Manhattan condos $1,629/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops $283K/room 5%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $478K/room 19%CPW $350K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,272/sf 24%Tribeca $1,941/sf 2%
Full index →
Cooperative · 1966
860 United Nations Plaza
860 United Nations Plaza, New York, NY 10017
Buildings·Midtown East·Cooperative

860 United Nations Plaza

860 United Nations Plaza, New York, NY 10017

Midtown East

BBL 1013607501 · BIN 1040072

CorridorMidtown East
At a glance
Year built
1966
Type
Cooperative
Units
167
Floors
38
Landmark
No
Pets
Permitted — the complex is documented as child- and dog-friendly
Financing
75 percent maximum per management-sourced records (verify per unit — records across the complex have cited varying limits)
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2003–2026

Bedroom-by-bedroom medians, the full transfer record, and how units trade against ask.

2BR median
$1.6M
Recent range
$1.2M – $2.8M
Listing discount
0.0%
Recorded transfers
169

860 United Nations Plaza is the West tower of the most architecturally consequential post-war cooperative complex in Midtown East — designed by Harrison, Abramovitz & Harris, the firm that led the United Nations Headquarters itself, and built in 1966 as one of the city's first major mixed-use cooperative projects. The site plan descends directly from the UN master-planning era: the massing was first imagined in 1947 by Le Corbusier as a member of the UN's architectural team, and the twin slabs were held just below the Secretariat's height in deference to it. Architectural records credit the complex as the first East Side project to adopt the twin-tower form pioneered on Central Park West, and as a project that materially bolstered the residential credibility of the UN corridor — the precondition for everything built near the river since.

The development story is itself a piece of mid-century New York history. The project began as a William Zeckendorf plan; after Zeckendorf withdrew, the Aluminum Company of America increased its stake to 70 percent and carried the $45 million venture forward with two Canadian investment subsidiaries, as The New York Times reported in July 1963. The two-tower design was adopted in part to placate Beekman Hill neighbors who objected to a single bulky slab blocking their southern views, and nearly an acre of the two-and-a-third-acre site was deeded to the city as a children's play area. The cooperative plan for the West tower — sponsored by Alcoa Plaza Associates and on file in The Roebling Research Library — was presented in April 1964 and sold through strongly: by the fifth amendment in September 1967, roughly 87 percent of the shares were gone.

What the West tower offers today is the complex's full proposition at its own address: protected United Nations and garden views across First Avenue (the UN grounds cannot be developed), Midtown skyline to the west, East River exposures on higher floors, and one of the most heavily staffed and serviced cooperative operations in Manhattan — shared with, but governed separately from, the East tower at 870. The complex's celebrated mid-century resident register (Truman Capote, Walter Cronkite, Robert F. Kennedy among the names the press attached to UN Plaza) is documented largely at the East tower and is treated in that profile; the two towers have always drawn from the same buyer pool of principals, diplomats, and media figures, and listing records have marketed upper-floor duplexes at 860 with their own celebrated provenance.

Architecture and unit composition

The West tower rises 38 floors in dark curtain-wall glass above the complex's six-story office base, its slab proportioned by two slightly protruding piers on the north and south facades — the detail architectural records single out as the massing's saving grace. Apartments carry nine-foot ceilings and the oversized windows that are the complex's defining interior feature; the architecture was always in service of the glass, and the glass is in service of the views. Lower floors (through roughly the 15th) were laid out at three-and-a-half to six rooms; the upper floors carry the larger simplexes, and the top eight floors of the two towers hold the complex's 56 duplexes — gallery-and-curved-staircase layouts, some with wood-burning fireplaces, that constitute the trophy inventory. Combinations across lines are common after six decades, and renovation quality varies widely line to line.

Building operations

The two cooperatives share an operating plant that has few peers in the city: doormen, concierge, attended elevators, the triple-height lobby over the enclosed garden court, the full-block private driveway with its dedicated 49th Street approach off the FDR, valet garage, fitness center, library, four sundecks, party and game rooms, central laundry, and storage — supported by a staff documented at 46 in management-sourced records (some records cite 53). On-site management runs the complex day to day. Each tower maintains its own board, its own share schedule, and its own policy decisions; buyers should not assume that terms documented for one tower bind the other. The West tower's offering plan and amendments are on file in The Roebling Research Library.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟢
Strong — under cap in both periods
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
Per unit / month range
See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
SWARMP
What this means for you

The latest available filing classified the facade as SWARMP — Safe With A Repair and Maintenance Program: the engineer identified conditions requiring monitoring or repair before the next inspection cycle. The scope, timeline, and how the building funds the work are building-specific — we review the filings and board materials for you.

Inspection history
2005–10
Safe
2010–15
Safe
2015–20
Safe
2020–25
SWARMP
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2028
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs required before the next inspection cycle.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent). Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

Recent transfers at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Apartment-level facts are independently verified before publishing; sale prices reflect the recorded transfer amount at the NYC Department of Finance.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Jul 13, 202615E
3 BR · 3 BA
$1,850,000-5.1%
Jun 24, 202616G
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,650 sf
$1,650,000$1,000/sf+6.5%
May 18, 202625B
3 BR · 3.5 BA · 2,200 sf
$2,500,000$1,136/sf+0.2%
Mar 27, 202622G
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,650 sf
$1,675,000$1,015/sf-1.2%
Mar 25, 2026PH
5 BR · 5.5 BA
$2,400,000-4.0%
Oct 27, 202523A
4 BR · 4.5 BA · 2,575 sf
$2,550,001$990/sf+2.0%
Oct 20, 202510F
3 BR · 3 BA · 2,100 sf
$1,648,000$785/sf-0.1%
Aug 29, 202523E
4 BR · 5.5 BA · 3,050 sf
$2,400,000$787/sf+9.1%

Market read. Most recent trades (2026) cleared a median $1,009/sf across 3 sales. Median listing discount 4.7% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

30A · 2,880 sf+88%
$2,600,000 ($903/sf) 2013$4,000,000 ($1,389/sf) 2017$4,900,000 ($1,701/sf) 2017
25B · 2,200 sf+79%
$1,400,000 ($636/sf) 2020$2,500,000 ($1,136/sf) 2026
12D+74%
$475,000 2004$827,500 2014
22C+56%
$849,000 2004$1,325,000 2018
14A+52%
$1,050,000 2003$1,600,000 2023

Other recent transfers

DateUnitPrice
Jun 2, 200412D$475,000
Apr 23, 200316A$999,000
View all 169 recorded transfers, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01360-7501) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.

What to know if you’re buying

Understand the shared-lot structure before you fall in love. One tax lot, one BIN, two apartment corporations, and a commercial office base underneath — the offering plan describes the cooperative's interest as the air space its tower occupies. None of this is a defect; all of it is unusual, and your attorney should review how taxes, base-building costs, and shared-amenity expenses flow through maintenance.

The views are structural. The UN grounds across First Avenue cannot be built on, and the river cannot be built across. South- and east-facing lines buy permanence that almost no Midtown glass tower can promise; west-facing lines buy the Midtown skyline. Price the exposure, not the building average.

The policy framework is mid-century-co-op moderate, not Park Avenue strict. 75 percent financing per management-sourced records, pets permitted, subletting with board approval and a documented fee schedule, and a buyer-paid 3 percent flip tax. Verify each term against the West tower's current documents — the towers' policies are similar but not interchangeable. Run the Co-op Board Qualification Calculator before offering.

The buyer-paid flip tax changes your closing math. A 3 percent purchaser-paid transfer fee is uncommon and materially affects total acquisition cost — run it through the Buyer Closing Cost Calculator alongside the mansion tax.

Calibrate the neighborhood honestly. The complex is its own precinct — driveway, garden court, playground and Peter Detmold Park adjacent — but the blocks around the UN are quiet at night and the nearest subways are a real walk west. Buyers who love it love exactly that; spend an evening on the block.

What to know if you’re selling

Sell the complex's pedigree, at the West tower's price. Harrison & Abramovitz, the UN adjacency, the Le Corbusier-era site plan, the driveway and lobby sequence — the provenance is identical to the East tower's, and the West tower's relative pricing is the value argument. Market against 870's comparables deliberately.

Lead with the operating plant. The staffing depth, attended elevators, and amenity stack are the daily product here and they survive any buyer's diligence. State the service model plainly in the marketing.

Be precise about what is documented. Policies, fees, and financials should be presented from the building's current documents, not from complex-level lore — the two towers diverge in details, and sophisticated buyers' attorneys will catch imprecision. We provide the offering plan and amendments from the Research Library to serious buyers' counsel.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 860 United Nations Plaza, also evaluate:

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across Midtown East — read The Roebling Team Guide to Midtown East.

Preparing a board package for this building?

The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.

Considering a move at 860 United Nations Plaza?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at 860 United Nations Plaza would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.