710 West End Avenue
710 West End Avenue, New York, NY 10025
BBL 1012420062 · BIN 1033688
- Year built
- 1928
- Type
- Cooperative
- Floors
- 16
- Landmark status
- Not an individual landmark; in the Riverside-West End Historic District Extension II
- NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission records, updated February 2026
- Subletting by shareholders
- Permitted
- Flip tax
- Tiered or formula; see fees
- Doorman
- Full-time doorman
Every recorded sale at this building, 2003–2026
Bedroom-by-bedroom medians, the full transfer record, and how units trade against ask.
- 1BR median, 2023–2026
- $720K
- 3 qualifying sales
- Recent range
- $713K – $1.5M
- Listing discount
- 3.7%
- Recorded transfers
- 88
Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.
A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at The Wester York would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.
West End Avenue between 94th and 95th is one of the quieter stretches of the corridor: a continuous wall of 1910s and 1920s apartment houses, no commercial frontage, and — behind the avenue line on the same tax block — Pomander Walk, the 1921 mock-Tudor enclave that has been a designated individual landmark since 1982. 710 West End Avenue is a George F. Pelham building from the end of the corridor's great apartment-house decade, sixteen stories of Classical Revival brick and terra cotta over a limestone base, and it sits in the middle of that block front.
Pelham was one of the corridor's defining architects, and the Landmarks Preservation Commission's own building record for this tax lot names him, dates the building 1926–1928 and classes it Classical Revival. That matters procedurally as well as historically: the lot is inside the Riverside–West End Historic District Extension II, designated June 23, 2015, which brought roughly 344 buildings between West 94th and West 108th Streets under Commission jurisdiction. Exterior alterations here — including windows, storefronts, through-wall units and rooftop work — generally require LPC approval, with staff review available for eligible work and exemptions for some maintenance. That is a recent condition, not an old one, and it is the single most consequential change in the building's regulatory life since the conversion.
The conversion itself is worth stating precisely, because secondary sources get it wrong in both directions. Coronet Properties Company bought the building on August 18, 1982 and incorporated the apartment corporation that October. The plan was presented to tenants on June 14, 1983 as an eviction plan under General Business Law §352-eeee — a structure that required 51 percent of occupied apartments to purchase, and that New York's 2019 housing legislation ended for new conversion plans. Ninety-two apartments were offered, every one of them then rent-controlled or rent-stabilised. The closing to the apartment corporation happened in October 1984. So: 1982 is the sponsor's purchase, 1983 is the offering, 1984 is the co-op. Sponsor control ended in 1985, and resident shareholders have run the board ever since.
The year-end 2020 statements describe a July 2020 refinancing into a $3.5 million ten-year loan at 3.00 percent, excess proceeds that quadrupled the reserve fund and a $500,000 credit line undrawn at that year-end. Those are historical figures, not current available reserves or debt balances; obtain updated statements and confirm the reported August 2030 maturity alongside the façade funding plan.
Architecture and unit composition
Sixteen stories, a 93-foot avenue frontage, a footprint of roughly 78 by 94 feet, and just under 100,000 gross square feet. Recorded gross floor area works out to a ratio of 10.65 against the 6.02 residential FAR of current R8 zoning; that simple comparison does not establish legal zoning floor area or what future work is permitted.
The apartment plan is legible from the recorded transfers: lines A through F running from the second floor to the sixteenth, a ground-floor residence, and a penthouse designated PHA. Six apartments per floor across fifteen residential floors accounts for the original ninety-two, and the drift down to eighty-nine in the current audited statements is combinations — recorded mergers include 2C with 2D, 6E with 6F, 10E with 10F, and a 2019–2020 combination joining 6E/6F with 7F across two floors. The building's larger homes are therefore made, not original, and they are made in the E and F lines more than anywhere else.
For a 1928 Pelham on West End Avenue, expect what the type delivers: entry foyers, defined rooms, real dining space, high ceilings and thick masonry between apartments. Exposures are the differentiator — the avenue-facing lines look west across West End Avenue, and the rear lines look east over the interior of a block that holds low-rise Pomander Walk rather than a wall of towers.
Building operations
Full service, union staffed, with a 24-hour attended lobby and a live-in resident manager. Payroll is by far the largest line in the operating budget, which is normal for a building of this size and staffing model, and the corporation contributes to the Building Service 32BJ funds under the standard apartment building agreement.
The building carries no garage and no recreation facility — the offering plan was explicit about that in 1983 and nothing has been added. What it does carry is a bulk cable and internet arrangement, central laundry, and rentable storage, each of which shows up as its own revenue line in the audited statements. Shareholders should read the cable and internet line for what it is: a bulk contract that lowers individual bills and raises the maintenance base.
The capital record is steady rather than dramatic. West façade masonry restoration was filed in 2004; further façade repairs in 2010 and 2016; the boiler burner was converted to dual gas/oil operation with a new gas service in 2014; elevator upgrades, security cameras and lobby furniture were capitalised in 2019, alongside the elevator door lock monitoring project that the August 2019 special assessment funded.
The live item is the exterior. The building's Cycle 9 façade report, filed January 2024, is SWARMP — safe with a repair and maintenance programme — which commits the owner to specific repairs by the completion date set in that report (one to five years after filing) rather than a clean bill. Consistent with that, façade and roof work was permitted in March 2025, a heavy-duty sidewalk shed was permitted in April 2025, façade repairs were permitted in May 2025, and further façade repairs were approved in January 2026; the filings do not show whether the work is complete. Any buyer should ask for the engineer's report, the current scope and cost, the reserve balance, and whether an assessment is contemplated.
Policy framework
Ownership form: Cooperative. You are buying shares in 710 West End Owners Corp. and a proprietary lease, not real property, and the purchase requires board approval after a full package and an interview.
Transfer fee: 3 percent of the net profit on the resale of shares, per the audited financial statements on file. Because it is levied on profit rather than on price, the calculation depends on your basis — including, potentially, capitalised improvements — so establish with the managing agent exactly how the corporation computes "net profit" before you price a sale.
Subletting: the proprietary lease bars assignment of the lease or subletting of the apartment without board consent, and provides that the board may impose whatever conditions it desires and charge a fee determined by the board. The operating statements carry a sublet-fee revenue line, so sublets are granted. The seasoning requirement, the maximum term and the current fee are not published — get them in writing from the managing agent.
Financing ceiling, minimum down payment, post-closing liquidity, debt-to-income, pied-à-terre use, parent purchases, guarantors, trusts and LLC ownership: none of this is published, and none of it is fixed by the offering plan or the financial statements on file. Prewar West End Avenue cooperatives commonly sit somewhere between 65 and 80 percent maximum financing with a post-closing liquidity requirement expressed as a multiple of annual carrying cost, but that is a corridor generalisation and not a statement about this building. Ask the managing agent for the current requirements before you make an offer, and run the Co-op Board Qualification Calculator against the answer rather than against an assumption.
Real estate taxes and the abatement: the corporation's stated policy is to refund the New York City co-op shareholder property tax abatement at approximately the time it charges its recurring operating assessment. The abatement credit and the assessment are separate items and must be reconciled for the specific apartment. Model the maintenance, the assessment and the credit together.
Landmark review: the lot is inside a designated historic district. Window replacement, through-wall installations, storefront or entrance changes and rooftop work require Landmarks Preservation Commission review. Anything filed before June 2015 was filed under a different regime.
Application and transaction fees
- Terms
- 3 percent of the net profit on the resale of shares, per the audited financial statements on file. A profit-based transfer fee, not a percentage of price and not a per-share charge — a materially different calculation, and one that rewards long holds less punitively than a gross-price flip tax
Source: The Roebling Team's building profile
Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to discuss the building's costs and purchase requirements.
Own an apartment here? Request an apartment-specific pricing review.
Sublet and pied-à-terre policy
A condominium owner leasing a unit and a co-op shareholder subletting are different rules, and a building-wide rule is different from a restriction on one apartment. This is the building's rule; confirm it for the specific apartment.
- Subletting by shareholders
- PermittedSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
- Pied-à-terre ownership
- Not verified
Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to discuss the sublet and pied-à-terre rules for that apartment.
Monthly carrying charges in recent sales
- Maintenance, per room
- $540 per room a monthMedian of 3 recorded sales since October 2023Source: recorded sales, refreshed October 2026
Maintenance as recorded with each sale. A co-op's maintenance already covers the building's real estate taxes and the building's own mortgage, if it has one; add your own loan payment for the monthly outlay. A summary of recorded sales, not a current bill; charges change.
Building staffing and amenities
- Doorman
- Full-time doormanSource: recent listing records
- Attended lobby
- YesSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
- Live-in superintendent
- YesSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
- Elevator
- YesSource: NYC Department of City Planning records (PLUTO)
- Amenities noted
- Laundry roomSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Staffing and amenities as our building profile and recent listing records describe them. A feature not listed is not confirmed absent. Outdoor space, parking and some facilities can belong to particular apartments or to a separate owner; confirm access for the specific apartment.
Local Law 97
- 2024–2029 annual penalty
- $0 (under cap)
- 2030–2034 annual penalty
- $14,785/yr
- Per unit / month range
- $0 – $13
- Modeled exposure split equally across 93 units (the residential count on the city's lot record). Not an assessed amount; co-op shareholders are typically charged by share allocation.
Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.
See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →Facade safety — Local Law 11
The latest available filing classified the facade as SWARMP — Safe With A Repair and Maintenance Program: the inspector (QEWI) identified conditions requiring monitoring or repair, with repairs due by the deadline stated in the filing. The scope, timeline, and how the building funds the work are building-specific — we review the filings and board materials for you.
How to read this, and where it comes from
QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — a licensed professional engineer or registered architect who meets DOB’s FISP qualifications and signs the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).
Penalties shown are amounts DOB assessed against filings on record across 2005–10 to 2020–25. The FISP dataset does not record whether they were paid, contested or remain open, so treat the figure as history rather than a current balance and confirm the building’s standing with the managing agent.
Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.
Recent sales
Turnover is normal and healthy for a building of this size — roughly five recorded share transfers a year across sixty-four distinct apartments since 2004, which produces a usable same-building comparable set. Two apartments remain in holders'-of-unsold-shares hands, about 1.75 percent of the corporation, which is a negligible overhang and not a governance factor.
Pricing here is a per-room and per-square-foot conversation against the West End Avenue prewar cooperative stock — the Pelham, Candela, Blum and Sugarman & Berger buildings that make up the corridor between the high 80s and the high 90s — rather than against the Upper West Side's condominium inventory, where the approval process, the financing terms and the buyer pool are all different. Within the building, value tracks line, floor, exposure and whether the apartment is an original layout or a combination. Combined E/F-line homes are the building's scarce product.
Two things belong in every honest underwriting here: the recurring operating assessment (which the abatement refund offsets rather than eliminates), and the live façade programme. Neither is unusual for a landmarked 1928 building; both should be quantified rather than assumed. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.
Recent transfers at this building, from The Roebling Research Library. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.
| Date | Unit | Apartment | Price | PPSF | vs. Ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2026 | 11C | 1 BR · 1 BA · 870 sf | $780,000 | $897/sf | -5.5% |
| Feb 2, 2026 | 14B | 2 BR · 2 BA | $1,425,000 | -3.4% | |
| Dec 4, 2025 | 9A | 2 BR · 2 BA | $1,290,000 | -7.7% | |
| Oct 9, 2024 | 4A | 2 BR · 2 BA · 1,200 sf | $1,530,000 | $1,275/sf | +2.3% |
| Aug 22, 2023 | 9C | 1 BR · 1 BA | $720,000 | -4.0% | |
| Apr 11, 2023 | 14E | 1 BR · 1 BA | $712,500 | -1.7% | |
| Dec 15, 2022 | 10EF | 2 BR · 2 BA | $1,635,000 | -13.7% | |
| Nov 15, 2022 | 4E | 1 BR · 1 BA | $682,000 | -1.9% |
Market read. Most recent trades (2026 to date) cleared a median $813/sf (floor-adjusted) across 1 sale. Floor-adjusted means each sale is restated to a constant mix of floors, so the figure can differ from the plain median of the sales listed above. Median listing discount 1.7% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.
The retrade record
Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.
Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.
Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01242-0062). Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified in The Roebling Research Library. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.
What would your apartment rent for?
Enter your apartment and I'll send you what it would rent for, from comparable closed leases at The Wester York and nearby.
At the recent median sale of $1.29M (3 transfers in the past 24 months, since October 21, 2024), a buyer putting 25% down would pay about $26,288 to close, or 2.0% of the price.
- Mansion tax: $12,900
- No mortgage recording tax or title insurance on a co-op purchase
- Attorneys, lender, building fees and filings: $13,388
Assumes a resale (the seller pays transfer taxes), a $4,500 attorney fee and a mortgage on the rest.
Keep up with The Wester York and its market
The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings like The Wester York. Unsubscribe anytime.
We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.
What to know if you’re buying
Budget the board process properly. This is a full cooperative approval: a complete financial package, tax returns, reference letters and an interview. Nothing about the requirements is published. Get the current package, the financing ceiling and the post-closing liquidity standard from the managing agent before you write an offer, not after.
Understand the flip tax before you buy, not before you sell. Three percent of net profit is a different animal from three percent of price. It affects your eventual exit math, and how the corporation computes basis is the whole question.
Model maintenance plus the operating assessment, and reconcile the abatement credit separately. The corporation refunds the shareholder tax abatement at roughly the same time it bills the assessment; the two must be reconciled for the specific apartment, not netted. Run the True Monthly Carrying Cost Calculator on the combined number.
Ask for the façade file. Cycle 9 was filed SWARMP in January 2024 and work has been permitted through 2025 and into 2026. Request the engineer's report, the scope, the cost and the funding plan.
Confirm the reported 2030 mortgage maturity. The year-end 2020 statements describe a $3.5 million underlying loan at 3.00 percent maturing August 1, 2030. Request current terms and the board's refinancing plan; future rates are unknown.
Landmark review is real. Window and other exterior alterations generally require LPC approval; eligible work can receive staff approval and visibility alone does not require a Commission hearing. Price renovation accordingly.
No garage, no gym. This is a full-service prewar house, not an amenity building, and it has never claimed to be one.
What to know if you’re selling
Lead with the architect, the district and the plan. A landmarked Pelham on West End Avenue with prewar room proportions is a specific product, and the buyer who wants it is not shopping condominiums.
State the conversion history correctly. 1982 was the sponsor's purchase; the co-op closed in October 1984. Getting this right in your materials pre-empts a diligence question.
Present the balance sheet. The year-end 2020 statements describe a 3.00 percent underlying mortgage, a reserve fund quadrupled at refinancing, a line of credit undrawn at that year-end and a concluded 2019 special assessment. Obtain current balances and terms, and provide the underlying Research Library documents to buyers' counsel.
Be direct about the façade programme. Buyers' attorneys pull FISP records. A scoped, funded project explained up front reads very differently from one discovered in week three.
Condition sells here. The buyer pool for prewar West End Avenue is deliberate and renovation-literate. Renovated apartments clear at premiums; estate condition clears when it is priced to the renovation math. Run the Renovation Cost Calculator against your asking strategy.
Comparable buildings
If you're considering 710 West End Avenue, also evaluate:
- 675 West End Avenue — a 1925 cooperative by the same architect, George F. Pelham; the closest like-for-like in authorship and vintage
- 720 West End Avenue — the 1927 building immediately to the north, converted to condominium; the same block front and the ownership-form alternative
- 755 West End Avenue — Rosario Candela, 1925; the corridor's prestige step-up a block north
- 760 West End Avenue — George and Edward Blum, 1926; the same decade and the same conversion era
- 685 West End Avenue — Sugarman & Berger, 1928; the closest peer by year of construction
- 680 West End Avenue — Rouse & Goldstone, 1916–1918; the earlier-generation alternative on the avenue
- 595 West End Avenue — a 1922–23 prewar rental converted to condominium; the condominium comparison further south
- 514 West End Avenue — Gaetano Ajello, 1923–24, in the Riverside–West End Historic District Extension I; the same corridor under the district's earlier expansion
- 250 West 94th Street — Sugarman & Berger, 1925; the side-street cooperative alternative a block away
- 310 Riverside Drive — a 1929 cooperative on the parkfront; the Riverside Drive alternative at the same vintage
- 336 West End Avenue — the corridor comparison in the 70s
- 215 West 95th Street — a 1986 ground-up condominium a block north; the new-construction alternative in the immediate area
More West End Avenue buildings
- 675 West End Avenue — 1925 co-op by George F. Pelham
- 680 West End Avenue — 1918 by W. K. Rouse & L. A. Goldstone
- 685 West End Avenue — 1928 co-op by Sugarman & Berger
- 720 West End Avenue — 1927 condominium by Emery Roth
- 732 West End Avenue — condominium
- 747 West End Avenue — 1912 co-op
The neighborhood
For the full corridor — architecture, transit, and pricing across West End Avenue — read The Roebling Team Guide to West End Avenue.
The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.
How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.
Considering a move at The Wester York?
Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com