Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,600/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $270K/room 2%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $472K/room 18%CPW $355K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,313/sf 24%Greenwich Village $2,455/sf 10%
Full index →
Cooperative · 1932
Eastgate
225 East 73rd Street, New York, NY 10021

225 East 73rd Street (Eastgate)

225 East 73rd Street, New York, NY 10021

Lenox Hill, Upper East Side

BBL 1014280013 · BIN 1043991

ArchitectEmery Roth
At a glance
Year built
1932
Type
Cooperative
Units
88
Floors
13
Landmark
No
Pets
Permitted per management-sourced records; confirm the house rules
Financing
75 percent maximum (25 percent minimum down) per management-sourced records
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2003–2026

Bedroom-by-bedroom medians, the full transfer record, and how units trade against ask.

1BR median
$945K
Recent range
$393K – $3.4M
Listing discount
1.9%
Recorded transfers
119

The block of East 73rd Street between Second and Third Avenues is the most coherent piece of residential architecture east of Third Avenue on the Upper East Side, and it exists because one developer built all of it. Bing & Bing commissioned Emery Roth for six buildings — 210, 215, 220, 225, 230 and 235 East 73rd Street — and put them up in stages between 1928 and 1936, marketing the group as a self-contained development. The result is a block that faces itself: brown brick, knobbed and irregular masonry, stone insets, and a tree canopy that has grown into the buildings rather than around them. 225 is the north-side member of the central pair and the close twin of 220 East 73rd Street directly opposite.

The Roth credit is the reason buyers cross the avenue for this block. Roth designed the Beresford, the San Remo, and a long run of Central Park West and Park Avenue trophies, and the Eastgate buildings carry his interior program — step-down living rooms, high beamed ceilings, real dining foyers, decorative fireplaces in many lines — at a tier that has nothing to do with trophy pricing. What a buyer is paying for here is prewar proportion and a coherent streetscape, not an address.

The block's protection is practical rather than legal, and that distinction matters. None of the six buildings is landmarked and the block is not in a historic district. The Upper East Side Historic District stops well short of it. What holds the streetscape together is that six cooperatives share an architect, a builder and a material vocabulary, and that the block draws no through traffic. There is no Landmarks review standing behind that, and buyers who assume there is should adjust the assumption.

The structural fact underneath all of it is zoning. The lot is R8B, which permits a residential floor-area ratio of 4.0. The building is built to 8.71. Nothing on this block could be rebuilt at its present bulk, which is the quiet reason the enclave's scale and light are durable in a way that legal designation is usually credited for.

Architecture and unit composition

Thirteen stories in brown brick across a hundred feet of frontage, with the central bays slightly recessed and the enclave's characteristic masonry texture worked across the base. The building carries roughly 89,000 square feet of residential area over a 10,216-square-foot lot.

The apartment mix runs wide. Department of Buildings filings across two decades name units on every floor from 1A through 1J at the base up to penthouse-level lines, which means small lettered apartments at the low end and combined layouts at the top. The combination history is heavy and continuing: filings document 2B with 2C, 3B with 3C, 4A with 4G, 5A with 5B, 8A with 8G, 8B with 8C, 10A with 10B, and 11A with 11B, several of them since 2020. That pattern is what produces the spread between the 87 and 88 unit counts in circulation, and it is also the main thing a buyer should understand about the inventory: the building's larger apartments were mostly assembled rather than drawn, and their layouts vary accordingly.

Prewar proportions renovate well here, and condition rather than line is usually the dominant pricing variable. Front units face the enclave streetscape; rear units face the mid-block interior. Neither exposure faces an avenue, which is the point of the block.

Building operations

Full service, with door staff and porter coverage, an on-site superintendent, a landscaped roof deck, a grilling courtyard, a renovated fitness center, central laundry, bike storage and private storage per management-sourced records.

Tax history. The cooperative took a J-51 benefit on an alteration completed around 1990 — PLUTO carries a 1990 alteration year, and the Department of Finance J-51 record shows the benefit initiating in 1992 against roughly $167,000 of qualifying alteration cost, structured as a fourteen-year exemption with a 90 percent abatement worth about $13,900 a year. The abatement balance was consumed in tax year 2002 and the record ends there. There is no J-51 benefit today, and no other building-wide exemption appears on the lot. Underwrite full unabated taxes; there is no step-up schedule left to run.

Capital posture. The recent filing record is unusually legible. The cooperative registered its laundry machines and reconfigured the fire sprinkler heads in 2022, carried out courtyard and cellar repairs across 2022 and 2023, and ran a façade program with a sidewalk shed in 2023 and a suspended scaffold for inspection and repair in 2024. The live item is mechanical: filings opened in late 2025 and permitted into 2026 cover a new high-pressure gas service, meter and reducing station, a new low-pressure gas line and gas train, a new gas meter room, a new chimney liner, and a retrofit gas can and head on the existing combination gas-and-oil burner. That is a full gas service and burner conversion, and it is the single most important thing for a buyer to ask about — its cost, its funding source, and whether an assessment is attached to it. We do not hold the building's financial statements, so the answer has to come from the managing agent and the corporation's counsel.

Policy framework

Ownership form: Cooperative. Purchase requires a full board package and an interview, and the board's discretion is not reviewable. Budget eight to twelve weeks from executed contract to closing.

Financing: 75 percent maximum per management-sourced records — a 25 percent minimum down payment. That is the ordinary Upper East Side prewar standard rather than a strict one.

Post-closing liquidity: Not published. Boards at this tier typically want liquid assets after closing equal to one to two years of the apartment's maintenance and mortgage payments, but the specific requirement here is unstated and should be asked before an offer is made, not after.

Subletting: Permitted case-by-case with board approval per management-sourced records. Seasoning requirements, term caps and sublet fees are not published; treat this as an owner-occupant building until the managing agent tells you otherwise in writing.

Pied-à-terre: Permitted with board approval per management-sourced records.

Co-purchase, guarantors and gifting: Considered case-by-case.

Trusts and LLCs: ACRIS shows several completed transfers into and out of revocable trusts in recent years, so trust ownership is clearly workable here in practice. That is not the same as a published policy, and LLC purchases are a different question entirely. Confirm both with the managing agent.

Flip tax: Conflicting figures are in circulation — $25 per share buyer-paid in one management-sourced record, 2 percent buyer-paid in another. On an 88-unit building those two structures produce very different numbers on a large combined apartment. Get the schedule in writing.

Pets: Permitted per management-sourced records.

None of the policy items above is published by the cooperative. All of them come from management-sourced and listing records, and all of them should be confirmed against the current house rules and proprietary lease during diligence.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟡
Moderate — under today's cap; material modeled 2030 exposure
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$32,353/yr
Per unit / month range
$0 – $31

Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
SWARMP
What this means for you

The latest available filing classified the facade as SWARMP — Safe With A Repair and Maintenance Program: the engineer identified conditions requiring monitoring or repair before the next inspection cycle. The scope, timeline, and how the building funds the work are building-specific — we review the filings and board materials for you.

Inspection history
2005–10
Safe
2010–15
Safe
2015–20
Safe
2020–25
SWARMP
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2028
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs required before the next inspection cycle.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

The building trades as a Roth prewar at a non-Roth price, which is the whole argument for the block. The comparable set is the other five Eastgate buildings first and the prewar side-street cooperatives between Second and Third Avenues second — not the Park and Fifth Avenue Roth inventory, whose economics are unrelated. Within the building, the meaningful spread is between the small lettered apartments in original condition and the assembled combinations that have been gut renovated; those are effectively two different products sharing a lobby, and averaging them produces a number that describes nothing.

Two things move value here beyond condition. The first is the combination question: on the upper floors, adjacent lines have repeatedly been merged, and whether a given apartment sits next to a combinable neighbor is a real option with a real price. The second is the gas and burner work now in progress, which belongs in every carrying-cost calculation until the building confirms how it is being funded. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.

Recent transfers at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Aug 3, 20267B
1 BR · 1 BA
$960,000-1.5%
Jun 18, 202611D
1 BR · 1 BA · 950 sf
$980,000$1,032/sf-2.0%
Jun 6, 20258AG
3 BR · 3 BA
$2,950,000+0.0%
May 29, 20259D
1 BR · 1 BA
$950,000-4.5%
May 6, 20254CC
3 BR · 3 BA
$2,500,000+0.0%
Feb 26, 20257A
2 BR · 2 BA
$1,650,000-2.9%
Feb 11, 202512A
1 BR · 1 BA
$899,000+0.0%
Nov 21, 20249E
1 BA
$427,975-1.6%

Market read. Most recent trades (2026) cleared a median $895/sf across 1 sale. Median listing discount 1.5% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

7B+94%
$495,000 ($619/sf) 2003$682,500 ($853/sf) 2011$945,000 2023$960,000 2026
7C · 1,600 sf+54%
$1,400,000 ($875/sf) 2005$2,006,000 ($1,254/sf) 2007$1,775,000 ($1,109/sf) 2013$2,150,000 ($1,344/sf) 2015
10C · 1,600 sf+52%
$1,230,000 ($769/sf) 2011$1,870,000 ($1,169/sf) 2013
3A+44%
$1,110,000 ($854/sf) 2006$1,595,000 2019
1A+39%
$285,000 2008$282,500 2011$456,000 2016$395,000 2021
View all 119 recorded transfers, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01428-0013) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.

What to know if you’re buying

The block is not landmarked, and that cuts both ways. Nothing here requires Landmarks approval, so façade and window work moves faster and costs less than it would in a historic district. It also means the enclave's architectural coherence rests on six separate boards making compatible choices, with no legal backstop. Zoning is the real protection: at R8B, the block is built to roughly twice what the district now allows.

Ask about the gas project before you offer. A new gas service, meter room, chimney liner and burner retrofit is a substantial capital item, and it is being permitted right now. Find out whether it is funded from reserves, from the underlying mortgage, or from an assessment.

There is no abatement left. The J-51 from the early-1990s alteration burned off in 2002. The tax line on the maintenance bill is the tax line.

Get the flip tax in writing. Two incompatible structures are in circulation. On a large combination the difference is material, and it is the buyer's cost under both.

Read the combination history for the specific apartment. Many of the larger units here were assembled from two smaller ones. That governs where the kitchen sits, how the circulation works, and whether there are two entry doors. Run the Renovation Cost Calculator against anything you plan to reconfigure.

Prepare the board package properly. Seventy-five percent financing is permissive by prewar standards, but the post-closing liquidity expectation is unpublished and the board interview is real. Run the Co-op Board Qualification Calculator before you offer.

What to know if you’re selling

Lead with the enclave, not the address. East 73rd between Second and Third is a story a buyer can be walked through in ten minutes. Emery Roth, Bing & Bing, six buildings, one architectural idea, no through traffic. That is the differentiator against generic side-street prewar stock a few blocks in any direction.

Be direct about the tax and mechanical posture. No abatement and an active gas project are both facts a diligent buyer's attorney will find. Presenting them early, with the building's own answer on funding, produces a better outcome than letting them surface at contract.

Price condition honestly. The gap between an estate-condition lettered apartment and a renovated combination in this building is wide, and buyers here are sophisticated about renovation math.

Document the combination potential if it exists. If the adjacent line has changed hands recently or the building has approved similar merges, that is a priced feature. The Department of Buildings record supports the argument.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 225 East 73rd Street, also evaluate:

  • 220 East 73rd Street — the enclave twin directly opposite; the closest like-for-like comparison in the city
  • 230 East 73rd Street — another Emery Roth building in the same Bing & Bing group, on the same block
  • 210, 215 and 235 East 73rd Street — the remaining three Eastgate buildings; no profile pages yet, but they belong in any comparable set drawn on this block
  • 150 East 73rd Street — prewar cooperative west of Third Avenue on the same street; the higher-priced, more formal alternative
  • 155 East 72nd Street — prewar cooperative one block south, west of Third; a different price tier and buyer pool
  • 164 East 72nd Street — prewar side-street cooperative one block south
  • 117 East 72nd Street — prewar cooperative closer to Park; the step-up in address and price
  • 200 East 74th Street — full-service alternative one block north
  • 201 East 74th Street — the immediate-neighborhood alternative on the next block
  • 207 East 74th Street — comparable side-street scale and economics a block north

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across Upper East Side — read The Roebling Team Guide to Upper East Side.

Preparing a board package for this building?

The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent.

Considering a move at Eastgate?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at Eastgate would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.