Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,632/sf ▴3%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $271K/room ▴4%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $465K/room ▴3%CPW $355K/roomFifth Ave $501K/roomBillionaires' Row $4,313/sfHell's Kitchen $1,328/sf ▴0%
Full index →
Cooperative · 1889
Bleecker Tower
644 Broadway, New York, NY 10012
Buildings·NoHo·Cooperative

644 Broadway (Bleecker Tower)

644 Broadway, New York, NY 10012

NoHo

BBL 1005290001 · BIN 1008418

CorridorNoHo
At a glance
Year built
1889
Type
Cooperative
Units
14
Floors
8
Landmark status
Not an individual landmark; in the NoHo Historic District
NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission records, updated February 2026
Doorman
Full-time doorman

Bleecker Tower sales history: 17 recorded sales

Own an apartment at Bleecker Tower?
Enter your apartment to see its recorded sale history and today’s estimate.
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2004–2026

Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.

Median $/sf, 2026 to date
$744
floor-adjusted, 1 sale
Listing discount
6.5%
Recorded sales
17
On record
2004–2026
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at Bleecker Tower would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.

As cited in The Wall Street Journal★ 92 reviews on Google

There are perhaps a dozen buildings in NoHo that read as civic architecture rather than commercial architecture, and this is one of them. Stephen Decatur Hatch designed it for the Manhattan Savings Institution, which had banked at Broadway and Bleecker since the 1850s and which — a decade after the most sensational bank robbery in the country's history was carried out on this corner in 1878 — tore down its old building and replaced it with something meant to look permanent. The predecessor came down in 1889; the new building was finished in 1891. Hatch mixed Queen Anne with Romanesque Revival and used carved sandstone, terra cotta, brick, copper and cast iron together, and he took the corner seriously: the chamfered angle is crowned by a copper-clad tower that is still the thing you see first from three blocks away. The ornament is idiosyncratically American — beavers, ears of corn and Native American faces appear in the keystones and cornices rather than the usual imported allegories. The bank's monogram is still legible in the Broadway pediment.

The upper floors were always income property. The bank leased them to clothing manufacturers from the start and remained in the building into the 1920s, after which the corner slid with the rest of lower Broadway into a long industrial afterlife — by 1959 The New York Times could describe it flatly as an eight-story loft and manufacturing building. That is the condition from which the residential building was made.

The conversion is the fact that governs how this building trades, and its date is worth stating carefully. PLUTO carries an alteration year of 1980; the city's historical J-51 file opens an abatement against this tax lot in 1981 on a certified alteration cost of $152,000. Published historical accounts describe the result as luxury loft apartments, two per floor, above a ground-floor restaurant. That is the 1980–81 conversion, and it produced the fourteen-unit cooperative that exists today. Some published architectural records instead date the residential conversion to 1987; that date is not what the tax and land-use record shows, and it may be describing the façade work of the late 1980s. Where the public record and a secondary source disagree, we go with the record and say so.

Two consequences of that vintage still shape a purchase here, and they are the subject of the next two sections: the tax benefit is long gone, and the occupancy classification is an open question.

Architecture and unit composition

Eight stories, a 7,257-square-foot corner lot, 48,182 square feet of residential area across fourteen homes — a gross-area ratio above 3,400 square feet, not measured interior living area or proof that each apartment is large. ACRIS share transfers run in East and West lines two per floor across the residential floors, consistent with the historical accounts of the 1980–81 conversion, but labels alone do not establish current half-floor layouts; confirm the approved plans.

The corner geometry is the product. Two exposures on every corner unit, the chamfered angle producing an unusual window wall, and the ceiling heights of a building designed for banking on the ground floor and manufacturing above. The remaining 6,883 square feet is ground-floor retail, which in a fourteen-unit cooperative is a meaningful share of the building and typically a meaningful offset to shareholder maintenance — ask the managing agent whether the retail is corporation-owned and producing rent, or a separately held commercial cooperative unit, because the two produce very different budgets.

Joint Live-Work Quarters for Artists — resolve this before anything else

Here is the situation honestly. Nothing in the records reviewed classifies the residential units at 644 Broadway as joint living-work quarters for artists. Department of Buildings filings carry the occupancy as RES and, more recently, as R-2. No filing describes an artist's studio or a JLWQ apartment. That is not the same as a clean answer.

What the record does establish is the zoning context, and it is exactly the context in which the question arises. Every Department of Buildings filing on this building that carries a zoning district records M1-5B — the manufacturing designation that governed NoHo until December 2021 and under which residential occupancy in this area was generally available only as joint living-work quarters for artists, occupancy limited to certified artists and their households. A building converted to residential use in 1980–81 in an M1-5B district is precisely the profile in which a JLWQA classification appears on a certificate of occupancy, and in which it is routinely missed in diligence.

What changed is the zoning, not the paperwork. The December 2021 SoHo/NoHo rezoning replaced M1-5B here with M1-5/R9A inside the Special SoHo-NoHo Mixed Use District (SNX) and made conventional residential use available going forward, with a voluntary path for converting existing conforming JLWQA use to residential use. Existing JLWQA occupancy may continue, subject to the same restrictions that applied before. What a rezoning does not do is amend an existing certificate of occupancy, a proprietary lease or an offering plan that describes units in the old terms. A JLWQA designation surviving on a C of O can affect an appraisal, a lender's willingness to finance, an insurance placement, and a seller's ability to describe a unit as a conventional apartment.

So do this, in writing, before contract: pull the current certificate of occupancy for BIN 1008418; ask the managing agent whether any unit is or ever was classified as joint living-work quarters or as commercial or light-manufacturing space; ask whether the cooperative has filed anything to convert or clarify occupancy since the 2021 rezoning; and ask what the board's position is on artist certification today. Your lender should have the answer before a commitment issues.

While you are at it, resolve the certificate of occupancy generally. The building has an Alteration-CO job open since September 2023 for the conversion of a ground-floor eating-and-drinking establishment to retail, and DOB records show the certificate reissued nine times as a renewal between August 2024 and September 2026. Establish whether a final certificate has issued.

Building operations and capital posture

The façade is the capital story here and it is a good one. Published historical records describe patch repairs in 1987 and again in 1992, followed by a determination that something more substantial was required — a full stabilization and restoration by Walter B. Melvin Architects, with specially formulated coatings applied to unify the elevations and prevent water intrusion, and the cast-iron balconies removed, stripped and rebuilt with stainless-steel joints. Confirm completion records, current engineering condition and warranties, and compare the façade scope with other capital needs before ranking costs or assigning value to the historical work.

That said, the materials reviewed do not establish the current operating and capital picture. The underlying mortgage and its maturity, the reserve position, any assessment in place, the retail lease terms and the current Local Law 11 cycle status are all matters for the financial statements. No audited financials for this cooperative were located in either offering-plan library. Have your attorney obtain the last two years of statements and the current board minutes.

Policy framework — what share ownership means here

The materials reviewed do not establish all current policies. Obtain written terms for the following questions before assessing a transaction.

Board package and interview. You are buying shares and a proprietary lease. Board consent is required for a sale. Confirm the package contents, interview format and timing from the building's application instructions; packages commonly include tax returns, a statement of net worth, bank and brokerage statements, references and a fully executed contract.

Financing ceiling and minimum down. Not published. Loft co-ops of this vintage and size range widely, from conventional 20 to 25 percent minimums to all-cash-only postures in the tightest buildings. Get the current requirement in writing from the managing agent before you make an offer.

Post-closing liquidity. Ask for the standard the board actually applies, measured against monthly maintenance and debt service, and whether retirement assets count toward it. The gross-area ratio above 3,400 square feet does not establish apartment living area or whether liquidity rather than income will constrain a particular application.

Debt-to-income. Ask for the maximum ratio and whether it is calculated gross or net. Run the Co-op Board Qualification Calculator before you offer.

Sublet policy. Not published. Ask for the seasoning period, maximum term, any lifetime cap, the sublet fee and its basis, and whether the board approves the subtenant. Then ask separately whether short-term or corporate occupancy is permitted at all.

Flip tax. Not documented on file. Ask whether one exists, how it is computed — percentage of gross price, percentage of gain, dollars per share, or flat fee — and who pays it by custom here. Calculate the fee under the actual operative formula and transaction terms; price level alone does not establish a six-figure difference.

Pied-à-terre, trusts and LLCs. Not published, and each is a separate question. Ask whether non-primary-residence purchase is permitted, whether a trust may take title and on what guarantee terms, and whether an LLC may ever hold shares. Assume no on LLCs until told otherwise in writing.

Alterations. Two approvals, not one. Review the board's alteration agreement and applicable LPC requirements: exterior alterations generally need LPC permits, and interior work requiring a DOB permit also needs LPC permission. Eligible work may receive staff approval and ordinary maintenance may be exempt. Budget the time as well as the cost — run the Renovation Cost Calculator with a Landmarks review priced in.

Building staffing and amenities

Doorman
Full-time doormanSource: recent listing records
Elevator
YesSource: NYC Department of City Planning records (PLUTO)

Staffing and amenities as our building profile and recent listing records describe them. A feature not listed is not confirmed absent. Outdoor space, parking and some facilities can belong to particular apartments or to a separate owner; confirm access for the specific apartment.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟠
Material — penalties in current period, escalating in 2030
2024–2029 annual penalty
$2,371/yr
2030–2034 annual penalty
$56,111/yr
Per unit / month range
$14 – $334
Modeled exposure split equally across 14 units (the residential count on the city's lot record). Not an assessed amount; co-op shareholders are typically charged by share allocation.

Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.

See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
Safe
What this means for you

The latest available FISP filing classified the facade as Safe — no repairs were required at that inspection. A filed Safe grade is not a guarantee of current condition: owners still maintain the facade and, where required, observe parapets each year. Future inspection timing (Local Law 49 of 2025 changed the cycle framework from October 1, 2026), repair and any assessment decisions remain building-specific.

Inspection history
2005–10
SWARMP
2010–15
Safe
2015–20
Safe
2020–25
Safe
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2027
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs are due by the deadline stated in the filing.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — a licensed professional engineer or registered architect who meets DOB’s FISP qualifications and signs the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

Fourteen apartments will not produce a meaningful in-building statistical set, and half-floor lofts of this scale are scarce enough in NoHo that the comparable pool has to be built by hand. Pricing here is argued on the attributes that a data feed cannot see: which exposures a unit holds, whether it takes the chamfered corner, ceiling height, the state of the systems installed in the 1980–81 conversion, and how much of the original fabric survives inside.

Two building-level facts belong in every underwrite. There is no tax benefit — the J-51 exemption and abatement from the conversion are fully exhausted, ending in the early 1990s, and the current Department of Finance record shows no exemption on the lot. And there is a real retail component in a very small cooperative, which cuts both ways: potential corporate rent whose ownership, lease terms, expenses and actual net contribution to maintenance require confirmation; retail occupancy alone does not establish income to the cooperative. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.

Recent transfers at this building, from The Roebling Research Library. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Apr 23, 20262E
2 BR · 7,257 sf
$5,400,000$744/sf-4.4%
Mar 18, 20225W
3 BR · 3 BA · 2,903 sf
$3,450,000$1,188/sf+4.7%
Dec 30, 20212W
2 BR · 2.5 BA · 3,000 sf
$5,400,000$1,800/sf-6.8%
Nov 29, 20217E
2 BR · 2 BA · 2,300 sf
$2,475,000$1,076/sf-10.0%
Mar 25, 20213W
4 BR · 3.5 BA · 2,903 sf
$3,200,000$1,102/sf-8.6%
Jul 18, 20167E
2 BR · 2 BA · 2,300 sf
$2,750,000$1,196/sf-35.3%
Dec 2, 20144E
2 BR · 1 BA · 1,400 sf
$1,995,000$1,425/sf+0.0%
Sep 23, 20132W
2 BR · 2 BA · 2,800 sf
$2,850,000$1,018/sf+1.8%

Market read. Most recent trades (2026 to date) cleared a median $744/sf (floor-adjusted) across 1 sale. Floor-adjusted means each sale is restated to a constant mix of floors, so the figure can differ from the plain median of the sales listed above. Median listing discount 6.5% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

2W · 3,000 sf+89%
$2,850,000 ($1,018/sf) 2013 → $5,400,000 ($1,800/sf) 2021
4E · 1,400 sf+87%
$1,065,000 ($761/sf) 2004 → $1,995,000 ($1,425/sf) 2014
2E · 7,257 sf+57%
$3,450,000 2009 → $3,750,000 2010 → $5,400,000 ($744/sf) 2026
7E · 2,300 sf-10%
$2,750,000 ($1,196/sf) 2016 → $2,475,000 ($1,076/sf) 2021
View all 17 recorded transfers, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-00529-0001). Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified in The Roebling Research Library. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.

For owners

What would your apartment rent for?

Enter your apartment and I'll send you what it would rent for, from comparable closed leases at Bleecker Tower and nearby.

Buying here? Co-op closing costs typically run 2 to 3% of the price. See NYC co-op and condo closing costs, line by line.

The Roebling Report

Keep up with Bleecker Tower and its market

The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings like Bleecker Tower. Unsubscribe anytime.

We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.

What to know if you’re buying

Resolve the occupancy classification first. JLWQA is not documented here, but the conversion's M1-5B context means it cannot be assumed away. Pull the certificate of occupancy for BIN 1008418 and get the managing agent's position in writing before your lender commits.

Confirm whether a final certificate of occupancy has issued. There has been an open Alteration-CO job since 2023 and nine renewal filings since August 2024.

Underwrite full taxes. The J-51 from the 1980–81 conversion burned off by the early 1990s. Nothing is phasing out.

Understand the retail. Ask whether the ground floor is corporation-owned and rent-producing or a separately held commercial cooperative unit, and get the lease terms either way.

Get the whole policy stack in writing before you offer. Financing ceiling, minimum down, liquidity, sublet terms, flip tax, pied-à-terre and entity-purchase rules. These terms were not established in the materials reviewed for this profile.

Confirm the LPC requirements for the renovation scope. Main NoHo Historic District — not NoHo East, which governs a neighboring building on this block under a different designation and a different report.

What to know if you’re selling

Get ahead of the certificate of occupancy. A buyer's attorney will find the open alteration job and the renewal history. Handing over the current certificate and the co-op's position at the outset converts a stall into a paragraph.

Answer the JLWQA question before it is asked. Even a documented "no" is worth having in hand, because buyers' counsel in NoHo ask it about every loft conversion of this vintage.

Sell the architecture with its sources. Stephen Decatur Hatch, the Manhattan Savings Institution, 1889–91, the copper tower, the restored cast-iron balconies. These are LPC-documented facts, not marketing claims, and they survive diligence.

Lead with scale. Document the specific home's measured interior area and floor allocation; the gross-area ratio above 3,400 square feet is not an apartment-size measurement.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 644 Broadway, also evaluate:

  • 27 Bleecker Street — the 1888 loft cooperative on the same tax block, in the NoHo East Historic District under a separate designation, with documented joint living-work quarters; the closest neighbor and the sharpest contrast in occupancy posture
  • 54 Bleecker Street — 1896 warehouse converted 1985–86; the closest peer on conversion vintage and J-51 history
  • 40 Bleecker Street — the new-construction NoHo condominium alternative
  • 36 Bleecker Street — NoHo loft building of comparable scale
  • 10 Bleecker Street — small NoHo cooperative nearby
  • 25 Bond Street — NoHo condominium; the tenure alternative at a higher price tier
  • 40 Bond Street — Herzog & de Meuron's NoHo condominium; the trophy contrast
  • 1 Bond Street — Bond Street loft building of similar unit count
  • 27 Great Jones Street — NoHo loft building a block east
  • 303 Mercer Street — large NoHo cooperative; the scale contrast in the same submarket
  • 285 Lafayette Street — Lafayette Street loft conversion of comparable vintage

More NoHo buildings

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, transit, and pricing across NoHo — read The Roebling Team Guide to NoHo.

Preparing a board package for this building?

The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.

Considering a move at Bleecker Tower?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Licensed Associate Real Estate Broker · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com