Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,632/sf ▴3%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $271K/room ▴4%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $465K/room ▴3%CPW $355K/roomFifth Ave $501K/roomBillionaires' Row $4,313/sfMidtown East $1,279/sf ▾9%
Full index →
Condominium · 1920
Arris Lofts
27-28 Thomson Avenue, Long Island City, NY 11101
Buildings·Condominium

27-28 Thomson Avenue (Arris Lofts)

27-28 Thomson Avenue, Long Island City, NY 11101

Long Island City, Queens

BBL 4000827501 · BIN 4000697

At a glance
Year built
1920
Type
Condominium
Units
237
Floors
8
Financing
Standard condominium financing; no board-imposed ceiling
Flip tax
Not documented in the records reviewed
Landmark status
Not an individual landmark; not in a historic district
NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission and City Planning records, updated February 2026
Leasing by owners
Permitted with conditions
Dogs and cats
Not permitted
Doorman
Full-time doorman

Arris Lofts sales history: 483 recorded sales

Own an apartment at Arris Lofts?
Enter your apartment to see its recorded sale history and today’s estimate.
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2007–2026

Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.

Median $/sf
$1,300
Listing discount
2.0%
Recorded sales
483
On record
2007–2026
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at Arris Lofts would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.

As cited in The Wall Street Journal★ 92 reviews on Google

Arris Lofts is the largest and most complete example of Long Island City's industrial-to-residential conversion, and it is one of the few in the district where the building being converted was genuinely worth converting.

The structure occupies an entire triangular block bounded by Thomson Avenue, Court Square and the Sunnyside Yards — roughly 76,800 square feet of land carrying about 379,500 square feet of building, in eight stories of poured concrete. It went up around 1920 (1923 in architectural and preservation records) as a speculative industrial building, and became one of six Eagle Electric Manufacturing Company warehouses in the neighborhood. Preservation records describe the original construction and the Eagle occupancy as distinct events; the date the company took the building is not firmly documented in public records. Eagle Electric, founded in 1920 by the brothers Louis and Philip Ludwig, made switches and wiring devices and was, for most of the twentieth century, one of the largest industrial employers in western Queens. Its sign above the Queensboro Bridge approach — Perfection Is Not An Accident — was visible to drivers, to 7 train riders and across the river, and it outlasted most of the manufacturing it advertised. The company was acquired in 2000 and its Long Island City production was gone by 2006. In between, the Thomson Avenue building served as a Metropolitan Life printing plant.

Because it was built as a daylight factory rather than a warehouse, the fabric translates well. The façade is entirely unadorned — no cornice, no ornament, no gesture toward anything but light — and is organized around very large window openings that existed to put daylight onto a factory floor. That is precisely what a loft buyer wants: ceiling heights running roughly 10 to 15 feet, oversized industrial casement glazing, and structural bays deep enough to produce genuinely open plans rather than the notional ones of new construction.

Costas Kondylis handled the conversion — a notable commission for an architect better known for Manhattan towers than for adaptive reuse. The design's central move was to open the interior of the triangle: a landscaped courtyard with a pond was carved into the center of the first floor, and the health club, with its lap pool, was placed against it behind large windows, so the pool looks out into the garden. In a building with a 537-foot frontage and an extremely deep floorplate, that courtyard is what makes the residential plan work at all — it converts the interior of the block from dead core into light and amenity.

The offering plan was declared effective on February 9, 2007, and the condominium began operating on June 11, 2007, the date of the first residential closing. (Most secondary sources date the conversion to 2008; the condominium's audited financial statements are the governing record.) The result — 237 residences, 17 work studios and 2 commercial units — is by a wide margin the largest for-sale loft building in Long Island City, and its scale is what allows it to carry a staffed lobby, a resident manager, a union workforce and a full health club at a per-unit cost that a boutique conversion cannot match.

The building also carries a complicated institutional history, documented in its own audited financials, that a buyer should understand before contract rather than after. That history is set out below, because it is material and because it is largely resolved in the condominium's favor.

Architecture and unit composition

The building is eight stories of poured concrete on a triangular lot of roughly 76,800 square feet, with about 379,500 square feet of built area and a lot frontage of roughly 537 feet. The plan is driven entirely by the geometry: the acute angles of the triangle produce corner residences with unusual window wall, and the interior courtyard resolves the depth problem inherent in a block-sized floorplate.

The 237 residences run from studios and one-bedrooms through large two- and three-bedroom lofts, with select units carrying private terraces and balconies designated as limited common elements. Ceiling heights of approximately 10 to 15 feet and the retained industrial casement windows are the consistent architectural signature across the inventory; the conversion preserved the factory reading rather than erasing it.

The 17 work-studio units are a distinct and unusual product. They are governed alongside the residences — the house rules refer throughout to the combined "Residential & Work Studio" section — but they are a separate unit class in the declaration, and any buyer looking at one should confirm with counsel exactly what use is permitted and what financing is available, since work-studio units do not always underwrite as conventional residential collateral.

Building operations

The governance structure is the first thing to understand. Arris Lofts is not a single undifferentiated condominium. The declaration divides it into a commercial section and a Residential & Work Studio section, with an overall Board of Managers and a separate R&WS Board of Managers that governs the residential and work-studio units and adopts their house rules. The commercial and work-studio units together hold approximately 18.26 percent of the total common interest. For a residential buyer, the practical effect is that the board making decisions about your hallways, your pool and your house rules is the R&WS board, while certain building-wide matters sit above it.

Staff and services. The building is staffed with a concierge and front desk, a resident manager and a unionized workforce covered by a collective bargaining agreement with SEIU Local 32BJ. Payroll and related costs were approximately $1.43 million of roughly $3.06 million in total operating expenses in the most recent audited year on file — a payroll-heavy cost structure typical of a large staffed building, and the line most exposed to union contract cycles.

The health club — pool, sauna, exercise room and locker rooms — is run under contract by an outside operator rather than by building staff. The condominium changed operators in October 2020, reducing the monthly management fee from $12,511 to $7,978. The exercise room is open 24 hours; pool and sauna operate on posted hours and the pool requires a lifeguard on duty.

Financial posture. In the most recent audited statements on file (years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019), the condominium ran total income of approximately $3.22 million against roughly $3.06 million of operating expenses, producing an operating surplus in both years — a building operating in balance rather than deficit. Board-restricted reserves for future major repairs stood at approximately $1.15 million at the 2020 year-end, and management-sourced records in early 2022 put cash on hand at roughly $1.8 million. Common charges rose 7 percent in 2022, and management confirmed no ongoing assessment at that time. The condominium's governing documents do not require advance funding of reserves, and no formal reserve study has been performed — a standard disclosure in New York condominium audits, but one that means the reserve balance is a board decision rather than a funded plan. A structural tax note: because non-residential space exceeds fifteen percent of the aggregate square footage, the condominium cannot elect exempt treatment under Section 528 of the Internal Revenue Code and is taxed under ordinary corporate rules.

Litigation and the sponsor settlement. Two matters are disclosed in the audited financial statements and should be checked for current status at diligence. First, the condominium brought an action against the sponsor over faulty rehabilitation construction and alleged misappropriation of condominium funds. The parties reached a full settlement in January 2019 for $1,744,000. The condominium received $310,000 during 2020 — of which $43,200 reimbursed unit owners for legal fees incurred when the action commenced — and the remaining $1,434,000 during 2021. The board resolved that the settlement proceeds be segregated and used exclusively to fund future major repairs and replacements, and they are held in a separate restricted account. This is the outcome a buyer wants from a construction-defect claim: pursued, settled in full, and ring-fenced for capital.

Second, the condominium initiated a lien foreclosure action in 2018 against the owner of the retail unit — an entity affiliated with the sponsor — over unpaid capital assessments and common charges. The retail owner counterclaimed, including a claim that the condominium had prevented it from securing a permanent certificate of occupancy for the building. Receivables from the commercial unit owner stood at $322,934 at the 2020 year-end, down from $443,906 a year earlier, and at approximately $163,796 by mid-2021. Management-sourced records in early 2022 indicated the matter had reached a receivership under which the retail unit's common charges are collected. Residential unit owners were reported to be free of arrears at that time.

Capital work. A hallway renovation was completed prior to 2022, with further hallway work and a Local Law 11 façade cycle contemplated. Any current transaction should pull the most recent LL11 filing status, the current audited financials, the current budget, and the status of both litigation matters rather than relying on the figures above, which reflect the most recent documents on file.

Policy framework

Ownership form. Condominium. Transfers proceed through a board right of first refusal, not a cooperative-style approval — closings are faster and the buyer pool is wider than at a comparable cooperative.

Subletting. Permitted with a formal process. A rental application and fee are required, the board has up to 21 days to issue a determination, no lease or sublease may be shorter than one year, and the board must approve tenants before move-in. The board may compel termination of a lease obtained through false or bad-faith application, and unit owners are jointly and severally liable for their tenants' compliance with the house rules. As of early 2022, roughly a quarter of the residences were being sublet.

Pets. Permitted for owners with breed prohibitions (Akitas, Chows, Doberman Pinschers, German Shepherds, Pit Bulls, Rottweilers), a two-pet maximum absent board consent, mandatory registration, and mandatory liability insurance of at least $100,000 naming the condominium as an additional insured. Tenants who took occupancy after January 1, 2012 may not keep a dog other than a certified guide dog, and the owner — not the tenant — bears the fine and the obligation to remove the tenant. Investor buyers should treat this as a material constraint on the rental pool. Pets are not permitted in the courtyard, on the roof terrace or in other common elements except in transit.

Alterations. A formal alteration agreement and application process governs any work involving structure or building systems, with board approval required in advance. Terrace and balcony work requires the use of a designated roofing contractor to preserve the roof warranty; owners who use another contractor bear the cost of any warranty breach. Construction noise is limited to weekdays, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

Moves and deliveries. Moves are scheduled in four-hour blocks, weekdays 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. and Saturdays 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. with a surcharge, against a refundable deposit. No moves on Sundays or holidays.

Outdoor space. Terraces and balconies are limited common elements. Charcoal and electric barbecues are permitted with a minimum four-foot hose attached to a working spigot as FDNY code requires; propane and gas grills are prohibited, with substantial fines. Smoking is prohibited throughout the common elements, including the courtyard and roof terrace.

Taxes. Units carry the J-51 condominium abatement, which is mutually exclusive with other abatement programs — a unit receiving J-51 is not eligible for the co-op/condo abatement. Verify the current position on the specific unit's Department of Finance bill, since J-51 benefits run for a fixed term and burn off.

Sublet and pied-à-terre policy

A condominium owner leasing a unit and a co-op shareholder subletting are different rules, and a building-wide rule is different from a restriction on one apartment. This is the building's rule; confirm it for the specific apartment.

Leasing by owners
Permitted with conditionsBoard approvalSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Pied-à-terre ownership
Not verified

Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to discuss the sublet and pied-à-terre rules for that apartment.

Own an apartment here? Request an apartment-specific pricing review.

The Roebling Team at Compass is a brokerage. We are not the building’s management or its application office.

Pets and in-unit washer/dryer

Dogs and cats
Not permittedSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
In-unit washer/dryer
Not verified

Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to confirm the pet and washer/dryer rules for that apartment.

The Roebling Team at Compass is a brokerage. We are not the building’s management or its application office.

Monthly carrying charges in recent sales

Common charges + taxes, per room
$400 per room a monthMedian of 25 recorded sales since October 2023Source: recorded sales, refreshed October 2026
Common charges + taxes, per square foot
$1.21 per square foot a monthMedian of 32 recorded sales since October 2023Source: recorded sales, refreshed October 2026

Common charges plus real estate taxes, combined into one monthly figure the way New York condominium listings show them. Add a mortgage payment for the monthly outlay. A summary of recorded sales, not a current bill; charges change.

Building staffing and amenities

Doorman
Full-time doormanSource: recent listing records
Concierge
YesSource: recent listing records
Attended lobby
YesSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Live-in superintendent
YesSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Package room
YesSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Elevator
YesSource: NYC Department of Buildings elevator records
Amenities noted
Fitness room, pool, spa, roof deck, garden, garage, bike storage, laundry roomSource: The Roebling Team's building profile

Staffing and amenities as our building profile and recent listing records describe them. A feature not listed is not confirmed absent.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟡
Moderate — under today's cap; material modeled 2030 exposure
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$88,575/yr
Per unit / month range
$0 – $31
Modeled exposure split equally across 237 units (the city tax-lot count). Not an assessed amount; co-op shareholders are typically charged by share allocation.

Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
SWARMP
What this means for you

The latest available filing classified the facade as SWARMP — Safe With A Repair and Maintenance Program: the engineer identified conditions requiring monitoring or repair, with repairs due by the deadline stated in the filing. The scope, timeline, and how the building funds the work are building-specific — we review the filings and board materials for you.

Inspection history
2005–10
Safe
2010–15
SWARMP
2015–20
Safe
2020–25
SWARMP
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2029
Assessed · 2005–10 to 2020–25
$2,650 in filing penalties
payment status not in the record
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs are due by the deadline stated in the filing.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Penalties shown are amounts DOB assessed against filings on record across 2005–10 to 2020–25. The FISP dataset does not record whether they were paid, contested or remain open, so treat the figure as history rather than a current balance and confirm the building’s standing with the managing agent.

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

Arris Lofts occupies a distinct position in the Long Island City market. Most for-sale inventory in the district is new-construction glass tower product built after 2010 — high floor counts, small units, tax abatements of varying vintage, and finishes that are broadly interchangeable from building to building. Arris is the opposite trade: an eight-story pre-war industrial building with ceiling heights, window walls and structural bays that no new construction in the neighborhood replicates, and a garden-and-pool amenity core that none of them has.

That character premium is the building's pricing argument, and it is durable. Loft product does not compete on the same axis as tower product; it competes on ceiling height, light, and the impossibility of building it again. The counterweight is that Arris is a 2007-vintage conversion of a 1920s structure, which means building systems and envelope carry the maintenance profile of both — and that the common charge supports a staffed, unionized, full-amenity operation across a floorplate the size of a city block.

For buyers, the honest comparison set runs in two directions. Against Long Island City new construction, Arris trades character and space for newer systems and, in some buildings, an active tax abatement. Against Manhattan and Brooklyn loft conversions of similar vintage and quality, Arris trades location for a materially lower price per square foot while delivering an amenity package — lap pool, courtyard, roof terrace, 24-hour fitness room, full staff — that most of them do not carry.

For sellers, the marketable facts are specific and verifiable: a named original industry with a genuine place in Queens history, a named conversion architect, ceiling heights and window walls that photograph, and a sponsor construction claim that was pursued and settled in full with the proceeds ring-fenced for capital. That last point is worth stating rather than avoiding — a building that sued its sponsor and collected is a stronger story than a building that never looked.

Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.

Recent closings at this building, from The Roebling Research Library. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Aug 12, 2026816
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,361 sf
$2,025,000$1,488/sf-7.1%
Jul 31, 2026804
1 BR · 2 BA · 1,338 sf
$2,050,000$1,532/sf-6.6%
Jul 20, 2026226
1 BR · 1 BA · 1,000 sf
$1,300,000$1,300/sf+0.0%
Jul 8, 2026514
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,762 sf
$2,125,000$1,206/sf-1.1%
May 28, 2026304
1 BR · 2 BA · 1,385 sf
$1,845,000$1,332/sf-6.8%
May 4, 2026228
1 BR · 1.5 BA · 1,085 sf
$1,230,000$1,134/sf-1.5%
Apr 29, 2026127
1 BR · 1 BA · 865 sf
$976,000$1,128/sf+8.6%
Mar 19, 2026529
1 BR · 2 BA · 1,133 sf
$1,500,000$1,324/sf+3.4%

Market read. Most recent trades (2026) cleared a median $1,300/sf (recorded) across 9 sales. Median listing discount 2.0% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

View all 483 recorded sales, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 4-00082-7501). Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified in The Roebling Research Library. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.

Rents · The Roebling Index

Closed rents at Arris Lofts, last 36 months

$63median rent per sq ft per year
SizeLeasesMedian / month
Studio2$4,175
1 bedroom14$4,975
2 bedroom5$7,200

21 closed leases, October 2023 to September 2026. Most recent lease September 2026. Sizes with fewer than 2 leases are not shown. Compiled by The Roebling Team at Compass from closed leases.

For owners

What would your apartment rent for?

The figures above are the building's closed leases. Enter your apartment and I'll send you what yours would rent for, from comparable leases at Arris Lofts and nearby.

What would buying here cost?

At the recent median sale of $1.45M (23 sales since 2024), a buyer putting 25% down would pay about $62,167 to close, or 4.3% of the price.

  • Mansion tax: $14,500
  • Mortgage recording tax: $20,934
  • Title insurance: $6,525
  • Attorneys, lender, building fees, reserves and filings: $20,208

Assumes a resale (the seller pays transfer taxes), a $4,500 attorney fee and a mortgage on the rest.

The Roebling Report

Keep up with Arris Lofts and its market

The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings like Arris Lofts. Unsubscribe anytime.

We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.

What to know if you’re buying

Read the two-board structure. The Residential & Work Studio board governs your house rules; the overall board sits above it; and the non-residential units hold roughly 18 percent of the common interest. Understand which body decides what before you assume how a decision will go.

Ask for the current status of both litigations. The sponsor construction claim was settled in full in 2019 and collected by 2021. The commercial-unit foreclosure and receivership was live as of 2022. Some lenders scrutinize condominiums with open litigation; get the current position in writing from the managing agent.

The tenant dog rule is real. If you are buying to rent, understand that your tenant cannot have a dog and that you, not the tenant, carry the fine and the obligation to remove them.

Confirm the J-51 position on your specific unit. J-51 runs for a fixed term, is mutually exclusive with the co-op/condo abatement, and its expiry changes the carrying cost.

Reserves are a board decision, not a funded plan. The governing documents do not require advance reserve funding and no reserve study has been performed. Ask what the current restricted balance is, what the Local Law 11 cycle looks like, and whether an assessment is contemplated.

Work studios are a different animal. If you are looking at one of the 17 work-studio units, confirm permitted use and financing availability with counsel and a lender before contract.

What to know if you’re selling

Lead with the fabric. Ten-to-fifteen-foot ceilings, original industrial casement windows, and a poured-concrete factory shell are not reproducible in Long Island City new construction. That is the whole argument.

Sell the courtyard and the pool together. The landscaped courtyard with its pond, and the lap pool that looks into it, are the single most distinctive amenity in the district's for-sale inventory.

Address the litigation proactively. A buyer's attorney will find it. Framed correctly — claim brought, settled in full, proceeds restricted to capital — it reads as governance strength rather than risk.

Position against towers, not against other lofts. Most competing Long Island City inventory is glass tower product. The buyer who wants a loft is not cross-shopping those buildings on price per square foot; they are cross-shopping ceiling height.

Comparable buildings

Long Island City does not yet have building profiles on this site. The most useful comparison set for Arris Lofts is therefore the industrial-conversion condominium tier in Brooklyn and Manhattan — buildings that make the same architectural argument at different price points:

  • 51 Jay Street — DUMBO conversion of an E.W. Bliss machine shop; the closest architectural analogue in Brooklyn, at a smaller scale and a higher price per square foot
  • The American Thread Building (260 West Broadway) — Tribeca loft conversion of a historic commercial building; the Manhattan benchmark for the type
  • Court Street Lofts (505 Court Street) — Brooklyn loft conversion created by non-eviction plan; a comparable conversion-mechanics case
  • 70 Washington Street — DUMBO condominium of 259 residences over a commercial unit; the closest match on scale and on residential-over-commercial structure
  • 85 Adams Street (The Beacon Tower) — DUMBO condominium with ground-floor commercial and a garage unit; another mixed-section governance comparison
  • 205 Water Street — DUMBO condominium; a smaller neighborhood peer
  • 260 Park Avenue South — Manhattan loft conversion; the uptown price comparison for the same product type
  • 421 Hudson Street (The Printing House) — West Village conversion with a rooftop health club and pool; the closest amenity analogue to the Arris health club
  • 250 West Street — 1906 Tribeca warehouse converted in 2012, with a pool and full amenity floor; the trophy end of the same architectural argument
  • 1 Morton Square — West Village loft-idiom condominium of 2004; new construction written in the industrial vocabulary rather than converted from it

More Long Island City buildings

The neighborhood

For the full neighborhood — its buildings, character, and market — read The Roebling Team Guide to Long Island City.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.

Considering a move at Arris Lofts?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com