644 Broadway (Bleecker Tower)
644 Broadway, New York, NY 10012
NoHo
BBL 1005290001 · BIN 1008418
- Year built
- 1889
- Type
- Cooperative
- Units
- 14
- Floors
- 8
- Landmark
- No
Every recorded sale at this building, 2004–2026
Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.
- Median $/sf
- $744
- Listing discount
- 6.5%
- Recorded sales
- 17
- On record
- 2004–2026
There are perhaps a dozen buildings in NoHo that read as civic architecture rather than commercial architecture, and this is one of them. Stephen Decatur Hatch designed it for the Manhattan Savings Institution, which had banked at Broadway and Bleecker since the 1850s and which — a decade after the most sensational bank robbery in the country's history was carried out on this corner in 1878 — tore down its old building and replaced it with something meant to look permanent. The predecessor came down in 1889; the new building was finished in 1891. Hatch mixed Queen Anne with Romanesque Revival and used carved sandstone, terra cotta, brick, copper and cast iron together, and he took the corner seriously: the chamfered angle is crowned by a copper-clad tower that is still the thing you see first from three blocks away. The ornament is idiosyncratically American — beavers, ears of corn and Native American faces appear in the keystones and cornices rather than the usual imported allegories. The bank's monogram is still legible in the Broadway pediment.
The upper floors were always income property. The bank leased them to clothing manufacturers from the start and remained in the building into the 1920s, after which the corner slid with the rest of lower Broadway into a long industrial afterlife — by 1959 The New York Times could describe it flatly as an eight-story loft and manufacturing building. That is the condition from which the residential building was made.
The conversion is the fact that governs how this building trades, and its date is worth stating carefully. PLUTO carries an alteration year of 1980; the city's historical J-51 file opens an abatement against this tax lot in 1981 on a certified alteration cost of $152,000. Published historical accounts describe the result as luxury loft apartments, two per floor, above a ground-floor restaurant. That is the 1980–81 conversion, and it produced the fourteen-unit cooperative that exists today. Some published architectural records instead date the residential conversion to 1987; that date is not what the tax and land-use record shows, and it may be describing the façade work of the late 1980s. Where the public record and a secondary source disagree, we go with the record and say so.
Two consequences of that vintage still shape a purchase here, and they are the subject of the next two sections: the tax benefit is long gone, and the occupancy classification is an open question.
Architecture and unit composition
Eight stories, a 7,257-square-foot corner lot, 48,182 square feet of residential area across fourteen homes — an average well above 3,400 square feet. This is a large-loft building by arithmetic. ACRIS share transfers run in East and West lines two per floor across the residential floors, which is exactly the configuration the historical accounts of the 1980–81 conversion describe and is the reason apartments here read as full half-floors rather than as conventional apartments.
The corner geometry is the product. Two exposures on every corner unit, the chamfered angle producing an unusual window wall, and the ceiling heights of a building designed for banking on the ground floor and manufacturing above. The remaining 6,883 square feet is ground-floor retail, which in a fourteen-unit cooperative is a meaningful share of the building and typically a meaningful offset to shareholder maintenance — ask the managing agent whether the retail is corporation-owned and producing rent, or a separately held commercial cooperative unit, because the two produce very different budgets.
Joint Live-Work Quarters for Artists — resolve this before anything else
Here is the situation honestly. Nothing in the records reviewed classifies the residential units at 644 Broadway as joint living-work quarters for artists. Department of Buildings filings carry the occupancy as RES and, more recently, as R-2. No filing describes an artist's studio or a JLWQ apartment. That is not the same as a clean answer.
What the record does establish is the zoning context, and it is exactly the context in which the question arises. Every Department of Buildings filing on this building that carries a zoning district records M1-5B — the manufacturing designation that governed NoHo until December 2021 and under which residential occupancy in this area was generally available only as joint living-work quarters for artists, occupancy limited to certified artists and their households. A building converted to residential use in 1980–81 in an M1-5B district is precisely the profile in which a JLWQA classification appears on a certificate of occupancy, and in which it is routinely missed in diligence.
What changed is the zoning, not the paperwork. The December 2021 SoHo/NoHo rezoning replaced M1-5B here with M1-5/R9A inside the Special SoHo-NoHo Mixed Use District (SNX) and made conventional residential use available going forward, with a voluntary path for converting existing conforming JLWQA use to residential use. Existing JLWQA occupancy may continue, subject to the same restrictions that applied before. What a rezoning does not do is amend an existing certificate of occupancy, a proprietary lease or an offering plan that describes units in the old terms. A JLWQA designation surviving on a C of O can affect an appraisal, a lender's willingness to finance, an insurance placement, and a seller's ability to describe a unit as a conventional apartment.
So do this, in writing, before contract: pull the current certificate of occupancy for BIN 1008418; ask the managing agent whether any unit is or ever was classified as joint living-work quarters or as commercial or light-manufacturing space; ask whether the cooperative has filed anything to convert or clarify occupancy since the 2021 rezoning; and ask what the board's position is on artist certification today. Your lender should have the answer before a commitment issues.
While you are at it, resolve the certificate of occupancy generally. The building has an Alteration-CO job open since September 2023 for the conversion of a ground-floor eating-and-drinking establishment to retail, and DOB records show the certificate reissued nine times as a renewal between August 2024 and September 2026. Establish whether a final certificate has issued.
Building operations and capital posture
The façade is the capital story here and it is a good one. Published historical records describe patch repairs in 1987 and again in 1992, followed by a determination that something more substantial was required — a full stabilization and restoration by Walter B. Melvin Architects, with specially formulated coatings applied to unify the elevations and prevent water intrusion, and the cast-iron balconies removed, stripped and rebuilt with stainless-steel joints. On a landmarked masonry-and-iron corner building of this age, that is the single most expensive category of work a cooperative faces, and evidence that it has been done properly is worth real money.
That said, the current operating and capital picture is not in the public record. The underlying mortgage and its maturity, the reserve position, any assessment in place, the retail lease terms and the current Local Law 11 cycle status are all matters for the financial statements. No audited financials for this cooperative were located in either offering-plan library. Have your attorney obtain the last two years of statements and the current board minutes.
Local Law 97
- 2024–2029 annual penalty
- $2,371/yr
- 2030–2034 annual penalty
- $44,689/yr
- Per unit / month range
- $14 – $266
Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.
See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →Facade safety — Local Law 11
The latest available FISP filing classified the facade as Safe — no repairs were required at that inspection. Facade inspections run on a fixed five-year cycle; future inspection, repair, and any assessment decisions remain building-specific.
How to read this, and where it comes from
QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).
Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.
Recent sales
Fourteen apartments will not produce a meaningful in-building statistical set, and half-floor lofts of this scale are scarce enough in NoHo that the comparable pool has to be built by hand. Pricing here is argued on the attributes that a data feed cannot see: which exposures a unit holds, whether it takes the chamfered corner, ceiling height, the state of the systems installed in the 1980–81 conversion, and how much of the original fabric survives inside.
Two building-level facts belong in every underwrite. There is no tax benefit — the J-51 exemption and abatement from the conversion are fully exhausted, ending in the early 1990s, and the current Department of Finance record shows no exemption on the lot. And there is a real retail component in a very small cooperative, which cuts both ways: rent that offsets maintenance, and a commercial tenancy whose lease terms, renewal dates and creditworthiness are part of your building's finances. Index any market statement to the last complete year rather than to a partial current one. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.
Recent transfers at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.
| Date | Unit | Apartment | Price | PPSF | vs. Ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2026 | 2E | 2 BR · 7,257 sf | $5,400,000 | $744/sf | -4.4% |
| Mar 18, 2022 | 5W | 3 BR · 3 BA · 2,903 sf | $3,450,000 | $1,188/sf | +4.7% |
| Dec 30, 2021 | 2W | 2 BR · 2.5 BA · 3,000 sf | $5,400,000 | $1,800/sf | -6.8% |
| Nov 29, 2021 | 7E | 2 BR · 2 BA · 2,300 sf | $2,475,000 | $1,076/sf | -10.0% |
| Mar 25, 2021 | 3W | 4 BR · 3.5 BA · 2,903 sf | $3,200,000 | $1,102/sf | -8.6% |
| Jul 18, 2016 | 7E | 2 BR · 2 BA · 2,300 sf | $2,750,000 | $1,196/sf | -35.3% |
| Dec 2, 2014 | 4E | 2 BR · 1 BA · 1,400 sf | $1,995,000 | $1,425/sf | +0.0% |
| Sep 23, 2013 | 2W | 2 BR · 2 BA · 2,800 sf | $2,850,000 | $1,018/sf | +1.8% |
Market read. Most recent trades (2026) cleared a median $744/sf across 1 sale. Median listing discount 6.5% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.
The retrade record
Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.
Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.
Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-00529-0001) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.
What to know if you’re buying
Resolve the occupancy classification first. JLWQA is not documented here, but the conversion's M1-5B context means it cannot be assumed away. Pull the certificate of occupancy for BIN 1008418 and get the managing agent's position in writing before your lender commits.
Confirm whether a final certificate of occupancy has issued. There has been an open Alteration-CO job since 2023 and nine renewal filings since August 2024.
Underwrite full taxes. The J-51 from the 1980–81 conversion burned off by the early 1990s. Nothing is phasing out.
Understand the retail. Ask whether the ground floor is corporation-owned and rent-producing or a separately held commercial cooperative unit, and get the lease terms either way.
Get the whole policy stack in writing before you offer. Financing ceiling, minimum down, liquidity, sublet terms, flip tax, pied-à-terre and entity-purchase rules. None of it is public.
Price Landmarks into any renovation. Main NoHo Historic District — not NoHo East, which governs a neighboring building on this block under a different designation and a different report.
What to know if you’re selling
Get ahead of the certificate of occupancy. A buyer's attorney will find the open alteration job and the renewal history. Handing over the current certificate and the co-op's position at the outset converts a stall into a paragraph.
Answer the JLWQA question before it is asked. Even a documented "no" is worth having in hand, because buyers' counsel in NoHo ask it about every loft conversion of this vintage.
Sell the architecture with its sources. Stephen Decatur Hatch, the Manhattan Savings Institution, 1889–91, the copper tower, the restored cast-iron balconies. These are LPC-documented facts, not marketing claims, and they survive diligence.
Lead with scale. Half-floor lofts averaging well above 3,400 square feet in NoHo are the product. Say the number.
Comparable buildings
If you're considering 644 Broadway, also evaluate:
- 27 Bleecker Street — the 1888 loft cooperative on the same tax block, in the NoHo East Historic District under a separate designation, with documented joint living-work quarters; the closest neighbor and the sharpest contrast in occupancy posture
- 54 Bleecker Street — 1896 warehouse converted 1985–86; the closest peer on conversion vintage and J-51 history
- 40 Bleecker Street — the new-construction NoHo condominium alternative
- 36 Bleecker Street — NoHo loft building of comparable scale
- 10 Bleecker Street — small NoHo cooperative nearby
- 25 Bond Street — NoHo condominium; the tenure alternative at a higher price tier
- 40 Bond Street — Herzog & de Meuron's NoHo condominium; the trophy contrast
- 1 Bond Street — Bond Street loft building of similar unit count
- 27 Great Jones Street — NoHo loft cooperative a block east
- 303 Mercer Street — large NoHo cooperative; the scale contrast in the same submarket
- 285 Lafayette Street — Lafayette Street loft conversion of comparable vintage
The neighborhood
For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across East Village + NoHo — read The Roebling Team Guide to East Village + NoHo.
The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.
How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent.
Considering a move at Bleecker Tower?
Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.
Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.
A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at Bleecker Tower would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.