324 East 93rd Street (The Marx)
324 East 93rd Street, New York, NY 10128
BBL 1015557503 · BIN 1090785
- Year built
- 2020
- Type
- Condominium
- Units
- 6
- Floors
- 6
- Pets
- Not documented in the records located for this page — confirm with the managing agent
- Landmark status
- Not an individual landmark; not in a historic district
- NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission and City Planning records, updated February 2026
- Doorman
- No doorman
Every recorded sale at this building, 2007–2025
Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.
- Median $/sf, 2025
- $1,586
- 1 sale
- Listing discount
- 0.7%
- Recorded sales
- 9
- On record
- 2007–2025
Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.
A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at The Marx Condominium would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.
This is a six-apartment building, and the whole proposition follows from that number. Each residence occupies an entire floor, so every apartment has windows front and back, no shared landing, and no neighbor above or below except one. In Manhattan the standard way to buy that experience is a townhouse; The Marx offers it inside a condominium, with condominium closing mechanics, at, on average, about a sixth of the operating burden of owning the whole building; each owner's actual share follows the common interests in the declaration.
It exists because the block is not landmarked. Block 1555, lot 7503 appears nowhere in the Landmarks Preservation Commission's designated-and-calendared database, and every filing on the site carries the landmark flag "N" — which is why the five-story building that stood here could be demolished outright in 2016 and replaced. A few blocks west, inside the Carnegie Hill Historic District, the same demolition and replacement would have needed Landmarks Preservation Commission approval. The trade is that R8B zoning sets the envelope for what can replace it: under the current district table, a street wall of 55 to 65 feet with a setback above it and a maximum building height of 75 feet for standard residences, higher for qualifying affordable or senior housing. The rules in force when this building was filed may have differed. PLUTO records a built FAR of 4.11 on the 2,517-square-foot lot against a district residential FAR of 4.00; that simple comparison does not establish legal zoning floor area or permitted future work.
The development history is short and clean. Demolition in late 2016, a new-building application filed in December 2018 and approved in June 2019, completion in 2020, a condominium subdivision filed with the Department of Buildings in May 2021 that describes the job in one line — subdivide the existing tax lot into six condominium tax lots — and a declaration dated November 2021 and recorded July 2022. The first residence closed in the summer of 2022 and the last of the six closed in 2025. The sellout is complete, and every apartment is held by a separate owner of record.
The carrying cost is the fact that needs the most attention. The six unit lots have carried a zero exemption on the assessment roll in every assessment year since they were created — no 421-a, J-51 or 485-x appears there — but abatements are applied on the bill, so check the specific apartment's tax bill. A buyer coming from abated new construction elsewhere in Manhattan may find the monthly number materially higher relative to price. There is no exemption phase-out ahead, but future bills still change with assessments and tax rates.
Architecture and unit composition
The lot is 2,517 square feet, roughly twenty-five feet of East 93rd Street frontage, and the building takes about 13,000 gross square feet out of it across six stories. There is no corner and no protected exposure on either flank, so light comes from the street to the north and the rear yard to the south — the classic Manhattan mid-block section, and the reason a full-floor plate here reads better in person than on paper.
Apartment 101 at the base is the outlier at 2,025 square feet, roughly 380 square feet larger than the floors above it, which usually indicates cellar or rear-yard area attached to the ground-floor residence; the plan should be walked and the survey read before assuming what that area is and whether it is usable living space. Apartments 201 through 501 are identical 1,646-square-foot plates. The top floor, 601, is 1,734 square feet.
The design office of record is Ralph Kowalczyk, RA, who signed the new-building application; structural and excavation work was filed by George Cambourakis, PE, and plumbing and mechanical by Alexander Soskin, PE. The building is contextual contemporary infill rather than a designed statement, and the honest description is that its value proposition is the floor plate and the location rather than the façade.
Building operations
There is no documented amenity program and no staffed lobby, ; the six-unit count alone does not determine appropriate staffing or amenities. City records show no doorman position, no garage, no commercial unit and no non-residential floor area on the lot. Confirm the actual managing-agent and service arrangements, common charges and reserves. Unit count and an undocumented amenity program do not establish low monthly costs or a thin reserve.
The corollary is concentration risk, and it is the operating fact a buyer here should reason about hardest. Six residences share every fixed cost. Roof, boiler and façade costs are allocated under the declaration; the stated six-story height does not itself trigger FISP/Local Law11, and a single delinquent owner averages nearly seventeen percent of the budget, with the actual share set by that unit's common interest. Ask for the operating budget, the reserve balance, the assessment history since 2022, the status of any sponsor obligations under the offering plan, and the building's warranty position — the structure is only a few years old, and the first meaningful capital cycle has not yet arrived.
Policy framework
Ownership form: Condominium. Purchases close through the standard right-of-first-refusal mechanism rather than a cooperative board approval.
Pied-à-terre, subletting, LLC, trust and foreign ownership: Not documented; confirm in the declaration, bylaws and house rules. Minimum lease terms, pet rules, and any move-in or alteration deposits are governed by house rules not located for this page and should be confirmed with the managing agent.
Board composition: With six units, the board is drawn from a pool of six owners. Governance in a building this small is personal, and the practical questions — who serves, how decisions get made, whether any owner holds more than one residence — are worth asking directly during diligence.
Real estate taxes: No exemption appears on any of the six unit lots in any assessment year; check the specific unit's tax bill for any abatement, and note the tax class 2C treatment when projecting future assessments.
Building staffing and amenities
- Doorman
- No doormanSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
- Elevator
- YesSource: NYC Department of Buildings elevator records
Staffing and amenities as our building profile and recent listing records describe them. A feature not listed is not confirmed absent. Outdoor space, parking and some facilities can belong to particular apartments or to a separate owner; confirm access for the specific apartment.
Local Law 97
This building is below the 25,000 sq ft threshold at which LL97 limits apply to a building on its own. It is still covered if it shares a tax lot or condominium board with buildings totaling over 50,000 sq ft; confirm on DOB’s covered-buildings list.
See full Local Law 97 analysis →Recent sales
All six residences have been conveyed to separate purchasers in individually recorded deeds between 2022 and 2025, and six distinct owners appear on the FY2027 assessment roll. The building is fully sold out and has not yet seen a resale.
That is the central pricing problem here and the reason to be disciplined. There is no in-building resale evidence at all — every recorded transaction is a sponsor sale, and sponsor sales in a six-unit boutique are negotiated one at a time across a three-year window rather than set by a market. Comparables have to be built from the small set of new-construction Yorkville condominiums and from full-floor and boutique product elsewhere on the Upper East Side, adjusted for the absence of an abatement and for the absence of staff and amenities.
Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.
Recent closings at this building, from The Roebling Research Library. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.
| Date | Unit | Apartment | Price | PPSF | vs. Ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2025 | 601 | 1,734 sf | $2,749,275 | $1,586/sf | — |
| Sep 18, 2024 | 501 | 1,646 sf | $2,072,138 | $1,259/sf | — |
| Jul 15, 2024 | 3 | 3 BR · 3 BA · 1,646 sf | $2,050,000 | $1,245/sf | +2.8% |
| Jul 9, 2024 | 301 | 1,646 sf | $2,050,000 | $1,245/sf | — |
| Jun 27, 2024 | 401 | 1,646 sf | $1,883,762 | $1,144/sf | — |
| Oct 3, 2022 | 2 | 3 BR · 3 BA · 1,646 sf | $2,295,000 | $1,394/sf | +0.0% |
| Jul 25, 2022 | 201 | 3 BR · 3 BA · 1,646 sf | $2,240,150 | $1,361/sf | — |
Market read. Most recent trades (2025) cleared a median $1,586/sf (recorded) across 1 sale. Median listing discount 0.7% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.
Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.
Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01555-7503; each condominium apartment is its own tax lot). Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified in The Roebling Research Library. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.
What would your apartment rent for?
Enter your apartment and I'll send you what it would rent for, from comparable closed leases at The Marx Condominium and nearby.
Buying here? Condo closing costs with a mortgage typically run 3 to 6% of the price. See NYC co-op and condo closing costs, line by line.
Keep up with The Marx Condominium and its market
The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings like The Marx Condominium. Unsubscribe anytime.
We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.
What to know if you’re buying
The roll shows no exemption in any year. Confirm on the unit's tax bill that no abatement applies. Model the true monthly number before you model the price.
Six owners carry every fixed cost. Read the budget, the reserve balance and the assessment history. Ask what happens if one owner stops paying.
Establish what the ground-floor residence actually includes. Apartment 101 is 380 square feet larger than the floors above it on the assessment roll. Read the plan, the survey and the declaration before assuming that area is finished living space or exclusive outdoor space.
Understand the lot-line exposure. This is a mid-block interior lot with light from the street and the rear yard only. Establish which windows are lot-line windows and what the adjacent parcels can legally become under R8B.
The building has no resale history. Every recorded deed is a sponsor sale. Price from outside comparables, not from the building's own record.
Comparable buildings
If you're considering The Marx, also evaluate:
- 212 East 95th Street — East Hill, a boutique new-construction condominium of roughly two dozen residences; the nearest small-scale condominium alternative in Yorkville
- 302 East 96th Street — Vitre, a 48-residence ground-up condominium with parking units; the newer, larger alternative a few blocks north
- 245 East 93rd Street — Astor Terrace, a 290-residence 1985 condominium by Skidmore, Owings & Merrill; the full-service condominium on the same street at the opposite scale
- 200 East 94th Street — Carnegie Park, built 1986 as a rental and converted to condominium in 2014; amenity-led alternative nearby
- 333 East 91st Street — Azure, a 2010 condop by SLCE Architects; newer construction with a different tenure structure
- 340 East 93rd Street — Plymouth Tower, a large 1980 cooperative directly across the street; the co-op alternative on the block
- 345 East 93rd Street — Mill Rock Plaza, a 1974 cooperative tower; scale, staffing and price per foot at the other end of the range
- 407 East 91st Street — a 35-residence cooperative converted from a former piano factory; loft-scale layouts in a small building
- 125 East 93rd Street — a 24-residence George F. Pelham cooperative of 1924; the small prewar alternative further west on the same street
More Upper East Side buildings
- 320 East 86th Street — 1925 condop
- The Park Mansion, 320 East 82nd Street — 1915 condominium
- 323 East 79th Street (The Matteo) — 2022 condominium
- 325 East 72nd Street — 1926 co-op
- 325 East 79th Street — 1929 co-op
- 325 East 80th Street — 1940 co-op
The neighborhood
For the full corridor — architecture, transit, and pricing across Upper East Side — read The Roebling Team Guide to Upper East Side.
How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.
Considering a move at The Marx Condominium?
Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com