Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,600/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $270K/room 2%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $472K/room 18%CPW $355K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,313/sf 24%Greenwich Village $2,455/sf 10%
Full index →
Cooperative · 1936
Eastgate
235 East 73rd Street, New York, NY 10021

235 East 73rd Street (Eastgate)

235 East 73rd Street, New York, NY 10021

Lenox Hill, Upper East Side

BBL 1014280017 · BIN 1043992

ArchitectEmery Roth
At a glance
Year built
1936
Type
Cooperative
Units
86
Floors
13
Landmark
No
Financing
75 percent maximum (25 percent minimum down) per management-sourced records; some listing records carry 80 percent. Confirm in writing
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2003–2026

Bedroom-by-bedroom medians, the full transfer record, and how units trade against ask.

1BR median
$830K
Recent range
$380K – $1.6M
Listing discount
3.5%
Recorded transfers
115

Eastgate is one of the few places in Manhattan where a single developer and a single architect built both sides of a block and meant it as one composition. Bing & Bing put up six brown-brick apartment houses on East 73rd Street between Second and Third Avenues between 1928 and 1936, all to Emery Roth's design, and marketed the group under its own name rather than as six addresses. 235 East 73rd Street is the last chapter of that project — it and 230 across the street were the final pair completed, in 1936, eight years after the first.

That sequence is not trivia; it changed the apartments. Architectural records report that the earlier Eastgate buildings were built with sunken living rooms and working fireplaces, and that in the last two — 230 and 235 — the fireplaces were decorative and never functional. A buyer walking from 225 to 235 is walking eight years down the same architect's evolution, and the mantels here are ornament rather than flue. Ask, and verify, before assuming otherwise.

What the building is in market terms is a Roth prewar without a Roth price. The enclave sits four long blocks east of Park Avenue, on a side street with no through traffic, in a building whose façade detail — the irregular projecting brickwork, the stone insets, the treated water-tank enclosure — belongs to the same hand that designed the Central Park West towers. The pricing belongs to Second Avenue. That gap is the whole argument for the block.

The third thing worth knowing is that this cooperative is unusually well documented and unusually strict. Its offering plan, house rules, sublet package and four years of audited financial statements sit in The Roebling Research Library, and the picture they produce is of a conservatively financed, owner-occupant building with an explicit two-year residency rule, board interviews for subtenants, a hard cap on cumulative subletting, and a fully specified pet policy. That is a narrower buyer pool than a Second Avenue condominium — and a more stable one.

Architecture and unit composition

Thirteen floors of brown brick on a 100-foot frontage, roughly 89,000 square feet of building on a 10,216-square-foot lot. The plan produces small-to-medium prewar layouts — studios and one-bedrooms in the lettered lines, two- and three-bedrooms in the assembled apartments — with prewar proportions, defined foyers and real closets. The building's history is one of steady consolidation: the gap between the 85 apartments recorded at conversion and the roughly 74 counted today is the record of decades of two-into-one merges, and Department of Buildings filings at this address are dominated by apartment-level combination and reconfiguration work.

For a buyer, that history is an option with a price. Whether a given apartment sits next to a combinable neighbor, and whether the board has approved similar merges recently, is a real feature and should be researched at the specific line rather than assumed at the building level.

Building operations

Tax history. The Department of Finance J-51 record shows three separate grants at this lot: one initiated in 1991 against roughly $60,100 of qualifying alteration cost, a second initiated in 1992 against roughly $128,600, and a third initiated in 1997 against roughly $107,000 — each a 90 percent abatement running on a twelve-year schedule extended to fourteen. The first two were consumed in tax year 2002; the last ran through tax year 2008 and the record ends there. There is no J-51 benefit today and no building-wide exemption on the lot. The only exemptions carried on the assessment roll are individual shareholder benefits — the co-op and condominium tax abatement and veterans' and seniors' exemptions — which the corporation receives and passes through to eligible shareholders, and which totalled roughly $143,000 in 2024 per the audited financials. Underwrite full unabated taxes. Real estate taxes were 39.4 percent of total operating expenses in 2024, which is what a prewar Upper East Side co-op with no abatement looks like from the inside.

This is the sharpest difference from 225 East 73rd Street next door, whose single J-51 grant burned off in 2002. Same block, same architect, same developer — different capital histories.

Debt. The corporation carries a single first mortgage originally written at $3,200,000, fixed at 2.925 percent, amortizing on a thirty-year schedule over a ten-year term and maturing March 1, 2031 with a balloon of roughly $2,450,000. The balance at the most recent year-end on file was approximately $2.93 million. There is also an unsecured revolving line of credit, increased from $500,000 to $1,250,000 during 2024 and co-terminus with the mortgage; it was undrawn at year-end. A sub-3 percent fixed rate running to 2031 is a genuine asset in the current environment, and it is worth understanding that the refinancing risk sits five years out rather than now.

Reserves and capital posture. Cash, reserves and investments totalled roughly $913,000 at the most recent year-end on file, against total assets of about $10.5 million and shareholders' equity of about $7.2 million. The corporation's governing documents do not require funded reserves and no reserve study has been performed — the auditors note the omission explicitly.

Live assessments — the most important item on this page for a buyer. The board imposed a capital assessment of approximately $400,000 (about $17.30 per share) billed in monthly installments from August 2023 through July 2025 to partially fund the Local Law 11 façade program. It then imposed a second capital assessment of $18.87 per share, roughly $437,000, billed monthly from August 2025 through July 2027, to fund a conversion of the building's boiler to gas. The gas conversion was estimated at approximately $370,000 exclusive of engineering when the most recent statements were issued, and no contract had been signed as of that date. A separate electrical upgrade to one unit, following a gas leak, was contracted at roughly $70,000. Any apartment purchased here today carries a running assessment through July 2027. Confirm the current per-share amount and remaining term with the managing agent before you price the monthly.

Building staff are covered by a Building Service 32BJ collective bargaining agreement, which expired in April 2026; payroll and related costs were 33.8 percent of operating expenses in 2024.

Policy framework

Ownership form: Cooperative. Purchase requires a full board package and an interview, and the board's discretion is not reviewable. Budget eight to twelve weeks from executed contract to closing, and note that NYC Local Law 58 of 2026 now imposes acknowledgment and decision deadlines on co-op boards.

Financing: 75 percent maximum per management-sourced records. Some listing records carry 80 percent; the two are not reconcilable and the managing agent's answer is the one that counts.

Post-closing liquidity: Not published. Boards of this type commonly expect liquid assets after closing equal to one to two years of maintenance and mortgage payments, but the requirement here is unstated. Ask before offering, not after.

Subletting: Restrictive by Upper East Side standards, and documented rather than inferred. Two-year owner-occupancy seasoning, board interview of the subtenant, one-year minimum term, a 20 percent-of-maintenance annual fee, no-smoking and no-pets clauses required in the sublease, and a hard ceiling of three sublet years in any five. This is not an investor building.

Pied-à-terre, co-purchase, guarantors and gifting: Not addressed in the house rules on file. Management-sourced records describe guarantors as acceptable on purchases — with the guarantor named on the shares — and not acceptable on sublets, and describe pieds-à-terre, co-purchasing and gifting as case-by-case with board approval. Confirm all of it.

Trusts and LLCs: ACRIS transfers at this lot include conveyances involving trusts and estates, so trust ownership functions here in practice. That is not a published policy, and LLC purchase is a separate question. Both should be confirmed, and both carry tax-abatement consequences worth raising with counsel.

Flip tax: 2.0 percent of the sale price per the corporation's audited financial statements. The payer is not stated there and the market records conflict. Get it in writing.

Alterations: The house rules require 80 percent floor coverage in all rooms except kitchens, pantries, bathrooms, closets and foyers, and confine construction noise to weekdays between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Both matter to a renovation schedule.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟢
Strong — under cap in both periods
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
Per unit / month range

Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
SWARMP
What this means for you

The latest available filing classified the facade as SWARMP — Safe With A Repair and Maintenance Program: the engineer identified conditions requiring monitoring or repair before the next inspection cycle. The scope, timeline, and how the building funds the work are building-specific — we review the filings and board materials for you.

Inspection history
2005–10
SWARMP
2010–15
Safe
2015–20
SWARMP
2020–25
SWARMP
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2028
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs required before the next inspection cycle.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

The comparable set is the other five Eastgate buildings first, and the prewar side-street cooperatives between Second and Third Avenues second. Park and Fifth Avenue Roth inventory is not the comparison; the economics are unrelated. Within the building, the meaningful spread is between small lettered apartments in original condition and assembled combinations that have been gut renovated — two different products sharing a lobby, and averaging them describes nothing.

Three things move value here beyond condition. The combination question, which is line-specific. The decorative-versus-working fireplace distinction, which separates 235 and 230 from the four earlier Eastgate buildings and which buyers frequently get wrong. And the running assessment through July 2027, which belongs in every carrying-cost calculation until the building confirms otherwise. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.

Recent transfers at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Apr 6, 20263E
1 BR · 1 BA
$855,000-4.9%
Mar 31, 20261D
1 BR · 1 BA · 953 sf
$680,000$714/sf-3.5%
Oct 22, 202512C
2 BR · 2 BA
$1,500,000+0.0%
Aug 21, 20255C
2 BR · 2 BA
$1,550,000+3.3%
Jul 31, 20242I
1 BA
$380,000-3.8%
Jun 12, 20242B
1 BA
$380,000-3.6%
Jan 26, 202412E
1 BA
$450,000+0.0%
Oct 11, 20234C
2 BR · 2 BA
$1,480,000-10.3%

Market read. Most recent trades (2026) cleared a median $747/sf across 1 sale. Median listing discount 3.4% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

12A+67%
$1,375,000 2009$1,495,000 2010$2,300,000 2018
10A · 1,300 sf+66%
$1,100,000 ($846/sf) 2009$1,825,000 ($1,404/sf) 2016
5D+52%
$470,000 2004$715,000 2022
5G+52%
$198,000 ($396/sf) 2003$300,000 2014
1B+51%
$285,000 2011$419,000 2015$429,000 2018
View all 115 recorded transfers, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01428-0017) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.

What to know if you’re buying

Underwrite the assessment, not just the maintenance. A per-share capital assessment runs through July 2027 to fund the gas conversion, on the heels of one that ran through July 2025 for the façade. Ask for the current per-share figure, the remaining term, and whether the board expects a third.

There is no abatement left. The last of three J-51 grants was consumed in tax year 2008. The tax line on the maintenance bill is the tax line.

The mortgage is an asset. Sub-3 percent fixed money running to March 2031, with an undrawn $1.25 million credit line behind it. Ask what the board's plan is for 2031 — but recognise that this building is not carrying the refinancing problem that many prewar co-ops are.

Read the sublet policy before you assume flexibility. Two years of owner occupancy, a board interview for the subtenant, a 20 percent-of-maintenance annual fee, and a three-in-five-years ceiling. If your plan involves renting the apartment at any point, price that plan honestly.

Check whether the fireplace works. In this building and in 230 across the street, architectural records indicate the fireplaces were built decorative. Do not pay for a working flue you have not verified.

The block is not landmarked, and that cuts both ways. No Landmarks approval is required for façade or window work, which makes it faster and cheaper. It also means the enclave's coherence depends on six separate boards making compatible choices. Zoning is the real protection: at R8B the block is built to roughly twice what the district now allows.

Prepare the board package properly. Run the Co-op Board Qualification Calculator before you offer, and ask the post-closing liquidity question early.

What to know if you’re selling

Lead with the enclave and the architect. Emery Roth, Bing & Bing, six buildings, one architectural idea, no through traffic. That is a story a buyer absorbs in ten minutes and it differentiates this address from generic side-street prewar stock.

Disclose the assessment on your terms. A running per-share assessment through July 2027 will surface in the board package. Presenting it early — with the building's own explanation of what it funds and what the mortgage looks like behind it — produces a better result than letting it appear at contract.

Sell the balance sheet. Sub-3 percent fixed debt to 2031, an undrawn credit line, positive shareholders' equity and a below-market rate are all facts that survive attorney diligence. Most competing prewar co-ops cannot say the same.

Price condition honestly. The gap between an estate-condition lettered apartment and a renovated combination is wide here. Run the Renovation Cost Calculator against your asking strategy.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 235 East 73rd Street, also evaluate:

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across Upper East Side — read The Roebling Team Guide to Upper East Side.

Preparing a board package for this building?

The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent.

Considering a move at Eastgate?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at Eastgate would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.