Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,632/sf ▴3%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $271K/room ▴4%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $465K/room ▴3%CPW $355K/roomFifth Ave $501K/roomBillionaires' Row $4,313/sfMidtown East $1,279/sf ▾9%
Full index →
Condominium · 1986
The Lincoln Park
211 West 71st Street, New York, NY 10023

211 West 71st Street (The Lincoln Park)

211 West 71st Street, New York, NY 10023

Lincoln Square, Upper West Side

BBL 1011637501 · BIN 1030444

At a glance
Year built
1986
Type
Condominium
Units
58
Floors
17
Landmark status
Not an individual landmark; not in a historic district
NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission and City Planning records, updated February 2026
Doorman
Full-time doorman

The Lincoln Park sales history: 82 recorded sales

Own an apartment at The Lincoln Park?
Enter your apartment to see its recorded sale history and today’s estimate.
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2003–2026

Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.

Median $/sf, 2026 to date
$1,444
floor-adjusted, 1 sale
Listing discount
1.2%
Recorded sales
82
On record
2003–2026
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at The Lincoln Park would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.

As cited in The Wall Street Journal★ 92 reviews on Google

The Lincoln Park is a small, well-behaved condominium in a location that does most of the work. The block sits one street south of the express subway at 72nd Street and Broadway, three blocks from Lincoln Center, and one block east of Riverside Park's southern approach. It is the sort of address that condominium buyers keep coming back to because the transit is genuinely exceptional — the 1, 2 and 3 at 72nd Street is one of only two express stops on the Upper West Side's Broadway line, with 96th Street — and because the surrounding streetscape between Broadway and West End is townhouse-scaled rather than tower-scaled.

The building itself belongs to a specific and now-scarce category: the mid-1980s Upper West Side condominium built new, on an interior lot, at contextual scale. It went up as a condominium rather than a conversion, which matters more than it sounds. The whole of the Upper West Side's condominium inventory splits into prewar buildings converted from rental, postwar rentals converted decades after construction, and the small ground-up new-construction cohort. This is the third kind, so there was no conversion to leave rental tenancies behind. ACRIS shows apartments changing hands between unrelated individual owners across four decades, which is what a healthy small condominium looks like in the record. Still confirm with the managing agent that the sponsor holds no remaining units, that no apartment carries a regulated tenancy, and how the declaration and by-laws allocate board control.

Architecturally it is modest and knows it. Red brick over a one-story limestone base, a canopied entrance, regular fenestration, recessed air-conditioning sleeves, a roof deck. There are no fireplaces and no fitness center. The 1980s Upper West Side produced a run of these contextual brick infill buildings after the neighborhood's zoning was tightened, and this is a competent one. The real design decision is the plan, not the elevation: roughly four apartments per floor on a lot only ninety-six feet wide produces genuinely large floor plates per residence and very few neighbors on a landing.

Architecture and unit composition

The building occupies an irregular interior lot of roughly 7,800 square feet and carries about 52,300 square feet of building area, of which just under 48,500 is residential. Divide that across 58 residences and the average is close to 835 square feet of gross building area per apartment before common-area deduction — this is a building of one- and two-bedroom homes rather than large family layouts, with a handful of larger and terraced units in the upper stack.

Because it is an interior lot with no corner, light comes from the street front and the rear yard. A small number of residences carry balconies; a duplex-scale terrace exists at the upper floors, evidenced by a 2009 Department of Buildings filing to reconstruct a terrace deck on a 16th-floor apartment. Buyers should establish, unit by unit, which windows face the street, which face the rear, and what is developable behind and beside the building — the neighbors on this block are low.

The commercial base fronts West 71st Street and comprises two condominium units under common ownership since 2022. It has historically housed neighborhood service retail; the Department of Buildings record shows tenant fit-outs through the 2000s and 2010s.

Building operations

The Lincoln Park runs as a full-service condominium at boutique scale: a 24-hour doorman and concierge at an attended lobby, a live-in resident manager, central laundry, and a roof deck. There is no fitness center. For a 58-residence building, doorman coverage plus a live-in superintendent is a substantial fixed cost spread over a small denominator, and common charges should be evaluated per square foot against the specific unit and the building's operating budget rather than against the amenity list.

The Department of Buildings record shows the maintenance profile of a well-kept 1980s building: façade repair cycles with sidewalk sheds in 2003, 2006, 2007 and 2013, a structural repair to the water tank bulkhead in 2008, chimney replacement and repointing in 2013, and a lobby alteration in 2006. Nothing in that record suggests deferred maintenance, but the façade cycle is regular and the next Local Law 11 filing is a fair question to ask before contract, along with the reserve position and the commercial rent contribution to the budget.

Policy framework

Ownership form: Condominium. Purchases close through the board's right of first refusal rather than a cooperative approval; confirm the timeline with the managing agent.

Pied-à-terre, subletting, LLC, trust and foreign ownership: all permitted under the standard condominium framework. Minimum lease terms and any sublet registration requirement should be confirmed with the managing agent.

Pets, house rules, alteration rules and washer/dryer permissions: not documented in public records for this building. These are all managing-agent questions and should be asked before contract rather than assumed from the building type.

Flip tax: not documented in public records. Confirm any resale capital contribution with the managing agent before pricing a sale.

Real estate taxes — the 421-a question. This is the fact most worth being precise about, and precision here means saying what the record does and does not support. No 421-a exemption appears on any residential unit lot in this condominium in any Department of Finance assessment roll from FY2011 through FY2027. The city's published assessment rolls do not extend back to the building's first taxable years, so the exact grant and expiry years cannot be verified from open records. What can be said with confidence: a building completed in 1985–86 that received 421-a would have received the short-term benefit then available — ten years, with the exemption phasing out over the final years — which would have been fully exhausted by the late 1990s at the latest, a quarter-century before the earliest roll on which this building appears unabated. Underwrite full unabated taxes on the specific unit. There is no step-up schedule ahead and no burn-off cliff behind; the tax line on a current bill is the tax line.

Application and transaction fees

Fees below are from building management's published schedule, as of September 2026. They are shown as published, item by item; no total is added because the total depends on the transaction. Deposits are listed apart from nonrefundable charges.

Purchase

7 items

Fees and charges

ItemPaid byWhenAmountRefundable
Application Processing FeePaid to managementRequiredPaid by BuyerWhen With the applicationAmount $700Refundable Non-refundable
Credit Check FeePer applicantPaid to managementPaid by BuyerWhen With the applicationAmount 150.00 per applicant and per adult occupant.Refundable Non-refundable
Move-In FeePaid to the buildingPaid by BuyerWhen With the applicationAmount $500Refundable Non-refundable
Working Capital ContributionPaid to the buildingPaid by BuyerWhen With the applicationAmount Equal to two (2) months Common ChargesRefundable Non-refundable
Closing Document Preparation FeePaid to managementPaid by BuyerWhen At closingAmount $300Refundable Non-refundable

Deposits

ItemPaid byWhenAmountRefundable
Move-In DepositConditionalPaid to the buildingPaid by BuyerWhen With the applicationAmount $1000 (if no damage to the common areas)Refundable Refundable
Move-Out DepositConditionalPaid to the buildingPaid by SellerWhen With the applicationAmount $1000 (if no damage to the common areas)Refundable Refundable

Rental or lease

9 items

Fees and charges

ItemPaid byWhenAmountRefundable
Move Out Fee - due from current occupant or unit ownerPaid to the buildingPaid by LandlordWhen With the applicationAmount $500Refundable Non-refundable
Additional Processing FeePaid to managementPaid by TenantWhen With the applicationAmount $200 for any application with more than one (1) co-applicant.Refundable Non-refundable
Application Processing FeePaid to managementRequiredPaid by TenantWhen With the applicationAmount $575Refundable Non-refundable
Credit Check FeePer applicantPaid to managementPaid by TenantWhen With the applicationAmount $150 per applicant and per adult occupant.Refundable Non-refundable
Move-In FeePaid to the buildingPaid by TenantWhen With the applicationAmount $1,000Refundable Non-refundable
Move-In FeeConditionalPaid to the buildingPaid by TenantWhen With the applicationAmount $500 if the unit is leased fully furnishedRefundable Non-refundable

Deposits

ItemPaid byWhenAmountRefundable
Move-Out DepositConditionalPaid to the buildingPaid by LandlordWhen With the applicationAmount $1000 (if no damage to the common areas)Refundable Refundable
Move-In DepositConditionalPaid to managementPaid by TenantWhen With the applicationAmount $1000 (if no damage to the common areas)Refundable Refundable

Lease renewal

Fees and charges

ItemPaid byWhenAmountRefundable
Application Processing FeePaid to managementRequiredPaid by TenantWhen With the applicationAmount $225Refundable Non-refundable

Management updates its schedule without a public filing. The date is when management last updated the page, not when a rule changed. Confirm the current schedule with management before you apply.

Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to discuss the building's costs and purchase requirements.

Own an apartment here? Request an apartment-specific pricing review.

The Roebling Team at Compass is a brokerage. We are not the building’s management or its application office.

Monthly carrying charges in recent sales

Common charges + taxes, per room
$717 per room a monthMedian of 5 recorded sales since October 2023Source: recorded sales, refreshed October 2026
Common charges + taxes, per square foot
$2.88 per square foot a monthMedian of 4 recorded sales since October 2023Source: recorded sales, refreshed October 2026
Common charges alone, per square foot
$1.49 per square foot a monthMedian of 3 listings since October 2023 that give the annual taxSource: listing records, refreshed October 2026
Real estate taxes alone, per square foot
$1.37 per square foot a monthMedian of 3 listings since October 2023 that give the annual taxSource: listing records, refreshed October 2026

Common charges plus real estate taxes, combined into one monthly figure the way New York condominium listings show them. Add a mortgage payment for the monthly outlay. The split into common charges and taxes comes from the listings that also give the annual tax, a different sample, so the two lines need not add up exactly to the combined median; a tax abatement can hold taxes below the full amount until it expires. A summary of recorded sales and listings, not a current bill; charges change.

Building staffing and amenities

Doorman
Full-time doormanSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Concierge
YesSource: recent listing records
Attended lobby
YesSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Live-in superintendent
YesSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Elevator
YesSource: NYC Department of Buildings elevator records
Amenities noted
Roof deck, laundry roomSource: The Roebling Team's building profile

Staffing and amenities as our building profile and recent listing records describe them. A feature not listed is not confirmed absent. Outdoor space, parking and some facilities can belong to particular apartments or to a separate owner; confirm access for the specific apartment.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟢
Strong — under cap in both periods
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
Per unit / month range
—

Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.

See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
Safe
What this means for you

The latest available FISP filing classified the facade as Safe — no repairs were required at that inspection. A filed Safe grade is not a guarantee of current condition: owners still maintain the facade and, where required, observe parapets each year. Future inspection timing (Local Law 49 of 2025 changed the cycle framework from October 1, 2026), repair and any assessment decisions remain building-specific.

Inspection history
2005–10
SWARMP
2010–15
SWARMP
2015–20
SWARMP
2020–25
Safe
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2029
Assessed · 2005–10 to 2020–25
$500 in filing penalties
payment status not in the record
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs are due by the deadline stated in the filing.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — a licensed professional engineer or registered architect who meets DOB’s FISP qualifications and signs the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Penalties shown are amounts DOB assessed against filings on record across 2005–10 to 2020–25. The FISP dataset does not record whether they were paid, contested or remain open, so treat the figure as history rather than a current balance and confirm the building’s standing with the managing agent.

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

The Lincoln Park trades as a mid-market Lincoln Square condominium: not new construction, not prewar, and priced in the band between the two. It suits a buyer who wants a condominium in a doorman building near the express subway without paying new-development pricing; confirm pied-à-terre, LLC or trust ownership and leasing rules in the declaration and bylaws.

Turnover is steady rather than brisk. ACRIS records roughly 176 deeds across the building's unit lots since the 1980s, spread evenly across the stack, so line-by-line and floor-by-floor comparables exist within the building itself. Pricing separates on floor, exposure, balcony and renovation condition; the absence of a fitness center and the modest amenity program hold the building below the newer condominium product on Broadway and West End, which is precisely the arbitrage for a buyer who values the location over the amenity roster. The unabated tax position means the headline price and the true monthly move together here, without the divergence that abated new construction creates. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.

Recent closings at this building, from The Roebling Research Library. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Sep 21, 202612A
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,064 sf
$1,570,000$1,476/sf-7.6%
Sep 19, 20252C
1 BR · 1 BA · 785 sf
$950,000$1,210/sf-2.6%
Jun 6, 20247C
1 BR · 1 BA · 787 sf
$999,000$1,269/sf-9.2%
Jan 30, 202417B
1 BR · 1 BA · 795 sf
$988,000$1,243/sf-17.3%
Jan 4, 20247A
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,064 sf
$1,545,000$1,452/sf-3.1%
Aug 23, 202315A
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,064 sf
$1,625,000$1,527/sf-1.5%
May 19, 20232A
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,064 sf
$1,390,000$1,306/sf-4.1%
Jul 28, 20225B
1 BR · 1 BA · 787 sf
$940,000$1,194/sf+0.0%

Market read. Most recent trades (2026 to date) cleared a median $1,444/sf (floor-adjusted) across 1 sale. Floor-adjusted means each sale is restated to a constant mix of floors, so the figure can differ from the plain median of the sales listed above. Median listing discount 1.2% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

3B · 772 sf+99%
$499,000 ($646/sf) 2003 → $735,000 ($952/sf) 2006 → $995,000 ($1,289/sf) 2016
7D · 528 sf+94%
$355,000 ($672/sf) 2004 → $349,000 ($661/sf) 2004 → $687,500 ($1,302/sf) 2017
14D · 550 sf+73%
$404,000 ($735/sf) 2005 → $700,000 ($1,273/sf) 2015
15B · 787 sf+65%
$720,000 ($915/sf) 2005 → $749,000 ($970/sf) 2006 → $1,185,000 ($1,506/sf) 2016
16B · 796 sf+64%
$760,000 ($955/sf) 2008 → $1,250,000 ($1,570/sf) 2015
View all 82 recorded sales, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01163-7501; each condominium apartment is its own tax lot). Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified in The Roebling Research Library. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.

For owners

What would your apartment rent for?

Enter your apartment and I'll send you what it would rent for, from comparable closed leases at The Lincoln Park and nearby.

Buying here? Condo closing costs with a mortgage typically run 3 to 6% of the price. See NYC co-op and condo closing costs, line by line.

The Roebling Report

Keep up with The Lincoln Park and its market

The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings like The Lincoln Park. Unsubscribe anytime.

We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.

What to know if you’re buying

Confirm the parking. Secondary sources describe an on-site garage; the city's own records show no garage area on this lot. Do not pay for parking you have not confirmed with the managing agent.

Do not assume a landmark constraint — or the absence of one. This lot sits just outside the West End–Collegiate Historic District Extension, so window and façade work here needs no LPC review. Several neighbors, including 213 West 71st next door and 212 West 71st across the street, are inside the Extension, where changes need LPC approval; other adjoining lots are not. Check each adjoining lot's designation and zoning when judging what could change beside and behind your specific exposures.

Underwrite the unit's actual tax bill. The records show no exemption, but abatements apply at the bill level; confirm the specific unit's bill before comparing it with abated inventory elsewhere.

Ask for the documents the public record does not carry. No offering plan for this building was located in either the Compass Offering Plan Library or The Roebling Research Library. That makes the managing agent the only source for the house rules, the pet policy, the alteration rules, the sublet terms, any resale capital contribution, and the reserve and Local Law 11 position. Request all of it before signing.

Four apartments to a floor is the product. Walk a landing. The building's quiet is a function of its density, and it is the thing a floor plan does not show you.

What to know if you’re selling

Lead with transit and Lincoln Center. The 72nd Street express station one block north is a genuine differentiator on the Upper West Side, where most of the residential stock is on the local. Say so plainly.

Sell the condominium framework, not the finishes. In a corridor dominated by cooperatives, there is no co-op board admission here. Confirm the LLC, trust, part-time-use and leasing rules in the declaration before marketing them.

Present the total monthly. Common charges plus unabated taxes is the number. Buyers coming from abated new development will otherwise draw the wrong comparison, and they will draw it late.

Benchmark against the right set. The comparable buildings are the other small and mid-size Lincoln Square condominiums, not the prewar cooperatives on the surrounding side streets, whose economics, policies and buyer pools are different.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 211 West 71st Street, also evaluate:

  • 235 West 71st Street — a 1912 Gaetan Ajello building run as a condominium on the same block; prewar architecture with the same ownership form
  • 2000 Broadway — Davis, Brody & Associates, 1987; the closest peer by vintage and ownership form, at larger scale and on the avenue
  • 214 West 72nd Street — 2021 ground-up condominium a block north; the new-construction alternative
  • 200 West 72nd Street — built as a rental in 2010 and converted to condominium in 2020; the full-amenity condominium comparison
  • 155 West 68th Street — a 1965 building converted to condominium, with a substantial rental population traceable to its conversion; a useful contrast in ownership history
  • 104 West 70th Street — a 1903 building run as a true condominium; the prewar condominium alternative to the south
  • 201 West 70th Street — a 1970s rental tower converted to cooperative in 1984; the full-service cooperative alternative at scale
  • 2025 Broadway (The Nevada) — a 1977 condop; the same neighborhood, an entirely different ownership structure worth understanding before you compare monthlies
  • 267 West 71st Street — an 1886–87 rowhouse converted to a walk-up cooperative on the same street; the small-building, low-carry alternative
  • 140 West 69th Street — a circa-1904 elevator cooperative nearby; prewar co-op economics and board approval

More Upper West Side buildings

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, transit, and pricing across Upper West Side — read The Roebling Team Guide to Upper West Side.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.

Considering a move at The Lincoln Park?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Licensed Associate Real Estate Broker · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com