Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,600/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $270K/room 2%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $472K/room 18%CPW $355K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,313/sf 24%Flatiron $1,769/sf 3%
Full index →
Cooperative · 1928
Boerum Court
96 Schermerhorn Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201
Buildings·Cooperative

96 Schermerhorn Street (Boerum Court)

96 Schermerhorn Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201

Brooklyn Heights, Brooklyn

BBL 3002710047 · BIN 3002707

At a glance
Year built
1928
Type
Cooperative
Units
105
Floors
13
Landmark
No
Board & building profile
Subletting
Board consent by resolution required (proprietary lease as filed, 1981); current limits unverified
Pets
Pet acknowledgment required in current purchase application; specific limits unverified

Compiled by The Roebling Research Desk from the building’s offering plan, amendments, and related building documents (primary source dated application requirements 2024; lease terms 1981 as filed). Reported and subject to confirmation. Board policies can change by amendment — confirm at the offer stage.

The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2004–2026

Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.

Median $/sf
$888
Listing discount
1.9%
Recorded sales
184
On record
2004–2026
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at Boerum Court would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.

Boerum Court is Downtown Brooklyn's original adaptive-reuse co-op — a 1928 college tower converted to 105 apartments in 1981, a full generation before institutional conversions became the neighborhood's signature move. St. John's College built the tower at Schermerhorn Street and Boerum Place for its downtown Brooklyn campus, and the building spent its first half-century in academic use: the college's law school and professional divisions operated here, the plan's engineering description records a later lease to Brooklyn College, and St. John's consolidated its operations to Queens by 1972. Through the 1970s the tower sat boarded up while Downtown Brooklyn emptied out. When Boerum Court Associates filed its cooperative plan in September 1981 — with conversion architecture by Schuman, Lichtenstein, Claman & Efron, the firm that continues today as SLCE Architects — the project was an early bet that the civic blocks east of Court Street could support market-rate ownership housing. Closings ran through 1982, and the bet paid off decades before the Flatbush Avenue tower boom validated it at scale.

The institutional origin is the product's advantage. Classrooms, a gymnasium, and a cafeteria became apartments with ceiling heights running roughly 10 to 17 feet depending on floor, oversized window openings, and layout variety no purpose-built 1928 apartment house offers. The fireproof Class 1 construction and pared Collegiate-Gothic-into-Art-Deco massing, with setbacks at the upper floors, give the building a civic presence on its corner; the setback roofs at the twelfth and fourteenth floors were converted to private terraces for the adjoining apartments.

The location deserves honest framing, and rewards it. The 1981 marketing name — "The Tower in the Heights" — overstated matters then and would now: the building stands east of Court Street, outside the Brooklyn Heights Historic District, on a block it shares with courts and civic buildings, where Downtown Brooklyn, Boerum Hill, and the Heights meet. What the address actually delivers is one of the best transit positions in brownstone Brooklyn — Borough Hall and Jay Street-MetroTech's full menu of lines within a few blocks — with Brooklyn Heights two short blocks west, Boerum Hill's restaurant rows a few minutes south, and pricing that reflects the civic block rather than the historic district. For buyers priced out of the district's co-ops who want volume, light, and transit, that trade is the whole case, and it is a good one.

Architecture and unit composition

The plan allocated 68,700 shares across 104 offered apartments (the superintendent's unit 1A stayed unallocated, producing the 104/105 count), totaling 325 zoning rooms — a mix weighted toward studios and one-bedrooms with a meaningful complement of larger and terrace units at the setbacks. Because the conversion carved apartments out of institutional floor plates, lines do not repeat cleanly floor-to-floor: ceiling height, window scale, and proportion vary more within this building than in any purpose-built peer, and unit-level evaluation matters correspondingly more. The 1980–82 alteration re-windowed the building with double-glazed aluminum units, added two upgraded boilers, a compactor system, and rebuilt roofs; the twelfth- and fourteenth-floor setback roofs became private terraces for bordering apartments.

Building operations

Boerum Court Owners, Inc. has operated the building since the 1982 closings, currently with FirstService Residential New York as managing agent per the co-op's purchase application. The conversion budget staffed the building for round-the-clock door coverage — superintendent, handyman, porter, and four doormen under the 32B contract — and service level has remained central to the building's identity; current staffing should be confirmed at offer stage. Apartments are individually metered for electricity. The Roebling Research Library holds the two-part offering plan, amendments, bylaws, house rules, current purchase application requirements, and recent financial statements for the building.

Policy framework

Subletting: Board consent by resolution, per the proprietary lease as filed. Current limits and fees should be confirmed with management.

Use: Residential use, with professional use by occupants permitted where lawful, under the lease as filed.

Pets: A pet acknowledgment is part of the current purchase application; confirm specific limits against the house rules.

Application economics: Documented above from the current purchase application — a $700 processing fee, $150 document fee, $100 consumer report fee per applicant, and paired $500 move fees/deposits on each side of the transaction, with a $1,000 seller closing fee.

Estates, trusts, and entities: The current application includes trust, LLC, and estate transfer tracks — an indication these structures are processed in an orderly way; approval remains board discretion.

Flip tax, financing minimums, pied-à-terre: Not publicly documented; confirm at offer stage.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟢
Strong — under cap in both periods
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
Per unit / month range

Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
Safe
What this means for you

The latest available FISP filing classified the facade as Safe — no repairs were required at that inspection. Facade inspections run on a fixed five-year cycle; future inspection, repair, and any assessment decisions remain building-specific.

Inspection history
2005–10
Safe
2010–15
Safe
2015–20
SWARMP
2020–25
Safe
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2029
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs required before the next inspection cycle.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

Recent transfers at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Aug 13, 202612A
2 BR · 1 BA
$915,000-1.1%
Jul 30, 20262F
1 BR · 1 BA
$575,000-0.7%
Jul 29, 2026PHB
1 BR · 1.5 BA · 1,000 sf
$900,000$900/sf-5.3%
Jun 3, 2026PHC
1 BR · 1.5 BA · 800 sf
$765,000$956/sf+2.0%
May 6, 20268E
1 BR · 1 BA · 775 sf
$760,000$981/sf-1.3%
Jan 21, 202611F
1 BR · 1 BA · 898 sf
$880,000$980/sf-2.1%
Sep 17, 2025PHE
1 BA
$535,000-0.9%
Apr 30, 2025PHF
1 BA · 600 sf
$475,000$792/sf-4.8%

Market read. Most recent trades (2026) cleared a median $888/sf across 2 sales. Median listing discount 1.9% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

8F · 800 sf+140%
$399,000 2010$850,000 ($1,104/sf) 2015$957,000 ($1,196/sf) 2022
2B+130%
$250,000 ($370/sf) 2005$312,500 ($463/sf) 2009$650,000 2018$575,000 2024
11D+116%
$440,000 ($518/sf) 2009$859,000 ($929/sf) 2018$950,000 2024
10F · 840 sf+116%
$435,000 2005$775,000 ($923/sf) 2019$940,000 ($1,119/sf) 2023
11E · 767 sf+108%
$355,000 ($458/sf) 2010$740,000 ($965/sf) 2024

Other recent transfers

DateUnitPrice
Sep 24, 20194FG$1,380,000
Jan 28, 20148G$383,500
View all 184 recorded transfers, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 3-00271-0047) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.

What to know if you’re buying

Evaluate the specific apartment, not the line. Institutional floor plates mean ceiling heights and proportions vary widely by floor and position — the difference between a 10-foot and a 15-foot ceiling in otherwise similar units is the difference between fine and extraordinary.

Price the location honestly, in your favor. You are buying the Downtown/Boerum Hill seam, not the historic district — that is precisely why the per-room price is what it is, with the Heights two blocks away and elite transit at the door.

Service is part of the maintenance. The building has carried full door staff since conversion; confirm current staffing and how it flows through the maintenance before comparing carrying costs against self-service walk-ups.

Confirm policy specifics early. Sublet limits, any flip tax, and financing minimums are board-level facts not stated in the public record; get them from management before offer.

What to know if you’re selling

Sell the volume. Ceiling height, window scale, and the St. John's provenance are the differentiators no nearby condo can copy; photograph accordingly and state the heights.

Frame the neighborhood forward. The honest pitch — Downtown convenience, Boerum Hill adjacency, Heights proximity, and the transit map — outperforms straining for a Heights label the block cannot support.

Anchor to the building's own comps. Boerum Court's recent trades, adjusted for ceiling height and terrace rights, price apartments more reliably than district co-op benchmarks that carry a different premium.

Have the application package ready. The requirements are documented and orderly; a prepared seller moves a qualified buyer through board review without drama.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering Boerum Court, also evaluate:

Preparing a board package for this building?

The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.

Considering a move at Boerum Court?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com