Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,600/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $270K/room 2%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $472K/room 18%CPW $355K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,313/sf 24%Greenwich Village $2,455/sf 10%
Full index →
Condominium · 2025
THE 74
201 East 74th Street, New York, NY 10021

201 East 74th Street (THE 74)

201 East 74th Street, New York, NY 10021

Lenox Hill, Upper East Side

BBL 1014290001 · BIN 1044019

At a glance
Year built
2025
Type
Condominium
Units
41
Floors
32
Landmark
No
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2016–2026

Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.

Median $/sf
$2,274
Listing discount
2.5%
Recorded sales
30
On record
2016–2026

THE 74 is the tallest thing built on this stretch of Third Avenue in a generation, and the way it was assembled explains almost everything about it. The site is an interior parcel fronting Third Avenue with two narrow panhandle extensions reaching north to East 75th Street and south to East 74th. Two small low-rise buildings on the avenue were never acquired. Rather than wait them out, the developer built over them: the tower's massing cantilevers across the retained structures on both sides, carrying a 32-story, approximately 420-foot reinforced-concrete tower on a base that does not match its footprint. That decision is legible from the sidewalk and has drawn published architectural criticism. It also delivered 41 residences on a parcel that conventional assemblage arithmetic said could not hold them.

The design is by Pelli Clarke & Partners, with SLCE Architects as architect of record. The envelope is a pleated white terracotta rainscreen — a folded, directional surface that catches shifting light through the day and functions as a ventilated cladding system, reducing thermal load on the structure behind it. The setback profile and the illuminated crown are explicit references to the interwar Manhattan skyscraper vocabulary. Terracotta of this kind has been the material of choice for a small group of recent Manhattan towers, and the argument it makes here is that a tall building on Third Avenue should read as a descendant of the 1920s skyline rather than as a glass insertion.

Interiors are by Rafael de Cárdenas, working across both the residences and the amenity collection — five-inch stained oak floors, white-oak parquet, custom millwork, floor-to-ceiling glass, and a set of amenity rooms designed as a coherent suite rather than assembled from a standard developer menu.

The unit plan is the commercial argument. Half-floor two- and three-bedroom residences carry the lower and middle floors. Floors 23 through 30 are full-floor four- and five-bedroom residences with ceilings to roughly 13 feet — genuinely rare inventory in Lenox Hill, where full-floor apartments are effectively confined to the prewar cooperative stock and come with the board, the financing ceiling, and the renovation. There are duplexes on the lower floors, a freestanding townhouse on the East 75th Street panhandle, and a duplex penthouse at the top.

Architecture and unit composition

Thirty-two stories over a multistory podium on Third Avenue. The tower is reinforced concrete; the envelope is a pleated white terracotta rainscreen carried from the base through the crown, with glass railings on the upper-level setbacks and upward-directed lighting accentuating the crown's textural surface.

The townhouse annex on the northern panhandle is a distinct piece of architecture in its own right: white terracotta framing recessed Juliet balconies on the second through fourth levels, a fifth-story loggia planted with hanging vegetation, and a ground floor clad in wood paneling with a cut-out of concentric rectangles framing the door. It reads as a separate house on East 75th Street and is deeded as a unit of the condominium.

The residences run two through five bedrooms. Half-floor two- and three-bedroom homes occupy the lower and middle of the tower; floors 23 through 30 hold full-floor four- and five-bedroom residences with ceiling heights to approximately 13 feet; duplexes sit on the lower floors; and a duplex penthouse with private terrace tops the building. Marketed floor areas confirm the scale — the duplex penthouse carries approximately 5,264 square feet of interior space plus roughly 1,589 square feet of private terrace in a four-bedroom configuration.

The amenity collection sits primarily on the 17th floor. The residents' lounge there carries a dining room, a wet bar and a kitchenette, with open city exposure. Alongside it: an entertainment suite with a catering kitchen and videoconferencing capability, a library, a fitness center with dedicated yoga and Pilates studios, a children's playroom, an art room, and a business center. At street level the lobby lounge opens onto a private garden. A rooftop terrace, private storage, a bike room and a laundry room complete the program, and the building operates with a full-time doorman, concierge and live-in superintendent.

Building operations

The building is one operating year old. The first-year budget filed with the offering plan is a projection; the first audited financial statements are the document that will establish what this building actually costs to run, and they should be requested before any offer is finalized.

Three items belong in the diligence file specifically because of how this building was built. First, the cantilevered massing over the retained neighboring structures creates permanent structural and legal relationships with those adjoining properties — easements, access rights, protection and maintenance obligations, and insurance questions. The recorded agreements governing them should be read. Second, the pleated terracotta rainscreen is a specialized envelope; its Local Law 11 cycle and long-term maintenance will draw from a narrower field of contractors than a conventional façade. Third, the amenity program is deep for 41 households, and the fixed operating base divided across a small owner count produces a common charge that should be modeled from the actual budget rather than the marketing sheet.

The building class question — what the city record actually says

The base tax lot for 201 East 74th Street carries a Department of Finance building class of HR. That is an unusual code to encounter on a new luxury condominium, and it needs explaining, because automated valuation and tax-estimate tools keyed to the base lot will misreport this building badly.

HR is not a condominium class and not a cooperative class. It sits in the Department of Finance's hotel series and designates a single-room-occupancy building. The rest of that PLUTO record is consistent with the code and inconsistent with the tower: year built 1915, five stories, 30 residential units, a lot of roughly 1,574 square feet, and a building area of roughly 5,875 square feet.

That record describes the walk-up formerly at 1291 Third Avenue, which the development site absorbed. City building records document it directly: a 2018 alteration application on the same building identifier proposed converting the occupancy classification from J-2 to R-2 across 31 dwelling units, and a November 2019 permit describes "interior renovation of exist SRO units" on the second floor. A June 2022 filing on the same identifier was made by El Ad East 74 LLC — the sponsor entity — confirming the developer's control of the parcel.

The practical consequences for a buyer are three. First, the base-lot assessment and any tax figure derived from it will bear no relationship to the individual unit's tax bill; the residential unit tax lots (1201 through 1241) are the correct reference. Second, third-party data products that read building class will misclassify this address, sometimes as SRO or hotel inventory. Third, any title, zoning or land-use question on this parcel should be run against the recorded condominium declaration and the current certificate of occupancy rather than against PLUTO, which has not caught up.

None of this is a defect in the building. It is a lag in the city's tax-lot record, and it is worth knowing before it turns up mid-transaction.

The site and its cost basis

The assemblage is documented in city records and is unusually expensive per buildable foot:

  • 1291 Third Avenue — $15,000,000 recorded September 2016
  • 1297 Third Avenue — $26,000,000 recorded January 2017
  • 1291 Third Avenue — $8,095,334 recorded June 2018
  • 204 East 75th Street$61,000,000 recorded April 2022, the transfer that put the assembled site in the developer's hands

Roughly $110 million of recorded land basis across those transfers, spread across 41 residences, works out to well over $2 million per unit before a single dollar of construction. That arithmetic is the reason the building is priced where it is, the reason the cantilever exists, and the reason the amenity program had to be strong enough to justify the number.

Policy framework

Pets: Permitted per listing records.

Pied-à-terre: Permitted. Standard condominium ownership; no primary-residence requirement.

Subletting: Permitted under the condominium right-of-first-refusal framework. Minimum lease term should be confirmed with the managing agent.

LLC and trust ownership: Permitted (standard NYC condominium).

Minimum down payment: 20 percent per listing records.

Property tax status: No abatement is documented in city records. Because the base tax lot still carries the pre-development record described above, any tax figure must be pulled from the individual residential unit lot. Run True Monthly Carrying Cost analysis against the actual current bill for the specific unit.

No offering plan for 201 East 74th Street is on file in The Roebling Research Library as of September 2026. The policy stack above reflects listing and management-sourced records; the plan, the by-laws and the house rules should be reviewed before an offer is finalized.

Local Law 97

Compliance status
Not subject to Local Law 97

This building is below the 25,000 sq ft threshold at which LL97 emissions caps apply. No regulatory capital pressure from this law specifically, current or 2030.

See full Local Law 97 analysis →

Recent sales

Recent closings at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Apr 3, 20265CSponsor Sale
1 BA · 536 sf
$972,401$1,814/sf-7.4%
Mar 10, 202620A
3 BR · 3.5 BA · 2,179 sf
$5,424,202$2,489/sf+0.4%
Jan 28, 20265A
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,401 sf
$2,836,218$2,024/sf-5.3%
Jan 27, 202625Sponsor Sale
5 BR · 4.5 BA · 3,815 sf
$11,763,171$3,083/sf-8.1%
Jan 21, 20269B
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,522 sf
$3,288,284$2,161/sf-2.8%
Nov 24, 202510BSponsor Sale
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,522 sf
$3,413,800$2,243/sf+0.0%
Nov 19, 20259A
3 BR · 3.5 BA · 2,171 sf
$4,727,658$2,178/sf-1.5%
Nov 7, 202516
5 BR · 4.5 BA · 3,693 sf
$9,372,194$2,538/sf-5.8%

Market read. Most recent trades (2026) cleared a median $2,274/sf across 4 sales. Median listing discount 2.5% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

View all 30 recorded sales, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01429-0001) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.

What to know if you’re buying

The full-floor tier is the reason to be here. Floors 23 through 30 deliver full-floor four- and five-bedroom residences with roughly 13-foot ceilings — a format that in Lenox Hill otherwise exists almost exclusively inside prewar cooperatives, with all of the approval and financing friction those carry.

Read the agreements with the adjoining owners. The cantilever is the building's defining structural decision and it created permanent obligations across property lines. Those documents are recorded and should be reviewed.

Ignore the base tax lot entirely. Pull the assessment and tax bill from the individual residential unit lot. The base-lot record still describes the SRO that preceded the tower.

Get the offering plan. It is not yet in either offering-plan library. Insist on it and read the house rules with it.

Price the amenity load. A 17th-floor lounge and dining room, an entertainment suite, an art room, a business center, a library and a full fitness floor divided across 41 households is a substantial fixed monthly base. Model from the budget.

What to know if you’re selling

Resales will price against sponsor inventory first. Sponsor units remained available into 2026. Until the sponsor is fully sold out, a resale competes with a seller who can offer concessions on transfer taxes and mansion tax. Price accordingly, or wait.

The tier structure is the pricing argument. The spread between the half-floor band in the $3 millions and $4 millions, the full-floor band in the $9 millions and above, and the crown near $4,000 per square foot is wide and legible. Position the specific residence inside that structure rather than against a building average.

Lead with the architecture credit and the terracotta. Pelli Clarke & Partners and a pleated terracotta rainscreen are durable marketing assets, and the material argument will read better in ten years than a curtain wall will.

Be prepared for the building-class question. Sophisticated buyers and their counsel will find the HR record. Explain it before they discover it.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering THE 74, also evaluate:

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across Upper East Side — read The Roebling Team Guide to Upper East Side.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent.

Considering a move at THE 74?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at THE 74 would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.