211 West 71st Street (The Lincoln Park)Recorded sales & closing prices
211 West 71st Street, New York, NY 10023
81 recorded closings, 2003–2025. Sortable and searchable below.
- Recorded closings
- 81
- Date range
- 2003–2025
- Median $/sf
- $1,201
- Listing discount
- 1.1%
- Monthly carry/sf
- $2.89
- Price range
- $349K – $3.1M
Change in the building’s median $/sf over each window, adjusted to a floor-adjusted basis — standardized to the building’s average floor, so it reflects price rather than which floors happened to sell. (2022 marks the rate-shock inflection.) Like-for-like repeat-sale figures to follow.
The Lincoln Park trades as a mid-market Lincoln Square condominium: not new construction, not prewar, and priced in the band between the two. Its buyer is typically someone who wants condominium flexibility — pied-à-terre use, an LLC or trust holding, the ability to rent — in a doorman building near the express subway, and who is unwilling to pay new-development pricing to get it.
Turnover is steady rather than brisk. ACRIS records roughly 176 deeds across the building's unit lots since the 1980s, spread evenly across the stack, so line-by-line and floor-by-floor comparables exist within the building itself. Pricing separates on floor, exposure, balcony and renovation condition; the absence of a fitness center and the modest amenity program hold the building below the newer condominium product on Broadway and West End, which is precisely the arbitrage for a buyer who values the location over the amenity roster. The unabated tax position means the headline price and the true monthly move together here, without the divergence that abated new construction creates. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.
The complete recorded-sale history for The Lincoln Park, compiled from NYC Department of Finance transfer records and verified listing data, then enriched apartment-by-apartment by The Roebling Team research desk. Across sales with a public asking price, the building carries a median listing discount of 1.1% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy here.
Price per square foot over time
67 sales with a known square footage, by closing date.
Premium by line
What each line’s exposure is worth — its light, outlook, and orientation — measured against the building’s average sale.
Recent closings
The building’s 10 most recent market sales.
| Date | Unit | Apartment | Price | $/sf | vs. Ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2025 | 2C | 1 BR · 1 BA · 785 sf | $950,000 | $1,210 | -2.6% |
| Jun 6, 2024 | 7C | 1 BR · 1 BA · 787 sf | $999,000 | $1,269 | -9.2% |
| Jan 30, 2024 | 17B | 1 BR · 1 BA · 795 sf | $988,000 | $1,243 | -17.3% |
| Jan 4, 2024 | 7A | 2 BR · 2 BA · 1,064 sf | $1,545,000 | $1,452 | -3.1% |
| Oct 4, 2023 | 6C | 1 BR · 1 BA | $795,000 | +0.0% | |
| Aug 23, 2023 | 15A | 2 BR · 2 BA · 1,064 sf | $1,625,000 | $1,527 | -1.5% |
| May 30, 2023 | 16C | 2 BR · 2 BA | $1,750,000 | -2.8% | |
| May 19, 2023 | 2A | 2 BR · 2 BA · 1,064 sf | $1,390,000 | $1,306 | -4.1% |
| Jul 29, 2022 | 6D | 1 BA | $620,000 | -4.6% | |
| Jul 28, 2022 | 5B | 1 BR · 1 BA · 787 sf | $940,000 | $1,194 | +0.0% |
The retrade record
Lines that have changed hands more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.
Every recorded sale
Sort any column; filter by unit or keyword. Prices are the recorded transfer amount at the NYC Department of Finance. Every sale sits in one of three states: counted in the building’s medians and trend; shown but excluded as a non-arms-length or nominal transfer; or shown and ⚑ flagged for review — a possible duplicate filing or an extreme $/sf outlier, held out of the statistics pending manual verification rather than allowed to move them.
| Apartment | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2025 | 2C | 1 BR · 1 BA | 785 | $950,000 | $1,210 | -2.6% |
| Jun 6, 2024 | 7C | 1 BR · 1 BA | 787 | $999,000 | $1,269 | -9.2% |
| Jan 30, 2024 | 17B | 1 BR · 1 BA | 795 | $988,000 | $1,243 | -17.3% |
| Jan 4, 2024 | 7A | 2 BR · 2 BA | 1,064 | $1,545,000 | $1,452 | -3.1% |
| Oct 4, 2023 | 6C | 1 BR · 1 BA | — | $795,000 | — | +0.0% |
| Aug 23, 2023 | 15A | 2 BR · 2 BA | 1,064 | $1,625,000 | $1,527 | -1.5% |
| May 30, 2023 | 16C | 2 BR · 2 BA | — | $1,750,000 | — | -2.8% |
| May 19, 2023 | 2A | 2 BR · 2 BA | 1,064 | $1,390,000 | $1,306 | -4.1% |
| Jul 29, 2022 | 6D | 1 BA | — | $620,000 | — | -4.6% |
| Jul 28, 2022 | 5B | 1 BR · 1 BA | 787 | $940,000 | $1,194 | +0.0% |
| May 10, 2022 | 11C | 1 BR · 1 BA | 798 | $935,000 | $1,172 | -1.6% |
| Oct 29, 2021 | 3A | 2 BR · 2 BA | 772 | $1,200,000 | $1,554 | — |
| Aug 4, 2021 | 8C | 1 BR · 1 BA | 785 | $837,000 | $1,066 | -1.4% |
| Jun 1, 2021 | 9C | 1 BR · 1 BA | 787 | $799,000 | $1,015 | -5.9% |
| Apr 20, 2021 | 8A | 2 BR · 2 BA | — | $1,130,000 | — | +0.0% |
| Mar 9, 2021 | 15A | 2 BR · 2 BA | 1,064 | $1,165,000 | $1,095 | -10.0% |
| Feb 13, 2020 | 7A | 2 BR · 2 BA | 1,064 | $1,525,000 | $1,433 | -6.2% |
| Dec 19, 2018 | 4C | 1 BR · 1 BA | 800 | $955,000 | $1,194 | +0.0% |
| May 14, 2018 | 12A | 2 BR | — | $1,715,000 | — | -2.5% |
| May 4, 2018 | 7A | 2 BR⚑ Flagged for review — recorded 772 sf disagrees with this line's 1,064 sf across other sales — the square footage looks mis-recorded; pending manual review | 772 | $1,700,000 | $2,202 | — |
| Mar 14, 2018 | 9D | 1 BA | 528 | $650,000 | $1,231 | -13.3% |
| Dec 19, 2017 | 7D | 528 | $687,500 | $1,302 | -1.6% | |
| Dec 21, 2016 | 5C | 1 BR | 785 | $1,149,000 | $1,464 | +0.0% |
| Dec 21, 2016 | 6C | 1 BR · 1 BA | 785 | $1,095,000 | $1,395 | +0.0% |
| Nov 3, 2016 | 7A | 2 BR | 1,064 | $1,695,000 | $1,593 | +0.0% |
| Jun 21, 2016 | 3B | 1 BR · 1 BA | 772 | $995,000 | $1,289 | +0.0% |
| Apr 18, 2016 | 15B | 1 BR · 1 BA | 787 | $1,185,000 | $1,506 | -5.2% |
| Feb 12, 2016 | 16A | 3 BR | 774 | $3,100,000 | $4,005 | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | 14B | 787 | $1,150,000 | $1,461 | — | |
| Oct 28, 2015 | 8B | 1 BR · 1 BA | 785 | $1,100,000 | $1,401 | +2.3% |
| Oct 20, 2015 | 16B | 1 BR | 796 | $1,250,000 | $1,570 | +0.0% |
| Oct 16, 2015 | 14D | 1 BA | 550 | $700,000 | $1,273 | +7.7% |
| Aug 11, 2015 | 7C | 1 BR | 787 | $1,105,000 | $1,404 | +4.3% |
| May 14, 2015 | 3C | 2 BR · 1 BA | 528 | $949,000 | $1,797 | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | 16C | 2 BR · 2 BA | 1,205 | $1,975,000 | $1,639 | -1.0% |
| Sep 27, 2013 | 5D | — | $625,000 | — | +4.3% | |
| Jan 31, 2013 | 10C | 1 BR | 780 | $875,000 | $1,122 | +0.0% |
| Sep 28, 2012 | 16C | 2 BR · 2 BA | 1,205 | $1,760,000 | $1,461 | -3.6% |
| Jun 28, 2012 | 9B | 1 BR | 772 | $795,000 | $1,030 | -0.5% |
| May 4, 2012 | 10A | 2 BR | 1,064 | $1,280,000 | $1,203 | -3.4% |
| Apr 6, 2012 | 17B | 1 BR | 795 | $795,000 | $1,000 | -4.2% |
| Jan 27, 2012 | 8C | 1 BR · 1 BA | 785 | $800,000 | $1,019 | +0.1% |
| Dec 22, 2011 | 12ASponsor Sale | 2 BR | 1,040 | $1,187,500 | $1,142 | -5.0% |
| Dec 6, 2011 | 9A | 2 BR | — | $1,250,000 | — | -5.7% |
| Nov 8, 2011 | 10C | 1 BR | 780 | $775,000 | $994 | -3.0% |
| Sep 1, 2011 | 5B | 1 BR | 787 | $740,000 | $940 | -0.7% |
| Jul 19, 2011 | 10D | non-market transfer (excluded from $/sf & trends) | 1,064 | $335,000 | — | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | 6BSponsor Sale | 1 BR | 772 | $716,250 | $928 | -4.5% |
| Apr 26, 2011 | 3A | 2 BR | 1,064 | $1,012,500 | $952 | -8.0% |
| Nov 29, 2010 | 6D | 1 BAnon-market transfer (excluded from $/sf & trends) | 1,064 | $350,000 | — | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | 2D | 528 | $399,000 | $756 | +0.0% | |
| Aug 25, 2009 | 11C | 1 BR | 798 | $698,000 | $875 | -5.0% |
| Oct 14, 2008 | 16B | 1 BR | 796 | $760,000 | $955 | -7.1% |
| Aug 5, 2008 | 5C | 1 BR | 785 | $950,000 | $1,210 | -4.9% |
| Jul 31, 2008 | 5DSponsor Sale | 530 | $565,000 | $1,066 | -1.7% | |
| Jun 23, 2008 | 4C | 1 BR | 800 | $790,000 | $988 | -1.1% |
| Aug 9, 2007 | 17B | 1 BR | 795 | $935,000 | $1,176 | -6.0% |
| May 24, 2007 | 2A | 2 BR | 1,064 | $1,500,000 | $1,410 | -6.0% |
| May 4, 2007 | 7A | 2 BR | — | $1,475,000 | — | -1.3% |
| Apr 27, 2007 | 10C | 1 BR | 780 | $770,000 | $987 | -0.6% |
| Nov 15, 2006 | 8A | 2 BR · 2 BA | 772 | $1,450,000 | $1,878 | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | 9DSponsor Sale | 528 | $489,000 | $926 | +0.0% | |
| Jul 25, 2006 | 2A | 2 BR | 1,064 | $990,000 | $930 | -1.0% |
| Jul 18, 2006 | 3B | 1 BR | 772 | $735,000 | $952 | +0.0% |
| Jul 13, 2006 | 10ASponsor Sale | 2 BR | 1,064 | $1,050,000 | $987 | +0.0% |
| May 31, 2006 | 8DSponsor Sale | 528 | $479,000 | $907 | +0.0% | |
| May 5, 2006 | 8C | 1 BR | 787 | $740,000 | $940 | -4.5% |
| Feb 13, 2006 | 15B | 1 BR | 772 | $749,000 | $970 | +0.0% |
| Dec 19, 2005 | 15B | 1 BR | 787 | $720,000 | $915 | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | 2D | 1,064 | $425,000 | $399 | — | |
| Jun 16, 2005 | 6ASponsor Sale | 2 BR | 1,085 | $1,200,000 | $1,106 | +4.3% |
| May 20, 2005 | 9B | 1 BR | 785 | $676,100 | $861 | — |
| Feb 13, 2005 | 14D | 550 | $404,000 | $735 | +1.3% | |
| Dec 8, 2004 | 5B | 1 BR | 785 | $600,000 | $764 | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | 2CSponsor Sale | 1 BR | 785 | $620,000 | $790 | +7.8% |
| Aug 30, 2004 | 7A | 2 BR⚑ Flagged for review — recorded 772 sf disagrees with this line's 1,064 sf across other sales — the square footage looks mis-recorded; pending manual review | 772 | $871,000 | $1,128 | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | 16CSponsor Sale | 2 BR | 1,205 | $1,291,500 | $1,072 | +12.3% |
| May 14, 2004 | 7D | 528 | $349,000 | $661 | +0.0% | |
| Mar 23, 2004 | 7BSponsor Sale | 1 BR | — | $579,000 | — | +0.0% |
| Feb 23, 2004 | 7D | 528 | $355,000 | $672 | +1.7% | |
| Oct 2, 2003 | 3B | 1 BR | 772 | $499,000 | $646 | — |
Sources, exclusions and how these figures are computed
Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01163-7501) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans. Storage, parking, and commercial units are excluded from all figures. Floor- and line-level $/sf are time-controlled (each sale measured against the building’s going rate at the time of sale) and expressed at today’s pricing, so they isolate the floor or line premium rather than blend two decades of market movement.
Put this data to work.
Know what’s fair before you offer — we’ll show you where each line trades, the building’s discount-to-ask pattern, and where the value sits right now.
Price to the building’s real trajectory, not a guess — we’ll position your line against its true comps to maximize the outcome.