greenwich Street — the same street, two blocks north; a useful direct Greenwich Street comparison
- 335 Greenwich Street — Greenwich Street loft ownership at a different scale and service level
- 311 Greenwich Street — nearby Greenwich Street inventory for buyers weighing conversion against later construction
- 145 Hudson Street — a block east; landmarked Tribeca conversion with a larger unit count and a fuller service model
The neighborhood
For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across Tribeca — read The Roebling Team Guide to Tribeca.
How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent.
Considering a move at The Mondo. The condominium is recorded with the Department of Finance as Mondo Condo, and that is the name that appears on PLUTO and on the Department of Buildings filings the condominium has made since the 1990s?
Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.
Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.
A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at The Mondo. The condominium is recorded with the Department of Finance as Mondo Condo, and that is the name that appears on PLUTO and on the Department of Buildings filings the condominium has made since the 1990s would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.