Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,600/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $270K/room 2%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $472K/room 18%CPW $355K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,313/sf 24%Greenwich Village $2,455/sf 10%
Full index →
Cooperative · 1928
The Wester York, per architectural and listing records
710 West End Avenue, New York, NY 10025

710 West End Avenue

710 West End Avenue, New York, NY 10025

Upper West Side

BBL 1012420062 · BIN 1033688

At a glance
Year built
1928
Type
Cooperative
Floors
16
Landmark
No
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2003–2026

Bedroom-by-bedroom medians, the full transfer record, and how units trade against ask.

1BR median
$720K
Recent range
$713K – $1.6M
Listing discount
3.7%
Recorded transfers
88

West End Avenue between 94th and 95th is one of the quieter stretches of the corridor: a continuous wall of 1910s and 1920s apartment houses, no commercial frontage, and — behind the avenue line on the same tax block — Pomander Walk, the 1921 mock-Tudor enclave that has been a designated individual landmark since 1982. 710 West End Avenue is a George F. Pelham building from the end of the corridor's great apartment-house decade, sixteen stories of Classical Revival brick and terra cotta over a limestone base, and it sits in the middle of that block front.

Pelham was one of the corridor's defining architects, and the Landmarks Preservation Commission's own building record for this tax lot names him, dates the building 1926–1928 and classes it Classical Revival. That matters procedurally as well as historically: the lot is inside the Riverside–West End Historic District Extension II, designated June 23, 2015, which brought roughly 344 buildings between West 94th and West 108th Streets under Commission jurisdiction. Any exterior change here — windows, storefronts, through-wall units, rooftop work — now requires Commission review. That is a recent condition, not an old one, and it is the single most consequential change in the building's regulatory life since the conversion.

The conversion itself is worth stating precisely, because secondary sources get it wrong in both directions. Coronet Properties Company bought the building on August 18, 1982 and incorporated the apartment corporation that October. The plan was presented to tenants on June 14, 1983 as an eviction plan under General Business Law §352-eeee — a structure that required 51 percent of occupied apartments to purchase, and that has not been available for Manhattan conversions in decades. Ninety-two apartments were offered, every one of them then rent-controlled or rent-stabilised. The closing to the apartment corporation happened in October 1984. So: 1982 is the sponsor's purchase, 1983 is the offering, 1984 is the co-op. Sponsor control ended in 1985, and resident shareholders have run the board ever since.

Financially the building reads conservative. The corporation refinanced its underlying mortgage in July 2020 into a $3.5 million ten-year loan at 3.00 percent, took out enough excess proceeds to quadruple the reserve fund, and added an undrawn $500,000 line of credit as a backstop. Debt of that size against ninety-odd apartments in a fully depreciated 1928 building is modest, and the rate is one that will look very good until 2030 — which is also the number a buyer should be watching, because a maturity in August 2030 on a building with an active façade programme is the next real decision point.

Architecture and unit composition

Sixteen stories, a 93-foot avenue frontage, a footprint of roughly 78 by 94 feet, and just under 100,000 gross square feet. The building is heavily over-built relative to current R8 zoning — a floor area ratio of 10.65 against 6.02 permitted — which is a settled, grandfathered condition and simply means the lot holds more building than it could hold today.

The apartment plan is legible from the recorded transfers: lines A through F running from the second floor to the sixteenth, a ground-floor residence, and a penthouse designated PHA. Six apartments per floor across fifteen residential floors accounts for the original ninety-two, and the drift down to eighty-nine in the current audited statements is combinations — recorded mergers include 2C with 2D, 6E with 6F, 10E with 10F, and a 2019–2020 combination joining 6E/6F with 7F across two floors. The building's larger homes are therefore made, not original, and they are made in the E and F lines more than anywhere else.

For a 1928 Pelham on West End Avenue, expect what the type delivers: entry foyers, defined rooms, real dining space, high ceilings and thick masonry between apartments. Exposures are the differentiator — the avenue-facing lines look west across West End Avenue, and the rear lines look east over the interior of a block that holds low-rise Pomander Walk rather than a wall of towers.

Building operations

Full service, union staffed, with a 24-hour attended lobby and a live-in resident manager. Payroll is by far the largest line in the operating budget, which is normal for a building of this size and staffing model, and the corporation contributes to the Building Service 32BJ funds under the standard apartment building agreement.

The building carries no garage and no recreation facility — the offering plan was explicit about that in 1983 and nothing has been added. What it does carry is a bulk cable and internet arrangement, central laundry, and rentable storage, each of which shows up as its own revenue line in the audited statements. Shareholders should read the cable and internet line for what it is: a bulk contract that lowers individual bills and raises the maintenance base.

The capital record is steady rather than dramatic. West façade masonry restoration was filed in 2004; further façade repairs in 2010 and 2016; the boiler burner was converted to dual gas/oil operation with a new gas service in 2014; elevator upgrades, security cameras and lobby furniture were capitalised in 2019, alongside the elevator door lock monitoring project that the August 2019 special assessment funded.

The live item is the exterior. The building's Cycle 9 façade report, filed January 2024, is SWARMP — safe with a repair and maintenance programme — which is a commitment to specific repairs before the next cycle rather than a clean bill. Consistent with that, façade and roof work was permitted in March 2025, a heavy-duty sidewalk shed went up in April 2025, façade repairs were permitted in May 2025, and further façade repairs were approved in January 2026. Any buyer should ask for the engineer's report, the current scope and cost, the reserve balance, and whether an assessment is contemplated.

Policy framework

Ownership form: Cooperative. You are buying shares in 710 West End Owners Corp. and a proprietary lease, not real property, and the purchase requires board approval after a full package and an interview.

Transfer fee: 3 percent of the net profit on the resale of shares, per the audited financial statements on file. Because it is levied on profit rather than on price, the calculation depends on your basis — including, potentially, capitalised improvements — so establish with the managing agent exactly how the corporation computes "net profit" before you price a sale.

Subletting: the proprietary lease bars assignment of the lease or subletting of the apartment without board consent, and provides that the board may impose whatever conditions it desires and charge a fee determined by the board. The operating statements carry a sublet-fee revenue line, so sublets are granted. The seasoning requirement, the maximum term and the current fee are not published — get them in writing from the managing agent.

Financing ceiling, minimum down payment, post-closing liquidity, debt-to-income, pied-à-terre use, parent purchases, guarantors, trusts and LLC ownership: none of this is published, and none of it is fixed by the offering plan or the financial statements on file. Prewar West End Avenue cooperatives commonly sit somewhere between 65 and 80 percent maximum financing with a post-closing liquidity requirement expressed as a multiple of annual carrying cost, but that is a corridor generalisation and not a statement about this building. Ask the managing agent for the current requirements before you make an offer, and run the Co-op Board Qualification Calculator against the answer rather than against an assumption.

Real estate taxes and the abatement: the corporation's stated policy is to refund the New York City co-op shareholder property tax abatement at approximately the time it charges its recurring operating assessment. The abatement therefore does not reduce a shareholder's net carry the way it does in buildings that pass it through and stop there. Model the maintenance and the assessment together.

Landmark review: the lot is inside a designated historic district. Window replacement, through-wall installations, storefront or entrance changes and rooftop work require Landmarks Preservation Commission review. Anything filed before June 2015 was filed under a different regime.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟢
Strong — under cap in both periods
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
Per unit / month range

Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
SWARMP
What this means for you

The latest available filing classified the facade as SWARMP — Safe With A Repair and Maintenance Program: the engineer identified conditions requiring monitoring or repair before the next inspection cycle. The scope, timeline, and how the building funds the work are building-specific — we review the filings and board materials for you.

Inspection history
2005–10
SWARMP
2010–15
SWARMP
2015–20
SWARMP
2020–25
SWARMP
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2029
Assessed · 2005–10 to 2020–25
$28,250 in filing penalties
payment status not in the record
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs required before the next inspection cycle.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Penalties shown are amounts DOB assessed against filings on record across 2005–10 to 2020–25. The FISP dataset does not record whether they were paid, contested or remain open, so treat the figure as history rather than a current balance and confirm the building’s standing with the managing agent.

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

Turnover is normal and healthy for a building of this size — roughly five recorded share transfers a year across sixty-four distinct apartments since 2004, which produces a usable same-building comparable set. Two apartments remain in holders'-of-unsold-shares hands, about 1.75 percent of the corporation, which is a negligible overhang and not a governance factor.

Pricing here is a per-room and per-square-foot conversation against the West End Avenue prewar cooperative stock — the Pelham, Candela, Blum and Sugarman & Berger buildings that make up the corridor between the high 80s and the high 90s — rather than against the Upper West Side's condominium inventory, where the approval process, the financing terms and the buyer pool are all different. Within the building, value tracks line, floor, exposure and whether the apartment is an original layout or a combination. Combined E/F-line homes are the building's scarce product.

Two things belong in every honest underwriting here: the recurring operating assessment (which the abatement refund offsets rather than eliminates), and the live façade programme. Neither is unusual for a landmarked 1928 building; both should be quantified rather than assumed. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.

Recent transfers at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Jul 14, 202611C
1 BR · 1 BA · 870 sf
$780,000$897/sf-5.5%
Feb 2, 202614B
2 BR · 2 BA
$1,425,000-3.4%
Dec 4, 20259A
2 BR · 2 BA
$1,290,000-7.7%
Oct 9, 20244A
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,200 sf
$1,530,000$1,275/sf+2.3%
Aug 22, 20239C
1 BR · 1 BA
$720,000-4.0%
Apr 11, 202314E
1 BR · 1 BA
$712,500-1.7%
Dec 15, 202210EF
2 BR · 2 BA
$1,635,000-13.7%
Nov 15, 20224E
1 BR · 1 BA
$682,000-1.9%

Market read. Most recent trades (2026) cleared a median $813/sf across 1 sale. Median listing discount 1.7% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

10B · 1,200 sf+58%
$999,900 2009$1,575,000 ($1,313/sf) 2022
3F · 850 sf+44%
$435,000 ($512/sf) 2003$626,000 ($736/sf) 2006
3E+33%
$600,000 2008$795,000 2014
9D+25%
$617,000 2013$770,000 2021
2E · 700 sf+24%
$395,000 ($564/sf) 2004$490,000 ($700/sf) 2005
View all 88 recorded transfers, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01242-0062) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.

What to know if you’re buying

Budget the board process properly. This is a full cooperative approval: a complete financial package, tax returns, reference letters and an interview. Nothing about the requirements is published. Get the current package, the financing ceiling and the post-closing liquidity standard from the managing agent before you write an offer, not after.

Understand the flip tax before you buy, not before you sell. Three percent of net profit is a different animal from three percent of price. It affects your eventual exit math, and how the corporation computes basis is the whole question.

Model maintenance plus the operating assessment, and treat the abatement as recaptured. The corporation refunds the shareholder tax abatement at roughly the same time it bills the assessment. Run the True Monthly Carrying Cost Calculator on the combined number.

Ask for the façade file. Cycle 9 was filed SWARMP in January 2024 and work has been permitted through 2025 and into 2026. Request the engineer's report, the scope, the cost and the funding plan.

Note the 2030 mortgage maturity. A $3.5 million underlying loan at 3.00 percent matures August 1, 2030. That rate will not be repeated. Ask how the board is thinking about it.

Landmark review is real. Windows and anything else visible from the street require Commission approval. Price renovation accordingly.

No garage, no gym. This is a full-service prewar house, not an amenity building, and it has never claimed to be one.

What to know if you’re selling

Lead with the architect, the district and the plan. A landmarked Pelham on West End Avenue with prewar room proportions is a specific product, and the buyer who wants it is not shopping condominiums.

State the conversion history correctly. 1982 was the sponsor's purchase; the co-op closed in October 1984. Getting this right in your materials pre-empts a diligence question.

Present the balance sheet. A 3.00 percent underlying mortgage, a reserve fund quadrupled at the 2020 refinancing, an undrawn line of credit and a concluded 2019 special assessment are all defensible facts, and we provide the underlying documents from the Research Library to serious buyers' counsel.

Be direct about the façade programme. Buyers' attorneys pull FISP records. A scoped, funded project explained up front reads very differently from one discovered in week three.

Condition sells here. The buyer pool for prewar West End Avenue is deliberate and renovation-literate. Renovated apartments clear at premiums; estate condition clears when it is priced to the renovation math. Run the Renovation Cost Calculator against your asking strategy.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 710 West End Avenue, also evaluate:

  • 675 West End Avenue — a 1925 cooperative by the same architect, George F. Pelham; the closest like-for-like in authorship and vintage
  • 720 West End Avenue — the 1927 building immediately to the north, converted to condominium; the same block front and the ownership-form alternative
  • 755 West End Avenue — Rosario Candela, 1925; the corridor's prestige step-up a block north
  • 760 West End Avenue — George and Edward Blum, 1926; the same decade and the same conversion era
  • 685 West End Avenue — Sugarman & Berger, 1928; the closest peer by year of construction
  • 680 West End Avenue — Rouse & Goldstone, 1916–1918; the earlier-generation alternative on the avenue
  • 595 West End Avenue — a 1922–23 prewar rental converted to condominium; the condominium comparison further south
  • 514 West End Avenue — Gaetano Ajello, 1923–24, in the Riverside–West End Historic District Extension I; the same corridor under the district's earlier expansion
  • 250 West 94th Street — Sugarman & Berger, 1925; the side-street cooperative alternative a block away
  • 310 Riverside Drive — a 1929 cooperative on the parkfront; the Riverside Drive alternative at the same vintage
  • 336 West End Avenue — the corridor comparison in the 70s
  • 215 West 95th Street — a 1986 ground-up condominium a block north; the new-construction alternative in the immediate area

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across West End Avenue — read The Roebling Team Guide to West End Avenue.

Preparing a board package for this building?

The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent.

Considering a move at The Wester York, per architectural and listing records?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at The Wester York, per architectural and listing records would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.