324 East 93rd Street (The Marx)
324 East 93rd Street, New York, NY 10128
Yorkville, Upper East Side
BBL 1015557503 · BIN 1090785
- Year built
- 2020
- Type
- Condominium
- Units
- 6
- Floors
- 6
- Landmark
- No
- Pets
- Not documented in the records located for this page — confirm with the managing agent
Every recorded sale at this building, 2007–2025
Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.
- Median $/sf
- $1,586
- Listing discount
- 0.7%
- Recorded sales
- 9
- On record
- 2007–2025
This is a six-apartment building, and the whole proposition follows from that number. Each residence occupies an entire floor, so every apartment has windows front and back, no shared landing, and no neighbor above or below except one. In Manhattan the standard way to buy that experience is a townhouse; The Marx offers it inside a condominium, with condominium closing mechanics, at roughly a sixth of the operating burden of owning the whole building.
It exists because the block is not landmarked. Block 1555, lot 7503 appears nowhere in the Landmarks Preservation Commission's designated-and-calendared database, and every filing on the site carries the landmark flag "N" — which is why the five-story building that stood here could be demolished outright in 2016 and replaced. A few blocks west, inside Carnegie Hill, that sequence is effectively foreclosed. The trade is that R8B zoning caps what can replace it: sixty feet, six stories, holding the street wall. The building is the maximum the district allows on a 2,517-square-foot lot, and PLUTO's built FAR of 4.11 against a district residential FAR of 4.00 confirms it is fully built out.
The development history is short and clean. Demolition in late 2016, a new-building application filed in December 2018 and approved in June 2019, completion in 2020, a condominium subdivision filed with the Department of Buildings in May 2021 that describes the job in one line — subdivide the existing tax lot into six condominium tax lots — and a declaration dated November 2021 and recorded July 2022. The first residence closed in the summer of 2022 and the last of the six closed in 2025. The sellout is complete, and every apartment is held by a separate owner of record.
The carrying cost is the fact that needs the most attention. There is no abatement here of any kind. Not 421-a, not J-51, not 485-x. The six unit lots have carried a zero exemption in every assessment year since they were created, and the residences have been taxed at full assessment from the first closing. A buyer coming from abated new construction elsewhere in Manhattan will find the monthly number materially higher relative to price, and it does not step up — it starts where it stays.
Architecture and unit composition
The lot is 2,517 square feet, roughly twenty-five feet of East 93rd Street frontage, and the building takes about 13,000 gross square feet out of it across six stories. There is no corner and no protected exposure on either flank, so light comes from the street to the north and the rear yard to the south — the classic Manhattan mid-block section, and the reason a full-floor plate here reads better in person than on paper.
Apartment 101 at the base is the outlier at 2,025 square feet, roughly 380 square feet larger than the floors above it, which usually indicates cellar or rear-yard area attached to the ground-floor residence; the plan should be walked and the survey read before assuming what that area is and whether it is usable living space. Apartments 201 through 501 are identical 1,646-square-foot plates. The top floor, 601, is 1,734 square feet.
The design office of record is Ralph Kowalczyk, RA, who signed the new-building application; structural and excavation work was filed by George Cambourakis, PE, and plumbing and mechanical by Alexander Soskin, PE. The building is contextual contemporary infill rather than a designed statement, and the honest description is that its value proposition is the floor plate and the location rather than the façade.
Building operations
There is no documented amenity program and no staffed lobby, and at six units there should not be. City records show no doorman position, no garage, no commercial unit and no non-residential floor area on the lot. A building of this size runs on a small managing-agent engagement, a porter or superintendent service contract, and common charges that reflect all of that — which in practice means a low absolute monthly number and very little cushion.
The corollary is concentration risk, and it is the operating fact a buyer here should reason about hardest. Six residences share every fixed cost. A roof, a boiler, a façade cycle or a Local Law 11 obligation lands on six owners rather than sixty, and a single delinquent owner is nearly seventeen percent of the budget. Ask for the operating budget, the reserve balance, the assessment history since 2022, the status of any sponsor obligations under the offering plan, and the building's warranty position — the structure is only a few years old, and the first meaningful capital cycle has not yet arrived.
Policy framework
Ownership form: Condominium. Purchases close through the standard right-of-first-refusal mechanism rather than a cooperative board approval, which produces faster and more predictable timelines.
Pied-à-terre, subletting, LLC, trust and foreign ownership: All permitted under the standard condominium framework. Minimum lease terms, pet rules, and any move-in or alteration deposits are governed by house rules not located for this page and should be confirmed with the managing agent.
Board composition: With six units, the board is drawn from a pool of six owners. Governance in a building this small is personal, and the practical questions — who serves, how decisions get made, whether any owner holds more than one residence — are worth asking directly during diligence.
Real estate taxes: No abatement of any kind on any of the six unit lots in any assessment year. Underwrite full unabated taxes on the specific unit, and note the tax class 2C treatment when projecting future assessments.
Local Law 97
This building is below the 25,000 sq ft threshold at which LL97 emissions caps apply. No regulatory capital pressure from this law specifically, current or 2030.
See full Local Law 97 analysis →Recent sales
All six residences have been conveyed to separate purchasers in individually recorded deeds between 2022 and 2025, and six distinct owners appear on the FY2027 assessment roll. The building is fully sold out and has not yet seen a resale.
That is the central pricing problem here and the reason to be disciplined. There is no in-building resale evidence at all — every recorded transaction is a sponsor sale, and sponsor sales in a six-unit boutique are negotiated one at a time across a three-year window rather than set by a market. Comparables have to be built from the small set of new-construction Yorkville condominiums and from full-floor and boutique product elsewhere on the Upper East Side, adjusted for the absence of an abatement and for the absence of staff and amenities. Market statements should be indexed to the last complete year rather than to partial-year data, which is especially thin at this unit count.
Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.
Recent closings at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.
| Date | Unit | Apartment | Price | PPSF | vs. Ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2025 | 601 | 1,734 sf | $2,749,275 | $1,586/sf | off-mkt |
| Sep 18, 2024 | 501 | 1,646 sf | $2,072,138 | $1,259/sf | off-mkt |
| Jul 15, 2024 | 3 | 3 BR · 3 BA · 1,646 sf | $2,050,000 | $1,245/sf | +2.8% |
| Jul 9, 2024 | 301 | 1,646 sf | $2,050,000 | $1,245/sf | off-mkt |
| Jun 27, 2024 | 401 | 1,646 sf | $1,883,762 | $1,144/sf | off-mkt |
| Oct 3, 2022 | 2 | 3 BR · 3 BA · 1,646 sf | $2,295,000 | $1,394/sf | +0.0% |
| Jul 25, 2022 | 201 | 3 BR · 3 BA · 1,646 sf | $2,240,150 | $1,361/sf | off-mkt |
Market read. Most recent trades (2025) cleared a median $1,586/sf across 1 sale. Median listing discount 0.7% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.
Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.
Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01555-7503) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.
What to know if you’re buying
There is no abatement and there never was one. Full unabated taxes from the first closing. Model the true monthly number before you model the price.
Six owners carry every fixed cost. Read the budget, the reserve balance and the assessment history. Ask what happens if one owner stops paying.
Establish what the ground-floor residence actually includes. Apartment 101 is 380 square feet larger than the floors above it on the assessment roll. Read the plan, the survey and the declaration before assuming that area is finished living space or exclusive outdoor space.
Understand the lot-line exposure. This is a mid-block interior lot with light from the street and the rear yard only. Establish which windows are lot-line windows and what the adjacent parcels can legally become under R8B.
The building has no resale history. Every recorded deed is a sponsor sale. Price from outside comparables, not from the building's own record.
Comparable buildings
If you're considering The Marx, also evaluate:
- 212 East 95th Street — East Hill, a boutique new-construction condominium of roughly two dozen residences; the nearest small-scale condominium alternative in Yorkville
- 302 East 96th Street — Vitre, a 48-residence ground-up condominium with parking units; the newer, larger alternative a few blocks north
- 245 East 93rd Street — Astor Terrace, a 290-residence 1985 condominium by Skidmore, Owings & Merrill; the full-service condominium on the same street at the opposite scale
- 200 East 94th Street — Carnegie Park, built 1986 as a rental and converted to condominium in 2014; amenity-led alternative nearby
- 333 East 91st Street — Azure, a 2010 condop by SLCE Architects; newer construction with a different tenure structure
- 340 East 93rd Street — Plymouth Tower, a large 1980 cooperative directly across the street; the co-op alternative on the block
- 345 East 93rd Street — Mill Rock Plaza, a 1974 cooperative tower; scale, staffing and price per foot at the other end of the range
- 407 East 91st Street — a 35-residence cooperative converted from a former piano factory; loft-scale layouts in a small building
- 125 East 93rd Street — a 24-residence George F. Pelham cooperative of 1924; the small prewar alternative further west on the same street
The neighborhood
For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across Upper East Side — read The Roebling Team Guide to Upper East Side.
How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent.
Considering a move at The Marx Condominium, the name recorded on the condominium declaration in ACRIS. Market records generally carry the plain street address?
Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.
Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.
A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at The Marx Condominium, the name recorded on the condominium declaration in ACRIS. Market records generally carry the plain street address would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.